Who do you support for U.S. Senate in...

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#34850 Jan 28, 2014
Devils Advocate wrote:
Michell and her BD party. They reported that Obamy paid for that. Well he may have, but whose money did he use. With his PEN he may have struck an Executative Order. MY oh My how so many can be fooled by so few, so many times.
According to the "invitation" that was "shown to the media", Obama told the invitees to eat dinner before coming to the party. Yeah. Right. Interesting that no cameras, picture phones nor anything else that would capture any images were allowed. Makes one wonder about the opulance and cost, huh? This administration has perfected lying to the point where if their lips are moving, they are lying.

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#34851 Jan 28, 2014
Devils Advocate wrote:
I believe he poor and elderly and long term sick should and needs to be taken care of. On the other hand, the welfare in this country has gone over the cliff like Granny. The 330,000 that Obammy Kare helped was good but at the expence of millions of hard working Americans. Themselves struggling to make ends meet. It would have been a lot cheaper to just put those 330.000 on foodstamps and welfare than to disrupt millions of middle class working folks. The Liberial Media reports everything is fine with the signups. They report that over 3 illion have enrolled. How many of those has signed up for Medicaid and how many of those has actually paid?
Amen! I couldn't figure out WHY a healthcare law wasn't passed that took care of the ones WHO NEEDED it. Well, it's all part of the "big" plan. This had to come first, I guess.

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#34852 Jan 28, 2014
Devils Advocate wrote:
You Liberials speak a lot of the Koch Brothers and their influience. What about the MILLIONS that OBammy has spent on his politics. Wher did that come from? Oh I know, the 10 dollars from each believing American that supported his Socialistic Agenda. How stupid can one be?
Well, duckanddodgebutt is OBSESSED with the Koch brothers, however, rumor has it that he LOVES Soros. Go figure. Oh! That's right! Soros is a liberal. He gets a pass. It's that old double standard the libroids live by.(It makes them look REALLY dumb.)
TheAllPowerful

Columbus, GA

#34853 Jan 28, 2014
new wrote:
<quoted text>
how can anyone be so ignorant about so much..........
How can anyone support imbeciles, and try to back it up with little links to nonsense? Yeah.
TheAllPowerful

Columbus, GA

#34854 Jan 28, 2014
Bill in Dville wrote:
<quoted text>
WTF is a double stander? Is it similar to a double bagger?
A double stander is 2 people loitering in front of a business. You're welcome.:D
TheAllPowerful

Columbus, GA

#34855 Jan 28, 2014
new wrote:
<quoted text>
A little more on this post..........
"The Lyubov Orlova is likely at the bottom of the ocean, not headed for the British coastline, experts say. One salvage hunter believes the vessel, which has been drifting in the Atlantic Ocean for almost a year, is filled with rodents who have been eating each other to stay alive."
"rodents who have been eating each other to stay alive."
yep, sounds like libroids to me..........
You are so narcissistic, you are replying to your own posts now? Scary insane dude. Better go get therapy fast. Pffft I thought it was bad you coming back again and again to rate your own posts, and now you are talking to yourself. I see white jackets in your future...
ChicknButt

Norcross, GA

#34856 Jan 28, 2014
Aggie23 wrote:
<quoted text>
You just need to look a little harder. But why should it surprise anyone, these are the same people who suggested that if you "have a birthday, anniversary or wedding coming up, let your friends know how important this election is to you. Register with Obama 2012 and ask for a donation in lieu of a gift."
========
MONDAY, JANUARY 27, 2014
MICHELLE OBAMA:“CHIP IN TO PROTECT OBAMACARE”
SHARE
Email
First Lady Michelle Obama sent an email to supporters urging them to chip in to support
Ok - no wonder no one is reporting this but the right-wing press.

What is actually written is completely different than what is being reported.

Right-wing sites indicate that Michelle is asking for donations FOR ObamaCare, to keep it running.

What is actually written is this:

ObamaCare is something to be proud of. Please donate $10.00 bucks to the Democratic Party, so we can insure a bunch of short-sighted uneducated hateful hill-billies don't continue to try to repeal.

