Who do you support for U.S. Senate in...
same

Jefferson, GA

#39707 Mar 24, 2014
goodbye wrote:
<quoted text>You live in perpetual fog. The Senate is just one of the 3 branches of government. 1/2 of 1/3 tried to change a law without changing a law. by applying economic pressure to the rest of the country. With the votes, you can change a law, without them you can't. You can take a law to the Supreme Court and get it overturned, you tried it didn't work. You people just don'ts seem to understand that, or you just don't care. Nobody is saying ObamaCare was ready to launch, the web site had problems that the people who built it couldn't comprehend. That's a result of the way government is forced to award contracts, the best and brightest will never be cheapest. The story of how a group of Obama supporters' from tech land in Californian, big time programmers and head of tech companies offered to fix it for free. But some silly law wouldn't allow that, so they we paid a fraction of what they normally make, and fixed the site, it took months, it now works very well. One of the interesting stories you don't get from FNC.
Polls show that the majority of Americans are against ObamaCare, they run that fact on FNC all the time. What they don't say is that a majority of Americans are in favor of fixing it, not killing it, that's just not going to happen. The train has left the station and the insurance companies are actually in business making money. People who didn't have insurance are getting quality insurance at a good price, if they quality they get help. People who couldn't get insurance because of pre-existing, now can. People who have gamed the system and not paid for insurance, at least now they will pay a venality. Republicans we in favor of a health care bill when Clinton was in office. The Republicans have never put for anything serious to address health care issues. Our health care system if putting the county out of business, ever more out of business that Bush 2 could do, as hard as he tried.

Think I am a liberal, not hardly. Just can't tolerate the tactics of the idiot fringe that you embrace, but don't really understand. Run another Bush, run Jeb, I WILL vote for him. I will not vote for anyone who embraces the tea party. And I am more of a majority than you are, and that's the Republican Party's biggest problem. As long as the tea party has influence in the party it will not succeed on a national level. It will do just fine in poor southern states. States with historically low education standards, large African American populations, low wages, high obesity rates, a larger percentage of smokers etc, get the picture?

Goodbye!

Heck ....you came into this forum a dummy .....and if your goodbye means this is your last post, then you 'll leave as a dummy also.

I personally made every effort to educate you to the truth of things ......but your insistence on remaining a dummy is far from me not putting forth an effort to correct you from your errors....



“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#39708 Mar 24, 2014
AnybodyButDeal wrote:
<quoted text>

You can pander to the Republicans to get you SOME relief IF YOU ARE WEALTHY. But if you are a worker then the Republican "Partly" is the wrong place to go for support.
Just curious. You liberals keep crying about the wealthy Republicans. Do you honestly think there are NO wealthy Democrats? Do you honestly think that wealthy Democrats don't have as much a stronghold on this country as wealthy Republicans?

If you are so sure about misguided support by some of us, then you must surely agree that blacks are supporting the wrong party by supporting the Democrats. After all, the Democrats are responsible for starting the KKK. We won't even go into how the Democrat "powers that be" are keeping the blacks and poor enslaved through entitlements.

"There are two Americas. The American that works, and the American that doesn't. The America that contributes, and the America that doesn't. It's not the haves and the have nots, it's the dos and the don'ts. Some people do their duty as Americans, obey the law, support themselves, contribute to society, and others don't. That's the divide in America. It's not about INCOME INEQUALITY, it's about civic irresponsibility. It's about a political party that preaches hatred, greed and victimization in order to win elective office. It's about a political party that loves power more than it loves its country. That's not invective, that's truth.
The politics of envy was on proud display a couple of weeks ago when President Obama pledged the rest of his term to fight "income inequality." The noted that some people make more than other people, that some people have higher incomes than others, and he says that's not just. THAT is the rationale of thievery. The other guy has it, you want it, Obama will take it for you. Vote Democrat. That is the electoral philosophy that is destroying America. It conceals a fundamental deviation from American values and common sense because it ends up not benefiting the people who support it, but a betrayal. The Democrats have not empowered their followers, they have enslaved them in a culture of dependence and entitlement, of victim-hood and anger instead of ability and hope. The president's premise-that you reduce income inequality be debasing the successful-seeks to deny the successful the consequences of their choices and spare the unsuccessful the consequences of their choices."

