Longtime GOP Texas Gov. Perry wins an...

Longtime GOP Texas Gov. Perry wins another term

There are 24520 comments on the El Paso Times story from Nov 2, 2010, titled Longtime GOP Texas Gov. Perry wins another term. In it, El Paso Times reports that:

Republican Gov. Rick Perry has defeated Democrat Bill White to win a third four-year term as Texas governor.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at El Paso Times.

justasayin

Greer, SC

#18580 Jun 26, 2013
Bernard Forand wrote:
<quoted text>
HA, ha you can be so funny. Thought you were savvy enough to know the Governor of AZ. Back into the chasm you go..
Time to paint ourselves as the Indians of 1773 and run down to the voting booths this 2014 and cast out the Tea. Out unto the waters of political oblivion. Republicans od sound mind and integrity will help us in that endeavor.
Senator Susan Collins {R Traditionalist} of Main,“finds it baffling that it’s a small minority of our caucus, that is holding up going to conference, when our party for years, has argued that we need to have a budget. Without a House conference we can’t possibly complete action on it.”
Senator Marco Rubio {R Tea Party} of Florida argues that we should continue to support the ideology that ONE Senator can have the power to hold the USA Hostage and Ransom it off to what that Senator desires.
Democrats counter with the need of raising the debt ceiling to cover the cost of the Congresses’ expenditures. Republicans inability to produce a bill for a budget, mandates this process of hand to mouth budgeting scenarios. Ideologies of the Tea Party pirates lurking in the shadows .“Our Way Or The Highway reverberating through our Congressional Sacred Hallways.
Damn, I don't know who Gabby Giffords or John McCain or Sandra Day O'Connor or William Rehnquist or Barry Goldwater or Janet Napolitano oh wait they are from......

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#18581 Jun 26, 2013
What do I hate Bernard? The attrition of freedom in America. The ever increasing number of laws that inundate the citizens of this land. The illegality of marijuana. The huge amount of my fellow citizens who are imprisoned. The fact that organic food costs a fortune. The fact that we breed lawyers like cockroaches but have a shortage of doctors. The fact that no matter how mundane the felony, we disenfranchise the felons from their ability to vote, and brand them for life. So tell me Bernard. Do I sound like a liberal, a conservative... Or a human being? You seem to have all the ready answers.
justasayin

Greer, SC

#18582 Jun 26, 2013
Bernard Forand wrote:
<quoted text>
Ah Texan it was you that brought this thread back to life and inspiring all of us to drink from your well. Having fun. Keep it up… Love Bernie..
Tea baggers are not liberal…. Pirates of Hostage/Ransom leadership. Anarchist. Observe differences in their definitions. You propose we adopt this erroneous ideology? You have a few cards missing in your deck…
lib·er·al [líbb&#601;r&#601;l, líbbr&#601;l]
adj
1. broad-minded: tolerant of different views and standards of behavior in others
2. progressive politically or socially: favoring gradual reform, especially political reforms that extend democracy, distribute wealth more evenly, and protect the personal freedom of the individual
3. generous: freely giving money, time, or some other asset
My great-aunt was liberal in her bequests.
4. generous in quantity: large in size or amount
a liberal helping
5. not literal: not limited to the literal meaning in translation or interpretation
a liberal interpretation of the rules
6. culturally oriented: concerned with general cultural matters and broadening of the mind rather than professional or technical study
a liberal education
7. of political liberalism: relating to a political ideology of liberalism
n (plural lib·er·als)
liberal person: somebody who favors tolerance or open-mindedness
Encarta ® World English Dictionary © & (P) 1998-2005 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
an·ar·chist [ánn&#601;rkist]
(plural an·ar·chists)
n
1. supporter of anarchism: somebody who believes that governments should be abolished as unnecessary
2. lawless person: somebody who tries to overthrow a government or behaves in a lawless way. Defiant
Encarta ® World English Dictionary © & (P) 1998-2005 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Your definition of Tea is false. Simply put to achieve those goals you proposed requires a socialistic ideology to achieve them.
"Definition of LIBERAL
1
a : of, relating to, or based on the liberal arts <liberal education>
b archaic : of or befitting a man of free birth
2
a : marked by generosity : openhanded <a liberal giver>
b : given or provided in a generous and openhanded way <a liberal meal>
c : ample, full
3
obsolete : lacking moral restraint : licentious
4
: not literal or strict : loose <a liberal translation>
5
: broad-minded; especially : not bound by authoritarianism, orthodoxy, or traditional forms
6
a : of, favoring, or based upon the principles of liberalism
b capitalized : of or constituting a political party advocating or associated with the principles of political liberalism; especially : of or constituting a political party in the United Kingdom associated with ideals of individual especially economic freedom, greater individual participation in government, and constitutional, political, and administrative reforms designed to secure these objectives
— lib·er·al·ly adverb
— lib·er·al·ness noun" I especially like #3 it must be true it's on the internet.

