Who do you support for U.S. Senate in...
Why

Commerce, GA

#19431 Jul 23, 2013
More of Obama and his crooks::

"WASHINGTON (AP)-- President Barack Obama's choice to be the No. 2 official at the Homeland Security Department is under investigation for his role in helping a company run by a brother of former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, The Associated Press has learned."


http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_DHS...
OMTE

Adel, GA

#19432 Jul 23, 2013
Informed Opinion wrote:
<quoted text>
Don't be mad at me.
I didn't vote for Bush, so I bear no responsibility for the Trillions of Taxpayers' Dollars the Right Wingers devoted to their Arab Muslim buddies.
What the hell are you talking about dude? You are one strange person. I was saying that I agreed that Bush was to blame, and that I didn't worship him or Reagan like you said I did. Are you suggesting that because Bush and Reagan done their part to destroy this country, that we should turn a blind eye to Obama trying to finish what they started? I don't want to be a The USA to become a Muslim Nation full of Mexicans. Sorry.
Why

Commerce, GA

#19433 Jul 23, 2013
Are these demos really moderate? or are they just afraid of getting out of office in 2014 and 2016?

"Moderate Democrats are quitting on Obamacare."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/w...

Why

Commerce, GA

#19434 Jul 23, 2013
Climate scientist on where the heat is going now that temps are NOT increasing.
What I want to know is who is rearranging and hiding from view the heat energy?

In other words, if we cant find it, cant measure it, dont know where it is, then it must be at the bottom of the Oceans.

Sounds like an Obama excuse to me.


"It looks like the Earth is continuing to accumulate energy but it looks like it is being re-arranged and hidden from view,” Professor Belcher said."
Why

Commerce, GA

#19435 Jul 23, 2013
OMTE wrote:
<quoted text>What the hell are you talking about dude? You are one strange person. I was saying that I agreed that Bush was to blame, and that I didn't worship him or Reagan like you said I did. Are you suggesting that because Bush and Reagan done their part to destroy this country, that we should turn a blind eye to Obama trying to finish what they started? I don't want to be a The USA to become a Muslim Nation full of Mexicans. Sorry.

Welcome to the club, "Dealing with Dummies."
LMBFAO

Dahlonega, GA

#19436 Jul 23, 2013
OMTE wrote:
Could one of ya'll mexicans tell me what these mexican are saying?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =FLTVxYCiacMXX
They're saying that you are a stupid moron and that your sister needs better hygeine habits.
Oh my

Blairsville, GA

#19437 Jul 23, 2013
OMTE wrote:
<quoted text>
http://www.topix.com/forum/city/blairsville-g...
Obama won't release the rest of the documents to prove his and their guilt. What can't understand about that. He invoked his "executive privilege" after Congress proved Holder was lying. Congress then voted to hold Holder in comtempt of court and they had enough votes to hold him in comtempt of Congress. Obama then stepped in to protect Holder and the Bush administration by covering it up with his "executive privilege". The very "privilege" he trashed the Bush administration for using to cover up other crimes against the American people. Obama, Holder, and The Bush Administration are criminals and should be put in Federal Prison.
Nixon was a criminal and he got pardoned.

Reagan was a criminal, got re-elected and sainthood.

Bush the Lesser lied us into a war, approved enhanced interrogation (the same stuff that was called torture when used against US soldiers in Vietnam), got re-elected, and is now painting really crappy pictures.

Your hatred for Obama is noted and documented.

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/gover...
Today, the White House pointed to recent history in announcing the president’s decision.“Both [Bush and Clinton] protected the same category of documents we’re protecting today (i.e., after-the-fact internal Executive Branch materials responding to congressional and media inquiries — in this case from the Justice Department),” the White House told reporters, adding that presidents have invoked executive privilege 24 times since President Ronald Reagan was in office:

Reagan claimed executive privilege three times, according to a 2008 Congressional Research Service report (PDF): in connection with investigations into Canadian oil leases, Superfund enforcement practices, and memos written by Justice William Rehnquist when he worked in the Justice Department, ahead of his nomination proceedings for the Supreme Court.

George H.W. Bush only invoked it once: In 1991, he allowed Dick Cheney, then the defense secretary, to not turn over documents subpoenaed during a congressional investigation into a Navy aircraft program.

