Who do you support for U.S. Senate in...
Where

Clarkesville, GA

#23493 Aug 28, 2013
Oh my wrote:
<quoted text>
You are a liar.
Your sick perversions run deep into your very soul and reveal themselves in your ever post.

Nope, stating a fact as presented by you, yourself, and all your posts...
Where

Clarkesville, GA

#23494 Aug 28, 2013
Oh my wrote:
<quoted text>
The perverted liar changes his name in the hopes of disguising his perversion.
It is obvious that you fail to understand the meaning of the word reciprocal, as the concept of reciprocity can be expressed in many forms.
And of course because you are a known liar who, through the perversion that infests your very soul, must subvert the very words that are posted by others when you purposefully ignore the second example provided. An example that clearly reveals your ignorance and prejudice.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_Rule
The Code of Hammurabi,(1780 BC),[12] dealt with the reciprocity of the Lex talionis, in ways, such by limiting retribution, as they did concepts of retribution (literally "an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth").
An early example of the Golden Rule that reflects the Ancient Egyptian concept of Maat appears in the story of The Eloquent Peasant, which dates to the Middle Kingdom (c. 2040–1650 BC): "Now this is the command: Do to the doer to cause that he do thus to you."

Liar, Liar, pants of firer.

My name changes but my game is the same. I have reasons for my name changing, none of which is any of your business. Everyone can recognize me by my postings, including the dumb libroids like yourself.

While you quote a reciprocal in this sorry post of yours, you leave out Leviticus, which is NOT a reciprocal.
Ye ole perverted subverter.

Your intent and purpose is to downgrade the meaning of Leviticus by introducing a new subject called an "eye for an eye."

In your case, every time I take an eye from you, I get a blind, useless, perverted eye.
Where

Clarkesville, GA

#23495 Aug 28, 2013
OMTE wrote:
<quoted text>Translation: You can't explain it either. SMH. You've become increasingly pathetic here recently. What's up with ya dude? Maybe you and your dog need to lay off the stuff. Just saying. ;)
http://www.lolbrary.com/lolpics/35/crackhead-...

I haven't seen anyone explain it. I don't believe anyone understands it, not even the CBO. Especially the 5W dimwit.
They do however understand they will be getting money, and that it will give libroids more money to waste on more useless projects.
Oh my

Blairsville, GA

#23496 Aug 28, 2013
Where wrote:
<quoted text>
http://www.topix.com/forum/city/blairsville-g...
Again you belie your intent.
The whole of my posts was the Christian teachings of equality that influenced the founding Fathers in the writing of the Constitution. Nowhere did I say we have a Christian Nation, as I know we do not; especially when we have the likes of you.
You misinterpreted my posts from your own preconceived and prejudiced notions for several reasons, 1-we dont like each other and never will, 2- you are a fanatic libroid and I am a calm conservative, 3- you constantly belie intent, in addition to giving a true notion or impression of subjects referenced.
And 4-your sorry attempt to belie again, and say that flattery is mockery; when your use of the term shows otherwise.
You continue to lie, subvert, and pervert. Your perversion, like your ignorance and prejudice, is plain as day.

And my point is that the equality of man is not an exclusively Christian teaching, and as such there were many things that influenced the Founders. Your continued failure to recognize this shows both your ignorance and your prejudice.

And while you may not have specifically said that America is a Christian Nation, your continued insistence that only Christian principles influenced the Founders certainly speaks volumes.

http://www.topix.com/forum/city/blairsville-g...
The Constitution came as close as man can come to fulfilling the Ideals expressed by the Bible as we know it today. The Constitution was an effort, by man, to instill the ideals of Christianity established by Jesus, who fulfilled the Old Testament Law, given to man by God. Without Christianity there would be no Constitution, because honest men recognize the inherent God given rights of man.
Oh my

Blairsville, GA

#23497 Aug 28, 2013
Where wrote:
<quoted text>
http://www.topix.com/forum/city/blairsville-g...
Nope, stating a fact as presented by you, yourself, and all your posts...
You are a liar, all of your posts show you to be a pervert with a deep perversion in your very soul. Your perversion feeds your ignorance and prejudice.

