Who do you support for U.S. Senate in...
Columbus Native

Oklahoma City, OK

#5280 Mar 27, 2013
Glorya wrote:
Term limits is the answer... how do we get there? We know what needs to be done. How do we ever influence politicians into making it LAW? I guess what I'm asking, will it ever happen?
Yes term limits? Remember Gingrigh and his contract to America. Well he waffled on the term limits part because according to him" Our constituates believe we(republicans) are doing such a good job that we hate to put you out after 8 years. He excused himself and the rest of Congress which was republican 1994-2001 so he could stay on indefineately. Lying scumbag hypocrite and his adultress lifestlye.
Columbus Native

Oklahoma City, OK

#5281 Mar 27, 2013
Well while the great republicans on this post stew, jerk, and whine, I will enjoy the next 3 years 10 months knowing that they are so upset. Get my government check next wednesday for which I have been paying into the system for 45 years, and knowing f-up republicans will not be able to Euthanize( Privatize) the system. Thanks again to our president who will see to it we are covered under Medicare and Medicaid. Also I am expecting a slight Cost Of Living pay increase next January. Now about mitt and his b-tch wishing they could of had a chance at America's financial wealth? Ain't gonna happen in my lifetime.
Glorya

Norcross, GA

#5282 Mar 27, 2013
I'm SAD & embarassed. Why waste my days being mad, when I have very little or no control over politicians. I can't save the world. I'm not a republican, I'm not a democrat. As I've said 100x, I've refused to associate myself with either party for many, many years. My home is almost paid for, I'm not high maintenance, not shaking in my shoes nor biting my nails. I'm not a doomsday prepper. I do worry, we are beyond the point of no return, the death spiral. So don't tell me what I am, or what I'm afraid of. Speak for yourselves. I can't read your mind and you can't read mine. I actually love life, not so much the sad state America is in. I actually make the most of life. And would like to see things improve, want to believe they will, I just don't see it happening.
Glorya

Norcross, GA

#5283 Mar 27, 2013
You'll be wasting ya time taking joy in my pain. What pain? You ain't got a clue. My overhead is low, I live way below my means. Thank goodness, not in debt. Life is good. So you'd be wasting time even think I'm whining & stewing. I have a life and do not depend on the government. You must have me confused with someone else, native from columbus.

Good grief, I certainly don't worry about you, why in the heck, would I even think about you for 1/2 a second? Much less worry? Never, not in my lifetime.

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#5284 Mar 27, 2013
Columbus Native wrote:
<quoted text>Great Post! Anytime you see mad upset republicans you know things are going well for the 67% of we voters who are not republican. I just get soo happy to see them so mad.
67%? Ur math is as stupid as ur comments.

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#5285 Mar 27, 2013
Well, Columbus Native is still mostly full of nonsense, I see.
- 67% non Republican? Than how did Romney get 48% of the vote - surprise, surprise, your numbers don't add up

- However, you are absolutely right that Gingrich let the 1994 incoming freshman Republicans down when he backed a 12 year term limit plan that went nowhere, instead of the 6-8 year limit that they wanted. Can't argue with you there.

- Don't worry about Republicans "euthanizing" "the system", worry more about Democrats pushing euthanasia for the elderly - that is far more likely. Remember Obama's suggestion for the 100 year old woman whose doctor said her only hope was a pacemaker that "maybe she would be better off taking a pain killer."

- so explain your vulgar comment about Mrs. Romney who from all appearances is a woman of character and grace who raised 5 sons. The Romneys gave away in charity far more than the Clintons, Gores, Bidens, and Obamas combined. Democrats are the ones who come into office with nothing and than parlay it into millions.

So am I mad, yes. I am mad that 51% of those that voted were too uninformed or too partisan to realize the disaster that putting Obama back in office could be for this country.
Man in Plaid

Birmingham, AL

#5286 Mar 27, 2013
In response to Bill and Glorya,

I believe that one reason for the immoral behavior of some elected officials arises from the scripted nature of their lives. Once they begin to campaign for a major office, they are groomed to appear a certain way. A team of speech writers create talking-points-based texts for them to read that ensures that they will say the right thing to the right audiences. Their campaign writers amp up their biography to make them appear as nearly superhuman figures, and this hyperbole is a must because they all must confront the task of overcoming and eradicating the evil perpetrated by the current officeholder. And of course, their elections are described as epic exertions of the undeniable voice of the people who cried out in despair to the gods of democracy, and said gods delivered in the form of the semi-divine politician who shall lead the bitterly oppressed, or the merely irritated, to a state of unimaginable liberty.

