Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 Full story: www.cnn.com 201,149

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Full Story
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#186780 Apr 5, 2013
Across The Pond wrote:
<quoted text>
Obviously not anymore,what are you the village moron? 10 states and counting now isn't it? That makes your bigoted post a lie! Try again sport! Yuk,Yuk,Yuk!
You try again, sportie little ponce. First, you don't even live here, what could your dense ass know? Second, if 10 support it, that means that 40 do not, not counting territories. This makes YOU the county dunce. Tee. Hee. Hee. Care to try again, nancy-boi?

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#186781 Apr 5, 2013
SkinTight wrote:
Pro-H8 Bigots who donated in Glendora, CA
http://www.sfgate.com/webdb/prop8/
Bigots in Glendora, CA who donated $$$ to the Yes on H8 campaign, how much and when:
Natalie Bench $200.00 08/14/08
W Douglas Steimle $2,500.00 08/14/08
Bard Smith $100.00 08/13/08
Douglas Bench $30.00 08/13/08
Jeffrey Murphy DDS $1,000.00 08/13/08
Lori Mcdonnel $1,000.00 08/13/08
Stephen Larson $250.00 08/12/08
Kjelstrom & Associates, Inc.$99.00 08/06/08
Thomas Marchetti $25.00 08/04/08
John Blenkinship $100.00 08/01/08
Thomas Marchetti $50.00 07/25/08
Robert Felten $100.00 05/22/08
Lillian Griffith $100.00 05/21/08
Lynn Green $50.00 03/17/08
Lynn Green $50.00 01/14/08
Where the list of anti conjugal marriage bigots who donated money to defeat Prop8husband&wifeMate?
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#186782 Apr 5, 2013
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you know how some Christians like announce over and over again that they are Christian? They have crosses around their necks. They have that "Jesus fish" think on their bumper. They always seem to have a piece of scripture on their tongue. Heck, there are entire network stations devoted to Christianity.
The same can be said for Judaism. The same can be said for Islam.
Are you as frustrated with these folks who seem to always be pushing their religion on you? Do you get as outraged at them when they want to "indoctrinate" your children in public schools or in other public areas?
Here's the thing... The dust will eventually settle down. LGBT people won't always have a need to "come out". At some point in the future--probably long after you and I are gone--being gay will be seen as perfectly normal. There won't be any need for us to make an special effort to make our presence known.
Ahh. You DO admit to having "special needs", then? Good. And you DO admit that "coming out" is a "special effort"? Good. Your need doesn't include any obligation, on my part, to have to listen to it. Keep it to yourselves, and tote your own loads. Used to be, in order to unburden oneself, one had to go to a psychiatrist, and pay large money to someone to listen to this type of self-indulgent whining. Now, it is publicity stunts and propaganda.
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#186783 Apr 5, 2013
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you know how some Christians like announce over and over again that they are Christian? They have crosses around their necks. They have that "Jesus fish" think on their bumper. They always seem to have a piece of scripture on their tongue. Heck, there are entire network stations devoted to Christianity.
The same can be said for Judaism. The same can be said for Islam.
Are you as frustrated with these folks who seem to always be pushing their religion on you? Do you get as outraged at them when they want to "indoctrinate" your children in public schools or in other public areas?
Here's the thing... The dust will eventually settle down. LGBT people won't always have a need to "come out". At some point in the future--probably long after you and I are gone--being gay will be seen as perfectly normal. There won't be any need for us to make an special effort to make our presence known.
So sorry, almost forgot....Religion and airing out ones guilty conscience are 2 different things, no? Please leave out the self-aggrandizement, it doesn't do.
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#186784 Apr 5, 2013
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes... In fact we are trying to convert heterosexuals. But not in the way you intimate.
We are trying to change your minds about homosexuality. We are in a movement to show you that we are equal to you in EVERY way; that we function normally in society just like you do. We are trying to show you that we will not be treated as a group of people who are willing to be hated and vilified out of your ignorance of science and your adherence to archaic religious beliefs.
In short, we're trying to get you to wrap your mind around the fact that we are like you in every way except a small aspect of our lives.
THAT is how we are trying to convert heterosexuals.
Unlike you, we ARE NOT on a mission to attempt to get you to change your attractions.
Get it now?
We already got it. You wish for us to ignore the obvious differences in the relationships. This, we cannot do. Go live your lives. Do not seek that which you do not rate. We are equals, in every Constitutional way. Since the Constitution does not mention SSM, we are equals. We can all vote, own property, own and bear arms, etc. Go and enjoy your rights, as we do.
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#186785 Apr 5, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
Exactly
what is it about those that oppose same sex marriage that their marriages are so terribly fragile that they are like frightened little children.
My marriage is fine, same sex marriage has not harmed me or my children in any way at all.
Why should it?
"Fragile"? Laughable attempt to feel superior. Your marriage HAS been damaged, you're just too dense to realize it. Must be a little too difficult to notice it, from up on high...
Randys Momma from beyond

