Who do you support for U.S. Senate in...
ChicknButt

Douglasville, GA

#37652 Feb 19, 2014
SPAM - He's an idiot.
time wrote:
<quoted text>
this from a dummy who cant find 2 items on a graph..........
The items weren't on the graph. That's the whole-point ape-boy.
ChicknButt

Douglasville, GA

#37653 Feb 19, 2014
time wrote:
<quoted text>
well heck..........this dummy has let the cat out of the bag..........so dummy Butt will now know I own him..........my bad..........
you could have painted him a pic..........and he still would not have got it..........
but noooooooooooooo..........you had to be a blabber mouth..........
Really, sincerely - please tell us - WTF is WRONG with you?
time

Hiawassee, GA

#37654 Feb 19, 2014

Global warming alert!!!!!


Another polar vortex expected to hit america once again next week..........

Folks are getting out their bathing suits in expectation of that warming trend..........

time

Hiawassee, GA

#37655 Feb 19, 2014
ChicknButt wrote:
SPAM - He's an idiot.
<quoted text>
The items weren't on the graph. That's the whole-point ape-boy.

yes they were dummy..........temp on the left and time on the bottom..........

the time was 50 years and so was the temps..........the temps in both graph patterns matched..........Two different 50 year cycles, and the temps go up and down in tandem together..........

hence..........global warming is a man made attempt for gubmints to get more money in order to better control the people..........




Devils Advocate

Douglas, GA

#37657 Feb 19, 2014
Most liberroids remind me of a pack of sled dogs. 8-10 dogs following the lead dog. The lead dog being Obammy, all the rest always have the same view. LOL
ChicknButt

Douglasville, GA

#37658 Feb 19, 2014
Here's the actual Hadley Crut3 chart, with actual markings. See any difference between the two time periods? You bet you do.

The chart posted by Vegetable-Brain is clearly deceiving information purely intended for propaganda purposes.

http://www.climate-skeptic.com/wp-content/upl...

You right wing whacko's are such suckers for propaganda.

Here's another important chart that's worth a look at:

http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/the-curio...
ChicknButt

Douglasville, GA

#37659 Feb 19, 2014
Devils Advocate wrote:
Most liberroids remind me of a pack of sled dogs. 8-10 dogs following the lead dog. The lead dog being Obammy, all the rest always have the same view. LOL
Sometimes it's necessary to translate the intention of the communications from the simple-minded into actual expressive language. In the above case I think he was trying to say this:

Many enlightened thinkers who believe in logic and for fair treatment for all men are reminiscent of the great relationships we see in nature. In this case the brilliant vision of President of the United States of America Barrack Hussein Obama is fully supported by those who put people above corporations and the greedy wealthy. All are united in working to provide the best for the citizens of the land. This is similar to a lead dog being supported by his capable and willing team to achieve a common goal.

Of course there are always a few dogs that just roll in their own poop and refuse to do anything useful. Most observers of nature call those miserable dogs a "Republican Congress".

See how much better that reads?

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#37660 Feb 19, 2014
Cbutt wrote:
<quoted text>
Talk about your hyperbole.
Are you defending that disgusting individual? Seriously?
time

Hiawassee, GA

#37661 Feb 19, 2014
ChicknButt wrote:
Here's the actual Hadley Crut3 chart, with actual markings. See any difference between the two time periods? You bet you do.
The chart posted by Vegetable-Brain is clearly deceiving information purely intended for propaganda purposes.
http://www.climate-skeptic.com/wp-content/upl...
You right wing whacko's are such suckers for propaganda.
Here's another important chart that's worth a look at:
http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/the-curio...