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#18583 Jun 26, 2013
Bernard has already bragged about having sex with a woman, he bragged about it on Topix. So... That makes him licentious! I always thought only kids bragged about sex! Seriously though, I thought the guy was bombed out of his gourd when he did that! How about it Bernard? Were you loaded??

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#18584 Jun 26, 2013
Defiant1 wrote:
<quoted text>
So "debunk" the fact that our troops are considered possible terrorists by Janet Napalitano and Barry Soetoro. "Debunk" the fact that our troops are
under scrutiny for anti-Obama thoughts. The answer is that you can't.
Sounds like the actions of a very paranoid bunch of criminals that run our government, but you should know that, you worthless O-bot.
I'll try this again:

Boy, when you can provide even one legitimate source that can disprove any of the fact I present then you might have some credibility. Until then keep wallowing in the land of "did not"
Read more at http://www.topix.com/forum/city/paris-tx/TQGE...
wtf

De Leon, TX

#18585 Jun 26, 2013
So What wrote:
Why you Dumbocrats even bother to show up is beyond me...
why do we have pepole in co. county thinking their republicans theres not enough money in comanche county for anyone to be republican. your dumb if you think that party cares for us.
Defiant1

Deer Park, TX

#18586 Jun 26, 2013
ActuaIIy wrote:
<quoted text>
I'll try this again:
Boy, when you can provide even one legitimate source that can disprove any of the fact I present then you might have some credibility. Until then keep wallowing in the land of "did not"
Read more at http://www.topix.com/forum/city/paris-tx/TQGE...
If you really want reliable info on Big Sis and the Dept. Of Homeland Stupidity, you can Google it your own damn self and find lots of sources. Same with the "special" treatment of our troops who don't like Obama.

I bet you probably need someone to wipe your lazy a$$ for you, you stupid drone. You also don't like the truth about your masters so
why should I waste my time on a fool like you?.

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#18587 Jun 26, 2013
ActuaIIy wrote:
<quoted text>
I'll try this again:
Boy, when you can provide even one legitimate source that can disprove any of the fact I present then you might have some credibility. Until then keep wallowing in the land of "did not"
Read more at http://www.topix.com/forum/city/paris-tx/TQGE...
I got a friend who can enlighten you. Wait a few minutes,
justasayin

Greer, SC

#18588 Jun 26, 2013
By Mary Kate Cary, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

In February, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano testified before Congress, and according to news accounts at the time, she purposely did not use the word "terrorism" at all, especially regarding any attacks against the United States by militant Islamic extremists. At the time, the Associated Press reported that she was the first chief of Homeland Security to drop the word "terror" from remarks to Congress.

So it was a surprise yesterday when the Huffington Post published an unclassified report that Napolitano sent to local law enforcement officials around the United States, warning them that "the return of military veterans facing significant challenges reintegrating into their communities could lead to the potential emergence of terrorist groups or lone wolf extremists capable of carrying out violent attacks." Other parts of the report mention veterans as potential recruits to terrorist cells as well. This is the thanks they get from a grateful nation? Apparently not.

Secretary Napolitano wouldn't use the word "terrorists" to describe extremists who carried out the 9/11 attacks, but she did use it to describe returning American soldiers who have kept us all safe from terrorism. Yesterday, the head of the American Legion wrote her a letter asking for an apology on behalf of all those serving our country. She went on the morning shows this morning and downplayed the whole thing as "Washington spin." On MSNBC this morning, she agreed to take only one question on the controversy and said everyone should "take a deep breath," a phrase which always makes me feel like the person saying it thinks the rest of us are a bunch of two-year-olds. Her response came across as condescending, and she seemed annoyed at the question.

If you read the whole report, you'll see that it's full of speculation and "potential" rather than actual threats. One thought struck me while I was reading it: Why was this unclassified in the first place? It was a mistake to put this report out to local law enforcement, where it was sure to get leaked to the press. But it was an even bigger mistake to write it at all. Our vets deserve better.

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#18589 Jun 26, 2013
Defiant1 wrote:
<quoted text>
If you really want reliable info on Big Sis and the Dept. Of Homeland Stupidity, you can Google it your own damn self and find lots of sources. Same with the "special" treatment of our troops who don't like Obama.
I bet you probably need someone to wipe your lazy a$$ for you, you stupid drone. You also don't like the truth about your masters so
why should I waste my time on a fool like you?.
If you had anything FACTUAL you would post it here instead of crying "look it up yourself" boy. You know you have NOTHING that's why you are reluctant to post anything to back you up.

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#18590 Jun 26, 2013
waco1909 wrote:
<quoted text> I got a friend who can enlighten you. Wait a few minutes,
Still waiting boy, did you fall asleep in front of fox news again
Defiant1

Deer Park, TX

#18591 Jun 26, 2013
ActuaIIy wrote:
<quoted text>
If you had anything FACTUAL you would post it here instead of crying "look it up yourself" boy. You know you have NOTHING that's why you are reluctant to post anything to back you up.
Like I said retard, you can find lots of info if you go look for it instead of trying to engage everyone else in mindless busy work which
is all that you are capable of.

