Who do you support for U.S. Senate in...

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#35296 Feb 3, 2014
ChicknButt wrote:
<quoted text>
It was a contrived propaganda piece, pure and simple. If you can't discern something that's BEYOND blatantly obvious, you've no credibility whatsoever anymore.
Umm.. wait.....
I didn't mean to imply that ever did in the first place.
I notice you completely ignored the blatant unfairness of allowing those who BROKE THE LAW to receive a status they didn't earn ahead of and in lieu of the people who followed the rules, jumped through the hoops and are either here on legal visas and green cards or are STILL in their native countries WAITING for their turn.

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#35297 Feb 3, 2014
the truth wrote:
<quoted text>
This is really the last time I post here. Its just a few clueless, brainwashed people who think they are conservative. They are not, they are just nuts who hate so much their reality is hate and misinformation. Don't empower them with the belief that someone like you give a rats ass what they think. Its something they just don't do, think.
Stop posting and they will tire of agreeing with each other and go away.
Translation: I'm tired of having my ignorant unsupported posts demolished by posters with the information and facts that prove I'm wrong to the point that all I can do is insult them rather than intelligently argue my position.

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#35298 Feb 3, 2014
Synergy wrote:
<quoted text>
He's gaming you, Aggie. That's what he does.
That's all he's got.

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#35299 Feb 3, 2014
ChicknButt wrote:
The question was: Do you work for an employer to earn a paycheck so that your costs of living can be met?
<quoted text>
It's a simple question. Why won't you answer it? Type in either 3 letters (YES) or 2 letters (NO). That's all.
I strongly suspect that you're divorced, and are living off an alimony settlement and a house awarded to you in the divorce. Or perhaps you're living off an inheritance. If you're old enough, you're probably not refusing social security.
My premise is this: You're living on wealth accumulated and worked for by someone else, not you.
Of course on this forum we'll never know the truth. Odds are good that I don't have it dead accurate, But I think a scenario like the following is likely true:
Bill in Dville- Living on wealth earned by him by providing services to an industry that profits from the sick and dying. Probably collects his social security check. Uses all kinds of sneaky tax-avoidance schemes to keep from paying anything to keep his country running.
Synergy - hasn't earned a dime of her own money through actual work in decades, if ever.
Now - eeking out a meager survival from social security and disability checks and by grilling squirrels.
Aggie - collects her social security check with glee each month. Is signed up for Medicaid.
BigDummy1 - Social Security, maybe disability. Maybe even something through VA.
All of you sit around slurping up Fox News and right-wing talk radio, hypocritically gripping about how people should work, all the while slurping up every benefit you can get your hands on.
And YOU are nothing more than a pimple on the butt of society who thinks he is doing a decent job of covering his socialistic/communistic dream for America. Those on topix who actually support you(perhaps one; maybe two;none?) either aren't bright enough to know what you represent or just go along with your liberal rantings, but don't TRULY understand what you are all about. You have zero integrity, no credibility and certainly no moral compass, so rave on catsh*t. You'll get buried one day. ROTFL

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#35300 Feb 3, 2014
Bill in Dville wrote:
<quoted text>
"It's a simple question. Why won't you answer it? Type in either 3 letters (YES) or 2 letters (NO). That's all."
The irony of this statement, and the entire post, from this poster, is laughable.
"I strongly suspect that you're divorced, and are living off an alimony settlement and a house awarded to you in the divorce. Or perhaps you're living off an inheritance. If you're old enough, you're probably not refusing social security.
My premise is this: You're living on wealth accumulated and worked for by someone else, not you."
Synergy can answer on her own, but perhaps she'll avoid such a bitter and childish post. However, poster is wrong.
"Synergy - hasn't earned a dime of her own money through actual work in decades, if ever.
Now - eeking out a meager survival from social security and disability checks and by grilling squirrels."
Synergy can answer on her own, but perhaps she'll avoid such a bitter and childish post. However, poster is still wrong.
"Bill in Dville- Living on wealth earned by him by providing services to an industry that profits from the sick and dying."
What exact industry would that be? Bet the poster is wrong.
"Probably collects his social security check."
LMAO. Not anywhere near age of being able to collect social security. Wrong again (not surprising, is it?).
"Uses all kinds of sneaky tax-avoidance schemes to keep from paying anything to keep his country running."
If poster is referencing legal tax avoidance ideas, like investing in tax free municipal bonds, utilizing long term capital gains treatment, etc., I would be guilty as "charged". That being said, I would have absolutely no concerns whatsoever if I were audited, wonder if poster could say the same. I pay what is legally required and am sure it's been a helluva lot more than the poster has paid.
"Aggie - collects her social security check with glee each month. Is signed up for Medicaid."
Aggie can answer on her own, but perhaps she'll avoid such a bitter and childish post. However, poster is still wrong.
"But I think"
Poster should quit thinking...It's amazing that such an erudite poster can be so wrong about so many things. That's why he's known as Skippy, like the little barking dog on the porch, so longing for attention. Barking for attention and complaining (as under prior names) when others ignore him...
OBVIOUSLY, duckanddodgebutt has lost what little mind he had. Seriously, he has gone off the d-e-e-p end. Bless his heart.