You make every effort to deceive..........but fail continually..........as you do with all your posts and misdirection data..........no honesty with this poster.......

your still my dummy..........I own you..........

what's in a chart huh??????????

well.........my chart was about temperatures..........your chart was about carbon dioxide.......

and since you like your charts so much..........I bet'cha didnt see the logo on your chart you put before us..........Junkscience,com... ......you should go there, might learn a thing or 2..........


http://www.globalwarmingclassroom.info/images...
" When global ground measured temperatures are compared to satellite measured temperatures, the satellite measured temperatures show far less warming. Satellite measurements can measure temperature to 0.07oC. Numerous research studies have also shown that these satellite temperatures agree well with real-time radiosonde balloon measurements of the earth's atmosphere.(Radiosonde balloons are released several times a day at various places around the earth, which report back the temperature and other data as they rise through the atmosphere. Since most of the ground measured temperatures are contaminated with heat island error, a growing number of scientists are concerned the global ground temperatures are hopelessly corrupted. "


and why are they corrupted??????????
http://www.globalwarmingclassroom.info/images...
"The heat island effect is a term describing how the growth of cities around historic temperature measuring stations can artificially raise the temperature for the city by 12oF. This happens because what used to be open fields and forests many decades ago around the measuring station are now buildings with asphalt roofs and parking lots which absorb the sun's energy and heating up the surrounding area. This has nothing to do with global warming and everything to do with land use changes. The heat island effect introduces a tremendous artificial warming error if this corrupted data is used without making a correction to determine the change in global temperatures around the world. The correction is very hard to do. Most of the global temperature data still has this error. The only set of data in which an attempt has been made to remove this source of error is the United States. Even though recent research shows this data still has some of the heat island effect error in it, most of it is removed and when plotted shows that the warmest period in the past 100 years occurred between 1925 and 1945, not the 1990s and 2000s.

The graphic to the left shows infrared photography of Atlanta, Georgia during the day (above) and night (below). The more red there is, the warmer the temperature. The greener it is, the cooler the temperature. Normal forests and fields in Georgia during the day would be a mustard green, not the hot red that is seen in the upper photo. At night it would be a cool green, not the mustard green/orange seen in the bottom photo, indicating the city still is much warmer than it would otherwise be. "

I've got more graphs..........many more, to debunk the libroids efforts to pillage the treasures of the world so greedy men like Gore can get rich..........


“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#37662 Feb 19, 2014
AnyoneButDeal wrote:
Just a couple points for information.
Bile used in the proper place is a good thing. Try eating your greasy possum without it.
EBT as in EBT card stands for Electronic Bank Transfer and Electronic Benefits Transfer. Many cards can be referred to as EBT cards. The SNAP EBT replaced the hardcore food stamps and is regulated electronically to prevent purchase of certain items. Other types by government agencies can be used to buy gas and just about anything PLUS getting cash from ATMs. Tax refunds can now be placed on EBT cards.
Most states are finding new ways to use the EBT including unemployment benefits and such.
Yoiur claim in regard to the SNAP EBT cards is incorrect. That may be what you want to believe and that may be what the original intent was, but it's not workng out that way. SURELY, you don't believe that.

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#37663 Feb 19, 2014
ChicknButt wrote:
<quoted text>
Sometimes it's necessary to translate the intention of the communications from the simple-minded into actual expressive language. In the above case I think he was trying to say this:
Many enlightened thinkers who believe in logic and for fair treatment for all men are reminiscent of the great relationships we see in nature. In this case the brilliant vision of President of the United States of America Barrack Hussein Obama is fully supported by those who put people above corporations and the greedy wealthy. All are united in working to provide the best for the citizens of the land. This is similar to a lead dog being supported by his capable and willing team to achieve a common goal.
Of course there are always a few dogs that just roll in their own poop and refuse to do anything useful. Most observers of nature call those miserable dogs a "Republican Congress".
See how much better that reads?
Good gosh! YOU are INSANE. CB, why don't you admit you are a socialist and that is the type of government you want for this country? Leave off all the platitudes and be honest about it for once. I have called you socialist MANY times and you've YET to deny it. Step up.
So! The Democrats in congress are all warm and fuzzy? Is THAT what you are saying?
You didn't address Harry Reid not bringing legislation to the Senate floor for a vote. Why is that?
time

Hiawassee, GA

#37664 Feb 19, 2014
ChicknButt wrote:
<quoted text>
Sometimes it's necessary to translate the intention of the communications from the simple-minded into actual expressive language. In the above case I think he was trying to say this:
Many enlightened thinkers who believe in logic and for fair treatment for all men are reminiscent of the great relationships we see in nature. In this case the brilliant vision of President of the United States of America Barrack Hussein Obama is fully supported by those who put people above corporations and the greedy wealthy. All are united in working to provide the best for the citizens of the land. This is similar to a lead dog being supported by his capable and willing team to achieve a common goal.
Of course there are always a few dogs that just roll in their own poop and refuse to do anything useful. Most observers of nature call those miserable dogs a "Republican Congress".
See how much better that reads?


