sodomy still on the books in Texas.<quoted text>You're entitled to your beliefs. You just can't inhibit someone else's rights simply because you believe something.
You say that a penis doesn't belong in a rectum. Does that mean heterosexual anal sex is as perverted as homosexuality? It used to be against the law for a heterosexual couple to have anal sex, and not that long ago. Should we return to that legal prohibition because you think it's wrong?
The argument that people and animals will be allowed to get married is just willful stupidity. This won't happen until animals are legally defined as people, in which case more important problems like eating animals will have to be addressed before the marriage issue.
It's much more reasonable to worry about someone marrying a corporation, since they're both legally considered to be persons. If you're wondering, I have no problem with that.
Your right. Maybe animals and humans can have a civil union.
You're right I'm just being over the top. I don't really care about this issue. I have no vested interest in it. If the American people decide they want this so be it. I don't believe gays should have the right to get married. I'm not going to march against it. Just a view point. That's all. The beastiality the pedophilia is all a smoke screen to rile up all the uber gay activist who can't see beyond their genitalia and are ruled by their sexual orientation. Wether you accept the fact that our anatomy for procreation and every other higher evolved living thing is based on male and female reproductive organs. Dude on dude and female on female goes against the natural world. To validate that union with the sanctity of a marriage goes against nature, religion and our societal mores. Sorry. If you discount religion and the American values you can't deny that it is unnatural.