Who do you support for U.S. Senate in...
rename

Jefferson, GA

#56169 Sep 6, 2014

Brazil: Chief Meteorologist Eugenio Hackbart of the MetSul Meteorologia Weather Center in Sao Leopoldo - Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil declared himself a skeptic. "The media is promoting an unprecedented hyping related to global warming. The media and many scientists are ignoring very important facts that point to a natural variation in the climate system as the cause of the recent global warming," Hackbart wrote on May 30, 2007.

rename

Jefferson, GA

#56170 Sep 6, 2014


And this is Cbutt……………
“the average citizen is bamboozled, lobotomized, lulled into mindless ac¬ceptance”
A lobotomized idiot…………..

France: Climatologist Dr. Marcel Leroux, former professor at Université Jean Moulin and director of the Laboratory of Climatology, Risks, and Environment in Lyon, is a climate skeptic. Leroux wrote a 2005 book titled Global Warming - Myth or Reality?- The Erring Ways of Climatology. "Day after day, the same mantra - that ‘the Earth is warming up'- is churned out in all its forms. As ‘the ice melts' and ‘sea level rises,' the Apocalypse looms ever nearer! Without realizing it, or perhaps without wishing to, the average citizen is bamboozled, lobotomized, lulled into mindless ac¬ceptance.... Non-believers in the greenhouse scenario are in the position of those long ago who doubted the existence of God ... fortunately for them, the Inquisition is no longer with us!"



rename

Jefferson, GA

#56171 Sep 6, 2014


Norway: Geologist/Geochemist Dr. Tom V. Segalstad, a professor and head of the Geological Museum at the University of Oslo and formerly an expert reviewer with the UN IPCC: "It is a search for a mythical CO2 sink to explain an immeasurable CO2 lifetime to fit a hypothetical CO2 computer model that purports to show that an impossible amount of fossil fuel burning is heating the atmosphere. It is all a fiction."

rename

Jefferson, GA

#56172 Sep 6, 2014


Yep…………..ole Sols influence………….
Finland: Dr. Boris Winterhalter, retired Senior Marine Researcher of the Geological Survey of Finland and former professor of marine geology at University of Helsinki, criticized the media for what he considered its alarming climate coverage. "The effect of solar winds on cosmic radiation has just recently been established and, furthermore, there seems to be a good correlation between cloudiness and variations in the intensity of cosmic radiation. Here we have a mechanism which is a far better explanation to variations in global climate than the attempts by IPCC to blame it all on anthropogenic input of greenhouse gases," Winterhalter said.


rename

Jefferson, GA

#56173 Sep 6, 2014


To counter the Shrillers and Screamers that Earth will implode, explode, burn up, freeze over, or generally just go to hell in a hand basket……………


Germany: Paleoclimate expert Augusto Mangini of the University of Heidelberg in Germany, criticized the UN IPCC summary. "I consider the part of the IPCC report, which I can really judge as an expert, i.e. the reconstruction of the paleoclimate, wrong," Mangini noted in an April 5, 2007 article. He added: "The earth will not die."



rename

Jefferson, GA

#56174 Sep 6, 2014
OMTE wrote:
<quoted text>
I answered this post with not just links but videos...
But topix erased it.
If you do love this country...
Go on youtube.
Look up "morsi campaign speech" "muslim brotherhood campaign"
Then look up on bing or google whichever you like and type in "Obama sends military aid to Morsi"
It is unbelieveable that Obama supported this man and we allowed it.
If the Egyptian people would not have overthown Morsi...Israel would have been destroyed by now and we would have been attacked already.
That's probably why the Egyptions say that Obama is a muslim terrorist too...
Look it up.


I have posted twice before that Cbutt is a "surface man."
Obviously most missed the meaning, so I will explain..........

A surface person has no substance, no underlying moral code, nor conscience...... some folks call them sociopaths and psychopaths..........many do not exhibit violent behavior and live within reasonable bounds of society........one trait most common to them is lying because they don’t really know the difference between lies and truth, and cannot distinguish between the two........

I truly believe Cbutt falls into this category for several reasons........
1. he does not accept facts presented, but instead looks for every conceivable way to avoid such facts.

2. he denies everything because he locks into a fallacy based on assumptions he believes in; not because of reliable input, but because he considers himself a part of the common good, which itself is a fallacy........in his realm of existence.......

