'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Se...

'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate

There are 256987 comments on the thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com story from Oct 1, 2010, titled 'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate. In it, thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com reports that:

"Fox News Sunday" is heading to Louisville, Ky. Jack Conway, Kentucky's attorney general and the Democratic candidate for Senate , and Rand Paul, the Republican nominee and son of Representative Ron Paul, Republican of Texas, have agreed to a live debate on "Fox News Sunday" on Oct.3 at 9 a.m. (Eastern time).

Join the discussion below, or Read more at thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com.

frank sucks

Clarksville, TN

#40852 May 27, 2012
frank wrote:
<quoted text>
So how's it going in mute wingnuz land :-/
Who knows perhaps you get lucky someday when lobotomies can be reversed!
It's awesome, watched Indy earlier, grilled out having a few cold ones.
Hey

Morehead, KY

#40855 May 27, 2012
frank wrote:
<quoted text>
The lack of understanding of the actual report referred to in the OP has given rise to the imaginary belief by the usual suspects (wingnuz) that somehow someone walked off with $16 trillion dollars in their pocket. And your ‘ad hominem’ wingnuz attacks don't change the actual facts to what you want them to be.
These are SHORT TERM LOANS, usually as short as overnight and as long as 90 days, all of which were returned, and all of which were for relatively small amounts. If you loan $3 million dollars a day, by the end of the year you've loaned 1.1 billion dollars, but that doesn't mean you've ever had remotely close to that amount of money, let alone given it away. It's absurdly laughable and insane that someone would think the Fed somehow secretly gave away more than the Gross Domestic Product of the United States. Leave it to the wingnuz Obama haters -- it gets better every day!
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142405274...
Short term loans your ignorant ass..
From the period between December 2007 and June 2010,the Federal Reserve had secretly bailed out many of the world’s banks, corporations, and governments. The Federal Reserve likes to refer to these secret bailouts as an all-inclusive loan program, but virtually none of the money has been returned and it was loaned out at 0% interest..
The list of institutions that received the most money from the Federal Reserve are as follows..

Citigroup:$2.5 trillion ($2,500,000,000,000)
Morgan Stanley:$2.04 trillion ($2,040,000,000,000)
Merrill Lynch:$1.949 trillion ($1,949,000,000,000)
Bank of America:$1.344 trillion ($1,344,000,000,000)
Barclays PLC (United Kingdom):$868 billion ($868,000,000,000)
Bear Sterns:$853 billion ($853,000,000,000)
Goldman Sachs:$814 billion ($814,000,000,000)
Royal Bank of Scotland (UK):$541 billion ($541,000,000,000)
JP Morgan Chase:$391 billion ($391,000,000,000)
Deutsche Bank (Germany):$354 billion ($354,000,000,000)
UBS (Switzerland):$287 billion ($287,000,000,000)
Credit Suisse (Switzerland):$262 billion ($262,000,000,000)
Lehman Brothers:$183 billion ($183,000,000,000)
Bank of Scotland (United Kingdom):$181 billion ($181,000,000,000)
BNP Paribas (France):$175 billion ($175,000,000,000)

There are more that could be listed..
Nutz

Harrodsburg, KY

#40857 May 27, 2012
wtf wrote:
<quoted text>The question was not who is really smart you numb nuts.
Well that's great because you would have an epic fail at that also!!
frank

Oakland, CA

#40858 May 27, 2012
CaptainofCrunch wrote:
<quoted text>
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =DwQbPgouUYoXX
They buy and sell junk loans based on worthless paper, they shuffle the loans and trade payments on the interest.
It's a big PONZI SCHEME!
Gets who gets soaked...WE THE PEOPLE because YOU THE SHEEPLE put your head in the sand when you vote!
...and Californian's have no economic common sense:
You allow illegals (classified by Pelosi and Brown) to draw foodstamps via the SNAP program...whereby homeless illegals can by hot food from fast food restaurants with foodstamps!
You voted for the Fed ... hmmmm?
He Man

Morehead, KY

#40859 May 27, 2012
frank wrote:
<quoted text>
You voted for the Fed ... hmmmm?
No he didn't and that's part of the problem, They can put whoever they want in there..Get It Now.....
whitehair

Fort Thomas, KY

#40860 May 28, 2012
Ron Paul is the only one pointing this out to all that will listen.Now the audit will not prove anything as surely the audit will be made by someone within the organization.

By the way ,with all the so called loans,and no pay back,have you noticed China is sellin U.S. money short?This could create a real problem for the U.S. if all other Countries start doing the same,and anyway our paper money will be less valuable in terms of buying power.What is it now?80%?