Har-Har-Har…………….a labroid will never understand the mind of conservative……………
I believe the poster was thinking something along these lines…………..

The best and smartest thinkers believe humans are born equal…………have equal opportunities…………..and either excel or fail according to their efforts to improve themselves………
Conservatives know that “fair treatment” from the mouth of a labroid, is a buzzword for taking from those who have, and giving to those who have not……………..
Everyone may or may not start off at the rear of the dog pack……………and the efforts they put forth will dictate whether or not they remain at the rear of the pack or get to be the leader of the pack…………..some do so honestly, some by hook or crook…….but those who make no effort all never get to be the leader……..
Conservatives believe in giving everyone the same chance…………libroids believe in being followers……….collecting the scraps from the table of their grand leader Obama…………those scraps come from a bountiful table provided by hard working americans whose tax burdens increase each day……and each year………….and if the tax receipts are not enough………..the libroids will increase min wages to put the poorer folks into a higher tax bracket to get more revenue to supply Obamas food table…………

Of course with the libroids feeding off the table of Obama……………..poop gets mixed in with the scraps and the libroids don’t even know it………….

time

Hiawassee, GA

#37665 Feb 19, 2014
time wrote:
<quoted text>
You make every effort to deceive..........but fail continually..........as you do with all your posts and misdirection data..........no honesty with this poster.......
your still my dummy..........I own you..........
what's in a chart huh??????????
well.........my chart was about temperatures..........your chart was about carbon dioxide.......
and since you like your charts so much..........I bet'cha didnt see the logo on your chart you put before us..........Junkscience,com... ......you should go there, might learn a thing or 2..........
http://www.globalwarmingclassroom.info/images...
" When global ground measured temperatures are compared to satellite measured temperatures, the satellite measured temperatures show far less warming. Satellite measurements can measure temperature to 0.07oC. Numerous research studies have also shown that these satellite temperatures agree well with real-time radiosonde balloon measurements of the earth's atmosphere.(Radiosonde balloons are released several times a day at various places around the earth, which report back the temperature and other data as they rise through the atmosphere. Since most of the ground measured temperatures are contaminated with heat island error, a growing number of scientists are concerned the global ground temperatures are hopelessly corrupted. "
and why are they corrupted??????????
http://www.globalwarmingclassroom.info/images...
"The heat island effect is a term describing how the growth of cities around historic temperature measuring stations can artificially raise the temperature for the city by 12oF. This happens because what used to be open fields and forests many decades ago around the measuring station are now buildings with asphalt roofs and parking lots which absorb the sun's energy and heating up the surrounding area. This has nothing to do with global warming and everything to do with land use changes. The heat island effect introduces a tremendous artificial warming error if this corrupted data is used without making a correction to determine the change in global temperatures around the world. The correction is very hard to do. Most of the global temperature data still has this error. The only set of data in which an attempt has been made to remove this source of error is the United States. Even though recent research shows this data still has some of the heat island effect error in it, most of it is removed and when plotted shows that the warmest period in the past 100 years occurred between 1925 and 1945, not the 1990s and 2000s.
The graphic to the left shows infrared photography of Atlanta, Georgia during the day (above) and night (below). The more red there is, the warmer the temperature. The greener it is, the cooler the temperature. Normal forests and fields in Georgia during the day would be a mustard green, not the hot red that is seen in the upper photo. At night it would be a cool green, not the mustard green/orange seen in the bottom photo, indicating the city still is much warmer than it would otherwise be. "
I've got more graphs..........many more, to debunk the libroids efforts to pillage the treasures of the world so greedy men like Gore can get rich..........