Clinton was the first president to invoke executive privilege without issuing a written order; according to today’s White House statement, he claimed the privilege 14 times, including to avoid having to testify about his involvement in the Whitewater scandal in 1995.

Clinton was overruled by a federal judge three years later, when he tried to avoid testifying or allowing his advisers to testify about his relationship with Monica Lewinsky. That made him the first president since Nixon to invoke the privilege and lose.

George W. Bush invoked executive privilege six times, including to avoid handing over documents to a congressional committee on the FBI’s use of mob informants in Boston, and to deny access to Justice Department correspondence about Clinton’s fundraising tactics.

In 2007, the Bush White House also declined to give Congress documents about the death of Pat Tillman, the football star-turned-Army Ranger, who was killed in Afghanistan. The military initially said Tillman was killed in a firefight with the enemy, but it was later discovered that he was shot in a friendly fire accident. In refusing to hand over the documents, Bush’s counsel said the documents “implicate Executive Branch confidentiality interests.”

Barely a month later, Bush used the privilege to allow Karl Rove, his senior adviser at the time, to avoid testifying before Congress during its investigation into the firing of nine federal prosecutors, allegedly for partisan reasons.
Oh my

Blairsville, GA

#19438 Jul 23, 2013
Aggie23 wrote:
<quoted text>
http://www.topix.com/forum/city/blairsville-g...
And your point......
Aggie23 wrote
http://www.topix.com/forum/city/blairsville-g...
Operation Wide Receiver was a gun tracing program initiated under Bush. Tracing mechanisms were physically put into guns.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ATF_gunwalking_s...
Discussions of getting tracking devices from Raytheon were not followed up.
..........
After Operation Wide Receiver was ended, several attorneys at the Phoenix USAO who reviewed the Wide Receiver cases for prosecution found the cases had been so poorly managed that they were reluctant to bring any of them to trial.[1]

At the time, under the Bush administration Department of Justice (DOJ), no arrests or indictments were made. After President Barack Obama took office in 2009, the DOJ reviewed Wide Receiver and found that guns had been allowed into the hands of suspected gun traffickers. Indictments began in 2010, over three years after Wide Receiver concluded. As of October 4, 2011, nine people had been charged with making false statements in acquisition of firearms and illicit transfer, shipment or delivery of firearms.[23] As of November, charges against one defendant had been dropped; five of them had pled guilty, and one had been sentenced to one year and one day in prison. Two of them remained fugitives.[31]
OMTE

Adel, GA

#19439 Jul 23, 2013
LMBFAO wrote:
<quoted text>
They're saying that you are a stupid moron and that your sister needs better hygeine habits.
I don't think that's what they are saying beaner.
OMTE

Adel, GA

#19440 Jul 23, 2013
Oh my wrote:
<quoted text>
Nixon was a criminal and he got pardoned.
Reagan was a criminal, got re-elected and sainthood.
Bush the Lesser lied us into a war, approved enhanced interrogation (the same stuff that was called torture when used against US soldiers in Vietnam), got re-elected, and is now painting really crappy pictures.
Your hatred for Obama is noted and documented.
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/gover...
Today, the White House pointed to recent history in announcing the president’s decision.“Both [Bush and Clinton] protected the same category of documents we’re protecting today (i.e., after-the-fact internal Executive Branch materials responding to congressional and media inquiries — in this case from the Justice Department),” the White House told reporters, adding that presidents have invoked executive privilege 24 times since President Ronald Reagan was in office:
Reagan claimed executive privilege three times, according to a 2008 Congressional Research Service report (PDF): in connection with investigations into Canadian oil leases, Superfund enforcement practices, and memos written by Justice William Rehnquist when he worked in the Justice Department, ahead of his nomination proceedings for the Supreme Court.
George H.W. Bush only invoked it once: In 1991, he allowed Dick Cheney, then the defense secretary, to not turn over documents subpoenaed during a congressional investigation into a Navy aircraft program.
Clinton was the first president to invoke executive privilege without issuing a written order; according to today’s White House statement, he claimed the privilege 14 times, including to avoid having to testify about his involvement in the Whitewater scandal in 1995.
Clinton was overruled by a federal judge three years later, when he tried to avoid testifying or allowing his advisers to testify about his relationship with Monica Lewinsky. That made him the first president since Nixon to invoke the privilege and lose.
George W. Bush invoked executive privilege six times, including to avoid handing over documents to a congressional committee on the FBI’s use of mob informants in Boston, and to deny access to Justice Department correspondence about Clinton’s fundraising tactics.
In 2007, the Bush White House also declined to give Congress documents about the death of Pat Tillman, the football star-turned-Army Ranger, who was killed in Afghanistan. The military initially said Tillman was killed in a firefight with the enemy, but it was later discovered that he was shot in a friendly fire accident. In refusing to hand over the documents, Bush’s counsel said the documents “implicate Executive Branch confidentiality interests.”
Barely a month later, Bush used the privilege to allow Karl Rove, his senior adviser at the time, to avoid testifying before Congress during its investigation into the firing of nine federal prosecutors, allegedly for partisan reasons.
Why do you say I hate Obama? Is it because, I think he should be held accountable for crimes he and Holder has committed? I know because I don't want him to let illegal criminal aliens break the law, while Americans are put in prison for the same thing. Instead he wants to reward them so he buy future elections. Like the one that was bought in Mexico? Is that it? Or is it because I don't want him and his Muslim Terrorist Brothers To destroy Israel. I don't hate him. I'm just wondering why he hates us. Ya know?