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Conroe, TX

#40861 May 28, 2012
Cornelius Scudmister wrote:
<quoted text>
Like I said you should STFU about shit you know nothing about.
BTW how did you get that dog in you pic to stand so close? Cover yourself in gravy?
But, if you did, you should be in a rage that BATF agent Larry Potts invented fraudulent evidence that killed one US Marshal, one 14 year old boy, and an FBI sniper shot a young mother through the head while she stood in an open doorway holding an infant in her arms. Then, again, this same BATF agent Larry Potts again invented fraudulent evidence that killed 4 BATF agents, 6 innocent Americans, and ultimately caused another 80 people to burn to death.

How do you feel about the BATF lying and getting all these people killed?

Since you say you have friends who died there, then you should be mad as hell about the BATF inventing fraudulent evidence that Larry Potts used to start that fiasco and kill 4 BATF agents, along with 6 innocent Americans at the beginning of that illegal federal assault.
Coincidentally, that's the same Larry Potts that invented the fraudulent evidence used to get one US Marshal killed, one 14 year old boy, and a young mother shot through the head by an FBI sniper while she stood in an open doorway holding an infant in her arms.
Larry Potts killed your friends.
And, now, Larry Potts is enjoying a very nice government retirement.
That should make your blood boil.
For proof, just read the goddam Congressional Record.

Come with something believable, idiot.
liza

Idamay, WV

#40862 May 28, 2012
OLD NEWS! Time for updates on here.
frank

Oakland, CA

#40863 May 28, 2012
He Man wrote:
<quoted text>
No he didn't and that's part of the problem, They can put whoever they want in there..Get It Now.....
So you want "the people" to decide who runs the banks?
frank

Oakland, CA

#40864 May 28, 2012
frank sucks wrote:
<quoted text>
It's awesome, watched Indy earlier, grilled out having a few cold ones.
I'll drink to that :-)

Since: Oct 08

Stanford

#40865 May 28, 2012
He Man wrote:
<quoted text>Whatever you wanna think but it all boils down to who pushed it(Right)Bill Clinton signed the damn thing because he wanted to,Much like Obama and the (NDAA), He may not have wrote it but he had no problem pushing it into law right???So either way they both screwed the country, As a matter of fact Bush refused to push(NDAA)..
Poppy bush did push for it, Clinton did finish the job, thus my earlier mention of same circles rubbing the same elbows. What we see in the public is often not like it is at all.

Prosecute the bush cartel/crime family

TIR
frank

Oakland, CA

#40866 May 28, 2012
whitehair wrote:
Ron Paul is the only one pointing this out to all that will listen.Now the audit will not prove anything as surely the audit will be made by someone within the organization.
By the way ,with all the so called loans,and no pay back,have you noticed China is sellin U.S. money short?This could create a real problem for the U.S. if all other Countries start doing the same,and anyway our paper money will be less valuable in terms of buying power.What is it now?80%?
What will you friggen wingnuz morons come up with next? You obviously don’t know the first thing about FOREX trading yet there your shooting off your stupid mouth. Chinese banks are now allowed to hold short positions in the U.S. dollar, the nation's foreign-exchange regulator said Monday. The move would help banks manage forex risk and would promote the yuan’s exchange rate based on the balance of payments. The move coincided with a widening of the daily allowed trading range for the yuan. Analysts are welcoming the move saying the decision to allow dollar shorts shows China is more confident that its currency is near a balanced level.
wtf

Richmond, KY

#40867 May 28, 2012
Nutz wrote:
<quoted text>
Well that's great because you would have an epic fail at that also!!
You little dipsh-t.

Since: Oct 08

Stanford

#40868 May 28, 2012
frank wrote:
<quoted text>
I could swear, I thought my post was a question ...:-/
You did ask a question. No matter who get into office next, we are still gonna be suffering from what george WMD bush did to us. If george WMD bush did learn anything, it was how to be a smooth huskter. Our plight as it's coming down the pike right now started back with the mighty reagan aka sir scamalot, and he had no other than poppy bush in tow. Yes, another bush!!!! See a pattern yet? Look at budget record for when the reagan/bush cartel took office, to when they left office. That administration is the one that got the trillion dollar deficit rolling, but every one seems to, or wants us to forget about that.

Prosecute the bush cartel/crime family!

TIR
wtf

Richmond, KY

#40869 May 28, 2012
whitehair wrote:
Ron Paul is the only one pointing this out to all that will listen.Now the audit will not prove anything as surely the audit will be made by someone within the organization.
By the way ,with all the so called loans,and no pay back,have you noticed China is sellin U.S. money short?This could create a real problem for the U.S. if all other Countries start doing the same,and anyway our paper money will be less valuable in terms of buying power.What is it now?80%?
that damn bush caused it all.

