“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#29327 Nov 30, 2012
Taxpayer wrote:
<quoted text>
Deny self-independence and to warship the state.
I challenge you to show evidence of such. Produce a curriculum or a text book that has such and agenda.
Now as far as worshiping the state is concerned, lets get rid of that pledge for starters. Democrats are on that side, in case you were not aware. We are for science, not pledges.

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#29328 Nov 30, 2012
Taxpayer wrote:
<quoted text>
When did anyone in the Federal government give a dam about anyone but themselves?
Oh cynical. Not everyone is as selfish as yourself.

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#29329 Nov 30, 2012
Taxpayer wrote:
I like these words.They fit.
America's social policy, with its unending bureaucratic programs to "help" the poor, the needy, the children, the disabled, the disenfranchised that benefits the authoritarian ruling class at the expense of productive citizens is the direct result of the Democrat Party adopting and implementing the old Socialist Party of America platform along with its class warfare under the now unpopular name "liberalism."
But anyone who calls socialism "socialism" will be called unhinged, deranged or simply stupid because we're all expected to use the euphemistic code word "progressivism" and pretend it isn't socialism.
I do not mind the word 'socialism' as long as it is used in proper context. When one claims America is a socialist society, it is to broad a claim, as we have some socialism and much capitalism.
I get really pissed when someone uses the word 'communism' incorrectly. America is not communist at all.

I have zero problem with being called a liberal. Only republicans think the word is negative. Funny thing though, republicans hate being called republicans. They all feel they are independent.
I guess 'republican' is a bad word, no matter what side the aisle one is on.

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#29330 Dec 1, 2012
Mike Duquette wrote:
<quoted text>BTW, these corporations are not even exclusively owned by Americans. Why would you want foreign owners to be able to fund our political races?
Sounds like sour grapes to me. I don't believe ANY speech should be limited in the U.S. Mike, you better wake up and smell the roses, our political races are bought and paid for by people that have or want to have a vested interest in the running of our government.
Taxpayer

Point Harbor, NC

#29331 Dec 1, 2012
Mike Duquette wrote:
<quoted text>I do not mind the word 'socialism' as long as it is used in proper context. When one claims America is a socialist society, it is to broad a claim, as we have some socialism and much capitalism.
I get really pissed when someone uses the word 'communism' incorrectly. America is not communist at all.
I have zero problem with being called a liberal. Only republicans think the word is negative. Funny thing though, republicans hate being called republicans. They all feel they are independent.
I guess 'republican' is a bad word, no matter what side the aisle one is on.
The America you are supporting is a social democracy being push to communist ideology. You get mad when people put it out into the light. The system you support advocates the use of democratic means to achieve a gradual transition from capitalism to socialism and then to communist. We already have a one party system. Whenever one wing of the statist Democrat/Republican One Party Syndicate champions the other wing pretends to oppose, so both can pretend to offer a "choice." There is no choice. The government owns us from the time we are born till the time we die and then they steal from our family after we die. The total control goes worldwide. They have already proven they can kill Americans anywhere on the planet. So there is on one choice yield and be enslaved to the state. Or fight for freedom.
Dick

Lenoir, NC

#29332 Dec 1, 2012
Taxpayer wrote:
<quoted text>
The America you are supporting is a social democracy being push to communist ideology. You get mad when people put it out into the light. The system you support advocates the use of democratic means to achieve a gradual transition from capitalism to socialism and then to communist. We already have a one party system. Whenever one wing of the statist Democrat/Republican One Party Syndicate champions the other wing pretends to oppose, so both can pretend to offer a "choice." There is no choice. The government owns us from the time we are born till the time we die and then they steal from our family after we die. The total control goes worldwide. They have already proven they can kill Americans anywhere on the planet. So there is on one choice yield and be enslaved to the state. Or fight for freedom.
Oooohhh, aren't you the all knowing. You've got it all figured out. Pathetic little minion.
TSF

Kenly, NC

#29334 Dec 1, 2012
Yes. It is very important to the interests of American citizens that our politics be controlled by money from foreigners like Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal and others who are pumping money into USA political advertisements to get republikans who will take bribes elected into office.
Makin bacon wrote:
<quoted text>
Sounds like sour grapes to me. I don't believe ANY speech should be limited in the U.S. Mike, you better wake up and smell the roses, our political races are bought and paid for by people that have or want to have a vested interest in the running of our government.
Snore