Those with sharp eyes will see the temps were the same in 2008 as they were in 1979........actually a little less..........in this link.........

http://www.globalwarmingclassroom.info/images...



time

Hiawassee, GA

#37666 Feb 19, 2014
Synergy wrote:
<quoted text>
Good gosh! YOU are INSANE. CB, why don't you admit you are a socialist and that is the type of government you want for this country? Leave off all the platitudes and be honest about it for once. I have called you socialist MANY times and you've YET to deny it. Step up.
So! The Democrats in congress are all warm and fuzzy? Is THAT what you are saying?
You didn't address Harry Reid not bringing legislation to the Senate floor for a vote. Why is that?

he likes the table scraps..........

thinks getting fat off scraps will warm him up for the polar vortex next week..........or keep him warm this summer..........which will be one of the coolest summers in many years..........for many parts of the country..........


time

Hiawassee, GA

#37667 Feb 20, 2014
ChicknButt wrote:
Here's the actual Hadley Crut3 chart, with actual markings. See any difference between the two time periods? You bet you do.
The chart posted by Vegetable-Brain is clearly deceiving information purely intended for propaganda purposes.
http://www.climate-skeptic.com/wp-content/upl...
You right wing whacko's are such suckers for propaganda.
Here's another important chart that's worth a look at:
http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/the-curio...


Maybe you can save face this way..........

http://randomcartoon.s3.amazonaws.com/40803.J...

time

Hiawassee, GA

#37668 Feb 20, 2014


And the morning report on global warming..........


"For decades this NASA graph based on the database of Great Britain's Climate Research Unit shows a dramatic increase in temperature was accepted by scientists as proving that there was a dramatic increase in earth's temperature starting in the late 1970s. CO2 levels also increased during this period starting in the late 1940s, leading to the conclusion that man was responsible for the temperature increase. However, this data is corrupted with the heat island effect. Also, note that the increase in atmospheric CO2 started in the late 1940s, just when earth was going through a cooling period. The heat island effect is supposed to have been mostly removed from the United States data set, which accounts for one-fourth of the worlds measuring stations. However, in the fall of 2009 and into the winter of 2010, it was revealed that rather than removing the heat island effect, NASA and NOAA may have actually amplified it. Also, the main temperature data base at the Climate Research Unit in Great Britain has deliberately corrupted the database used in producing the graph."

this is the false data graph..........
http://www.globalwarmingclassroom.info/images...


the above corrected by..........

"A serious error was found in the NASA temperature data for the United States in 2007. When corrected, it was determined that the warmest year in the past 100 years was not in 1998 and 2006 as previously believed, but was 1934, followed 1998. 1921 became the third hottest year, followed by 2006 and 1933. Out of the five hottest years, three occurred in the 1920s and 30s and only two were in the past 10 years. Notice that the US data do not have the same steep increase in temperature shown in the corrupted data of Britain's Climate Research Unit's data in the graph above. This dramatically changes scientists understanding of the importance of the warming that has occurred since 1975. The period between 1995 and 2009 is no warmer than the period between 1920 and 1935. This error in the NASA data has lead to discoveries of other errors in the data which are raising concern about data integrity of NASA's Goddard Institute of Space Studies."

http://www.globalwarmingclassroom.info/images...



and the immediate above was corrected by this..........

"When global ground measured temperatures are compared to satellite measured temperatures, the satellite measured temperatures show far less warming. Satellite measurements can measure temperature to 0.07oC. Numerous research studies have also shown that these satellite temperatures agree well with real-time radiosonde balloon measurements of the earth's atmosphere.(Radiosonde balloons are released several times a day at various places around the earth, which report back the temperature and other data as they rise through the atmosphere. Since most of the ground measured temperatures are contaminated with heat island error, a growing number of scientists are concerned the global ground temperatures are hopelessly corrupted."

http://www.globalwarmingclassroom.info/images...