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#39709 Mar 24, 2014
AnybodyButDeal wrote:
Just shut up, sit down and eat your gubmint inspected and gubmint approved gruel with the rest of us.
Take your gubmint FDA approved medicine like a real man.
"Income variations in society is a result of different choices leading to different consequences. Those who choose wisely and responsibly have a far greater likelihood of success, while those who choose foolishly and irresponsibly have a far greater likelihood of failure. Success and failure usually manifest themselves in personal and family income. You choose to drop out of high school or to skip college--and you are apt to have a different outcome than someone who gets a diploma and pushes on with purposeful education. You have your children out of wedlock and life is apt to take one course; you have them within a marriage and life is apt to take another course. Most often in life our destination is determined by the course we take.
My doctor, for example, makes far more than I do. There is significant income inequality between us. Our lives have had an inequality of outcome, but, our lives also have had an inequality of effort. While my doctor went to college and then devoted his young adulthood to medical school and residency, I got a job in a restaurant. He made a choice, I made a choice, and our choices led us to different outcomes. His outcome pays a lot better than mine. Does that mean he cheated and Barack Obama needs to take away his wealth? No, it means we are both free men in a free society where free choices lead to different outcomes."

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#39710 Mar 24, 2014
AnybodyButDeal wrote:
Just shut up, sit down and eat your gubmint inspected and gubmint approved gruel with the rest of us.
Take your gubmint FDA approved medicine like a real man.
"It's not inequality Barack Obama intends to take away, it is freedom. The freedom to succeed, and the freedom to fail. There is no true option for success if there is no true option for failure. The pursuit of happiness means a whole lot less when you face the punitive hand of government if your pursuit brings you more happiness than the other guy. Even if the other guy sat on his arse and did nothing. Even if the other guy made a lifetime's worth of asinine and shortsighted decisions. Barack Obama and the Democrats preach equality of outcome as a right, while completely ignoring inequality of effort. The simple Law of the Harvest -- as ye sow, so shall ye reap--is sometimes applied as, "The harder you work, the more you get." Obama would turn that upside down. Those who achieve are to be punished as enemies of society and those who fail are to be rewarded as wards of society. Entitlement will replace effort as the key to upward mobility in American society if Barack Obama gets his way. He seeks a lowest common denominator society in which the government besieges the successful and productive to foster equality through mediocrity. He and his party speak of two Americas, and their grip on power is based on using the votes of one to sap the productivity of the other. America is not divided by the differences in our outcomes, it is divided by the differences in our efforts. It is a false philosophy to say one man's success comes about unavoidably as the result of another man's victimization. What Obama offered was not a solution, but a separatism. He fomented division and strife, pitted one set of Americans against another for his own political benefit. That's what socialists offer. Marxist class warfare wrapped up with a bow. Two Americas, coming closer each day to proving the truth to Lincoln's maxim that a house divided against itself cannot stand."

Since: Jul 12

Douglasville, GA

#39711 Mar 24, 2014
Synergy wrote:
<quoted text>
"It's not inequality Barack Obama intends to take away, it is freedom. The freedom to succeed, and the freedom to fail. There is no true option for success if there is no true option for failure. The pursuit of happiness means a whole lot less when you face the punitive hand of government if your pursuit brings you more happiness than the other guy. Even if the other guy sat on his arse and did nothing. Even if the other guy made a lifetime's worth of asinine and shortsighted decisions. Barack Obama and the Democrats preach equality of outcome as a right, while completely ignoring inequality of effort. The simple Law of the Harvest -- as ye sow, so shall ye reap--is sometimes applied as, "The harder you work, the more you get." Obama would turn that upside down. Those who achieve are to be punished as enemies of society and those who fail are to be rewarded as wards of society. Entitlement will replace effort as the key to upward mobility in American society if Barack Obama gets his way. He seeks a lowest common denominator society in which the government besieges the successful and productive to foster equality through mediocrity. He and his party speak of two Americas, and their grip on power is based on using the votes of one to sap the productivity of the other. America is not divided by the differences in our outcomes, it is divided by the differences in our efforts. It is a false philosophy to say one man's success comes about unavoidably as the result of another man's victimization. What Obama offered was not a solution, but a separatism. He fomented division and strife, pitted one set of Americans against another for his own political benefit. That's what socialists offer. Marxist class warfare wrapped up with a bow. Two Americas, coming closer each day to proving the truth to Lincoln's maxim that a house divided against itself cannot stand."
+1 Excellent post!! Looks to me that you have it figured out to the last t being crossed. Of course the dummies that post against you will deny it and call you names. That is all they have left.