3. lying is acceptable because there is no conscience, nor a moral code to direct him otherwise........

We see it numerous times with his posts, where his main point is too disallow the posted data, attack the source of the data, and fail completely to give a rebuttal with facts to back up his rebuttal..........

And always, always; giving in to a peripheral subject which has nothing to do with the original subject, but which is intended to present another lie......

rename

Jefferson, GA

#56175 Sep 6, 2014


Gays getting special attention..........

"According to NBC’s Peter King and ESPN’s Stephen A. Smith, NFL officials called teams around the league to gauge interest in signing Michael Sam to their practice squad.

Yesterday, the Dallas Cowboys signed Sam, who is trying to become the first openly gay player in NFL history.

King reported this during the pre-game show on NBC prior to the Seahawks/Packers season opener Thursday night."

"This report, that is surely to upset other players vying for NFL practice squads around the league, was initially reported by ESPN’s Stephen A. Smith on yesterday’s edition of “First Take.”


I wonder how many of these NFL officials are gay also.........helping out their "buddy."


http://dailycaller.com/2014/09/04/report-nfl-...

ChicknButt

Alpharetta, GA

#56176 Sep 6, 2014
rename wrote:
<quoted text>
I have posted twice before that Cbutt is a "surface man."
Obviously most missed the meaning, so I will explain..........
A surface person has no substance, no underlying moral code, nor conscience...... some folks call them sociopaths and psychopaths..........many do not exhibit violent behavior and live within reasonable bounds of society........one trait most common to them is lying because they don’t really know the difference between lies and truth, and cannot distinguish between the two........
I truly believe Cbutt falls into this category for several reasons........
1. he does not accept facts presented, but instead looks for every conceivable way to avoid such facts.
2. he denies everything because he locks into a fallacy based on assumptions he believes in; not because of reliable input, but because he considers himself a part of the common good, which itself is a fallacy........in his realm of existence.......
3. lying is acceptable because there is no conscience, nor a moral code to direct him otherwise........
We see it numerous times with his posts, where his main point is too disallow the posted data, attack the source of the data, and fail completely to give a rebuttal with facts to back up his rebuttal..........
And always, always; giving in to a peripheral subject which has nothing to do with the original subject, but which is intended to present another lie......
In other words - I don't just accept every lie you dredge up from insane right-wing coal-company propaganda , and instead make sure I know what the facts are from reputable sources. That's what you're actually saying.

For example - you've posted several nutjobs from a 2007 minority report that claim there isn't a consensus on global warming. I don't know WHY you did that because we've already covered that ground and you lost...
----------
..
..
Here's the truth - from an actual reliable source:

http://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/

Consensus: 97% of climate scientists agree

Statement on climate change from 18 scientific associations

"Observations throughout the world make it clear that climate change is occurring, and rigorous scientific research demonstrates that the greenhouse gases emitted by human activities are the primary driver." (2009)
rename

Jefferson, GA

#56177 Sep 6, 2014


Opps..........why do they never lose tax returns.........


"IRS says it has lost emails from 5 more employees "


http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_IRS...

ChicknButt

Alpharetta, GA

#56178 Sep 6, 2014
AMERICAN SCIENTIFIC SOCIETIES

Statement on climate change from 18 scientific associations

"Observations throughout the world make it clear that climate change is occurring, and rigorous scientific research demonstrates that the greenhouse gases emitted by human activities are the primary driver." (2009)2
AAAS emblem
American Association for the Advancement of Science

"The scientific evidence is clear: global climate change caused by human activities is occurring now, and it is a growing threat to society." (2006)3
ACS emblem
American Chemical Society

"Comprehensive scientific assessments of our current and potential future climates clearly indicate that climate change is real, largely attributable to emissions from human activities, and potentially a very serious problem." (2004)4
AGU emblem
American Geophysical Union

"Human&#8208;induced climate change requires urgent action. Humanity is the major influence on the global climate change observed over the past 50 years. Rapid societal responses can significantly lessen negative outcomes." (Adopted 2003, revised and reaffirmed 2007, 2012, 2013)5
AMA emblem
American Medical Association

"Our AMA ... supports the findings of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s fourth assessment report and concurs with the scientific consensus that the Earth is undergoing adverse global climate change and that anthropogenic contributions are significant." (2013)6
AMS emblem
American Meteorological Society