Imagine being such a person. Hearing such overblown rhetoric and playing such a role over the course of an eighteen month campaign would have a way of working on one's self image. As a result, some officials embrace the caricature of the mythic leader who transcends the laws of reality and society that bind the rest of us. This is no different from celebrities and major professional athletes who scoff at reality and do as they please when they please. They somehow disconnect from the simple fact that actions, sooner or later, have consequences. In the case of some figures of this status, I believe that they become dissociated from their senses of self. Consequently, the role that they play in public life carries over to private life, and the results are always embarrassing and sometimes scary.

In regard to the issue of the best candidates not running, I wonder if well-grounded people with a sense of integrity would put up with the theatrics of political life. It seems like a fine way to be ruined, if one isn't careful. Take the example of Herman Cain. I didn't believe that he was presidential material, personally. But, I think his downfall shows one of the most troubling facets of contemporary American politics. If they don't like you, or if you pose a threat, then get ready for a smear job. I don't know if any or all of the allegations made against him were true, but it didn't matter. If the opposition can find or fabricate the right kind of dirt and make people believe it at an opportune moment, you're done, plain and simple.

Since: Jul 12

Douglasville, GA

#5287 Mar 27, 2013
make me sick wrote:
<quoted text>
You are on the right track but on the wrong train. The hidden leaders of the Republican Party, the very rich upper class who now have complete control to finance all elections thanks to the people they had appointed to the Supreme Court. They now have complete control of our leaders, it only takes money to be elected and they have it all. They don't care what political party the are with, its the outcome they seek. These same people have been building a cheap labor force in this country for years. In the last 20 or so years the buying power of the middle class has declined dramatically, while the very rich has grown expediential.
They are building a kingdom for the rich in this country and you are a laborer. They were behind making the military a volunteer army to protect their children and to make your children do all the dirty work. You are helping them make the middle class nothing more than the working poor. You bow down and make offerings to them, you make me sick.
Since you blame the Republicans for all this evil then what are the Democrats responsible for? The Democrats are in power and control the current administration. Why is it that the Democrats are not mentioned? Are all the Democrats actually Republicans, and if so why did you vote Democratic? BTW are you really Columbus Native?

Since: Jul 12

Douglasville, GA

#5288 Mar 27, 2013
Many people think that there should be term limits to stop this political corruption. I used to think that was a good idea but have rethought the whole idea.
Yes these politicians are liars and are corrupted but the people put them in office again and again, knowing what morals and ethics they have. The politician should be blamed for being an unethical liar and possible thief, but the voters put him in there and it is the voters responsibility to vote him out. That is the American way. It is not up to the politicians to educate the ignorant masses of voters so that they will pick the right man for the office. Politicians get away with everything because of ignorant and naive voters.
I also think that if the politicians are corrupt they will just find a way will steal twice as much in two terms as they would steal in three or four terms. That is just their greedy , immoral, unethical nature.
To think that a two term limit would change things is probably a false assumption.
Glorya