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#39712 Mar 24, 2014
@ Syn, those posts were outstanding. Thanks for sharing.

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#39713 Mar 24, 2014
goodbye wrote:
<quoted text>
You live in perpetual fog. The Senate is just one of the 3 branches of government. 1/2 of 1/3 tried to change a law without changing a law. by applying economic pressure to the rest of the country. With the votes, you can change a law, without them you can't. You can take a law to the Supreme Court and get it overturned, you tried it didn't work. You people just don'ts seem to understand that, or you just don't care. Nobody is saying ObamaCare was ready to launch, the web site had problems that the people who built it couldn't comprehend. That's a result of the way government is forced to award contracts, the best and brightest will never be cheapest. The story of how a group of Obama supporters' from tech land in Californian, big time programmers and head of tech companies offered to fix it for free. But some silly law wouldn't allow that, so they we paid a fraction of what they normally make, and fixed the site, it took months, it now works very well...... People who didn't have insurance are getting quality insurance at a good price, if they quality they get help. People who couldn't get insurance because of pre-existing, now can. People who have gamed the system and not paid for insurance, at least now they will pay a venality. Republicans we in favor of a health care bill when Clinton was in office. The Republicans have never put for anything serious to address health care issues. Our health care system if putting the county out of business, ever more out of business that Bush 2 could do, as hard as he tried.
Think I am a liberal, not hardly..... And I am more of a majority than you are, and that's the Republican Party's biggest problem. As long as the tea party has influence in the party it will not succeed on a national level. It will do just fine in poor southern states. States with historically low education standards, large African American populations, low wages, high obesity rates, a larger percentage of smokers etc, get the picture?
Goodbye!
(Deletions made for space only)
Syn has tried to help you by telling you to quit embarassing yourself and you just don't listen. You are still illustrating a complete ignorance of how our legislative process was supposed to work.

If you think the Obamacare website was offered out for bid, you really are delusional. It was awarded on a no bid basis to CGI Federal, a subsidiary of a CANADIAN firm. High ranking officials in the company contributed to Obama's campaigns and one of the VPs was a classmate of Michelle Obama's.

The website is running very well, really? Then why are we seeing reports of people who went on signed up, PAID and are now being told there is no record of them having insurance. Why are people being told that "yes, we will cover your preexisting condition, but you get to pay for the very expensive medications you need yourself", why are leading cancer centers being TAKEN off the networks of Obamacare insurance policies, why is it the only way the IRS can get a hold of that penalty for not having insurance is by taking it out of a tax refund - if there is no refund, the IRS can do NOTHING to get that penalty. All of these issues have been noted before with the links to support them, not repeating them again.

I couldn't care less if you call yourself a liberal or a martian, it is your blindness to the harm the Democrat policies are doing to this country that boggle the mind. You don't see the harm Obamacare is doing to our healthcare system, you don't see the harm the intractability of Obama and Reid and Obama's arbitrary decisions to "enforce this, don't enforce this, semi-enforce this and DEFINITELY don't enforce that" are doing to the integrity of our legislative and judicial system. Your willful ignorance is both stunning and pathetic.
same

