You were lamenting the deaths of men, women and children caused by Bush. I simply asked you how many MORE had died since Obama had been in office. I guess those people don't count, right? You won't count the men, women and children who have died on Obama's watch because it doesn't fit into your liberal agenda. lol Okay.
When are you all going to start blaming Bush for the problems with Obamacare? If you already have, disregard the question.
OK - That gets us up-to-date on this discussion. Let's see what Synergy has to say in response.<quoted text>
I see. Using that SAME LOGIC - let's say you were standing at the top of a 1000-ft cliff. Bush runs up behind you and pushes you off. When you are 500-feet from the bottom, the presidency changes hands, and Obama is president.
Using that logic, you would say that the death of your splattered corpse would be Obama's fault, despite the fact that Bush pushed you off. Is that about right?
Fake indignation. RWW's are full of that.<quoted text>
Count? Count as what? A score in some childish game? This comes across as pathetically juvenile, and doesn't really even make any sense.<quoted text>
So the deaths on Obama's watch DO NOT count.
Ok, she's getting excited, she thinks she has something. She's probably gearing up with an insult.<quoted text>
And she delivers with the insult! Useless, and using the "vilify the other guys so I don't have to use logic or facts" tactic that we've grown to expect. No surprises here. Also no facts or logic.<quoted text> That's what I expected from you brainless liberals.
Here she makes is extremely apparent that she absolutely had NO grasp of the concept I put before her. The idea that the person who created the situation should take the responsibility for the event he set in motion.<quoted text> Even what he isn't responsible for.
We're just getting more of the typical - let's throw logic out the window because we don't like the results tactic.
Here she comes to a conclusion without even remotely backing it up. Kind of like they claim they "Won" when they really didn't.<quoted text>
Your analogy is a very poor attempt at passing the blame.
And she wraps up with an insult. Who would have guessed?<quoted text>
Those with a brain know better. You don't qualify.
This post didn't defend her position, it demonstrated an inability to acknowledge simple logic, it showed typical RWW denial of truth, it claimed victory when no victory was earned.
In other words, it was useless and devoid of substance, despite being loud angry and arrogant.