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#18592 Jun 26, 2013
Defiant1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Like I said retard, you can find lots of info if you go look for it instead of trying to engage everyone else in mindless busy work which
is all that you are capable of.
If you had anything FACTUAL you would post it here instead of crying "look it up yourself" boy. You know you have NOTHING that's why you are reluctant to post anything to back you up.
Defiant1

Deer Park, TX

#18593 Jun 26, 2013
ActuaIIy wrote:
<quoted text>
Still waiting boy, did you fall asleep in front of fox news again
Do you think that you are so important that you rate immediate answers from anyone?. Don't you have a CPUSA meeting to go to?.

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#18594 Jun 26, 2013
Defiant1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you think that you are so important that you rate immediate answers from anyone?. Don't you have a CPUSA meeting to go to?.
If you had anything FACTUAL you would post it here instead of crying "look it up yourself" boy. You know you have NOTHING that's why you are reluctant to post anything to back you up.

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#18595 Jun 26, 2013
Defiant1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you think that you are so important that you rate immediate answers from anyone?. Don't you have a CPUSA meeting to go to?.
how many is a few minutes on your planet, boy?
Defiant1

Deer Park, TX

#18596 Jun 26, 2013
ActuaIIy wrote:
<quoted text>
how many is a few minutes on your planet, boy?
Probably the time lapse is a little shorter here on Earth than it is from your planet of Uranus. After all, you already have spent a whole lifetime there.

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#18597 Jun 26, 2013
Defiant1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Probably the time lapse is a little shorter here on Earth than it is from your planet of Uranus. After all, you already have spent a whole lifetime there.
how many is a few minutes on your planet, boy?
justasayin

Greer, SC

#18598 Jun 26, 2013
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/12/02/jane...
""There's been a lot of evolution over the past three years," she said. "The thing that's most noticeable to me is the growth of the lone wolf," the single attacker who lives in the United States or elsewhere who is not part of a larger global conspiracy or network, she said.

She named no examples, but it's a phenomenon that is increasingly the focus of international anti-terror operations.

A former U.S. Army psychiatrist is the sole suspect in deadly shootings at Fort Hood, Texas, in 2009. In March, a Kosovo Albanian acting alone fatally shot two American airmen in Frankfurt, Germany. In April, a remote-control bomb exploded in a Marrakech cafe popular with tourists, killing 17 people, mostly foreigners – an attack devised by a Moroccan who was inspired by al-Qaida and tried unsuccessfully for years to join the international terror network before returning to Morocco to devise an attack of his own."
If you care to look, there are other articles out there in which she does say "returning" troops COULd be a threat. The quote above was at a conference in Paris. Sorry I was late, doing dishes! Not asleep.
Defiant1

Deer Park, TX

#18599 Jun 26, 2013
justasayin wrote:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ 2011/12/02/janet-napolitano-lo ne-wolf_n_1125876.html
""There's been a lot of evolution over the past three years," she said. "The thing that's most noticeable to me is the growth of the lone wolf," the single attacker who lives in the United States or elsewhere who is not part of a larger global conspiracy or network, she said.
She named no examples, but it's a phenomenon that is increasingly the focus of international anti-terror operations.
A former U.S. Army psychiatrist is the sole suspect in deadly shootings at Fort Hood, Texas, in 2009. In March, a Kosovo Albanian acting alone fatally shot two American airmen in Frankfurt, Germany. In April, a remote-control bomb exploded in a Marrakech cafe popular with tourists, killing 17 people, mostly foreigners – an attack devised by a Moroccan who was inspired by al-Qaida and tried unsuccessfully for years to join the international terror network before returning to Morocco to devise an attack of his own."
If you care to look, there are other articles out there in which she does say "returning" troops COULd be a threat. The quote above was at a conference in Paris. Sorry I was late, doing dishes! Not asleep.
I doubt if the O-bot cares to go look for anything. He just wants us to waste our time digging up sources so he can try to discredit everything.
That's what O-bots do.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Bushland Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Review: Adult Video Gallery-Paramount (Oct '11) Sep 17 alwysneed1 12
News Conversation Surrounds Confederate Statue at Am... Sep 15 BRolland 4
News APD Officer, Randall County Deputy Recognized f... Sep 15 BRolland 1
News Amarillo, Lubbock mayors form coalition to incr... Aug 25 Sage 2
News Driver hits flock of sheep on Amarillo Boulevar... Aug 25 Sage 1
Depression, pain n anxiety treatment ; Aug 24 Grim reaping 2
adult theater paramount on osage (Sep '14) Aug '17 Denny 7

Bushland Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Bushland Mortgages