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#35301 Feb 3, 2014
new wrote:
<quoted text>
here's your narcissist Pres attempting to throw a football.........ht eman is a complete dummy like his followers........
"On Sunday, President Obama celebrated the Super Bowl by having the White House tweet a picture of him throwing a football:"
http://www.truthrevolt.org/news/obama-tweets-...
Is there ANYTHING this man does not try to make about himself:

Commemoration of Rosa Parks refusal to "go to the back of the bus" - tweet of Obama sitting on the bus

Nelson Mandela dies - tweet of Obama standing in Mandela's jail cell -(where he stayed for about 5 minutes, Mandela was there for 27 years)

==========
OBAMA HONORS PEARL HARBOR DEAD WITH PICTURE OF HIMSELF

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/...
==========
And finally, now he has had himself included in the WH biographies of virtually every president of the last century.
"Narcissism update: Obama now inserts himself into online bios of past presidents"

http://news.investors.com/politics-andrew-mal...

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#35302 Feb 3, 2014
TROLL MAN wrote:
<quoted text>
I'd say you pretty much pegged it right.
I'd say it's no surprise you support your alter ego. lolololol BTW, duckanddodgebutt(you) has/have not been right about anything on Topix. Don't feel bad. We don't expect anything from you.

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#35303 Feb 3, 2014
ChicknButt wrote:
Of the right-wing-whackos that post on this page, the only one that actually shows up to a job and works is OMTE. Maybe the General.
That says a lot about the demographic bias inherent in the insane comments the other ones keep posting.
Do you realize how stupid and bitter you sound? Apparently, not. If you are trying to win the pity vote, you've won it.

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#35304 Feb 3, 2014
ChicknButt wrote:
The question was: Do you work for an employer to earn a paycheck so that your costs of living can be met?
<quoted text>
It's a simple question. Why won't you answer it? Type in either 3 letters (YES) or 2 letters (NO). That's all.
I strongly suspect that you're divorced, and are living off an alimony settlement and a house awarded to you in the divorce. Or perhaps you're living off an inheritance. If you're old enough, you're probably not refusing social security.
My premise is this: You're living on wealth accumulated and worked for by someone else, not you.
Of course on this forum we'll never know the truth. Odds are good that I don't have it dead accurate, But I think a scenario like the following is likely true:
Bill in Dville- Living on wealth earned by him by providing services to an industry that profits from the sick and dying. Probably collects his social security check. Uses all kinds of sneaky tax-avoidance schemes to keep from paying anything to keep his country running.
Synergy - hasn't earned a dime of her own money through actual work in decades, if ever.
Now - eeking out a meager survival from social security and disability checks and by grilling squirrels.
Aggie - collects her social security check with glee each month. Is signed up for Medicaid.
BigDummy1 - Social Security, maybe disability. Maybe even something through VA.
All of you sit around slurping up Fox News and right-wing talk radio, hypocritically gripping about how people should work, all the while slurping up every benefit you can get your hands on.
Translation: Dang it, like "the truth" I am so tired of having my posts exploded with facts that I am just going to resort to that tried and true method of the Left and insult the "opposition" by pretending I have a clue about them and projecting my own life upon them. And while I'm at it, I'll follow the example of my beloved president and attack the one news station that isn't licking his boots and the radio shows that actually give the whole story.

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#35305 Feb 3, 2014
TROLL MAN wrote:
<quoted text>
I'd say you pretty much pegged it right.
Of course you do.

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#35306 Feb 3, 2014
ChicknButt wrote:
Of the right-wing-whackos that post on this page, the only one that actually shows up to a job and works is OMTE. Maybe the General.
That says a lot about the demographic bias inherent in the insane comments the other ones keep posting.
And you know this how?

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#35307 Feb 3, 2014
TROLL MAN wrote:
<quoted text>
It seems that a lot of extreme right-wingers who worked and are now retired have the "screw you, I got mine, who cares about you" attitude.
AND the reason you feel that way is because of the hatespeak that the left pours out to you on a daily basis and has been pouring out for the last five years. I'm not an extreme right winger, but I DO know when an administration is existing on divisiveness. You left wingers apparently are too weak minded to see what is right before your eyes.

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#35308 Feb 3, 2014
TROLL MAN wrote:
<quoted text>
It seems that a lot of extreme right-wingers who worked and are now retired have the "screw you, I got mine, who cares about you" attitude. As for myself, I've worked and got mine (and now manage my own business) but want to see the younger generation have as many opportunities as I was able to take advantage of. Unfortunately, I don't see much hope for that with current policies - and I mean policies on both sides of the fence (I wouldn't consider myself a "Liberal" but I'm definitely not a Right Wing Wacko.)
More assumptions about people you know nothing about.

