Christ did not send me to baptize
First Prev
of 5
Next Last
Roman Catholic Sproul

Manassas, VA

#86 Sep 17, 2013
Mike Peterson wrote:
<quoted text>
I didn't know you were a Seventh Day Adventist or a Oneness Pentecostal. All of these are from their websites.
From a lot of websites. The Catholics are in denial. can you imagine what it means if you rewrite scriptures?
Mike Peterson wrote:
<quoted text>
2nd Paragraph. "Could have been". not true
I will only deal with this one. Anyone can read the whole paragraph and see that you go the point of lying to further your denial The paragraph says that this eyewitness saw the unaltered book of Matthew and it may have been the original. The fact it was the unaltered version means Eusebius was aware of an altered version. He quotes the unaltered version. Whether it was the original or not is irrelevant as we know for a fact that the copy we have in our bibles today is not the original. It is nothing but dishonesty to disqualify the statement of Eusebius because he was not sure it was the very original book. He did know it was the unaltered book. History is biased because of pick and choose lairs down through the ages that would do anything to promote their version regardless of the truth. Such is this post.

Demonstratio Evangelica" by Eusebius:

Eusebius was the Church historian and Bishop of Caesarea. On page 152 Eusebius quotes the early book of Matthew that he had in his library in Caesarea. According to this eyewitness of an unaltered Book of Matthew that could have been the original book or the first copy of the original of Matthew. Eusebius informs us of Jesus' actual words to his disciples in the original text of Matthew 28:19: "With one word and voice He said to His disciples: "Go, and make disciples of all nations in My Name, teaching them to observe all things whatsover I have commanded you." That "Name" is Jesus.
Mike Peterson

Jackson, MS

#87 Sep 18, 2013
Roman Catholic Sproul wrote:
<quoted text>From a lot of websites. The Catholics are in denial. can you imagine what it means if you rewrite scriptures?
<quoted text>
I will only deal with this one. Anyone can read the whole paragraph and see that you go the point of lying to further your denial The paragraph says that this eyewitness saw the unaltered book of Matthew and it may have been the original. The fact it was the unaltered version means Eusebius was aware of an altered version. He quotes the unaltered version. Whether it was the original or not is irrelevant as we know for a fact that the copy we have in our bibles today is not the original. It is nothing but dishonesty to disqualify the statement of Eusebius because he was not sure it was the very original book. He did know it was the unaltered book. History is biased because of pick and choose lairs down through the ages that would do anything to promote their version regardless of the truth. Such is this post.
Demonstratio Evangelica" by Eusebius:
Eusebius was the Church historian and Bishop of Caesarea. On page 152 Eusebius quotes the early book of Matthew that he had in his library in Caesarea. According to this eyewitness of an unaltered Book of Matthew that could have been the original book or the first copy of the original of Matthew. Eusebius informs us of Jesus' actual words to his disciples in the original text of Matthew 28:19: "With one word and voice He said to His disciples: "Go, and make disciples of all nations in My Name, teaching them to observe all things whatsover I have commanded you." That "Name" is Jesus.
Please quote book and chapter of Demonstratio Evangelica" by Eusebius:

It is much too large to read everything. There are multiple page 176s. There are multiple Books and mutliple chapters in each book.

I am eagerly waiting your reply. The fate of the CC hangs in balance. Jesus might be proven wrong in his promise.

Check your 7th Day Adventist website or was it the oneness Pentecostals.?

While I was looking, i noticed he was talking about the books in the OT that Luther threw out. Was Eusebius right or wrong about them?

The Vatican is waiting. This is new revelation for them and they will have to close up shop and 1.2 billion catholics will be without a Church.

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

#88 Sep 18, 2013
Mike Peterson wrote:
<quoted text>
Please quote book and chapter of Demonstratio Evangelica" by Eusebius:
It is much too large to read everything. There are multiple page 176s. There are multiple Books and mutliple chapters in each book.
I am eagerly waiting your reply. The fate of the CC hangs in balance. Jesus might be proven wrong in his promise.
Check your 7th Day Adventist website or was it the oneness Pentecostals.?
While I was looking, i noticed he was talking about the books in the OT that Luther threw out. Was Eusebius right or wrong about them?
The Vatican is waiting. This is new revelation for them and they will have to close up shop and 1.2 billion catholics will be without a Church.
But the Sproul family bashing business won't be going without a pay check!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 5
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Callands Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Christians Murder American Indians (Jan '12) 2 hr Kevin Williams 26
Catholics (Feb '14) 3 hr Barnsweb 3,235
KickBack Jack's Sun Rick Fahr 4
Satanic Tea Party (Nov '13) May 1 Vince Neil 11
Job losses Apr 30 Brandon Barnette 1
does anyone give blood (Dec '13) Apr 29 John F Kennedy 3
thomas jefferson edwards Apr 28 nuks67 2
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Callands Mortgages