Who do you support for U.S. Senate in...

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#11411 May 16, 2013
ChicknButt wrote:
I'm starting to see the logic of some of you RWW's.
The 1% really might be job creators. At least according to this news article:
http://www.cnn.com/2013/05/15/us/disney-skipp...
Communist News Network? lol

At any rate, you DO realize that some of those wealthy people are democrats, right?
It's appalling, but I'm sure Obama approves. It will help his promise about jobs. Heck! He might have been the originator of that idea! Weren't you the one who referred to him as the JOBS president? Perhaps this is his idea of "working together".
Informed Opinion

Sunapee, NH

#11412 May 16, 2013
ChicknButt wrote:
Great post.

In think the Right Wing Wackos need and love Obama.

Just like:
- the Riddler needs Batman;
- Moriarity needed Holmes; and
- Lex Luther needs Superman.

Right Wing Wackos always need a "Great Satan" to fight or the RWWs won't surrender the it's and their children's futures and money to their masters.

As one banker friend told me after many scotches - the saddest day in the world will be when abortion is completely criminalized, and everyone has so many guns in their homes they can't shut the closet doors - then how are we gonna keep the little people scared ?
Oh my

Blairsville, GA

#11413 May 16, 2013
Apparently wrote:
<quoted text>
http://www.topix.com/forum/city/blairsville-g...
Didn’t read this thread for a while. When I finally did I found a high level of intelligent and reasonable conservative Patriots debunking, in a highly formidable manner, every malicious deception the Far Left Liberals, Progressives, Humanists, and Socialist insisting upon spewing denigrations upon America and those of us who actually love our Nation.

...and get back to our jobs of exposing misrepresentations of fact and truth, as such pertains to the issues of our day.
Apparently we just do it to see what shade of red your face will become. Oooops, did I just call you a red. By all means, please expose more of your misrepresentations of fact and truth, everyone needs a good chuckle.
Oh my

Blairsville, GA

#11414 May 16, 2013
Aggie23 wrote:
<quoted text>
...After all, with those hate-filled terms listed above infecting your post, you MUST be someone the government has to try and shut up through IRS strong arm tactics and delays that will inhibit your getting the designation of tax exempt- you'll get it, but it may take three years - during which time potential donors may be hesitant to support you and you may miss the election cycle entirely - oops.
Be sure and stick to that line of reasoning, the victimhood suits you so well.
OMTE

New Bethlehem, PA

#11415 May 16, 2013
Synergy wrote:
<quoted text>
Communist News Network? lol
At any rate, you DO realize that some of those wealthy people are democrats, right?
It's appalling, but I'm sure Obama approves. It will help his promise about jobs. Heck! He might have been the originator of that idea! Weren't you the one who referred to him as the JOBS president? Perhaps this is his idea of "working together".
This may be helpful to you.
http://politicalhumor.about.com/library/bl-li...
Best site ever.
Oh my

Blairsville, GA

#11416 May 16, 2013
Informed Opinion wrote:
<quoted text>
http://www.topix.com/forum/city/blairsville-g...
Those pesky facts :

WASHINGTON -- The pivotal role of the Central Intelligence Agency in the deadly attack in Benghazi, Libya, last month burst into the public spotlight late on Thursday.

A U.S. official familiar with the Benghazi intelligence, who spoke under the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive matters, confirmed that the two former Navy SEALs who died in the assault, were contractors working for the agency.
.... his official memo counted 35 "U.S. government personnel," of whom only eight were State Department. Many of the rest were secretly with the CIA, the official confirmed.
... This was no accident. In fact, the compound served little routine diplomatic purpose, and was largely under the operational control of the CIA.
... During the October congressional hearing, Chaffetz had halted the testimony of a State Department official when she brought up the annex, out of concerns that her remarks might "deal with sources and methods that would be totally inappropriate in an open forum such as this."
... When secret agencies are involved, and especially when they are as pivotal as they were in Benghazi, public explanations can be treacherous, and officials will go out of their way to avoid exposing the agency's role, especially if the operations could be ongoing.
"The CIA can't admit their role because it compromises the cover of the facility, and that's the most important thing," said Bob Baer, who spent two decades as a field officer in the CIA. "You can never compromise cover."
... "State Department officials believed that security responsibility was set to be shouldered in part by CIA personnel in the city through a series of secret agreements that even some officials in Washington didn't know about," the Journal wrote.
The Journal's report placed the blame for many of the missteps in Benghazi specifically on CIA director David Petraeus, who was described as aloof in the weeks after that episode.
... the delay in publicly identifying Woods and Doherty was a consequence of the unique sensitivity of determining whether they would be outed as CIA agents, or if the State Department would claim the two as theirs.
.... his official memo counted 35 "U.S. government personnel," of whom only eight were State Department. Many of the rest were secretly with the CIA, the official confirmed.

... This was no accident. In fact, the compound served little routine diplomatic purpose, and was largely under the operational control of the CIA.