And if you really want the younger generation to have the opportunities we grew up having you need to stop voting for a party that is intent on destroying the capitalist system that allows people to have a dream and take risks and chances and start a business and build that dream and actually, "gasp", reap the rewards of their hard work and risk. You won't want to support a party that wants to micromanage every aspect of your life and believes you aren't even smart enough to know what health care insurance plan works for you and your family.
ChicknButt

Douglasville, GA

#35309 Feb 3, 2014
Synergy wrote:
<quoted text>
It shouldn't have been allowed AT ALL. See how you idiots play? It's okay as long as it supports YOUR lunatic left wing agenda. I am sick of it. You can run your game all you like, but I'm not buying. You are about as arrogant as that worthless tool you voted for and with about as little reason to be as he has.
I see the math and the reason of this escapes you completely.

It's ok, I'm sure you're good at something else.
ChicknButt

Douglasville, GA

#35310 Feb 3, 2014
bored monitor wrote:
<quoted text>
But the libturd question will be did u pay ur fair share?
Actually, it's not.

Don't be jealous I didn't include you in my list of probability. You see, it's just that I don't feel you're worth the effort of thinking about at all.
ChicknButt

Douglasville, GA

#35311 Feb 3, 2014
Bill in Dville wrote:
<quoted text>
I pay what is legally required and am sure it's been a helluva lot more than the poster has paid.
Bill, my first inclination was to write a snarky yet true response to this, but I'm not going to. Instead, I'm just going to be a bit brutally honest with you.

You consistently make claims of everyone else having "wealth envy". The bottom line is, you have a bad case of "wealth pride". You never miss an opportunity to make your little comments, and insure everyone around you knows that you've "done alright". It's as if you measure the self-worth of a man by his bank account, and you want everyone to know that by that measure, you win the game.

That's low-class, plebeian, tasteless, and repulsive. If you really examine that part of yourself and find a better platform to stand on, you might find that not so many people think you're a complete azzhole.

I really don't think it's possible for someone to be as much of a cartoon-character as you portray yourself to be, but then again, maybe it is.

By the way, you're being a bit presumptuous yourself, aren't you, Big Man?
ChicknButt

Douglasville, GA

#35312 Feb 3, 2014
Bill in Dville wrote:
<quoted text>
Now - eeking out a meager survival from social security and disability checks and by grilling squirrels."
On the humorous side of things, I noticed you had no disagreement about this one. LOL!

Since: Jan 14

Location hidden

#35313 Feb 3, 2014
Aggie23 wrote:
<quoted text>
More assumptions about people you know nothing about.
And if you really want the younger generation to have the opportunities we grew up having you need to stop voting for a party that is intent on destroying the capitalist system that allows people to have a dream and take risks and chances and start a business and build that dream and actually, "gasp", reap the rewards of their hard work and risk. You won't want to support a party that wants to micromanage every aspect of your life and believes you aren't even smart enough to know what health care insurance plan works for you and your family.
Apparently you're the one making assumptions. Didn't vote for the current administration either time.
ChicknButt

Douglasville, GA

#35314 Feb 3, 2014
Synergy wrote:
<quoted text>
You think he is an illerate moron because HE doesn't agree with YOU. See how that works? It's your usual double standard. YOU telling ANYONE he/she should be ashamed is LAUGHABLE. If I want to tell someone that I agree with his/her post, I'll do it. GET IT?
Your logic is broken. You should get that into the shop for repairs.

I think he's an illiterate moron because he consistently writes stupid moronic things and it's apparent he has mental problems.

I realize a certain protection-response comes in, like when you see a baby rabbit with an injured leg, but that still doesn't make the rabbit Einstein.
ChicknButt

Douglasville, GA

#35315 Feb 3, 2014
Aggie23 wrote:
<quoted text>
And you know this how?
Aggie, you humorless witch.

It was an extension of the thoughts that followed this:
ChicknButt wrote:
Of course on this forum we'll never know the truth. Odds are good that I don't have it dead accurate, But I think a scenario like the following is likely true:
Do I have to point out the obvious to you guys EVERYTIME a post has more than 7 words in it?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Brunswick Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
What McIntosh/Darien does not want you to know (May '13) Jun 15 squeen82 25
companies Jun 15 the local hog hun... 1
Divorce Attorney Jun 1 Help1 1
Part 12 Guy Heinze Jr. (May '10) May 30 TheOriginalCoolio 1,201
The Villas at Golden Isles May 26 LoriAnne 2
Speed Trap along the I-95 corridor in Mcintosh ... (Nov '15) May '16 KJay 7
What Y'all think of District Attorney Jackie Jo... (Nov '11) Apr '16 David 99
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Brunswick Mortgages