"It is clear from extensive scientific evidence that the dominant cause of the rapid change in climate of the past half century is human-induced increases in the amount of atmospheric greenhouse gases, including carbon dioxide (CO2), chlorofluorocarbons, methane, and nitrous oxide." (2012)7
APS emblem
American Physical Society

"The evidence is incontrovertible: Global warming is occurring. If no mitigating actions are taken, significant disruptions in the Earth’s physical and ecological systems, social systems, security and human health are likely to occur. We must reduce emissions of greenhouse gases beginning now." (2007)8
GSA emblem
The Geological Society of America

"The Geological Society of America (GSA) concurs with assessments by the National Academies of Science (2005), the National Research Council (2006), and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC, 2007) that global climate has warmed and that human activities (mainly greenhouse&#8208;gas emissions) account for most of the warming since the middle 1900s." (2006; revised 2010)9
ChicknButt

Alpharetta, GA

#56179 Sep 6, 2014
International academies: Joint statement

"Climate change is real. There will always be uncertainty in understanding a system as complex as the world’s climate. However there is now strong evidence that significant global warming is occurring. The evidence comes from direct measurements of rising surface air temperatures and subsurface ocean temperatures and from phenomena such as increases in average global sea levels, retreating glaciers, and changes to many physical and biological systems. It is likely that most of the warming in recent decades can be attributed to human activities (IPCC 2001)." (2005, 11 international science academies)10
USNAS emblem
U.S. National Academy of Sciences

"The scientific understanding of climate change is now sufficiently clear to justify taking steps to reduce the amount of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere." (2005)11

U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCIES

USGCRP emblem
U.S. Global Change Research Program

"The global warming of the past 50 years is due primarily to human-induced increases in heat-trapping gases. Human 'fingerprints' also have been identified in many other aspects of the climate system, including changes in ocean heat content, precipitation, atmospheric moisture, and Arctic sea ice." (2009, 13 U.S. government departments and agencies)12

INTERGOVERNMENTAL BODIES

IPCC emblem
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

“Warming of the climate system is unequivocal, as is now evident from observations of increases in global average air and ocean temperatures, widespread melting of snow and ice, and rising global average sea level.”13

“Most of the observed increase in global average temperatures since the mid-20th century is very likely* due to the observed increase in anthropogenic greenhouse gas concentrations.”14

*IPCC defines ‘very likely’ as greater than 90 percent probability of occurrence.
ChicknButt

Alpharetta, GA

#56180 Sep 6, 2014
So - Rather than relying on every oil-and-coal funded crackpot that Senater Inhof could put cobble together for a 2007 Minority Report - with Senator Inhof himself working for the oil and coal companies - how about listening to NASA and almost every science organisation on the planet that deal with climate research?

Doesn't that make sense to you?

----------

I'm not playing your games anymore Rename -

So far I've debunked 100% of the crap you've drudged up from the worst sources on the planet. I've knocked the ever-loving sh!t out of everything you've thrown out there hoping it would stick against the wall.

If what you post ISN'T from a reliable scientific organization without ties to oil and coal - I'll ignore it. Unlike you - I have better things to do than be insane.

After having absolutely destroyed your BS 100% of the time, for years - it's time for you to realize when to shut up and quit talking.. except you're insane and can't do it...
rename

Jefferson, GA

#56181 Sep 6, 2014


so the libroids are making every effort to present climate change as one of the talking points for the november elections..........a day late and a dollar short......



"On Thursday at Harry Reid's annual energy conference in Las Vegas, Hillary Clinton said, "Climate change is the most consequential, urgent, sweeping collection of challenges we face."


"According to Doctor Craig Idso, the chairman of the Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change, increased levels of C02 reduce the negative effects of a number of plant stresses including: high salinity, low light, high and low temperatures, insufficient water, air pollution, and C02 protects against herbivores, i.e. being eaten by animals and insects."


http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/...



