Who do you support for U.S. Senate in...

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#20380 Jul 31, 2013
Informed Opinion wrote:
Fox Reported:
Republican National Committee announces 2016 Party Platform.
The Republican National Committee announced today the following to be central to their 2016 Party Platform. "The Right Wing of the Party spent a lot of corporate "donations" to archive these victories", stated Grand Wizard .... er .... State Committeeman who spoke on conditions of anonymity,(enhanced by the mask he was wearing at the time).
- The immediate repeal of the 19th Amendment to the Constitution.
God created stoves, laundry, and children for women, and the Bible clearly tells them to shut up and obey their Husbands.
It all went straight to Hell when they stopped cooking and started voting - besides- when women can't vote - it'll be easier to regulate those uteruses their too stupid to control.
- The immediate repeal of the Civil Rights Act.
As Rand Paul says, if you own a business and don't want to do business with blacks, Hispanics, Native Americans,women, Muslims, Catholics, or any others, by God, that's America.
Let's be honest, if'n you ain't a white, property ownin, Christian, you ain't a "Real" 'Merican.
- Cutting all taxes on anyone and everyone to zero.
As Right Wing Americans keep saying, if you lower taxes you increase revenue,(don't ask - just have faith); therefore, just cut taxes to Zero,(especially for the rich), and the revenue will flood the government.
Hey. God parted the seas for Moses, surely He can make this work too.
- Immediately privatize Social Security and Medicare.
There are lots of investment advisors ( Bernie Madoff and Allen Stanford are available);
and
who wouldn't their health care dollars into profits, and bonuses for insurance company executives,
and an insurance company executive deciding whether you get that cancer surgery, or he gets that new Lamborghini ?
What are you ..a Com'nist ?
Think of the profits for investment advisors, funds, and banks, just like 401K saved Americans from those horrible pensions, this will save Americans from those lengthy "golden years."
If you don't have enough income during your working years to save for retirement, or those damn kids get sick, that's God's way of saying to you its "time to go."
- The reconstitution of the draft - but only for those unable to claim they attend college, or tour Europe saving souls for Mormans, or have daddy's who can get them into the Texas Air National Guard.
After all, we love folks who love war, as long as there's no need for them or their kids to fight.
YOU voted for Obama TWICE.'nuff said.
Oh my

Blairsville, GA

#20381 Jul 31, 2013
Aggie23 wrote:
<quoted text>
http://www.topix.com/forum/city/blairsville-g...
Let's look for equivalency here:
You, without any evidence to support such libel, accuse me of referring to those I disagree with as
"jew-lovers, ni$$er-lovers, queers or child molesters" and state that my "anti-homosexual stance is well known, the sites you reference and articles you cite are clear in their goal of portraying some vast homosexual agenda" .
I snickered at someone referring to you as a "nubbin head"
And you say the Right Wing has a problem with "nuance"?
Libel, in an anonymous forum full of pseudonyms, who's being libeled some vaporous persona that exists only as a stream of electrons.

Again you mischaracterize to inflate your sense of outrage:
"accuse me of referring to those I disagree with as "jew-lovers, ni$$er-lovers, queers or child molesters""

It's a common tactic to disparage a group with incorrect statements, then accuse any who point out the fallacy of such statements to be defending the disparaged group, or be one of the group, of be a lover of the group. It's guilt by association since the original disparaging remarks are presented as truth and their truth is unquestionable so that any who question must be defending the indefensible.

You have supported flagrantly biased articles that have distrorted what is being reported to serve a political agenda, and you support posters who partake in the same behavior that you find so objectionable in others. Your outrage would be a bit more convincing if it were equally applied.

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#20382 Jul 31, 2013
Informed Opinion wrote:
Finally an honest Right Winger announces what she consider a "Fair" tax code.
DREW ANGERER FOR THE NEW YORK TIMES
By JONATHAN WEISMAN
Last Updated: 7:33 PM ET
LAWRENCEVILLE, N.J.—
Debbie Schaeffer, the owner of Mrs. G TV and Appliances, probably did not give the answer the two chairmen of Congress’s powerful tax-writing committees were looking for when they pressed her this week for ideas on a fairer, simpler tax code:
“Get rid of the deductions that don’t affect me,” she said.
"Get rid of the deductions that don’t affect me,” she said.
"Get rid of the deductions that don’t affect me,” she said.
Thank God, and honest Right Wing American, who publicly admits what Normal Americans have known all along:
"It's all about me."
And they wonder why we can't trust them with power.
YOU voted for Obama TWICE. rotfl

