Who do you support for U.S. Senate in...

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#32124 Nov 21, 2013
Oops, forgot the link.
http://nypost.com/2013/11/21/1704907/
now

Buford, GA

#32125 Nov 21, 2013
ChicknButt wrote:
<quoted text>
I really do wish you'd just fall into a well.
Stupidity should be painful.

Well heck if you weren't such a big dummy who never gets anything right, I could go easy on you. Try something right for a change and I just might ligthen up........but not as long as you post crap like post # 32101, on page # 1538.....







now

Buford, GA

#32126 Nov 21, 2013
one too many wrote:
<quoted text>You must be an eternal optimist, CB. To Quote Bob Dylan- "You may as well try and catch the wind".

you're still a dummy jeb, always will be one. Ha, your fate in life.....
now

Buford, GA

#32127 Nov 21, 2013
Aggie23 wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, really - "their job" - tell it to the Democrats.
"George W. Bush suffered stiffer resistance and longer delays for his nominees than Obama. Bush’s nominees to the DC Circuit faced confirmations dragging on for 707 days on average, with one particular nomination (Brett ­Kavanaugh) dragging on past 1,000 days. By contrast, Patricia Millett was nominated on June 4 this year and obtained a vote by the Senate just 149 days later, on Oct. 31; Pillard, 161 days; Wilkins, 167 days; and Caitlin Halligan, 433 days. Earlier this year, the Senate confirmed Obama’s nomination of Sri Srinivasan for the DC Circuit after a 346-day wait.
...Obama’s circuit court nominees during his first term faced confirmation battles lasting 268 days. Again, that pales in comparison to the 362 days Bush’s nominees took.
.... Of all his circuit court nominations during his first term, the vast majority, 85 percent, have now been confirmed. Bush got only 72 percent of his nominees confirmed. In fact, a couple of the openings on the DC Circuit court are only available because Democrats refused to confirm Bush’s nominees."

They always whine for their candy, they always have.....

Demos are the party of special interest who feed off gubmint revenues, always have been, always will be....



ChicknButt

Norcross, GA

#32128 Nov 21, 2013
Aggie23 wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, really - "their job" - tell it to the Democrats.
"George W. Bush suffered stiffer resistance and longer delays for his .(........snipped bit of plagerized article from the pathetic rag the New York Post ....Not the Times...The Post ...yes..she really went there.)
Don't forget to give the New York Post credit for their work.

http://nypost.com/2013/11/21/1704907/

But really? the Post? You're better than that Aggie. But I'll match your New York Post and raise you a MotherJones that actually gives a factual and more than surface-deep explanation of why this was necessary.

Plus the article photo is awesome.

http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2013/11/s...

Actually read the article and you'll get a much deeper insight into the issues at stake than you'll get from the Post (LOL!), or Fox.
ChicknButt

Norcross, GA

#32129 Nov 21, 2013
now wrote:
<quoted text>
Well heck if you weren't such a big dummy who never gets anything right, I could go easy on you. Try something right for a change and I just might ligthen up........but not as long as you post crap like post # 32101, on page # 1538.....
Oh, please please go easy on me. Your intellectual powers ae...

awww screw it.

I can't even be sarcastic in light of the incredible dumbassery you display ever single day on here, all day, day after day, non-stop...post after post after post of pure relentless ever-flowing infinite lame stupidity.

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#32130 Nov 21, 2013
ChicknButt wrote:
<quoted text>
Don't forget to give the New York Post credit for their work.
http://nypost.com/2013/11/21/1704907/
But really? the Post? You're better than that Aggie. But I'll match your New York Post and raise you a MotherJones that actually gives a factual and more than surface-deep explanation of why this was necessary.
Plus the article photo is awesome.
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2013/11/s...
Actually read the article and you'll get a much deeper insight into the issues at stake than you'll get from the Post (LOL!), or Fox.
It really is amusing to watch you Lefties disparage sources given the ones you so often use, but regardless of the source - matters of fact are matters of fact.
ChicknButt

Norcross, GA

#32131 Nov 21, 2013
one too many wrote:
<quoted text>You must be an eternal optimist, CB. To Quote Bob Dylan- "You may as well try and catch the wind".
You're right. My hoping he falls down a well tactic is probably more productive than asking him to recognize and correct his own idiocy.

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#32132 Nov 21, 2013
one too many wrote:
<quoted text>You must be an eternal optimist, CB. To Quote Bob Dylan- "You may as well try and catch the wind".
Y'all are too busy breaking it.
one too many

Cordele, GA

#32133 Nov 21, 2013
Aggie23 wrote:
Oops, forgot the link.
http://nypost.com/2013/11/21/1704907/
...dementia? Already? lol
Laughing at U

Blairsville, GA

#32134 Nov 21, 2013
now wrote:
<quoted text>
Ask him the eternal question........
which came first, the egg or the sperm.......
We're all just wishing your father hadn't come first... maybe if your mom had we wouldn't have to put up with your childish nonsense...
ChicknButt

Norcross, GA

#32135 Nov 21, 2013
Aggie23 wrote:
<quoted text>
Y'all are too busy breaking it.
Why Aggie!