Norcross, GA

#5289 Mar 27, 2013
Man in Plaid wrote:
In response to Bill and Glorya,
I believe that one reason for the immoral behavior of some elected officials arises from the scripted nature of their lives. Once they begin to campaign for a major office, they are groomed to appear a certain way. A team of speech writers create talking-points-based texts for them to read that ensures that they will say the right thing to the right audiences. Their campaign writers amp up their biography to make them appear as nearly superhuman figures, and this hyperbole is a must because they all must confront the task of overcoming and eradicating the evil perpetrated by the current officeholder. And of course, their elections are described as epic exertions of the undeniable voice of the people who cried out in despair to the gods of democracy, and said gods delivered in the form of the semi-divine politician who shall lead the bitterly oppressed, or the merely irritated, to a state of unimaginable liberty.
Imagine being such a person. Hearing such overblown rhetoric and playing such a role over the course of an eighteen month campaign would have a way of working on one's self image. As a result, some officials embrace the caricature of the mythic leader who transcends the laws of reality and society that bind the rest of us. This is no different from celebrities and major professional athletes who scoff at reality and do as they please when they please. They somehow disconnect from the simple fact that actions, sooner or later, have consequences. In the case of some figures of this status, I believe that they become dissociated from their senses of self. Consequently, the role that they play in public life carries over to private life, and the results are always embarrassing and sometimes scary.
In regard to the issue of the best candidates not running, I wonder if well-grounded people with a sense of integrity would put up with the theatrics of political life. It seems like a fine way to be ruined, if one isn't careful. Take the example of Herman Cain. I didn't believe that he was presidential material, personally. But, I think his downfall shows one of the most troubling facets of contemporary American politics. If they don't like you, or if you pose a threat, then get ready for a smear job. I don't know if any or all of the allegations made against him were true, but it didn't matter. If the opposition can find or fabricate the right kind of dirt and make people believe it at an opportune moment, you're done, plain and simple.
They'll dig and dig until they get that scoop of dirt. Then, turn into mud & the smearing begins, even before campaigns get off the ground. I remember one or 2 dropped out because it was discovered they had illegal immigrants gardners/housekeepers. And the media flies with it. You are so right.

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#5290 Mar 27, 2013
Columbus Native wrote:
Well while the great republicans on this post stew, jerk, and whine, I will enjoy the next 3 years 10 months knowing that they are so upset. Get my government check next wednesday for which I have been paying into the system for 45 years, and knowing f-up republicans will not be able to Euthanize( Privatize) the system. Thanks again to our president who will see to it we are covered under Medicare and Medicaid. Also I am expecting a slight Cost Of Living pay increase next January. Now about mitt and his b-tch wishing they could of had a chance at America's financial wealth? Ain't gonna happen in my lifetime.
Your post made me burst out laughing. You make a bucket of rocks seem smart.

On the sad side, you have NO IDEA what you are heading for.

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#5291 Mar 27, 2013
Columbus Native wrote:
Well while the great republicans on this post stew, jerk, and whine, I will enjoy the next 3 years 10 months knowing that they are so upset. Get my government check next wednesday for which I have been paying into the system for 45 years, and knowing f-up republicans will not be able to Euthanize( Privatize) the system. Thanks again to our president who will see to it we are covered under Medicare and Medicaid. Also I am expecting a slight Cost Of Living pay increase next January. Now about mitt and his b-tch wishing they could of had a chance at America's financial wealth? Ain't gonna happen in my lifetime.
I truly don't know of anyone who is stewing about all of this. Most people I know are concerned, but were/are prepared financially, etc. So, sorry to rain on your parade. I DO feel a bit sorry for you, though. You are eaten up with bitterness and envy. Sad.
Glorya

Norcross, GA

#5292 Mar 27, 2013
http://www.washingtonguardian.com/study-healt...

Maybe this link will be some proof of what is about to come.

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#5293 Mar 27, 2013
Glorya wrote:
http://www.washingtonguardian. com/study-health-overhaul-rais e-claims-cost-32-pct-1
Maybe this link will be some proof of what is about to come.
The low information, uninformed voters won't believe this. They are living in some kind of bubble. For whatever reason, they are convinced they will be immune to all of this. Pretty incredible.
Thanks for the link.
formerresident