Jefferson, GA

#39714 Mar 24, 2014
Synergy wrote:
<quoted text>"It's not inequality Barack Obama intends to take away, it is freedom. The freedom to succeed, and the freedom to fail. There is no true option for success if there is no true option for failure. The pursuit of happiness means a whole lot less when you face the punitive hand of government if your pursuit brings you more happiness than the other guy. Even if the other guy sat on his arse and did nothing. Even if the other guy made a lifetime's worth of asinine and shortsighted decisions. Barack Obama and the Democrats preach equality of outcome as a right, while completely ignoring inequality of effort. The simple Law of the Harvest -- as ye sow, so shall ye reap--is sometimes applied as, "The harder you work, the more you get." Obama would turn that upside down. Those who achieve are to be punished as enemies of society and those who fail are to be rewarded as wards of society. Entitlement will replace effort as the key to upward mobility in American society if Barack Obama gets his way. He seeks a lowest common denominator society in which the government besieges the successful and productive to foster equality through mediocrity. He and his party speak of two Americas, and their grip on power is based on using the votes of one to sap the productivity of the other. America is not divided by the differences in our outcomes, it is divided by the differences in our efforts. It is a false philosophy to say one man's success comes about unavoidably as the result of another man's victimization. What Obama offered was not a solution, but a separatism. He fomented division and strife, pitted one set of Americans against another for his own political benefit. That's what socialists offer. Marxist class warfare wrapped up with a bow. Two Americas, coming closer each day to proving the truth to Lincoln's maxim that a house divided against itself cannot stand."
I don't know who you're quoting ...,..... but the writer has put into words the thoughts of millions of Americans......

same

Jefferson, GA

#39715 Mar 24, 2014
Aggie23 wrote:
<quoted text>Syn has tried to help you by telling you to quit embarassing yourself and you just don't listen. You are still illustrating a complete ignorance of how our legislative process was supposed to work.

If you think the Obamacare website was offered out for bid, you really are delusional. It was awarded on a no bid basis to CGI Federal, a subsidiary of a CANADIAN firm. High ranking officials in the company contributed to Obama's campaigns and one of the VPs was a classmate of Michelle Obama's.

The website is running very well, really? Then why are we seeing reports of people who went on signed up, PAID and are now being told there is no record of them having insurance. Why are people being told that "yes, we will cover your preexisting condition, but you get to pay for the very expensive medications you need yourself", why are leading cancer centers being TAKEN off the networks of Obamacare insurance policies, why is it the only way the IRS can get a hold of that penalty for not having insurance is by taking it out of a tax refund - if there is no refund, the IRS can do NOTHING to get that penalty. All of these issues have been noted before with the links to support them, not repeating them again.

I couldn't care less if you call yourself a liberal or a martian, it is your blindness to the harm the Democrat policies are doing to this country that boggle the mind. You don't see the harm Obamacare is doing to our healthcare system, you don't see the harm the intractability of Obama and Reid and Obama's arbitrary decisions to "enforce this, don't enforce this, semi-enforce this and DEFINITELY don't enforce that" are doing to the integrity of our legislative and judicial system. Your willful ignorance is both stunning and pathetic.
Dummies don't know they are dumb ....... and refuse to cross the red line into knowledge......or hit the reset button to start over.......

Those who refuse are doomed in dummyLand for eternity......

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#39716 Mar 24, 2014
same wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't know who you're quoting ...,..... but the writer has put into words the thoughts of millions of Americans......
I just realized I didn't include his name at the end. Sorry.

Bob Lonsberry from Rochester, NY. He nailed it better than anyone I have read or heard. Genius. He is a radio personality. It wouldn't matter if he was a ditch digger. He NAILED it.
His description of what has been and is happening can't be denied.
AnybodyButDeal

United States

#39717 Mar 25, 2014
Bush divided the country.
Republicans have seen to it that PRESIDENT Obama couldn't reunite the country. Today we have seen the Republican attempt to use religion to control the masses. These is the same greedy slim that says there should be any "slimy' unions.

Disparity between low wage workers and the CEOs is a huge problem of greed.

Republicans and their nuts, like those here, that keep yapping on their fears of socialism and driving out labor unions is the very thing that would push any country into socialistic revolution.

Such a thing takes the roll of the union, that of giving the worker fair representation, and places that roll onto the government and into government laws, real socialism.

Example is when the government is FORCED to raise the worker's wages through minimum wage increases in order to counter corporate greed.