Elmwood Park, IL

#186786 Apr 5, 2013
Randy -Rock- Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
We already got it. You wish for us to ignore the obvious differences in the relationships. This, we cannot do. Go live your lives. Do not seek that which you do not rate. We are equals, in every Constitutional way. Since the Constitution does not mention SSM, we are equals. We can all vote, own property, own and bear arms, etc. Go and enjoy your rights, as we do.
The constitution does not specifically disallow SSM, so it must be legal already.
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#186787 Apr 5, 2013
just the facts wrote:
<quoted text>And there you have it. Marriage to you is a sanctioned fluckfest, a god ordained ticket to procreation. Well good for you. My marriage is about sharing my life with my wife. Any one can have sex you moron, and you damn sure don't need to be married to do so. What a sad life you have.
Any gay can share their life with another, without making false claims to a title that they do not rate. You're the sad one. We know about sex, you clot, and it is no basis for a marriage. We know 'bout that, too.
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#186788 Apr 5, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes.. my wife is my best friend, my closest confidant and harshest critic, the one I share my hopes and dreams with, she is not my property, but my partner in life
I don’t see any reason not to extend that to same sex couples.
Tradition mean nothing to me, traditionally Christians were murdered for entertainment. Just because something was true long ago, does not make it a good thing for today.
"I don’t see any reason not to extend that to same sex couples." Well, we do. And, as per the Christians, they also murdered my lot for no good reason, and I still maintain respect for them. Was not surprised, however, to note X-Box's little hissie fit "Happy dead jew on a stick day", what can one expect, from a fine example of a serious lack of breeding and class, such as he/she/it? I suppose that he/she/it was enthused about it being called "Cesar Chavez Day"...
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#186789 Apr 5, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
Nope, only rap stars with songs like "slap my bitch up" refer to and thank god publically
How sad, that you have to go back to a song, from 1997, and it was "Smack My Bitch Up"... Which actually meant to "up ones game", not a reference to wife-beating. And, I am surprised that you appear to dislike rappers. Watch out, you'll have Chongo calling you a racist, in no time at all.... Just for the record, it also annoys me when they all thank God for making them winners, as if, LOL, God was micro-managing them...
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#186790 Apr 5, 2013
Station wrote:
Call another trash hauling company to haul away D, quick.
:-D
Nice.
At first, I misunderstood you, but have come to appreciate you.
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#186791 Apr 5, 2013
heartandmind wrote:
<quoted text>
you cite the witherspoon institute? seriously? to begin with that's a religious based think tank so of course you'll get biased information.
secondly....the study you refer to, in 2012, the Witherspoon Institute drew public attention for having funded a controversial study—called the "New Family Structures Study" (NFSS)—concerning LGBT parenting, conducted by Mark Regnerus, an associate professor of sociology at the University of Texas at Austin - which was found to be severely flawed in an audit conducted by the publisher of the study Social Science Research, and was criticized by major professional scientific institutions and associations as well as other sociologists at the University of Texas. The American Sociological Association formally condemned the NFSS for being invalid in a brief to the United States Supreme Court. The University of Texas conducted an inquiry into the publication and declined to conduct a personal investigation stating that ordinary errors are not considered personal misconduct. Documents from the University of Texas at Austin show that Mark Regnerus requested payment authorizations, for assistance in data analysis, to William Bradford Wilcox, associate professor of sociology at the University of Virginia, a member of the James Madison Society at Princeton University, the director of the National Marriage Project at the University of Virginia, and fellow (at that time) of the Witherspoon Institute. William Bradford Wilcox no longer appears on the official website for the Witherspoon Institute. Although the Witherspoon funding was part of the controversy, these documents show direct involvement in the study by the Witherspoon Institute. The methodology of the study has received criticism.
keep trying lil' buddy.
Here's the pot calling the kettle "Negro. " (Come get some, Chongo) Your side has repeatedly fed us gibberish and propaganda, from your "Whack-a-doodle" sites, and you are calling "foul"? It is to laugh.
Chongo