Change your name again to prove you are a liar.

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#23498 Aug 28, 2013
Informed Opinion wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh please don't make us Right Wingers pay our own way !
We constantly whine about making freeloading deadbeats be personally responsible but, we don't mean us.
Waaaaaaahhhh !
(This is just too easy).
Says the lazy traitorous looney left wing lunatic who dispises this country but lives off the government.
YOU give new meaning to the word: deadbeat. Run along, union hack.
Where

Clarkesville, GA

#23499 Aug 28, 2013
Oh my wrote:
<quoted text>

And my point is that the equality of man is not an exclusively Christian teaching, and as such there were many things that influenced the Founders. Your continued failure to recognize this shows both your ignorance and your prejudice.

And while you may not have specifically said that America is a Christian Nation, your continued insistence that only Christian principles influenced the Founders certainly speaks volumes.
http://www.topix.com/forum/city/blairsville-g...
The Constitution came as close as man can come to fulfilling the Ideals expressed by the Bible as we know it today. The Constitution was an effort, by man, to instill the ideals of Christianity established by Jesus, who fulfilled the Old Testament Law, given to man by God. Without Christianity there would be no Constitution, because honest men recognize the inherent God given rights of man.

And you have yet to show any teaching of equality that precede the teachings of the bible. You continue to abide in ignorance, sebversion, and downright misquotes of my intended posts.

Your continued efforts to subjugate my posts unto your twisted intents are a complete failure because I am right, and you are wrong.
Where

Clarkesville, GA

#23500 Aug 28, 2013
Oh my wrote:
<quoted text>
You are a liar, all of your posts show you to be a pervert with a deep perversion in your very soul. Your perversion feeds your ignorance and prejudice.
Change your name again to prove you are a liar.

Nope, I'm not lying about your perverion or subversion; nor your Atheism and Animalism.
You have ism's coming out your ears; all of your prior posts supports this.

And since you dont have a soul, your ears overflow.

I'll change my name again at my convenience, thank you very much!
Where

Clarkesville, GA

#23501 Aug 28, 2013
Synergy wrote:
<quoted text>
Says the lazy traitorous looney left wing lunatic who dispises this country but lives off the government.
YOU give new meaning to the word: deadbeat. Run along, union hack.

He's the one who pays $100 for a "grab-bag of surprise" at the "OBAMA CARNIVAL" which contents contain Chinese trinkets worth $3.
correction

Nicholasville, KY

#23502 Aug 28, 2013
How wrote:
<quoted text>
FYI: you're posting to an atheist..
There is no such thing.
There are some agnostics and some anti-theists, but no atheists.
Why

Nicholasville, KY

#23503 Aug 28, 2013
hrodgers769 wrote:
<quoted text>
Ditto that! Democratic all the way!!!!
So I assume you are good with outlawing religious freedom.
You support dismembering infants prior to birth for convenience sake.
You support the demise of marriage.
You think killing old people for the greater good is OK.
These are but some of the platforms that the democrat party stands upon and has for decades.
Just want to make sure we all know where you stand.
calling bs

Nicholasville, KY

#23504 Aug 28, 2013
Synergy wrote:
<quoted text>
Says the lazy traitorous looney left wing lunatic who dispises this country but lives off the government.
YOU give new meaning to the word: deadbeat. Run along, union hack.
It's an idiot. Ignore it and it will go away.
Oh my

Blairsville, GA

#23505 Aug 28, 2013
Where wrote:
<quoted text>
http://www.topix.com/forum/city/blairsville-g...
Liar, Liar, pants of firer.
My name changes but my game is the same. I have reasons for my name changing, none of which is any of your business. Everyone can recognize me by my postings, including the dumb libroids like yourself.
While you quote a reciprocal in this sorry post of yours, you leave out Leviticus, which is NOT a reciprocal.
Ye ole perverted subverter.
Your intent and purpose is to downgrade the meaning of Leviticus by introducing a new subject called an "eye for an eye."
In your case, every time I take an eye from you, I get a blind, useless, perverted eye.
You change your to deceive; decpetion and perversion are the game you play.