That is insanity. Especially when the Republicans start their whining.
AnybodyButDeal

United States

#39718 Mar 25, 2014
Any Democratic attempt to provide or expand healthcare coverage, even if it ultimately fails, is better than no attempt nothing in healthcare as provided by the Republicans.
AnybodyButDeal

United States

#39719 Mar 25, 2014
Workers need to revolt not to overthrow the government but to overthrow the Republican "Partly".
same

Jefferson, GA

#39720 Mar 25, 2014


"Has Nasa found a new Earth? Astronomer discovers first same-sized planet in a 'Goldilocks zone' that could host alien life."



I suggest we send a probe there to determine first if libroids live there..........if so, we can avoid a calamity by bypassing that sorry planet..........and not dumping trillions into it's economy and crashing the economy of the Universe..........


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/articl...

WasBushStupid

United States

#39721 Mar 25, 2014
BTW, there is no indication anywhere that Bush knew how many states we have or cared as long as he was "the dictator"(his words).

"I didn't grow up in the ocean -- as a matter of fact -- near the ocean -- I grew up in the desert. Therefore, it was a pleasant contrast to see the ocean. And I particularly like it when I'm fishing." --George W. Bush, Washington, D.C., Sept. 26, 2008

"Anyone engaging in illegal financial transactions will be caught and persecuted." --George W. Bush, Washington, D.C., Sept. 19, 2008

"We're fixing to go down to Galveston and obviously are going to see a devastated part of this fantastic state." --George W. Bush, Houston, Sept. 16, 2008
same

Jefferson, GA

#39722 Mar 25, 2014


"World Famous Bear Trainer Barack Obama "


http://conservativebyte.com/2014/03/world-fam...

Scott

Dahlonega, GA

#39723 Mar 25, 2014
AnybodyButDeal wrote:
Bush divided the country.
Republicans have seen to it that PRESIDENT Obama couldn't reunite the country. Today we have seen the Republican attempt to use religion to control the masses. These is the same greedy slim that says there should be any "slimy' unions.
Disparity between low wage workers and the CEOs is a huge problem of greed.
Republicans and their nuts, like those here, that keep yapping on their fears of socialism and driving out labor unions is the very thing that would push any country into socialistic revolution.
Such a thing takes the roll of the union, that of giving the worker fair representation, and places that roll onto the government and into government laws, real socialism.
Example is when the government is FORCED to raise the worker's wages through minimum wage increases in order to counter corporate greed.
That is insanity. Especially when the Republicans start their whining.
Someone said on her that you're not so funny. I sure have to disagree since you really made me laugh this morning. But, I do have some questions:

What is a "greedy slim"? Is that maybe Slim Whitman or maybe Slim Pickens?

What is a Union "roll"? Would that be like a dinner roll or maybe a cinnamon roll made by a union worker?

How would workers untie against "Republicans partly"?

Anyway, thanks for the laughs.
same

Jefferson, GA

#39724 Mar 25, 2014


A quote from Syn's non-favorite political hack..........between Reid and Pelosi, their clown act is tiresome..........


"UNREAL: Harry Reid Says Republicans May Have Helped Putin Invade Crimea…"


http://weaselzippers.us/180516-unreal-harry-r...

AnybodyButDeal

United States

#39725 Mar 25, 2014
Correction:
These is the same greedy slim that says there should NOT be any "slimy' unions.
same

Jefferson, GA

#39726 Mar 25, 2014


"Climate scientists refuse to debate global warming ‘skeptics’ in the media"


Guess they are afraid of being "shown" up as wacko leftists..........


http://dailycaller.com/2014/03/24/climate-sci...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Brunswick Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Speed Trap along the I-95 corridor in Mcintosh ... (Nov '15) Aug 22 Carlo c 11
pillpoppers (Nov '10) Aug 16 sick 11
Local cop rides with 1%MC club (Sep '13) Aug 15 Anonymous 15
What Y'all think of District Attorney Jackie Jo... (Nov '11) Aug 12 Justice for Jerrod 102
Part 12 Guy Heinze Jr. (May '10) Aug 10 Guilty 1,203
Family doctor recommendation in or around Bruns... Aug 8 NewToGA 1
What McIntosh/Darien does not want you to know (May '13) Jul '16 Nteri 26

Brunswick Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Brunswick Mortgages