Only in the right-wing media can real events be so distorted.
scary stupid

Marianna, FL

#34857 Jan 28, 2014
new wrote:
And for the daily global warming report..........
"Early Week Polar Plunge Could Be Winter's Coldest"
http://www.accuweather.com/en/weather-news/ne...
You are scary stupid, that's all I got to say to you. The rest you wouldn't understand.
the truth

Marianna, FL

#34858 Jan 28, 2014
Devils Advocate wrote:
It is a never ending cycle. I was accused of watching only Fox News, but that is not true. I watch them all. If I want to watch them try and destroy Christie, then I watch MSNBC. That is the only subject they have been on for 2-3 weeks. Hours and hours of traffic problems. Yet you never hear them report on the Bengazi, IRS, Fast and Furious, NSA, and other coverups by Obammy and his cronnies. Those are non issues because the annointed one has said so. He is their GOD and nothing he does can be wrong.
I also watch different cable opinion news shows. Main difference is MSNBC doesn't rehash the same news over and over and over again. They stick to news that's fairly current with a slanted view. FNC's slanted views are mostly ones that have been rehashing for years. I truly believe its because their core audience is just a little on the dumb side. If you want to get a truer picture of real news, try real news sources, CBS, NBC & ABC. Maybe if you did you wouldn't make really stupid statements like he is GOD, the anointed one and he can do nothing wrong.
ChicknButt

Norcross, GA

#34859 Jan 28, 2014
Synergy -

So your question is "what would I say if Benghazi, NSA" happened under a Republican president?"

Well, Benghazi is something that happened TO us, not something that WE did. I don't blame Bush for 9/11 - I blame a bunch of crazy Muslims.

I don't blame Bush for Katrina - I blame him for the federal reaction TO Katrina.

See how that works?

One thing that's important for you to remember is that the world is a lot bigger than your living-room and Fox News. A lot goes on out there.

So - Benghazi happened to us - same reaction no matter who's president. However, I do blame the Republican-led House for failing to Fund security requests by the State Department. Yet another reminder about why we shouldn't elect irresponsible zealots into office.

NSA? If anybody was walking around the world thinking the US didn't have all kinds of computers running every kind electronic surveillance possible after 9/11 and the Patriot Act, they're just living with their heads in the ground. No blame for Rep or Dem president there.

IRS? It's some minor instance with big press that happened in a huge and chaotic organization. Honestly - they were filtering for exactly the groups most likely to be breaking the laws. No big deal either way - handle it and move on.

What drove you to your question is your burning hatred for "Libroids" in general and Obama in particular. That hatred and the non-stop right-wing press drivel you subject yourself to have clouded your perspectives of reality. Now - to you (and the obstructionist Republicans)- the whole thing is an "us against them" scenario, not a "all of us working together" to make this a better country to live in. This didn't happen accidentally. Some very nasty people with some VERY big dollar interests have orchestrated this state of events in the country, and you've just followed their instructions.

Happy?

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#34860 Jan 28, 2014
ChicknButt wrote:
<quoted text>
Ok - no wonder no one is reporting this but the right-wing press.
What is actually written is completely different than what is being reported.
Right-wing sites indicate that Michelle is asking for donations FOR ObamaCare, to keep it running.
What is actually written is this:
ObamaCare is something to be proud of. Please donate $10.00 bucks to the Democratic Party, so we can insure a bunch of short-sighted uneducated hateful hill-billies don't continue to try to repeal.
Only in the right-wing media can real events be so distorted.
Let's review:

Bill in Dville wrote:
http://twitchy.com/2014/01/27/ youve-got-to-be-joking-michell e-obama-asks-for-10-donations- to-help-protect-obamacare-guff aws-ensue
Key phrase: "michelle obama asks for $10 donations to help protect Obamacare"

I post the email that states:
"So before Barack gives his State of the Union address tomorrow, chip in $10 or more and help protect Obamacare"

Please post the websites that say it is to keep Obamacare running - every one I look at shows it is fundraising to "protect" Obamacare by electing Democrats. The only one I see "distorting" the facts is you.
ChicknButt

Norcross, GA

#34861 Jan 28, 2014
scary stupid wrote:
<quoted text>
You are scary stupid, that's all I got to say to you. The rest you wouldn't understand.
I've explained it to him multiple times. He is scary stupid.

I gesss he gets that way from being a lonely hermit living in a Ted Kaczinsky-shack out in the woods.
ChicknButt

Norcross, GA

#34862 Jan 28, 2014
Waiting for Synergies post telling me she didn't like my answer, and having her throw some childish insults my way.

She's on here to "win", whatever that means.