You made a fart joke! LOL!
one too many

Cordele, GA

#32136 Nov 21, 2013
one too many wrote:
<quoted text>You must be an eternal optimist, CB. To Quote Bob Dylan- "You may as well try and catch the wind".
My bad- it was Donavan(not Dylan). Maybe I am the one with dementia, huh Ag! lol
ChicknButt

Norcross, GA

#32137 Nov 21, 2013
Interesting Dylan/Donovan story here-

http://music.cbc.ca/blogs/blogpost.aspx...

Watch the video - it's great...
one too many

Cordele, GA

#32138 Nov 21, 2013
ChicknButt wrote:
<quoted text>
Why Aggie!
You made a fart joke! LOL!
Dammit man!!! You reckon her and "now" are related? They both seem to have some fascination with farts! LMAO

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#32139 Nov 21, 2013
ChicknButt wrote:
<quoted text>
Why Aggie!
You made a fart joke! LOL!
It was handed to me on a platter -alas, I was weak.
now

Buford, GA

#32140 Nov 21, 2013
Laughing at U wrote:
<quoted text>
We're all just wishing your father hadn't come first... maybe if your mom had we wouldn't have to put up with your childish nonsense...

I hear an echo again.......from a useless poster......



now

Buford, GA

#32141 Nov 21, 2013
one too many wrote:
<quoted text>My bad- it was Donavan(not Dylan). Maybe I am the one with dementia, huh Ag! lol

No jeb, just dumb........

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#32142 Nov 21, 2013
one too many wrote:
<quoted text>Dammit man!!! You reckon her and "now" are related? They both seem to have some fascination with farts! LMAO
I would happily claim kinship with "now", but my family's "not from around here."
now

Buford, GA

#32143 Nov 21, 2013

This is worth a repeat..........


Ohhhhh, the hypocrisy of the hypocrites who first birthed hypocrisy…..…………..

“In 1974, Congress created a special methodology for balancing the budget, whereby the U.S. Senate could reduce the escalating budget deficit with a simple majority vote (i.e., 51 votes), rather than requiring the usual 60 votes that are needed to stop a filibuster. Under this Senate rule, the expediting process was called "reconciliation," but it was only to be used for balancing the budget.

First, President Obama and his Democrat congressional leaders, Pelosi and Reid, attempted to change the rules to effect passage of this legislation at any price. They used budget "reconciliation" rules to bypass the planned GOP Senate filibuster that would normally have allowed the Republicans to defeat the legislation with 41 Senate votes.(The 41-vote possibility became a potential reality when Massachusetts elected a Republican, Scott Brown, to the U.S. Senate on January 19, 2010.)

Second, the Democrat congressional leaders invoked a convoluted concept of "procedural rules," to make sure one way or the other President Obama could get this cherished piece of legislation through Congress.

The Washington Post article expounded the convoluted methodology as follows:
"Rather than passing the Senate bill and then passing the fixes, the House will pass the fixes under a rule that says the House "deems" the Senate bill passed after the House passes the fixes.

"The virtue of this, for Pelosi's members, is that they don't actually vote on the Senate bill. They only vote on the reconciliation package. But their vote on the reconciliation package functions as a vote on the Senate bill...the bottom line is this: When the House votes on the reconciliation fixes, the Senate bill is passed, even if the Senate hasn't voted on the reconciliation fixes, and even though the House never specifically voted on the Senate bill."

And that convoluted way of thinking did not even include Speaker Pelosi's “most revealing” comment expressed during an interview on Fox News on March 9, 2010: "We have to pass the health care bill so that you can find out what is in it."

So, to make the story brief, the socialist members in the U.S. Congress were willing to do anything to pass and have signed into law what Vladimir Lenin deemed "the keystone in the arch of socialism" — government control of medical care!"

And we have found out what's in it!!! a sorry piece of legislation even demos are now blasting...of course to get re-elected........

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Brunswick Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Brunswick for a family (Feb '16) Sun lil1818 3
Speed Trap along the I-95 corridor in Mcintosh ... (Nov '15) Jan 18 Anonymous 29
News Phillips given Outstanding Educator Award (Jul '07) Jan 14 rick 2
What McIntosh/Darien does not want you to know (May '13) Jan 9 Mara Rahl 29
Part 12 Guy Heinze Jr. (May '10) Jan 2 Middletown 1,210
White Boy Rap (Jun '11) Nov '16 Danny Noonan 5
Farrell Landon Ho Slayer (Oct '12) Nov '16 Farrell Landon 6

Brunswick Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Brunswick Mortgages