Decatur, GA

#5294 Mar 27, 2013
Bigdave1 wrote:
Many people think that there should be term limits to stop this political corruption. I used to think that was a good idea but have rethought the whole idea.
Yes these politicians are liars and are corrupted but the people put them in office again and again, knowing what morals and ethics they have. The politician should be blamed for being an unethical liar and possible thief, but the voters put him in there and it is the voters responsibility to vote him out. That is the American way. It is not up to the politicians to educate the ignorant masses of voters so that they will pick the right man for the office. Politicians get away with everything because of ignorant and naive voters.
I also think that if the politicians are corrupt they will just find a way will steal twice as much in two terms as they would steal in three or four terms. That is just their greedy , immoral, unethical nature.
To think that a two term limit would change things is probably a false assumption.
We the public look for what is wrong in our leaders, rather then what is right. The media loves the trash. We idealize then devalue. People are complicated. We all have strengths and limitations. We have things that are great about us, and we have our personal failings. Why do we think politicians or athletes are immune from being humans?
2. Politicians are televised. Jimmy Carter didn't have much television presence. Perhaps that is why he got so much credit as being the best "ex president". He was off camera.
3. FDR was elected for four terms. He wouldn't make it for one, with polio today, in a wheelchair.
4. Ronald Reagan was hugely popular. He was a great orator.
5. Why don't we have checks and balances so that the stealing doesn't happen. It seems like land deals back door is how so many of them become wealthy. What price are we the people paying for no checks and balances? We focus on foodstamp fraud. Piddly compared to the dollars stolen at the top. We are focussing on somebody who might be ripping off the system at 100 a month, while ignoring those stealing millions from the taxpayer. I don't get it.
6. If we could get out of this "democrat"/ "republican" labeling, maybe we could actually get something done again.
7. It takes money, but we are paying a very heavy price by placing money at the top of the list of what we value. We have moved away from our core values.
8. People don't get involved. We are trained that the only people with voices are lawyers.
Man in Plaid

Birmingham, AL

#5295 Mar 27, 2013
Aggie23 wrote:
Well, Columbus Native is still mostly full of nonsense, I see.
- 67% non Republican? Than how did Romney get 48% of the vote - surprise, surprise, your numbers don't add up
- However, you are absolutely right that Gingrich let the 1994 incoming freshman Republicans down when he backed a 12 year term limit plan that went nowhere, instead of the 6-8 year limit that they wanted. Can't argue with you there.
- Don't worry about Republicans "euthanizing" "the system", worry more about Democrats pushing euthanasia for the elderly - that is far more likely. Remember Obama's suggestion for the 100 year old woman whose doctor said her only hope was a pacemaker that "maybe she would be better off taking a pain killer."
- so explain your vulgar comment about Mrs. Romney who from all appearances is a woman of character and grace who raised 5 sons. The Romneys gave away in charity far more than the Clintons, Gores, Bidens, and Obamas combined. Democrats are the ones who come into office with nothing and than parlay it into millions.
So am I mad, yes. I am mad that 51% of those that voted were too uninformed or too partisan to realize the disaster that putting Obama back in office could be for this country.
Sadly, many of those within this fifty-one percent don't care if the country falls off a cliff as long as they get their checks on schedule.
Glorya

Norcross, GA

#5296 Mar 27, 2013
Synergy wrote:
<quoted text>
The low information, uninformed voters won't believe this. They are living in some kind of bubble. For whatever reason, they are convinced they will be immune to all of this. Pretty incredible.
Thanks for the link.
I didn't read all 111 comments, most are FED UP & upset & wonder how it came to this.

Since: Jul 12

Douglasville, GA

#5297 Mar 27, 2013
formerresident wrote:
<quoted text>
We the public look for what is wrong in our leaders, rather then what is right. The media loves the trash. We idealize then devalue. People are complicated. We all have strengths and limitations. We have things that are great about us, and we have our personal failings. Why do we think politicians or athletes are immune from being humans?
2. Politicians are televised. Jimmy Carter didn't have much television presence. Perhaps that is why he got so much credit as being the best "ex president". He was off camera.
3. FDR was elected for four terms. He wouldn't make it for one, with polio today, in a wheelchair.
4. Ronald Reagan was hugely popular. He was a great orator.
5. Why don't we have checks and balances so that the stealing doesn't happen. It seems like land deals back door is how so many of them become wealthy. What price are we the people paying for no checks and balances? We focus on foodstamp fraud. Piddly compared to the dollars stolen at the top. We are focussing on somebody who might be ripping off the system at 100 a month, while ignoring those stealing millions from the taxpayer. I don't get it.
6. If we could get out of this "democrat"/ "republican" labeling, maybe we could actually get something done again.
7. It takes money, but we are paying a very heavy price by placing money at the top of the list of what we value. We have moved away from our core values.
8. People don't get involved. We are trained that the only people with voices are lawyers.
Why don't we have checks and balances? The answer is obvious. The people making the laws are the ones that make the checks and balances. They give themselves pay raises and every perk that one can think of. By doing that the taxpayer is giving them everything that they want. They have control over the news media which fails to inform the public just what rotten things these politicians have done.
Yes, we are being striped of money but the far worse thing is that we are being striped of our freedom.
jeb stuart

