Please

Imperial, MO

#51 Jun 18, 2013
Letusnamenames wrote:
<quoted text>
Prove I'm wrong. I have screen shots of the assessor's website. If info has changes then I will be at a county council session demanding an investigation.
Do you want a cookie for your screen shots? I'm pretty sure I don't give a rats behind what you have shots of.. All I care is about the picture you promised. Now bring it doc. Someone accused you of using a fake picture so you pulled it and promised a new one. Bring it...... Do you have a new improved picture of you? A skinny you? Come on doc, pretty please. We'd love to see you. If your pretty enough I might want to visit your practice. Come on doc.... I need a pretty shrink. With the way you argue I'm glad your a doctor and not a lawyer. It's the same ole same ole. I'd have to hope you didn't spend much in med school either. Bahahahahahaha now picture please. Since this is a topic you started I felt it was ok to get it wayyyyyy of course like you do to so many others.

Since: Apr 13

Location hidden

#53 Jun 18, 2013
remember when wrote:
<quoted text>Were you at the city council raising a ruckus when crisler wasn't paid up? Or do you pick and choose like peewee?

How many times has peewee changed the rules for this?
I only cause a ruckus when you don't play fair. Make sure your allies pay on time before going after others.

Since: Apr 13

Location hidden

#55 Jun 19, 2013
remember when wrote:
<quoted text>You don't play fair ??? What ? There are rules and guidelines that should apply to all EQUALLY !!

That doesn't exactly happen in Arnold when were talking about peewee and his merry men does it?

How many times has peewee changed the rules to suit hisself on this?
And how many times have you all twisted the rules to suit your own needs?

You get after Crisler for not paying on time when one of your very own doesn't pay on time either. If you complain about on time then you should make sure your group is clean, too.
Question

Arnold, MO

#56 Jun 19, 2013
And who started the practice of deceiving the public in Arnold?

Since: Apr 13

Location hidden

#57 Jun 19, 2013
Question wrote:
And who started the practice of deceiving the public in Arnold?
More important is why do you feel it is okay to play deceptive games? If they all jumped off of a cliff would you follow?

If you're uncovering corruption as you purport then you should be clean as the driven snow and stay that way. Just because others do it doesn't make it okay for you to do it.
Question

Arnold, MO

#58 Jun 19, 2013
Just because you have diarrhea of the brain doesn't mean everyone thinks you have any lucid thoughts! You erroneously believe you know who is attached to each screen name here, I can assure you remain clueless. You have cognitive distortions in your thought process, your writings are irrational and you exaggerate things on a regular basis. No attacks, just stating observations.

Since: Apr 13

Location hidden

#59 Jun 19, 2013
Question wrote:
Just because you have diarrhea of the brain doesn't mean everyone thinks you have any lucid thoughts! You erroneously believe you know who is attached to each screen name here, I can assure you remain clueless. You have cognitive distortions in your thought process, your writings are irrational and you exaggerate things on a regular basis. No attacks, just stating observations.
Wow! You just accused me of doing everything you do on a daily basis. Remember, the accuser is usually the one doing the action.
Question

Arnold, MO

#60 Jun 19, 2013
No, just stated the obvious, everybody but you seems to get it.

Since: Apr 13

Location hidden

#61 Jun 19, 2013
Question wrote:
No, just stated the obvious, everybody but you seems to get it.
That's what you think. I think you all don't get it and never will. You and your buddies were voted out by a two to one margin. And when you all lost all you could do is post an article about election fraud in Ohio.
Back on Track

Arnold, MO

#62 Jun 19, 2013
Letusnamenames wrote:
<quoted text>
That's what you think. I think you all don't get it and never will. You and your buddies were voted out by a two to one margin. And when you all lost all you could do is post an article about election fraud in Ohio.
Poor baby, your mom didn't know which end of you to powder! It's only natural you continue to talk out of the wrong orifice and have, well you know, shinola for brains.

Since: Apr 13

Location hidden

#63 Jun 20, 2013
Back on Track wrote:
<quoted text>Poor baby, your mom didn't know which end of you to powder! It's only natural you continue to talk out of the wrong orifice and have, well you know, shinola for brains.
Too bad all you can post are personal attacks when the flaws of your group are exposed. Don't like that much, do you? Everyone can tell it is true, too, because of those personal attacks. You give yourself away. You're sort of screwed though because personal attacks show guilt and so does silence on the matter. Unless you post a valid argument you expose your guilt.
Back on Track

Arnold, MO

#64 Jun 20, 2013
It might be a good idea for you to start seeking and reading the truth, I know it might make your head spin a bit(you're used to that anyway), but you will be given ample opportunity to soak it all in.