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#20383 Jul 31, 2013
Informed Opinion wrote:
<quoted text>
You are an eternal optimist.
Expecting a Right Winger to understand complex issues or matters is like expecting a pig to play Handel's "Messiah" on the piano - even if they had the intellectual skills the absence of opposable thumbs is just too much to overcome.
What's their fixation on aberrant sexual conduct anyway ?
With,
Larry Craig's "wide stance";
Sanford's Pretend Appalachian Trial hike,
Gengrich's "my wife's cancer made me bang my mistress",
Vitter's "Hookers are my thing",
Ensign's "mind if I do your wife - I'll pay $100K for her", and
Limbaugh's "give me drugs, Viagra, and some black hookers",
you'd think they'd avoid the subject.
BILL CLINTON(and he was the PRESIDENT!!!!!) Go ahead and smoke THAT CIGAR.
You can put lipstick on the Left Wing Lunatic pigs, but they are STILL pigs. Yep!
jeb stuart

Cordele, GA

#20384 Jul 31, 2013
When wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm not your enemy jeb, you are your worst enemy. What Dave has been trying to tell you is people either succeed in life by putting forth an effort to succeed or they can lay blame on others for their failures.
A carpenter who cannot square cut a board will have no customers, neither will a baker who produces a bitter tasting cake.
Those who succeed are the ones who put forth an effort to better themselves in order to create a demand for their product or their services.
And just how do you measure success? You and Dave seem to assume that anyone who doesn't buy into the radical right wing philosophies is either on the "public dole", or wants to be. I live in an area where 75% of the people vote republican even though over half are getting government assistance. Sometimes I almost wish that right wingers would get their way- it would serve some of these fools right!

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#20385 Jul 31, 2013
Oh my wrote:
<quoted text>
You're cherry-pickin',
what report, where's the link, what were the details.
You got nuthin', but keep trying.
Pardon me, "Where" for jumping in:

"In 1998 The APA issued a report claiming that the negative potential of adult sex with children was overstated and that the vast majority of both men and women reported no negative sexual effects from childhood sexual abuse experiences.
http://www.greeleygazette.com/press/...

I believe "Where" referenced the link earlier, but I KNOW I posted a similar quote with the link in post #20300 - you know the post where you keep ignoring the links to Salon and the NY Post. And I believe the quotes are from the same report.

"The American Psychological Association also helped to define down pedophilia in 1998 when its Psychological Bulletin published A Meta-analytic Examination of Assumed Properties of Child Sexual Abuse. The studys three authors (Bruce Rind, Phillip Tromovitch and Robert Bauserman) suggested that such abuse does not cause harm and recommended that pedophilia should instead be given a value neutral label like adult-child sex"." http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolu...

So, I would say "you got nuthin."

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#20386 Jul 31, 2013
Oh my wrote:
<quoted text>
You're cherry-pickin',
what report, where's the link, what were the details.
You got nuthin', but keep trying.
Oh! I almost forgot the other excuse: The Left Wing Lunatic "cherry-pickin' card.
Yeah, throw that one down, too, whenever it's convenient.

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#20387 Jul 31, 2013
Oh my wrote:
<quoted text>
Libel, in an anonymous forum full of pseudonyms, who's being libeled some vaporous persona that exists only as a stream of electrons.
Again you mischaracterize to inflate your sense of outrage:
"accuse me of referring to those I disagree with as "jew-lovers, ni$$er-lovers, queers or child molesters""
It's a common tactic to disparage a group with incorrect statements, then accuse any who point out the fallacy of such statements to be defending the disparaged group, or be one of the group, of be a lover of the group. It's guilt by association since the original disparaging remarks are presented as truth and their truth is unquestionable so that any who question must be defending the indefensible.
You have supported flagrantly biased articles that have distrorted what is being reported to serve a political agenda, and you support posters who partake in the same behavior that you find so objectionable in others. Your outrage would be a bit more convincing if it were equally applied.
So! Are you going to throw down the "nuance" card or the "cherry-pickin'" card next?

