Student's pellet gun confiscated afte...

Student's pellet gun confiscated after overheard comment

There are 2 comments on the The Brownsville Herald story from Jan 12, 2012, titled Student's pellet gun confiscated after overheard comment. In it, The Brownsville Herald reports that:

Police confiscated a pellet gun today belonging to a Porter High School student after a teacher reported a comment of the student's about the gun to campus administration, a spokeswoman for the Brownsville Independent School District said.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Brownsville Herald.

Jose A Bocanegra

Schaumburg, IL

#1 Jan 16, 2012
Based on the vague information available in this article, this is overreach on the part of the authorities involved (e.g. the BPD, the BISD police, the school district and high school administration).
There was no imminent danger to students or other persons, and there is no indication that the student intended (credibly) to bring the pellet gun to the high school, and it is not illegal to own and responsibly use (e.g. clearly indicating with an orange tip band that the firearm in question is an airgun or pellet gun) a pellet gun in one's home and on one's property.
While I understand and sympathize with the objective to exercise greater "vigilance" by the police and school district authorities and that that leads them to interpret what they did as taking preventive measures, we, as a community and society, must remind these public servants that they must operate, though frustratingly difficult as it may sometimes be, within the boundaries of a rule of law established by (U.S. and Texas) constitutional law and judicial precedents.
I would also be concerned about ignorant judges and legal counsel consenting or condoning these measures given the absense of probable cause to conduct such (softly coerced) searches of and seizures in residents' homes. In our collective desire optimize public safety, particularly in our public schools, we must be wary of illiberal censorship and unconstitutional actions by our public servants (e.g. law enforcement, judges, district attorneys, teachers, school administrators).
After the unfortunate, sad accident at Cummings Middle School, we should not unfairly blame law enforcement or curtail their discretion, but we should also not empower or encourage them to blatantly curtail our civil liberties, belonging to students and non-students.
Rights

Saltillo, MS

#2 Jan 23, 2012
Jose A Bocanegra wrote:
Based on the vague information available in this article, this is overreach on the part of the authorities involved (e.g. the BPD, the BISD police, the school district and high school administration).
There was no imminent danger to students or other persons, and there is no indication that the student intended (credibly) to bring the pellet gun to the high school, and it is not illegal to own and responsibly use (e.g. clearly indicating with an orange tip band that the firearm in question is an airgun or pellet gun) a pellet gun in one's home and on one's property.
While I understand and sympathize with the objective to exercise greater "vigilance" by the police and school district authorities and that that leads them to interpret what they did as taking preventive measures, we, as a community and society, must remind these public servants that they must operate, though frustratingly difficult as it may sometimes be, within the boundaries of a rule of law established by (U.S. and Texas) constitutional law and judicial precedents.
I would also be concerned about ignorant judges and legal counsel consenting or condoning these measures given the absense of probable cause to conduct such (softly coerced) searches of and seizures in residents' homes. In our collective desire optimize public safety, particularly in our public schools, we must be wary of illiberal censorship and unconstitutional actions by our public servants (e.g. law enforcement, judges, district attorneys, teachers, school administrators).
After the unfortunate, sad accident at Cummings Middle School, we should not unfairly blame law enforcement or curtail their discretion, but we should also not empower or encourage them to blatantly curtail our civil liberties, belonging to students and non-students.
Perfect assessment.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Brownsville Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News 'Beautiful Wall' a Tough Task Patchy border bar... 18 hr tomin cali 7
Election Who do you support for State Board of Education... (Oct '10) Tue CheeseSniff 1,050
anti christ Jan 15 suckmydickuperv 1
News Joe Lopez of Grupo Mazz found guilty on 3 counts (Oct '06) Jan 13 lillieh12 6,488
Valley Reality Show! Jan 11 C-Styles 1
News Americans who live near border say Trump's wall... Dec 28 Unknown Soldier 5
La vida mal Dec '16 Sasha 1

Brownsville Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Brownsville Mortgages