Idso website at this link..........a family affair.....

http://www.co2science.org/

“Registered Conservative”

Since: Jul 11

Location hidden

#56183 Sep 6, 2014
ChicknButt wrote:
<quoted text>
For Informational purposes and full disclosure:
RedState.com was launched in 2004 as a 527 political action committee. The "conservative community group site announced it had agreed to be purchased by Eagle Publishing, the parent company of Human Events, Regnery Publishing, Evans-Novak Political Report, the Conservative Book Club
The Founder was a Bush appointee, AND the son of a Bush appointee. He questioned President Bush's decision" to attend Coretta Scott King's "funeral because she is a 'communist,'"
The article is based around data from the Center for Immigration Studies, a think tank that, according to the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), has "been part of a broad-based and well-planned effort to attack immigration in all forms" .
Center for Immigration Studies is part of the John Tanton Network, the anti-immigrant "empire of organizations" created by, or connected to, population-control advocate and nativist John Tanton.
Although CIS does not disclosed its donors --it received almost $10 million in funding from 1995 to 2011 from just 13 right wing foundations, according to annual reports filed with the Internal Revenue Service and Federal Election Commission.
The donors are most of the same names you see on all of the Global Warming Deniers and other right-wing echo-chamber funding lists.
William H. Donner Foundation:$140,000 (2005-2011)
The Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation:$220,000 (2003-2011)
Armstrong Foundation:$77,500 (2004-2011)
Scaife Family Foundation:$893,500 (1995-2011)
Sarah Scaife Foundation:$1,340,000 (1997-2011)
The Weiler Foundation:$10,000 (2010-2011)
Colcom Foundation:$6,087,000 (2001-2011)
Smith Richardson Foundation:$58,000 (2006)
DonorsTrust anonymous donor(s):$350,000 (2008, two distributions)
The Carthage Foundation:$607,500 (1991-2003)
John M. Olin Foundation:$110,000 (1996-2002)
Jaquelin Hume Foundation:$35,000 (1999-2002)
Philip M. McKenna Foundation:$40,000 (1999-2000)
That's some pretty whacked-out hard-care right-wing fascist crap you're reading there, General...
<quoted text>
And the Heritage Organisation IS the Koch Brothers - Oil and Coal barons.
Furthermore - the second line of the article you printed was this:
........"The workforce shrank again, hitting another historic low."
Which is a HUGE LIE. A blatant - absolute pure lie.
The jobs numbers are the lowest of 2014 - which overall have been a good year. Certainly good by any standards compared what we've seen since Bush tanked the economy. This information is verifiable, so it's pretty audacious that thy would base their entire article around such a massively wrong piece of disinformation.
Here is recent date from the BLS:
http://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/empsit.pd...
And more importantly, longer-term data:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2013/09/06/emp...
----------
So - for informational purposes - it should be known that the website creating the article is funded by the furthest-right contributors to the right-wing echo-chamber there is.
The articles is based around data provided by people from the John Taunton network - hard-core lunatics.
The article starts off with a blatant - no getting around it - major lie in the second sentence.
----Good to know - for those who care where their information comes from..
The information reported, is accurate. When you have no intelligent comments, you attack the source. Lame tactic that doesn't work, just like current democrat policies.
rename

Jefferson, GA

#56184 Sep 6, 2014
ChicknButt wrote:
<quoted text>

Here's the truth - from an actual reliable source:
http://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/
Consensus: 97% of climate scientists agree
Statement on climate change from 18 scientific associations
"Observations throughout the world make it clear that climate change is occurring, and rigorous scientific research demonstrates that the greenhouse gases emitted by human activities are the primary driver." (2009)

Well heck..........your nasa source is repeating the same lie as other libroids and your sorry self..........


Only 2 dozen members produced the “consensus” statement……………..

Only 52 Scientists Participated in UN IPCC Summary is hardly 97% of climate scientists........


The 97% is a fallacy perpetrated by that dummy website you so often quote but fail to give a link too......

ChicknButt

Alpharetta, GA

#56185 Sep 6, 2014
rename wrote:
so the libroids are making every effort to present climate change as one of the talking points for the november elections..........a day late and a dollar short......
"On Thursday at Harry Reid's annual energy conference in Las Vegas, Hillary Clinton said, "Climate change is the most consequential, urgent, sweeping collection of challenges we face."
"According to Doctor Craig Idso, the chairman of the Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change, increased levels of C02 reduce the negative effects of a number of plant stresses including: high salinity, low light, high and low temperatures, insufficient water, air pollution, and C02 protects against herbivores, i.e. being eaten by animals and insects."
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/...
Idso website at this link..........a family affair.....
http://www.co2science.org/
Remember - Craig Idso has been debunked a bunch of times? This is like the 4th or 5th time? He runs his "organisation" out of a garage and is funded by the Koch Brothers?

Why do you keep forgetting things like that?