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#20388 Jul 31, 2013
Oh my wrote:
<quoted text>
Libel, in an anonymous forum full of pseudonyms, who's being libeled some vaporous persona that exists only as a stream of electrons.
Again you mischaracterize to inflate your sense of outrage:
"accuse me of referring to those I disagree with as "jew-lovers, ni$$er-lovers, queers or child molesters""
It's a common tactic to disparage a group with incorrect statements, then accuse any who point out the fallacy of such statements to be defending the disparaged group, or be one of the group, of be a lover of the group. It's guilt by association since the original disparaging remarks are presented as truth and their truth is unquestionable so that any who question must be defending the indefensible.
You have supported flagrantly biased articles that have distrorted what is being reported to serve a political agenda, and you support posters who partake in the same behavior that you find so objectionable in others. Your outrage would be a bit more convincing if it were equally applied.
To libel - anything that is defamatory or misrepresents damagingly.
I find being accused falsely of using the terms "jew lover, ni$$a lover, queers or child molesters" against those with whom I disagree to be highly insulting and defamatory.

And I continue to tell you to prove it by any postings I have ever made - you continue to not do so - because you can't. So you are once again proved to be a liar. I am not responsible for what others write - so this weak attempt to somehow justify your false accusations is just as hollow as your initial attempt.

But continue proving the point that when you lose an argument you go straight for the ad hominem attacks. You just continue to undercut any shred of credibility some may have still granted you, so go for it.
When

Cleveland, GA

#20389 Jul 31, 2013
Aggie23 wrote:
<quoted text>
Let's look for equivalency here:
You, without any evidence to support such libel, accuse me of referring to those I disagree with as
"jew-lovers, ni$$er-lovers, queers or child molesters" and state that my "anti-homosexual stance is well known, the sites you reference and articles you cite are clear in their goal of portraying some vast homosexual agenda" .
I snickered at someone referring to you as a "nubbin head"
And you say the Right Wing has a problem with "nuance"?

Mr Nubbinhead is like the Giraffe that tried to thread the needle. Got his head through but his azz can't get through.

Now that he's stuck in the needle, he wants to prick (did I say that) anyone around, doesn't matter to him if the kid is 10 or 15, guy or girl.

He, along with IO, are intent on allowing adults to have sex with any age child. Their argument is NOT about the age of consent, as they so try to project, their argument is it should be done.

A couple of perverts in my book.
When

Cleveland, GA

#20390 Jul 31, 2013
Informed Opinion wrote:
<quoted text>

What's their fixation on aberrant sexual conduct anyway ?

Probably has something to do with having 2 perverts posting here on topix showing approval of adult/child sex.

Hey, maybe the NSA would be interested in you two.
When

Cleveland, GA

#20391 Jul 31, 2013
Aggie23 wrote:
<quoted text>
Hmmm, Mary Kay Letourneau was 34 and Vili Fualaau was 12 (pedophilia generally is given a 13 year old cut off) when they began a sexual relationship. She taught him when he was in second grade and sixth grade.(even writing that makes me nauseated) So where would she fit on your scale - and what difference does it make anyway?
Do you see some moral difference between pedophilia and child molestation - I (and I can probably speak for others on here) are still trying to understand what your point was in bringing up the "older woman, younger boy" scenario in a discussion regarding pedophilia and the attempt to
"destigmatize" pedophilia and change the DSM regarding it. You then harangue someone for not seeing the "nuance" - perhaps you should look up the definition.

He's definitely making every effort to destigmatize it, he's nearly at the point of advocating it. Maybe he'll come out of the closet yet and bring his loony tunes IO with him.
When

Cleveland, GA

#20392 Jul 31, 2013
Aggie23 wrote:
<quoted text>
I thought so.

And you were amusing, I did some ROFL at his expense.


Columbus Native

Oklahoma City, OK

#20393 Jul 31, 2013
Looks like Syn And Angie's hemoroids are inflamed again today. Still pissed over romneys major defeat I guess? Well anyway todays another good day, no republican in the White House,and thankfully for atleast another three and one half years,no bowing and stooping to their rich masters,no gigantic tax breaks for the already bloated wealthy,and Snooping organizations like NSA have been exposed to the world and why of all places are they located in Hong Kong communist China? Who do these control freaks work for? gathering info on all the world? This is not a democrat nor republican issue but one of privacy for all of us. Off cource if bush was still in office you would'nt hear a sound from republicans.
When

Cleveland, GA

#20394 Jul 31, 2013
Oh my wrote:
<quoted text>
Nope, never said "young boys", but let's look at what I did say...
Riddle me this,
why is it a source of pride for a young male to learn the ropes from an older woman, when that older woman is nothing more than a child molester.
Now, I wonder what age group of young males would consider it a source of pride to have been with an older woman, would a 15 year old male who had consensual sex with 17-18 year old female.
Oh wait, but the law says that a 15 year old can't give consent, so it becomes rape and a matter of child molestation.