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#34863 Jan 28, 2014
ChicknButt wrote:
<quoted text>
Ok - no wonder no one is reporting this but the right-wing press.
What is actually written is completely different than what is being reported.
Right-wing sites indicate that Michelle is asking for donations FOR ObamaCare, to keep it running.
What is actually written is this:
ObamaCare is something to be proud of. Please donate $10.00 bucks to the Democratic Party, so we can insure a bunch of short-sighted uneducated hateful hill-billies don't continue to try to repeal.
Only in the right-wing media can real events be so distorted.
lol Very poor attempt. This post of your explains exactly WHY you are so completely ignorant as to what is happening with this administration. You just purely make it up as you go. Wow. Your post TRULY exposes how you STILL defend the indefensible. This would be funny if it weren't so sad.
BTW, when are you going to answer the question? Post # 34763.

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#34864 Jan 28, 2014
the truth wrote:
<quoted text>
I also watch different cable opinion news shows. Main difference is MSNBC doesn't rehash the same news over and over and over again. They stick to news that's fairly current with a slanted view. FNC's slanted views are mostly ones that have been rehashing for years. I truly believe its because their core audience is just a little on the dumb side. If you want to get a truer picture of real news, try real news sources, CBS, NBC & ABC. Maybe if you did you wouldn't make really stupid statements like he is GOD, the anointed one and he can do nothing wrong.
Funniest post of the day! FULL of liberal excuses.

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#34865 Jan 28, 2014
the truth wrote:
<quoted text>
I also watch different cable opinion news shows. Main difference is MSNBC doesn't rehash the same news over and over and over again. They stick to news that's fairly current with a slanted view. FNC's slanted views are mostly ones that have been rehashing for years. I truly believe its because their core audience is just a little on the dumb side. If you want to get a truer picture of real news, try real news sources, CBS, NBC & ABC. Maybe if you did you wouldn't make really stupid statements like he is GOD, the anointed one and he can do nothing wrong.
Oh, now this is priceless. MSNBC - you mean the "Christie Bridgegate" channel.
ChicknButt

Norcross, GA

#34866 Jan 28, 2014
Aggie23 wrote:
<quoted text>
Let's review:
Bill in Dville wrote:
http://twitchy.com/2014/01/27/ youve-got-to-be-joking-michell e-obama-asks-for-10-donations- to-help-protect-obamacare-guff aws-ensue
Key phrase: "michelle obama asks for $10 donations to help protect Obamacare"
I post the email that states:
"So before Barack gives his State of the Union address tomorrow, chip in $10 or more and help protect Obamacare"
Please post the websites that say it is to keep Obamacare running - every one I look at shows it is fundraising to "protect" Obamacare by electing Democrats. The only one I see "distorting" the facts is you.
They say "protect Obamacare" rather than "protect Obamacare by electing Dems". They know the difference in nuance. So do you. Odd how only extreme-right publications thought it was worth mentioning.

Hitler would have been envious of the right-wing propaganda machine. It's epic in proportions and it's a non-stop steam-roller feeding it's junkies all day every day.

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#34867 Jan 28, 2014
ChicknButt wrote:
Synergy -
So your question is "what would I say if Benghazi, NSA" happened under a Republican president?"
Well, Benghazi is something that happened TO us, not something that WE did. I don't blame Bush for 9/11 - I blame a bunch of crazy Muslims.
I don't blame Bush for Katrina - I blame him for the federal reaction TO Katrina.
See how that works?
One thing that's important for you to remember is that the world is a lot bigger than your living-room and Fox News. A lot goes on out there.
So - Benghazi happened to us - same reaction no matter who's president. However, I do blame the Republican-led House for failing to Fund security requests by the State Department. Yet another reminder about why we shouldn't elect irresponsible zealots into office.
NSA? If anybody was walking around the world thinking the US didn't have all kinds of computers running every kind electronic surveillance possible after 9/11 and the Patriot Act, they're just living with their heads in the ground. No blame for Rep or Dem president there.
IRS? It's some minor instance with big press that happened in a huge and chaotic organization. Honestly - they were filtering for exactly the groups most likely to be breaking the laws. No big deal either way - handle it and move on.
What drove you to your question is your burning hatred for "Libroids" in general and Obama in particular. That hatred and the non-stop right-wing press drivel you subject yourself to have clouded your perspectives of reality. Now - to you (and the obstructionist Republicans)- the whole thing is an "us against them" scenario, not a "all of us working together" to make this a better country to live in. This didn't happen accidentally. Some very nasty people with some VERY big dollar interests have orchestrated this state of events in the country, and you've just followed their instructions.
Happy?
1.You've changed your tune as far as blaming Bush. Convenient.
2. Noticed you didn't mention Hillary in regard to Benghazi. Instead, you blamed the Republicans. Not surprised. Convenient.
3. NSA. Ohhhhh. Libroid whine #2. It has happened before.
4. Blame ME. lol What drives me is the insincerity of socialists like YOU.
You didn't answer the question.
WHAT would you be posting if Obama were a Republican? Please post one of your stellar paragraphs telling us how full of hate the liberals would be for not supporting Obama and the healthcare debacle, NSA(his watch), Benghazi(his watch), higher debt(his watch) and more joblessness(his watch).
What would you be posting about Obama right now if he were a Republican?(That's the question.)
ChicknButt