Gastonia, NC

#29335 Dec 1, 2012
Makin bacon wrote:
<quoted text>
Sounds like sour grapes to me. I don't believe ANY speech should be limited in the U.S. Mike, you better wake up and smell the roses, our political races are bought and paid for by people that have or want to have a vested interest in the running of our government.
Old news Bacon. That's exactly what Rockerfeller, Carnegie, Morgan, & Vanderbilt did. They paid 20 million to have Pres. Mckinley(R) elected and in their pockets to only line their pockets. They each paid 200 grand for their President that was bought literally & criminally by four crooks. And good ole Teddy R.(D) was put on as VP to keep him at bay because he was against big business and was going to put an end to it. So McKinley offered him the VP position and he took it without battin a eyelash only to eventually backfire on the 4 crooks when McKinley got assassinated. 20 grand back in 1900 equates to 20 million today. Pennies to them; 3 of the 4 were multi billionaires by todays standards but it wasn't the money honey. It was the power that kept fueling their glutony for more and more power and to keep small enterprise at bay while each of them monopolized the steel, oil, rail roads/freight industries. And all the while, didn't give a rats ass about the workers who worked in horrific and dangerous conditions. If that ain't criminal then what is besides the obvious, scum of society today. It ain't going away and to think the 2012 campaign combined costed 4-5 billion. That's another crime in it of itself. That 4-5 billion could of kept our fellow americans fed, clothed, sheltered, with money left over to educate these less fortunate people to at least put food in their mouths etc. Our Gov't today as I see it is just as corrupt as it was in the late 1800's - present.

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#29336 Dec 1, 2012
Makin bacon wrote:
<quoted text>
Sounds like sour grapes to me. I don't believe ANY speech should be limited in the U.S. Mike, you better wake up and smell the roses, our political races are bought and paid for by people that have or want to have a vested interest in the running of our government.
So you are just fine with companies owned by foreign people being the ones who buy our government?
Yes, I am sour about it. Why are you not? No wonder your party trots out people like Mitt. Your party is bought and paid for and the members of your party are cool with that.

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#29337 Dec 1, 2012
Taxpayer wrote:
<quoted text>
The America you are supporting is a social democracy being push to communist ideology. You get mad when people put it out into the light. The system you support advocates the use of democratic means to achieve a gradual transition from capitalism to socialism and then to communist. We already have a one party system. Whenever one wing of the statist Democrat/Republican One Party Syndicate champions the other wing pretends to oppose, so both can pretend to offer a "choice." There is no choice. The government owns us from the time we are born till the time we die and then they steal from our family after we die. The total control goes worldwide. They have already proven they can kill Americans anywhere on the planet. So there is on one choice yield and be enslaved to the state. Or fight for freedom.
I just want to know who agreed to this post enough to put a check mark on it?

I am glad that you have moved away from calling America a communist nation and are now just worried it will someday become communist. Baby steps.
Taxpayer

Gastonia, NC

#29338 Dec 1, 2012
Mike Duquette wrote:
<quoted text>You are right, I need to find a new thread. This one is dead.
Please do what you post you're going to do. We would loose all respect for you Miley, only can you create your new thread to read simply 2012-2013 Politidicks by. Here, here!
Taxpayer

Gastonia, NC

#29339 Dec 1, 2012
Sorry! New Thread to read 2012-2013 Politidicks by Mike.
Taxpayer

Gastonia, NC

#29340 Dec 1, 2012
Mike Duquette wrote:
<quoted text>I just want to know who agreed to this post enough to put a check mark on it?
I am glad that you have moved away from calling America a communist nation and are now just worried it will someday become communist. Baby steps.
You got some major issues. Now you want to know who put a check mark on a post. Get on with your sad, pathetic life.

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#29341 Dec 1, 2012
Taxpayer wrote:
<quoted text>Please do what you post you're going to do. We would loose all respect for you Miley, only can you create your new thread to read simply 2012-2013 Politidicks by. Here, here!
Maybe you should learn to read carefully. I never said I was going to find a new thread, I said I 'needed' to do so. Can you see the difference? I feel conservatives often fail to understand what they read as in this case. It seems to be a trend.
Actually, I am looking, but that does not mean I will stop responding to your republican rants.