What !!!! but there were clear lines between the counsulate and annex, clear lines in the sand, you stay on your side and we'll stay on ours. This has to get nailed down, this is going to get nailed down, just as soon as Darrell Issa can find a commercial flight that can get to Benghazi in 7 hours.

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#11417 May 16, 2013
Informed Opinion wrote:
<quoted text>
Great post.
In think the Right Wing Wackos need and love Obama.
Just like:
- the Riddler needs Batman;
- Moriarity needed Holmes; and
- Lex Luther needs Superman.
Right Wing Wackos always need a "Great Satan" to fight or the RWWs won't surrender the it's and their children's futures and money to their masters.
As one banker friend told me after many scotches - the saddest day in the world will be when abortion is completely criminalized, and everyone has so many guns in their homes they can't shut the closet doors - then how are we gonna keep the little people scared ?
Your friend needs to go on the wagon.
OMTE

New Bethlehem, PA

#11418 May 16, 2013
Synergy wrote:
<quoted text>
Communist News Network? lol
At any rate, you DO realize that some of those wealthy people are democrats, right?
It's appalling, but I'm sure Obama approves. It will help his promise about jobs. Heck! He might have been the originator of that idea! Weren't you the one who referred to him as the JOBS president? Perhaps this is his idea of "working together".
I found a picture of You, Dave, Aggie, and Bill.
http://politicalhumor.about.com/library/bl-li...
LOL.

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#11419 May 16, 2013
Oh my wrote:
<quoted text>
Apparently we just do it to see what shade of red your face will become. Oooops, did I just call you a red. By all means, please expose more of your misrepresentations of fact and truth, everyone needs a good chuckle.
Pot-kettle- well, you know the rest.

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#11420 May 16, 2013
Oh my wrote:
<quoted text>
Be sure and stick to that line of reasoning, the victimhood suits you so well.
"You can't HANDLE the truth."

Keep paddling.

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#11421 May 16, 2013
OMTE wrote:
<quoted text>This may be helpful to you.
http://politicalhumor.about.com/library/bl-li...
Best site ever.
Wonder who erased MSNBC and inserted FOX in that pic? Probably some misguided Loonie Lib.
Bored

Commerce, GA

#11422 May 16, 2013
Oh my wrote:
<quoted text>
.... his official memo counted 35 "U.S. government personnel," of whom only eight were State Department. Many of the rest were secretly with the CIA, the official confirmed.
... This was no accident. In fact, the compound served little routine diplomatic purpose, and was largely under the operational control of the CIA.
What !!!! but there were clear lines between the counsulate and annex, clear lines in the sand, you stay on your side and we'll stay on ours. This has to get nailed down, this is going to get nailed down, just as soon as Darrell Issa can find a commercial flight that can get to Benghazi in 7 hours.

A copy cat Obama attempt to change the talking points that I nearly fell for. Change the talking points and the focus on who was responsible changes.

Well just look what we have here, even Chris Matthews has soured on Obama. He no longer get the thrill running up his leg.

"President Obama "obviously likes giving speeches more than he does running the executive branch," Chris Matthews said tonight."

http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2013/05/c...
Bored

Commerce, GA

#11423 May 16, 2013
"Benghazi Emails Directly Contradict White House Claims."

Obama digging his own grave?


http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/newly-rel...
Bored

Commerce, GA

#11424 May 16, 2013
"Petraeus email objected to Benghazi talking points."

The CIA on one page, the State Dept on another page, and the White House claims they are on no page.

http://www.myfoxdc.com/story/22258258/ex-dipl...
Bored

Commerce, GA

#11425 May 16, 2013
"White House’s Benghazi email dump shows critical two-day gap, CIA objection."

2 day gap???
Everyone sleeping on those 2 days???
Everyone looking for more places to point their fingers??
Rats looking for a safe haven???
A continuous attempt to cover up????

http://dailycaller.com/2013/05/16/white-house...



Oh my

Blairsville, GA

#11427 May 16, 2013
No surprizes here, it's so hard to nail things down when the nails keep popping out. Maybe Darrell Issaa needs more help finding a commercial flight that can go from DC to Benghazi in 7 hours.

First on CNN: Pickering, Mullen challenge Issa to let them testify in public
By CNN's Jake Tapper and Alison Harding
May 16th, 2013 07:01 AM ET
http://thelead.blogs.cnn.com/2013/05/16/first...

In a letter to Rep. Darrell Issa exclusively obtained by CNN, the co-chairmen behind an independent review of September's deadly attack in Benghazi, Libya, expressed irritation over the House Oversight Committee chairman's portrayal of their work and requested he call a public hearing at which they can testify.

"The public deserves to hear your questions and our answers," wrote former Ambassador Thomas Pickering and former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Adm. Mike Mullen, co-chairmen of the Accountability Review Board that was convened to investigate the September 11th attack.

Link to letter...
http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2013/images/05/1...