It's because you don't give a crap about the truth - you just want to spread your lies.

You are a sad waste of all the potential a human being could have been - just a sad waste and a creature to be pitied.
rename

Jefferson, GA

#56186 Sep 6, 2014
ChicknButt wrote:
So far I've debunked 100% of the crap you've drudged up from the worst sources on the planet. I've knocked the ever-loving sh!t out of everything you've thrown out there hoping it would stick against the wall.
If what you post ISN'T from a reliable scientific organization without ties to oil and coal - I'll ignore it. Unlike you - I have better things to do than be insane.
After having absolutely destroyed your BS 100% of the time, for years - it's time for you to realize when to shut up and quit talking.. except you're insane and can't do it...

The only thing you've proven dummy is my prior post which states..........

"1. he does not accept facts presented, but instead looks for every conceivable way to avoid such facts.

2. he denies everything because he locks into a fallacy based on assumptions he believes in; not because of reliable input, but because he considers himself a part of the common good, which itself is a fallacy........

3. lying is an acceptable because there is no conscience, nor a moral code to direct him otherwise........

We see it numerous times with his posts, where his main point is too disallow the posted data, attack the source of the data, and fail completely to give a rebuttal with facts to back up his rebuttal..........

And always, always; giving in to a peripheral subject which has nothing to do with the original subject, but which is intended to present another lie......"





ChicknButt

Alpharetta, GA

#56187 Sep 6, 2014
rename wrote:
I miss a day of postings..........review the posts..........and find the motor mouth of topix, which we all know as a dumb chicken, spilling bs and lies across the pages once again..........
I will be posting this on a regular basis to remind everyone what a liar this dummy is..........
I will be unrelenting, continuous, and consistent..........
A post by the Dummy CButt........
post #54015
Note to readers:

Every contention by this idiot has been debunked thoroughly - not ONCE but numerous times on this forum. There is no life whatsoever left in his claims. Not only are his claims dead - they've fully submitted to rigor mortis and just plain stink at this point.

Why does he keep posting them? Because he's mentally challenged.
ChicknButt

Alpharetta, GA

#56188 Sep 6, 2014
rename wrote:
<quoted text>
The 97% is a fallacy perpetrated by that dummy website you so often quote but fail to give a link too......
Oh - You mean NASA?

http://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/

You Dolt.
rename

Jefferson, GA

#56189 Sep 6, 2014

co2 from 3 to 4 parts per 10,000.......a minor change to "enhanced" the co2 effect in the IPPC report by reducing the Sun's irradiance by fiat, using the same exact data on the Sun from the ar4 report..........


Ken Haapala with the Science and Environmental Policy Project (SEPP), for example, compared and contrasted the IPCC report with another major climate report that takes a more realistic approach. Produced by the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change (NIPCC), the “Climate Change Reconsidered II: Physical Science and the Summary for Policymakers” paints a very different picture using many of the same studies cited by the UN.

Among other major concerns cited by Haapala and other experts is the fact that the sensitivity of the climate to increases in carbon dioxide is missing from the IPCC report.“Yet, this is the entire political issue,” he noted.“Is the climate sensitive to human emissions of CO2 or not? Does an increase in the molecules of CO2 from 3 to 4 per 10,000 parts of air make a difference in climate?” The UN does not know.

“Further, the report glosses over the fact that there has been no statistically significant rise in surface temperatures for over 16 years,” Haapala continued, echoing criticism worldwide about the UN effort to downplay the elephant in the room.“Instead, it asserts a greater certainty in its work than prior reports. It reduced the uncertainty from 10% to 5%, with no empirical basis.... The purpose of a physical science is to describe nature, and to understand how it works. It is becoming increasingly evident that IPCC science does not describe nature. Yet, the IPCC intensifies its certainty in its work?”


Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Brunswick Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Speed Trap along the I-95 corridor in Mcintosh ... (Nov '15) Wed Sweetums67 39
where can we catch shrimp in Darien with a thro... Jun 18 mac 8
Jeannie Stamey (Jul '15) Jun 16 Farrell Landon 4
where in Darien can i use draw net to catch shr... Jun 12 mac 2
Looking for Brian flanders Jun 10 Wondering 4
Daisy mae Jun 9 Xx_DARK_GOKU_666_xX 2
are great white sharks in altamahal river ? Jun 8 Farrell Landon 5

Brunswick Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Brunswick Mortgages