Wooster, OH

#186794 Apr 5, 2013
Randy -Rock- Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Here's the pot calling the kettle "Negro. " (Come get some, Chongo) Your side has repeatedly fed us gibberish and propaganda, from your "Whack-a-doodle" sites, and you are calling "foul"? It is to laugh.
"Racist"! "Hater!" I'm'n'a have yo' ass banned. I'm'na show you, sucka... Oh, wait. Dagnabbit, you haven't made any new registered tags for me to have banned, Geuss I'm a powerless little fluck. I'll just have to smoke some mo' crack... And cackle about clever I is fo' using my Assy McGee picture, they haven't figured out how ugly I is, yet...
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#186795 Apr 5, 2013
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>I take it that you are against having Harvey Milk's name on buildings?
I prefer Anita Bryant...
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#186796 Apr 5, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Big D is really against polygamy but cannot express that because it will reveal his hypocrisy.
How does that old cobblers go, again? Oh yeah... "Says he's for it, but knocks anyone that is for it, and defends anyone who is against it"...or some old shit like that....
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#186797 Apr 5, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Sure.
No, really... He doesn't personally approve of it, so we must all adjust our value systems, so as to accommodate him... He thinks that what we value is for shit, so we can all clam up, then he will approve. He, and his type, think that 90% of us are all mixed up, so we can throw any mention of religion out of the window, too. But, by cracky, he'll defend us against anyone pushing their beliefs on us, as long as it isn't him that we need defending from....
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#186798 Apr 5, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong I would vote in favor of it if it came up
I have tried to point out in the past an issue that will need to be dealt with if this will ever go forward but you are not bright enough to distinguish between support and awareness of a problem.
In the future I won’t refer to it anymore as I don’t want to confuse the village idiot any further
Now, who made any mention of Village X-Box? Leave him alone, he has enough problems, already....

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

#186799 Apr 5, 2013
Randy -Rock- Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
We already got it. You wish for us to ignore the obvious differences in the relationships. This, we cannot do. Go live your lives. Do not seek that which you do not rate. We are equals, in every Constitutional way. Since the Constitution does not mention SSM, we are equals. We can all vote, own property, own and bear arms, etc. Go and enjoy your rights, as we do.
The Supreme Court has supported citizen's fundamental rights to marry 14 times since 1888

Here are a few of their comments regarding marriage...

Loving v. Virginia,(1967):“The freedom to marry has long been recognized as one of the vital personal rights essential to the orderly pursuit of happiness by free men.”

Boddie v. Connecticut,(1971):“[M]arriage involves interests of basic importance to our society” and is “a fundamental human relationship.”

Cleveland Board of Education v. LaFleur,(1974)“This Court has long recognized that freedom of personal choice in matters of marriage and family life is one of the liberties protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.”

Moore v. City of East Cleveland,(1977)(plurality):“[ W]hen the government intrudes on choices concerning family living arrangements, this Court must examine carefully the importance of the governmental interests advanced and the extent to which they are served by the challenged regulation.”

Zablocki v. Redhail,(1978):“[T]he right to marry is of fundamental importance for all individuals.”

Turner v. Safley,(1987):“[T]he decision to marry is a fundamental right” and an “expression of emotional support and public commitment.”

Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey,(1992):“These matters, involving the most intimate and personal choices a person may make in a lifetime, choices central to personal dignity and autonomy, are central to the liberty protected by the Fourteenth Amendment. At the heart of liberty is the right to define one’s own concept of existence, of meaning, of the universe, and of the mystery of human life.”

Lawrence v. Texas,(2003):“[O]ur laws and tradition afford constitutional protection to personal decisions relating to marriage, procreation, contraception, family relationships, and education.… Persons in a homosexual relationship may seek autonomy for these purposes, just as heterosexual persons do.”

----------

Only when all unrelated, consenting, adult couples are able to marry the person of their choice will we be fully equal.
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#186800 Apr 5, 2013
Jaredb8 wrote:
<quoted text>
So what you are truly saying then is all you are opposed to is the use of a word?? Doesent that seem silly??
Yeah, I hate to agree with you, I smelt the wire in the bush there. It is plenty more, than just the title, that we object to, it's the governmental mandates that we are objecting to. The official implementation of legislated morality that has our hair standing up.
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#186801 Apr 5, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
That is the entire issue
a word
A word they don’t own, as it relates to dozens of religions and no religion at all. They want to define that word not only for themselves but to force that word upon others not of their religion.
The word scares them to the core of their being.
The rights don’t concern them... it is the word itself that shakes them to their core.
These people are frightened to death over how someone might use that word.
It is really pathetic when you think about it.
Nice try. We are not forcing the definition of that word, you are chiseling it open, to all. Reducing its meaning, by allowing any to lay claim to it, like allowing all the illegal aliens (I refuse to call them "Guest Workers") to call themselves "American Citizens". Wrong move, there, pal. And, using the word "scares". A little too much, LOL, we are not scared, do not attempt to feel superior through such childish means... Did it make you feel all big, bad and strong? Pictured us all in the corner, cowering? LOL. Thanks for the laugh.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Carmel Valley Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 13 min JOEL 70,555
Ask the Auto Doctor (Mar '06) Wed ben goolsby 1,514
Some Mexicans leaving US, planning never to return (Dec '08) Nov 3 llt 15,728
Seaside Police: Family of child found wandering... Nov 1 Vanessa butler 1
Who do you support for Superintendent of Public... (Oct '10) Oct 30 concernedconserva... 48
Boyfriend of slain vendor can't fathom shooting (Jan '11) Oct 28 noturpuppet 3
Live Oak stabbing is second in two days (Jun '08) Oct 28 maranatha 246
Carmel Valley Dating
Find my Match

Carmel Valley People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Carmel Valley News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Carmel Valley

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 7:09 pm PST