...The dispute between Issa and the co-chairmen came to a head after neither Pickering nor Mullen attended a May 8 House Oversight Committee hearing on the attacks, sparking a heated back and forth about who was invited and when. The rhetoric intensified Sunday during a highly contentious joint appearance with Issa and Pickering on NBC's "Meet the Press" in which Issa maintained the two "refused to come before our committee." Pickering insisted that he was not invited despite expressing a willingness to testify.

...Issa also suggested on the program that Pickering and Mullen meet with the committee behind closed doors so as not to create "some sort of stage show." But the two assert in their letter that a public hearing is a "more appropriate forum" and accuse Issa of changing his "position on the terms of our appearance."

"Having taken liberal license to call into question the Board's work, it is surprising that you now maintain that members of the committee need a closed-door proceeding before being able to ask "informed questions" at a public hearing," they write in the letter.

Pickering and Mullen assert that since they are not witnesses, but rather officials asked to serve on a review board, they should be permitted to testify in public.
Danger zone

Grayson, GA

#11428 May 16, 2013
Laughing at U wrote:
I've never been much on politics, but I finally am beginning to understand the difference between the two parties...
Democrats tend to have logic, irony and a sense of humor... Republicans are smug, use crude language and call names....
At least that's what it looks like reading this thread...
It's very obvious you haven't paid attention.
Your backwards opinion means very little to us who know otherwise.
Danger zone

Grayson, GA

#11429 May 16, 2013
Bored wrote:
"White House’s Benghazi email dump shows critical two-day gap, CIA objection."
2 day gap???
Everyone sleeping on those 2 days???
Everyone looking for more places to point their fingers??
Rats looking for a safe haven???
A continuous attempt to cover up????
http://dailycaller.com/2013/05/16/white-house...
Even CNN reports, the Benghazi talking points have, "Hillary's fingerprints all over it" - news from the left.
Bored

Commerce, GA

#11430 May 16, 2013
"Men who are physically strong are more likely to have right wing political views.

Weaker men more likely to support welfare state and wealth redistribution."

Strong repubs tell truths.
weak socialists tell lies.

Confirms my viewpoints so I must be strong and have right wing political views.

Confirms my viewpoints about the liberace socialists her so they must be weak kneed socialist telling lies and living off the haves seeing as they are have nots.

Strong conservatives foresee the weak kneed socialists invading the building (America) and like the termites they are, eating away at the fabric and causing rot among the very young.



http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-232...
Bored

Commerce, GA

#11431 May 16, 2013
Oh my wrote:
No surprizes here, it's so hard to nail things down when the nails keep popping out. Maybe Darrell Issaa needs more help finding a commercial flight that can go from DC to Benghazi in 7 hours.
First on CNN: Pickering, Mullen challenge Issa to let them testify in public
By CNN's Jake Tapper and Alison Harding
May 16th, 2013 07:01 AM ET
http://thelead.blogs.cnn.com/2013/05/16/first...
In a letter to Rep. Darrell Issa exclusively obtained by CNN, the co-chairmen behind an independent review of September's deadly attack in Benghazi, Libya, expressed irritation over the House Oversight Committee chairman's portrayal of their work and requested he call a public hearing at which they can testify.
"The public deserves to hear your questions and our answers," wrote former Ambassador Thomas Pickering and former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Adm. Mike Mullen, co-chairmen of the Accountability Review Board that was convened to investigate the September 11th attack.
Link to letter...
http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2013/images/05/1...
...The dispute between Issa and the co-chairmen came to a head after neither Pickering nor Mullen attended a May 8 House Oversight Committee hearing on the attacks, sparking a heated back and forth about who was invited and when. The rhetoric intensified Sunday during a highly contentious joint appearance with Issa and Pickering on NBC's "Meet the Press" in which Issa maintained the two "refused to come before our committee." Pickering insisted that he was not invited despite expressing a willingness to testify.
...Issa also suggested on the program that Pickering and Mullen meet with the committee behind closed doors so as not to create "some sort of stage show." But the two assert in their letter that a public hearing is a "more appropriate forum" and accuse Issa of changing his "position on the terms of our appearance."
"Having taken liberal license to call into question the Board's work, it is surprising that you now maintain that members of the committee need a closed-door proceeding before being able to ask "informed questions" at a public hearing," they write in the letter.
Pickering and Mullen assert that since they are not witnesses, but rather officials asked to serve on a review board, they should be permitted to testify in public.

I surely do hope they testify, maybe this week or next week.

They are the committee being investigated by the IG who does a good job of duck and dodge also.


Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Brunswick Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Divorce Attorney Jun 28 Jail The Ho 2
Judge Jean Bolin (May '12) Jun 27 Meth-intosh Busted 12
Speed Trap along the I-95 corridor in Mcintosh ... (Nov '15) Jun 27 Mcintrash Finest 8
What McIntosh/Darien does not want you to know (May '13) Jun 15 squeen82 25
companies Jun 15 the local hog hun... 1
Part 12 Guy Heinze Jr. (May '10) May '16 TheOriginalCoolio 1,201
The Villas at Golden Isles May '16 LoriAnne 2

Brunswick Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Brunswick Mortgages