Here you claim that Leviticus predates all mentions of the Golden Rule or the concept of reciprocity...
http://www.topix.com/forum/city/blairsville-g...

This is a lie, and in your sick perverted mind you cannot admit the mistake. Your error has been shown as plain as day and all you can post in reply is ignorance and lying perversion.

Your continued failure to understand that the concept of reciprocity can be expressed as both a positive and a negative just proves your ignorance. Please continue to show the true depth of your perversion as you post lie after lie after lie.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_Rule
The Code of Hammurabi,(1780 BC),[12] dealt with the reciprocity of the Lex talionis, in ways, such by limiting retribution, as they did concepts of retribution (literally "an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth").

An early example of the Golden Rule that reflects the Ancient Egyptian concept of Maat appears in the story of The Eloquent Peasant, which dates to the Middle Kingdom (c. 2040–1650 BC): "Now this is the command: Do to the doer to cause that he do thus to you."
Oh my

Blairsville, GA

#23506 Aug 28, 2013
Where wrote:
<quoted text>
http://www.topix.com/forum/city/blairsville-g...
And you have yet to show any teaching of equality that precede the teachings of the bible. You continue to abide in ignorance, sebversion, and downright misquotes of my intended posts.
Your continued efforts to subjugate my posts unto your twisted intents are a complete failure because I am right, and you are wrong.
You are a bald-faced liar, this example clearly predates Leviticus, it has been shown to you in many previous posts, but in your sick and twisted perversion you cannot admit your error.

You post out of ignorance, you post out of prejudice, you post lies because you are a perverted perverter and lover of perversion. Everyone knows this, change your name and people will still know you as a liar.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_Rule

An early example of the Golden Rule that reflects the Ancient Egyptian concept of Maat appears in the story of The Eloquent Peasant, which dates to the Middle Kingdom (c. 2040–1650 BC): "Now this is the command: Do to the doer to cause that he do thus to you."
Where

Jefferson, GA

#23507 Aug 28, 2013
correction wrote:
<quoted text>There is no such thing.
There are some agnostics and some anti-theists, but no atheists.
Especially on their deathbed.
OMTE

Kittanning, PA

#23508 Aug 28, 2013
Oh my wrote:
<quoted text>
You change your to deceive; decpetion and perversion are the game you play.
Here you claim that Leviticus predates all mentions of the Golden Rule or the concept of reciprocity...
http://www.topix.com/forum/city/blairsville-g...
This is a lie, and in your sick perverted mind you cannot admit the mistake. Your error has been shown as plain as day and all you can post in reply is ignorance and lying perversion.
Your continued failure to understand that the concept of reciprocity can be expressed as both a positive and a negative just proves your ignorance. Please continue to show the true depth of your perversion as you post lie after lie after lie.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_Rule
The Code of Hammurabi,(1780 BC),[12] dealt with the reciprocity of the Lex talionis, in ways, such by limiting retribution, as they did concepts of retribution (literally "an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth").
An early example of the Golden Rule that reflects the Ancient Egyptian concept of Maat appears in the story of The Eloquent Peasant, which dates to the Middle Kingdom (c. 2040–1650 BC): "Now this is the command: Do to the doer to cause that he do thus to you."
What are you doing now, following IO's gameplan? SMH. Do you think, if you post the same lies over and over again, that somebody will believe you? Nevermind, that's obvious. Just because YOU are part of the retards, known as muslims, and you morons modeled your fake religion after the Jewish/Christian faith. Doesn't mean they did the same. Your post is as weak and stupid, as your fake religion. Ya dumb muslim.:)
OMTE