Cbutt

Douglasville, GA

#37669 Feb 20, 2014
time wrote:
And the morning report on global warming..........
"For decades this NASA graph based on the database of Great Britain's Climate Research Unit shows a dramatic increase in temperature was accepted by scientists as proving that there was a dramatic increase in earth's temperature starting in the late 1970s. CO2 levels also increased during this period starting in the late 1940s, leading to the conclusion that man was responsible for the temperature increase. However, this data is corrupted with the heat island effect. Also, note that the increase in atmospheric CO2 started in the late 1940s, just when earth was going through a cooling period. The heat island effect is supposed to have been mostly removed from the United States data set, which accounts for one-fourth of the worlds measuring stations. However, in the fall of 2009 and into the winter of 2010, it was revealed that rather than removing the heat island effect, NASA and NOAA may have actually amplified it. Also, the main temperature data base at the Climate Research Unit in Great Britain has deliberately corrupted the database used in producing the graph."
this is the false data graph..........
http://www.globalwarmingclassroom.info/images...
the above corrected by..........
"A serious error was found in the NASA temperature data for the United States in 2007. When corrected, it was determined that the warmest year in the past 100 years was not in 1998 and 2006 as previously believed, but was 1934, followed 1998. 1921 became the third hottest year, followed by 2006 and 1933. Out of the five hottest years, three occurred in the 1920s and 30s and only two were in the past 10 years. Notice that the US data do not have the same steep increase in temperature shown in the corrupted data of Britain's Climate Research Unit's data in the graph above. This dramatically changes scientists understanding of the importance of the warming that has occurred since 1975. The period between 1995 and 2009 is no warmer than the period between 1920 and 1935. This error in the NASA data has lead to discoveries of other errors in the data which are raising concern about data integrity of NASA's Goddard Institute of Space Studies."
http://www.globalwarmingclassroom.info/images...
and the immediate above was corrected by this..........
"When global ground measured temperatures are compared to satellite measured temperatures, the satellite measured temperatures show far less warming. Satellite measurements can measure temperature to 0.07oC. Numerous research studies have also shown that these satellite temperatures agree well with real-time radiosonde balloon measurements of the earth's atmosphere.(Radiosonde balloons are released several times a day at various places around the earth, which report back the temperature and other data as they rise through the atmosphere. Since most of the ground measured temperatures are contaminated with heat island error, a growing number of scientists are concerned the global ground temperatures are hopelessly corrupted."
http://www.globalwarmingclassroom.info/images...
This information was originally presented through "energycentral", written by Bob Ashworth.

About Bob Ashworth: Mr. Ashworth is a chemical engineer and has presented over 50 technical papers on fuels and fuel related subjects. He has worked for Big Energy for his entire career. Next.
WhatAboutMe

United States

#37670 Feb 20, 2014
time wrote:
<quoted text>
A dummy who converts 4 into 8..........and say this ""Since 2000, eight rural hospitals have closed in Georgia.", without a link to back up his lie..........
Wow, what a one-way idiot "time" is.
"time" is the one that first posted the hospital closing article on page 1806 WITHOUT PROVIDING A LINK. But now, wants to declare some posting rule for others to abide by that "time" itself don't use. Typical right wing hypocrite.

Wow, it(8) was in the linked story that I provided, read it. That's why I put it(8) in quotation marks AND PROVIDED THE LINK.

Dang.

Note to new Topix readers: If you don't hate right wing posters and Republicans then just hang around 5 minutes to read their stuff, you will.
WhatAboutMe

United States

#37671 Feb 20, 2014
Synergy wrote:
<quoted text>
Yoiur claim in regard to the SNAP EBT cards is incorrect. That may be what you want to believe and that may be what the original intent was, but it's not workng out that way. SURELY, you don't believe that.
I made no claim and only stated a fact of information. Some people have found loops around every program forever. Even some in the corporate welfare crowd was found to be misusing funds that they received from the government.
Stop being a micro-loser, like "time".

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#37672 Feb 20, 2014
Cbutt wrote:
<quoted text>
Talk about your hyperbole.
That wasn't hyperbole - that last sentence was absolutely beyond the pale.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Brunswick Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Speed Trap along the I-95 corridor in Mcintosh ... (Nov '15) Aug 11 elder abuse 50
Job Corps info. (Aug '11) Aug 10 Jenforbus 6
Looking Aug 10 Truth 10
are great white sharks in altamahal river ? Aug 2 FLNDN 6
Watch Out Woodbine Aug 2 BellSouth 1
What Y'all think of District Attorney Jackie Jo... (Nov '11) Jul 21 Martin gillis 103
Part 12 Guy Heinze Jr. (May '10) Jul '17 Jeb 1,232

Brunswick Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Brunswick Mortgages