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#19441 Jul 23, 2013
Informed Opinion wrote:
<quoted text>
The point is -
where was all this outrage when Obama's predecessor was engaged in exactly the same conduct.
I missed the Right Wing demanding Atty. Gen. Gonzales be arrested and prosecuted for all this same conduct.
Your point is noted. Will you PLEASE for the LOVE OF GOD, MOVE ON!
why is that

Odum, GA

#19442 Jul 23, 2013
Bigdave1 wrote:
<quoted text>
We need guns, bombs and walls to keep you crying, whining, tax loving liberals out.
What a stupid elitist statement, you really need is a brain, but that's hopeless. TRY to be honest for a change. This country has never been this polarized since the Civil War, that's a fact. The big difference between the north and the south at the time was how to handle and treat Negros. After some of the bloodiest years in our history with the country in ruins the North won. Skip forward to today, not much has changed, the problem for most conservative southerners is lazy freeloading tax avoiding blacks and Hispanics. People from the south that make up the majority of what's left of ultra conservatives sill have the same issues as the civil war era southerners had many years ago. Then they admitted it in public, now they only admit it in private. Its not racism, in a word its superiority, lots of whites in the South still believe they are better than blacks and Hispanics, a lot better. Don't think I don't know, I was born and raised in the deep south, never been north of Virginia. But I read, from many different source's, always have. The large numbers of lazy out of work freeloading whites doesn't seem to bother them, why is that?

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#19443 Jul 23, 2013
Informed Opinion wrote:
<quoted text>
Don't be mad at me.
I didn't vote for Bush, so I bear no responsibility for the Trillions of Taxpayers' Dollars the Right Wingers devoted to their Arab Muslim buddies.
But you did vote for the fool we have now TWICE. You ARE responsible for that. You are responsible for every single thing we are having to deal with NOW!

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#19444 Jul 23, 2013
OMTE wrote:
<quoted text>What the hell are you talking about dude? You are one strange person. I was saying that I agreed that Bush was to blame, and that I didn't worship him or Reagan like you said I did. Are you suggesting that because Bush and Reagan done their part to destroy this country, that we should turn a blind eye to Obama trying to finish what they started? I don't want to be a The USA to become a Muslim Nation full of Mexicans. Sorry.
There is something wrong with that guy. Senile? Who knows. He is OBSESSED with the past. I don't think even he knows what he means. Weird.
OMTE