Kittanning, PA

#23509 Aug 28, 2013
Where

Jefferson, GA

#23510 Aug 28, 2013
Oh my wrote:
<quoted text>
You change your to deceive; decpetion and perversion are the game you play.
Here you claim that Leviticus predates all mentions of the Golden Rule or the concept of reciprocity...
http://www.topix.com/forum/city/blairsville-g...
This is a lie, and in your sick perverted mind you cannot admit the mistake. Your error has been shown as plain as day and all you can post in reply is ignorance and lying perversion.
Your continued failure to understand that the concept of reciprocity can be expressed as both a positive and a negative just proves your ignorance. Please continue to show the true depth of your perversion as you post lie after lie after lie.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_Rule
The Code of Hammurabi,(1780 BC),[12] dealt with the reciprocity of the Lex talionis, in ways, such by limiting retribution, as they did concepts of retribution (literally "an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth").
An early example of the Golden Rule that reflects the Ancient Egyptian concept of Maat appears in the story of The Eloquent Peasant, which dates to the Middle Kingdom (c. 2040–1650 BC): "Now this is the command: Do to the doer to cause that he do thus to you."

Well Mr pervert of Ism's.
And now you again belie (for the 3rd time) your attempt to change what I did say, to your personal understanding about the Golden rule and Reciprocity of said rule. Your attempt is a feeble effort of mis-directing the postings from one subject to another.


The twix and the twain don’t mix.

Your link to my post shows I say NOTHING about your so-called Golden rule or Reciprocity.
The 2 terms are your attempt at subverting what I did say, which is, "The founding Fathers received their knowledge from their Christian forebears and passed that knowledge into the Constitution.“, which is the same as saying “the Constitution contains words and laws that show very strong influence from Christian teachings.”

“The Golden Rule or ethic of reciprocity is a maxim,[1] ethical code or morality[2] that essentially states either of the following:
•(Positive form of Golden Rule): One should treat others as one would like others to treat oneself.[1]
•(Negative form of Golden Rule): One should not treat others in ways that one would not like to be treated (also known as the Silver Rule).
This concept describes a "reciprocal", or "two-way", relationship between one's self and others that involves both sides equally, and in a mutual fashion.[3][4]"

And from this we get your comment, an ”eye for an eye.”

Which is NOT the same thing said in Leviticus,“You shall not take vengeance or bear a grudge against your kinsfolk. Love your neighbor as yourself: I am the LORD.”

Which is the same thing Jesus demonstrated during his ministry on Earth. What he demonstrated was the following from Leviticus,“You shall not take vengeance or bear a grudge against your kinsfolk. Love your neighbor as yourself: I am the LORD.” There was no “eye for an eye” and no reciprocity on the part of Jesus. Jesus, as Lord, lived the love of his neighbor without reciprocity, without coercion, and without an eye for an eye.

There is no reciprocity clause or amendment in this teaching of “love thy neighbor”, as it is in your golden rule and an “eye for an “eye.”
Where

Jefferson, GA

#23511 Aug 28, 2013
Oh my wrote:
<quoted text>
You are a bald-faced liar, this example clearly predates Leviticus, it has been shown to you in many previous posts, but in your sick and twisted perversion you cannot admit your error.
You post out of ignorance, you post out of prejudice, you post lies because you are a perverted perverter and lover of perversion. Everyone knows this, change your name and people will still know you as a liar.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_Rule
An early example of the Golden Rule that reflects the Ancient Egyptian concept of Maat appears in the story of The Eloquent Peasant, which dates to the Middle Kingdom (c. 2040–1650 BC): "Now this is the command: Do to the doer to cause that he do thus to you."

Again, your sorry post is an "eye for an eye."
Which is not Christian teachings.
I do understand it is your teaching, you being a muslim and all.

Perhaps you can point out in the Constitution where it says "an eye for an eye."
This should be interesting.


Where

Jefferson, GA

#23512 Aug 28, 2013
OMTE wrote:

I really think his high heels should be black, or white.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Brunswick Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Speed Trap along the I-95 corridor in Mcintosh ... (Nov '15) Aug 11 elder abuse 50
Job Corps info. (Aug '11) Aug 10 Jenforbus 6
Looking Aug 10 Truth 10
are great white sharks in altamahal river ? Aug 2 FLNDN 6
Watch Out Woodbine Aug 2 BellSouth 1
What Y'all think of District Attorney Jackie Jo... (Nov '11) Jul 21 Martin gillis 103
Part 12 Guy Heinze Jr. (May '10) Jul '17 Jeb 1,232

Brunswick Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Brunswick Mortgages