ROFL
So now comes your usual twisting of what you originally said; you now make up a sorry scenario with the ages of 2 teens to alleviate or tone down your original intent with regards to an older woman when everyone here knows you were showing your male chauvinism which libroids are famous for.
When

Cleveland, GA

#20395 Jul 31, 2013
Aggie23 wrote:
<quoted text>
Let's look for equivalency here:
You, without any evidence to support such libel, accuse me of referring to those I disagree with as
"jew-lovers, ni$$er-lovers, queers or child molesters" and state that my "anti-homosexual stance is well known, the sites you reference and articles you cite are clear in their goal of portraying some vast homosexual agenda" .
I snickered at someone referring to you as a "nubbin head"
And you say the Right Wing has a problem with "nuance"?

That's a Nubbinhead for you.
When

Cleveland, GA

#20396 Jul 31, 2013
Oh my wrote:
<quoted text>

You have supported flagrantly biased articles that have distrorted what is being reported to serve a political agenda, and you support posters who partake in the same behavior that you find so objectionable in others. Your outrage would be a bit more convincing if it were equally applied.

As have you, but who am I to lecture to an ahole.
When

Cleveland, GA

#20397 Jul 31, 2013
Aggie23 wrote:
<quoted text>
Pardon me, "Where" for jumping in:
"In 1998 The APA issued a report claiming that the negative potential of adult sex with children was overstated and that the vast majority of both men and women reported no negative sexual effects from childhood sexual abuse experiences.
http://www.greeleygazette.com/press/...
I believe "Where" referenced the link earlier, but I KNOW I posted a similar quote with the link in post #20300 - you know the post where you keep ignoring the links to Salon and the NY Post. And I believe the quotes are from the same report.
"The American Psychological Association also helped to define down pedophilia in 1998 when its Psychological Bulletin published A Meta-analytic Examination of Assumed Properties of Child Sexual Abuse. The studys three authors (Bruce Rind, Phillip Tromovitch and Robert Bauserman) suggested that such abuse does not cause harm and recommended that pedophilia should instead be given a value neutral label like adult-child sex"." http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolu...
So, I would say "you got nuthin."

Thanks, I was going to get to it but see your post now.

Oh my thinks we owe him valid references when most of his are biased by those who support his position.
When

Cleveland, GA

#20398 Jul 31, 2013
Aggie23 wrote:
<quoted text>

So, I would say "you got nuthin."

Maybe he has 2 heads, Nubbinhead and NuthinHead.
Oh my

Blairsville, GA

#20399 Jul 31, 2013
Aggie23 wrote:
<quoted text>
http://www.topix.com/forum/city/blairsville-g...
To libel - anything that is defamatory or misrepresents damagingly.
I find being accused falsely of using the terms "jew lover, ni$$a lover, queers or child molesters" against those with whom I disagree to be highly insulting and defamatory.
Nope, once again you are mischaracterizing what I said to inflate your sense of outrage.

As you can plainly see you felt it simply incomprehensible that any would disagree with your position: Why do you want to be arguing over this topic, Are you sure you want to have this agrument, No one believes that you are having this argument.

http://www.topix.com/forum/city/blairsville-g...
Now, you ask, "WHY do you want to be arguing over this topic?", as if to say anyone who does not agree with you must surely be in support of what you are against, so that we must all share in your fears and prejudices or we'll be labeled jew-lovers, ni$$er-lovers, queers or child molesters.

http://www.topix.com/forum/city/blairsville-g...
It's a common tactic to disparage a group with incorrect statements, then accuse any who point out the fallacy of such statements to be defending the disparaged group, or be one of the group, of be a lover of the group. It's guilt by association since the original disparaging remarks are presented as truth and their truth is unquestionable so that any who question must be defending the indefensible.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Brunswick Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
What McIntosh/Darien does not want you to know (May '13) Apr 22 darienspeedtrap 24
What Y'all think of District Attorney Jackie Jo... (Nov '11) Apr 13 David 99
Trump may be doing us a favor Mar '16 JillyJelly 1
Speed Trap along the I-95 corridor in Mcintosh ... Mar '16 davefash 5
megan swantek (Jun '13) Mar '16 yo!! 3
News Report: GOP Leaders Met With Elon Musk, Tim Coo... Mar '16 biten back 1
News Incorporate St. Simons and Sea islands? Yes No (Mar '06) Mar '16 Bii Hilton 3
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Brunswick Mortgages