Since: Apr 13

Location hidden

#65 Jun 20, 2013
Back on Track wrote:
It might be a good idea for you to start seeking and reading the truth, I know it might make your head spin a bit(you're used to that anyway), but you will be given ample opportunity to soak it all in.
One problem, what you spout isn't the truth. I have proven on here that it is made up conspiracies or twisted truth (aka lies). I have asked for links and you provide links to out of state stories and out of town stories. You also post lawsuits which are not proof of guilt or conspiracy because they haven't gone to court to determine guilt yet you have convicted them on here.

I think your the one spinning and unable to comprehend with all of the theories and twisted truths you're coming up with. I want to be as twisted as you.
Back on Track

Arnold, MO

#66 Jun 20, 2013
Letusnamenames wrote:
<quoted text>
One problem, what you spout isn't the truth. I have proven on here that it is made up conspiracies or twisted truth (aka lies). I have asked for links and you provide links to out of state stories and out of town stories. You also post lawsuits which are not proof of guilt or conspiracy because they haven't gone to court to determine guilt yet you have convicted them on here.
I think your the one spinning and unable to comprehend with all of the theories and twisted truths you're coming up with. I want to be as twisted as you.
You have proved nothing! Bless your little heart, you can't help it that you cannot stay on point. Will help you with that! In keeping with the subject of this thread, I offer the following:
The official requirements are that you be paid up when you are a candidate. If someone happens to file a complaint with the Department of Revenue that someone is not paid up while running, an investigation is done. If the DOR determines that there is indeed and outstanding balance, the candidate is afforded thirty days after that to pay up or risk being removed from the ballot, those are the facts.

Since: Apr 13

Location hidden

#67 Jun 20, 2013
Back on Track wrote:
<quoted text>You have proved nothing! Bless your little heart, you can't help it that you cannot stay on point. Will help you with that! In keeping with the subject of this thread, I offer the following:
The official requirements are that you be paid up when you are a candidate. If someone happens to file a complaint with the Department of Revenue that someone is not paid up while running, an investigation is done. If the DOR determines that there is indeed and outstanding balance, the candidate is afforded thirty days after that to pay up or risk being removed from the ballot, those are the facts.
So it is okay for a currently elected official to be late? You are such a bunch of hypocrites.
Back on Track

Arnold, MO

#68 Jun 20, 2013
Just clarifying what the state statute says.

Since: Apr 13

Location hidden

#69 Jun 21, 2013
Back on Track wrote:
Just clarifying what the state statute says.
Ahhhh, but you are demanding more than the state statute. They did pay up before the election. And Boyer didn't file the complaint with the DOR. He expected Diane to handle it. Then when she does handle it you all scream foul. Seems like you're being hypocritical. You should check your candidates out before you have them run and you would t have this problem now, would you?
Back on Track

Arnold, MO

#70 Jun 21, 2013
Nope. Just expecting equal treatment. You just won't admit that this administration is FAMOUS for disqualifying individuals that do not subscribe to their political whims for petty reasons and then do not do the same for their political allies that are guilty of the same petty infractions. Hence the reason Diane Waller and the City will be in Federal Court defending themselves in a case for violation of Missey's Civil Rights.

Since: Apr 13

Location hidden

#71 Jun 21, 2013
Back on Track wrote:
Nope. Just expecting equal treatment. You just won't admit that this administration is FAMOUS for disqualifying individuals that do not subscribe to their political whims for petty reasons and then do not do the same for their political allies that are guilty of the same petty infractions. Hence the reason Diane Waller and the City will be in Federal Court defending themselves in a case for violation of Missey's Civil Rights.
It'll be funny when it comes up that it was previously expected that she deal with it.

Doesn't sound like you all are expecting equal treatment. Seems like you only want the treatment that benefits you.

Since: Apr 13

Location hidden

#72 Jun 21, 2013
Back on Track wrote:
Nope. Just expecting equal treatment. You just won't admit that this administration is FAMOUS for disqualifying individuals that do not subscribe to their political whims for petty reasons and then do not do the same for their political allies that are guilty of the same petty infractions. Hence the reason Diane Waller and the City will be in Federal Court defending themselves in a case for violation of Missey's Civil Rights.
Oh, and you didn't seem to think it was petty reasons when you wanted Crisler and Moritz disqualified for those same reasons. What's that word that comes to mind? Oh yeah...HYPOCRITE.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Carondelet Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
25 people Arrested on Federal Meth Charges (Sep '13) 1 hr beeen there 38
Rascal's New Restaurant in Arnold 4 hr Try it first 5
Triple shooting in Maplewood Fri BDoherty 1
Fox C6 Board of Education : Discussion Nov 20 XAIO 844
Reuters Calls Delmar Loop "Downtown St. Louis" ... Nov 20 Enough is Enough 4
Simpson Jr.? Nov 18 what's up with that 12
Ferguson prepares for grand jury verdict Nov 17 hardhead 3
Carondelet Dating
Find my Match

Carondelet People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Carondelet News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Carondelet

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 9:10 am PST