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#29342 Dec 1, 2012
Snore wrote:
<quoted text>Old news Bacon. That's exactly what Rockerfeller, Carnegie, Morgan, & Vanderbilt did. They paid 20 million to have Pres. Mckinley(R) elected and in their pockets to only line their pockets. They each paid 200 grand for their President that was bought literally & criminally by four crooks. And good ole Teddy R.(D) was put on as VP to keep him at bay because he was against big business and was going to put an end to it. So McKinley offered him the VP position and he took it without battin a eyelash only to eventually backfire on the 4 crooks when McKinley got assassinated. 20 grand back in 1900 equates to 20 million today. Pennies to them; 3 of the 4 were multi billionaires by todays standards but it wasn't the money honey. It was the power that kept fueling their glutony for more and more power and to keep small enterprise at bay while each of them monopolized the steel, oil, rail roads/freight industries. And all the while, didn't give a rats ass about the workers who worked in horrific and dangerous conditions. If that ain't criminal then what is besides the obvious, scum of society today. It ain't going away and to think the 2012 campaign combined costed 4-5 billion. That's another crime in it of itself. That 4-5 billion could of kept our fellow americans fed, clothed, sheltered, with money left over to educate these less fortunate people to at least put food in their mouths etc. Our Gov't today as I see it is just as corrupt as it was in the late 1800's - present.
Snore, couldn't agree more. That's why I told Mike to wake up and smell the roses. It's not like political offices just started being bought and sold the last 20 years. Goodness gracious, Joe Kennedy paid everybody and their brother to have Jack elected. You speak about it wasn't the money honey, but the power, I beg to disagree, you have to have money to get the power. Had John and Robert Kennedy not been assasinated and Ted learned to drive a little better while drunk, our country would have had 24 years of Kennedys in the WH and it would have been by payoffs.

The group you speak of is part Carnegie, Rockefeller etc all a part of the Bliderberg Group. People make lite of this group controlling not only our country's elections but other' as well, but they have the MONEY and the POWER and they do it. They practically own the world's wealth. I agree with you that our country is corrupt today as back a 100+ years ago. However, trying to ban speech by outside corportions is the least of our problems with elections, If that's the case, let's cease trade with other countries and see how well we can do by not being able to send commodities(?) made here in the U.S. just between the states. You can't tell countries our country owes money to hand over fist we'll ban your speech in our country. I think that would be like cutting your nose off to spite your face. Going back to the Bliderberg Group, old daddy Bush was in bed with the group too, so it's not just a one party group they own.

Good post Snore.

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#29343 Dec 1, 2012
Taxpayer wrote:
<quoted text>You got some major issues. Now you want to know who put a check mark on a post. Get on with your sad, pathetic life.
Why would I not want to know? Are you now suppressing questions? I see quite a lot of judge-its on posts these days, but I see very few responses to my posts. It seems someone does not have the balls to put a name in front of their opinion. It seems they cannot articulate their views.

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#29344 Dec 1, 2012
Taxpayer wrote:
<quoted text>
Deny self-independence and to warship the state.
Still waiting for evidence of your outrageous claim?

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#29345 Dec 1, 2012
Taxpayer wrote:
I like these words.They fit.
America's social policy, with its unending bureaucratic programs to "help" the poor, the needy, the children, the disabled, the disenfranchised that benefits the authoritarian ruling class at the expense of productive citizens is the direct result of the Democrat Party adopting and implementing the old Socialist Party of America platform along with its class warfare under the now unpopular name "liberalism."
But anyone who calls socialism "socialism" will be called unhinged, deranged or simply stupid because we're all expected to use the euphemistic code word "progressivism" and pretend it isn't socialism.
You see, when you blame the democrats for all ills, I tend to think you are a republican.
Funny how when you get called out on it, you claim it is also the republicans fault. Make up your mind and stay consistent.

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#29346 Dec 1, 2012
Mike Duquette wrote:
<quoted text>So you are just fine with companies owned by foreign people being the ones who buy our government?
Yes, I am sour about it. Why are you not? No wonder your party trots out people like Mitt. Your party is bought and paid for and the members of your party are cool with that.
Mike, sorry honey, I was speaking of Old Hank aka Guam tipper and the sour grapes. The article I posted didn't have your name or picture, it was Hank. Stop personalizing everything so much and that should cut down on your whining. BTW, your party is bought and paid for too. You really need to read more. Read the post by Snore and my response, maybe between the two, you might want to read about what he posted and what I posted. Both very interesting reading.

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#29347 Dec 1, 2012
Mike Duquette wrote:
<quoted text>Maybe you should learn to read carefully. I never said I was going to find a new thread, I said I 'needed' to do so. Can you see the difference? I feel conservatives often fail to understand what they read as in this case. It seems to be a trend.
Actually, I am looking, but that does not mean I will stop responding to your republican rants.
YOU, Mike Duquette, actually have the nerve to tell someone to READ more carefully? This coming from a man that rather someone tell him what a book is about than read it?? At least conservatives TRY to read and you use cliff or online summaries. Oh yeah buddy, you're the guy to be admonishing anyone about reading something!!!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Canton Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Waterville Lake (Apr '11) Apr 30 Heelaholic 11
Canton Jukebox (Jul '12) Apr 23 geezer 15
Bragging/BS Apr 22 Denton H 3
Homewrecker Apr 14 Julie 2
Local price gougers Apr 10 LovingHighlands 3
28 m young looking 4 younger lad reward Apr 8 Rawrsomearmadillo 2
Hiking in Clyde Apr '15 MandiAltman 1
More from around the web

Canton People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]