Since: Oct 08

Stanford

#40870 May 28, 2012
Jay wrote:
<quoted text>
****
That's breathe....with an E.
If you had put as much effort into answering the question rather than attempting to conger up some clever retort, maybe we would all know the answer to the question.
Now answer the question.
That's conjure, not conger!

TIR

Since: Oct 08

Stanford

#40871 May 28, 2012
frank wrote:
<quoted text>
The lack of understanding of the actual report referred to in the OP has given rise to the imaginary belief by the usual suspects (wingnuz) that somehow someone walked off with $16 trillion dollars in their pocket. And your ‘ad hominem’ wingnuz attacks don't change the actual facts to what you want them to be.
These are SHORT TERM LOANS, usually as short as overnight and as long as 90 days, all of which were returned, and all of which were for relatively small amounts. If you loan $3 million dollars a day, by the end of the year you've loaned 1.1 billion dollars, but that doesn't mean you've ever had remotely close to that amount of money, let alone given it away. It's absurdly laughable and insane that someone would think the Fed somehow secretly gave away more than the Gross Domestic Product of the United States. Leave it to the wingnuz Obama haters -- it gets better every day!
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142405274...
Definition, wingnut, or wingnuz: right wing extremist. One who lives for their next fix of hate radio, or Faux channel propaganda!
one million seconds = roughly 12 days
one billion seconds = nearly 32 years
one trillion seconds = nearly 32,000 years
How many regular people can even wrap their mind around a number that large?

TIR
He Man

Morehead, KY

#40872 May 28, 2012
whitehair wrote:
Ron Paul is the only one pointing this out to all that will listen.Now the audit will not prove anything as surely the audit will be made by someone within the organization.
By the way ,with all the so called loans,and no pay back,have you noticed China is sellin U.S. money short?This could create a real problem for the U.S. if all other Countries start doing the same,and anyway our paper money will be less valuable in terms of buying power.What is it now?80%?
How did the dollar die? First it died slowly — then all at once.

The slow death began with the dollar’s birth as a global reserve currency. America was creditor and manufacturer to the world, and the capitalist superpower. People around the globe transacted overwhelmingly in dollars. Above all else, people needed dollars to conduct trade, and they were willing to pay richly for them, and for dollar-denominated debt.

By the ’90s America began enjoying a tremendous free lunch — the world provided America with goods, resources and services, and Americans provided the global reserve currency, as well as acting as world military policing global shipping. Why manufacture at home, or produce resources at home when the world wants your currency? To get what you want, all you have to do is run your printing press — which was much easier after 1971, when Nixon ended the gold exchange standard. In a flat free-trade world, supply chains and technology agglomerated wherever the labour was cheapest, which was predominantly Asia. So America let her industrial base and her domestic supply webs degenerate, to enjoy the free lunch that the dollar brought:

The next leg of the story is that foreigners realised that actually maybe the necessity of the dollar was an illusion. With America no longer the world’s manufacturer or creditor, who needs America? If you need a consumer, there are billions of people and trillions of dollars, and trillions of dollars worth of resources in Asia, and South America, and Europe. America’s government is deeply-indebted, and its military is bogged-down in difficult conflicts around the world.

As Ron Paul noted:

We are like a man who used to be rich and is in the habit of paying for everybody’s meals and announces at a lavish dinner that he will pay the bill, only to then turn to the fellow sitting nearby and say,“Can I use your credit card? I will pay you back!”

Since: Oct 08

Stanford

#40873 May 28, 2012
frank sucks wrote:
<quoted text>
You remind me of a gal that couldn't talk without hand motions, waving her arms about to the point that was all you remembered from what she said.
With you, it's wingnuz. You would be mute without it, never able to complete a thought without throwing it in, like a crutch.
It's also obvious that it sucks to be you, so there's always that.
Carry on!
The word/term wingnut/wingnuz is an easy way to describe a simple minded way of thinking, flat worlders, easily hypnotized simpletons, cretins etc.. Seems to bother some, more that others. Hmmmm,, looks like it may have hit its target this time.

TIR

Since: Oct 08

Stanford

#40874 May 28, 2012
frank sucks wrote:
<quoted text>
It's awesome, watched Indy earlier, grilled out having a few cold ones.
Hmmmm,,,, that doesn't sound so bad to me. Maybe I should change my way of thinking.

TIR

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Cadiz Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
What happens if Bevin cancels the Obamacare Med... (Jul '16) Mon Work Night Shift 76
shelley paulson singleton Mon amazed 1
stephanie king (Sep '13) Sun Oh wow 14
Amish and Mennonites Jan 22 inquiring mind 18
Shes baacckkk Jan 22 Insidelookinout 5
I banged him (May '16) Jan 22 Bigboy 4
living wage in trigg county Jan 21 Old Dixiecrat 14

Cadiz Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Cadiz Mortgages