Norcross, GA

#34868 Jan 28, 2014
Synergy wrote:
<quoted text>
lol Very poor attempt. This post of your explains exactly WHY you are so completely ignorant as to what is happening with this administration. You just purely make it up as you go. Wow. Your post TRULY exposes how you STILL defend the indefensible. This would be funny if it weren't so sad.
BTW, when are you going to answer the question? Post # 34763.
I've already answer it, you silly Whacko...

So pathetic. Your posts explain how you voted against America, TWICE! Now everybody has to live with your obstructionist Right-Wing whacko congressmen who are stopping a good president from helping middle-class Americans. So pathetic of you! You have no honesty to keep trying to defend it! Admit it, you can't! Pot-Kettle-Black, Clueless & uneducated. IRONY! You voted against America TWICE!!! Pathetic!

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#34869 Jan 28, 2014
ChicknButt wrote:
Synergy -
So your question is "what would I say if Benghazi, NSA" happened under a Republican president?"
Well, Benghazi is something that happened TO us, not something that WE did. I don't blame Bush for 9/11 - I blame a bunch of crazy Muslims.
I don't blame Bush for Katrina - I blame him for the federal reaction TO Katrina.
See how that works?
One thing that's important for you to remember is that the world is a lot bigger than your living-room and Fox News. A lot goes on out there.
So - Benghazi happened to us - same reaction no matter who's president. However, I do blame the Republican-led House for failing to Fund security requests by the State Department. Yet another reminder about why we shouldn't elect irresponsible zealots into office.
NSA? If anybody was walking around the world thinking the US didn't have all kinds of computers running every kind electronic surveillance possible after 9/11 and the Patriot Act, they're just living with their heads in the ground. No blame for Rep or Dem president there.
IRS? It's some minor instance with big press that happened in a huge and chaotic organization. Honestly - they were filtering for exactly the groups most likely to be breaking the laws. No big deal either way - handle it and move on.
What drove you to your question is your burning hatred for "Libroids" in general and Obama in particular. That hatred and the non-stop right-wing press drivel you subject yourself to have clouded your perspectives of reality. Now - to you (and the obstructionist Republicans)- the whole thing is an "us against them" scenario, not a "all of us working together" to make this a better country to live in. This didn't happen accidentally. Some very nasty people with some VERY big dollar interests have orchestrated this state of events in the country, and you've just followed their instructions.
Happy?
And the distortion just keeps on a-coming.

CB: "I do blame the Republican-led House for failing to Fund security requests by the State Department."

'In testimony Wednesday before the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, Charlene Lamb, a deputy assistant secretary of state for diplomatic security, was asked,“Was there any budget consideration and lack of budget which led you not to increase the number of people in the security force there?”
Lamb responded,“No, sir.”'
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/10...

"The State Department acknowledged Wednesday that it rejected appeals for more security at its diplomatic posts in Libya in the months before a fatal terrorist attack in Benghazi as Republicans suggested that lapses contributed to the deaths of the U.S. ambassador and three other Americans."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-...
==========

CB: "IRS? It's some minor instance with big press that happened in a huge and chaotic organization. Honestly - they were filtering for exactly the groups most likely to be breaking the laws. No big deal either way - handle it and move on."

Pardon me, your bias is showing. "groups most likely to be breaking the laws" - and why would you presume that? Oh, of course - because they are CONSERVATIVE. Talk about your head in the ground.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Brunswick Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
nasty woman. you've been warned. Thu Don smith 6
Speed Trap along the I-95 corridor in Mcintosh ... (Nov '15) Mar 8 Ben 30
What McIntosh/Darien does not want you to know (May '13) Feb 28 Barbara78 33
Poll Is Brunswick a racist town Feb 28 dverdan363 1
Part 12 Guy Heinze Jr. (May '10) Feb '17 Blue 1,221
i-95 accident (Mar '09) Feb '17 GodsPrincess2939 6
immigration issues Jan '17 Heywood 1

Brunswick Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Brunswick Mortgages