Jesup, GA

#5298 Mar 27, 2013
formerresident wrote:
<quoted text>
We the public look for what is wrong in our leaders, rather then what is right. The media loves the trash. We idealize then devalue. People are complicated. We all have strengths and limitations. We have things that are great about us, and we have our personal failings. Why do we think politicians or athletes are immune from being humans?
2. Politicians are televised. Jimmy Carter didn't have much television presence. Perhaps that is why he got so much credit as being the best "ex president". He was off camera.
3. FDR was elected for four terms. He wouldn't make it for one, with polio today, in a wheelchair.
4. Ronald Reagan was hugely popular. He was a great orator.
5. Why don't we have checks and balances so that the stealing doesn't happen. It seems like land deals back door is how so many of them become wealthy. What price are we the people paying for no checks and balances? We focus on foodstamp fraud. Piddly compared to the dollars stolen at the top. We are focussing on somebody who might be ripping off the system at 100 a month, while ignoring those stealing millions from the taxpayer. I don't get it.
6. If we could get out of this "democrat"/ "republican" labeling, maybe we could actually get something done again.
7. It takes money, but we are paying a very heavy price by placing money at the top of the list of what we value. We have moved away from our core values.
8. People don't get involved. We are trained that the only people with voices are lawyers.
number 6 on your list would be number one on mine.

Since: Jul 12

Douglasville, GA

#5299 Mar 27, 2013
Aggie23 wrote:
@Man in Plaid - Great post.
When the only outlets for information were newspapers and network television, there truly was a monopoly on information outlets and the public was pretty much at the mercy of the ideology of those who ran the newspapers and networks. These were and are dominated by those with leftward leanings. With the rise of talk radio - which I happily agree does lean right, a different view point was readily available for the first time. But most importantly of all, the internet has made information available for any who want it and are willing to do a little work. You still have to deal with the possible slant that may exist on what you find on the net, but there is also information available that is strictly factual with no inherent bias. You can find out exactly what tax revenue the govt receives and who pays it. You can find out the percentages of people in a state that supported a candidate. You can read opinions straight from the source rather than going through someone else's filter. It may still not be fool proof, but never has an individual been able to school themselves on a subject with such ease.
As to your points about career politicians on both sides of the aisle - couldn't agree more. Which is why I would love to see term limits. Let's get back to what the Founders envisioned - citizen legislators who SERVED for a period of time and then went back to the real world.
I don't know if you have noticed or not but the internet is being cleaned. It used to be there were many facts on it that showed different points of views but now it is getting like the nightly news. Go to one site and read it and then you are looking for a different angle on a story but they are all written by the same person. Many of the different sites now use the same story, word for word. Just as the news media has been doing. The story is the same and the words are identical right from the White House.
For example just look up almost anything on Obama and the same stories will be on site after site. You will probably not find anything on the legitimate web pertaining to him that is not been cleaned. I was looking up communism the other night and I was shocked to see how all the sites made communism look like it was a great idea. I have seen stories that have come out and within an hour or two disappear because they had something in them that the government or this administration didn't want you to see. Even the web is being censured right in front of your eyes.
This is the last piece of the puzzle that must be controlled to complete the new agenda. Almost all the news that is now being put on the web, which is more than tv, is approved by the higher powers to be. There are a few rouge news media outlets but even Fox pretty much goes along with the flow since a couple of years ago.
I have seen people starting to make a controversial statement on Fox and the station would go off the air for about a minute until that comment was over. This has happened several times lately.
With censorship the masses will always be ignorant. Even this site deletes controversial statements. I think this is the new norm.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Brunswick Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Anti-Gay Pastor Found Guilty Of Molesting Teena... Apr 17 Here is what I 7
What McIntosh/Darien does not want you to know (May '13) Apr 14 Showtime 35
Speed Trap along the I-95 corridor in Mcintosh ... (Nov '15) Apr 14 Showtime 32
News Melvin Shares Life Story in Young Stranger Apr 12 Greg B 1
Creative Landscaping Mar 31 Stole from me 1
Part 12 Guy Heinze Jr. (May '10) Mar 28 Meme 1,227
ex sheriff bennett Mar 28 in the know 1

Brunswick Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Brunswick Mortgages