Adel, GA

#19445 Jul 23, 2013
why is that wrote:
<quoted text>
What a stupid elitist statement, you really need is a brain, but that's hopeless. TRY to be honest for a change. This country has never been this polarized since the Civil War, that's a fact. The big difference between the north and the south at the time was how to handle and treat Negros. After some of the bloodiest years in our history with the country in ruins the North won. Skip forward to today, not much has changed, the problem for most conservative southerners is lazy freeloading tax avoiding blacks and Hispanics. People from the south that make up the majority of what's left of ultra conservatives sill have the same issues as the civil war era southerners had many years ago. Then they admitted it in public, now they only admit it in private. Its not racism, in a word its superiority, lots of whites in the South still believe they are better than blacks and Hispanics, a lot better. Don't think I don't know, I was born and raised in the deep south, never been north of Virginia. But I read, from many different source's, always have. The large numbers of lazy out of work freeloading whites doesn't seem to bother them, why is that?
You are full of shit too. Some maybe, but not all. You must be a dang mexican too. Blacks are legal citizens and should not be even put in the same category as mexicans. Dummy. The Blacks are the ones these mexicans are hurting the worst, by taking their jobs. Have you not been reading the news? Obama and Holder wants Americans to believe that BS. That's why Obama has been doing his best to start a race war between the Whites and Blacks. To divide us so he can push his muslim dictator agenda right passed us. We are not mexicans. We can see what he's doing. It ain't happening migo.

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#19446 Jul 23, 2013
Why wrote:
Are these demos really moderate? or are they just afraid of getting out of office in 2014 and 2016?
"Moderate Democrats are quitting on Obamacare."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/w...
They are worried about the conservatives taking the Senate AND they can clearly see what a train wreck Obamacare is. They are having major regrets. What the fool libs fail to see is that Obama will NEVER have to deal with his healthcare being decided by his own law. He and his family will always receive only the best of care because he will be a former U.S. president.
Informed Opinion

United States

#19447 Jul 23, 2013
OMTE wrote:
<quoted text>You are incapable of just answering a question. Aren't you? Do you work for Obama? Are you a muslim terrorist?:)
No,
I'm no Right Wing Wacko,
lover of Arab Muslims who supported Bush spending Trillions of Taxpayers' Dollars.

I'm a Normal American who wants to spend our money on America and Americans, not on the Arab Muslims that Right Wingers care about so much.

Hey... Let's elect another Right Wing Republican so we can send more Trillions of Taxpayers' Dollars to the Middle East - how about Syria.
Informed Opinion

United States

#19448 Jul 23, 2013
Synergy wrote:
<quoted text>Your point is noted. Will you PLEASE for the LOVE OF GOD, MOVE ON!
Good.

So no more silly Obama bashing over silly matters.

We'll all bash Obama for important things and demand Bush and Cheney share his jail cell.
Informed Opinion

United States

#19449 Jul 23, 2013
why is that wrote:
<quoted text>What a stupid elitist statement, you really need is a brain, but that's hopeless. TRY to be honest for a change. This country has never been this polarized since the Civil War, that's a fact. The big difference between the north and the south at the time was how to handle and treat Negros. After some of the bloodiest years in our history with the country in ruins the North won. Skip forward to today, not much has changed, the problem for most conservative southerners is lazy freeloading tax avoiding blacks and Hispanics. People from the south that make up the majority of what's left of ultra conservatives sill have the same issues as the civil war era southerners had many years ago. Then they admitted it in public, now they only admit it in private. Its not racism, in a word its superiority, lots of whites in the South still believe they are better than blacks and Hispanics, a lot better. Don't think I don't know, I was born and raised in the deep south, never been north of Virginia. But I read, from many different source's, always have. The large numbers of lazy out of work freeloading whites doesn't seem to bother them, why is that?
Because they are the lazy freeloading whites.
OMTE

Adel, GA

#19450 Jul 23, 2013
Saudia Arabia is fixing to lay waste to both Iran and Israel. I can't find the other article that said they had proof that Pakistan had given Saudi Arabia TWO NUCLEAR weapons one for Israel and one for Iran. It is almost upon us. Now Saudi Arabia is setting a missile site up in the desert. Looks like Obama will succeed. I hope evrybody's ready.
http://www.news.com.au/newstest2/archive-old-...

http://www.news.com.au/newstest2/archive-old-...

http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2013-07-11...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Brunswick Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Info on him Jun 16 IllBBk 1
Blues,boy,Xa-nax,add-erall,H,B/lk,Etc Jun 9 Locko 1
Want to buy between 50 - 1000 acres of Good Lan... Jun 7 private buyer 1
what is ku? May 31 moe 1
Judge Jean Bolin (May '12) May 26 Dog pound 16
want to buy 40 - 200 acres of land near darien May '18 retired 1
Beware. Apr '18 jbk 4

Brunswick Jobs

Personal Finance

Brunswick Mortgages