Randall Hutton

[Dances with Wolves]

Hutton free after posting bond a second time
By Carl Hamilton
[e-mail]
Published: Sunday, April 19, 2009 8:29 PM CDT
Randall Fergus Hutton, a 55-year-old convicted sex offender twice arrested in recent weeks on new child molestation charges, is free on bond.

Hutton who lives in the 400 block of Williams Road in Elkton, posted $300,000 in bonds on Thursday after spending one night in the Cecil County Detention Center following his most recent arrest on April 15, a jail spokeswoman reported.

http://www.cecilwhig.com/articles/2009/04/20/...

This dude is in trouble. He had been convicted once already, before he was required to register.

[BIG BOY]

you don't understand this is cecil county you can do that stuff here the states attorney here is trying to be a judge and will let him plead to a lesser sharge and walk again he needs to be shot no qeustions asked I bet if it was your child you would see it different ! I would kill him my self if he done that to my child garranteed fact !!!

[mad]

Is wife MARY HUTTON I think gets OFF sexually on him molesting kids.She bailed him out twice what a sick B---H

[Dances with Wolves]

mad wrote:

Is wife MARY HUTTON I think gets OFF sexually on him molesting kids.She bailed him out twice what a sick B---H

This story gets a whole lot messier. Take a look at this site:

http://www.dat.state.md.us/

Now, look up Kent County, property no. 02-9374. Look who they co-own property with. A School Board Superintendant!!!!

I hope law enforcement is looking into both Kent County and Queen Ann County with this prev and Mrs. perv own property.

Mary should be ashamed of herself, knowing that he is a convicted pedophile, jailed TWICE and SHE Bailed him out TWICE!

[Dances with Wolves]

BIG BOY wrote:

you don't understand this is cecil county you can do that stuff here the states attorney here is trying to be a judge and will let him plead to a lesser sharge and walk again he needs to be shot no qeustions asked I bet if it was your child you would see it different ! I would kill him my self if he done that to my child garranteed fact !!!

He was convicted and did time the last time, so he didn't get off, except for Lidums who gave his less time in jail. He is a convicted sex offender who was convicted before the registry was a requirement.

I don't think any of the Judges want to take it this time. I wish the Whig would do more investigation, but with their budget cuts, it looks like this story is going to get white washed.

[seeker]

take all the sex offenders and keep them in jail.i think it is wrong to let them out.these kids never get over this.cut their things off also.

[Nancy Drew]

Dances with Wolves wrote:

<quoted text>
This story gets a whole lot messier. Take a look at this site:
http://www.dat.state.md.us/
Now, look up Kent County, property no. 02-9374. Look who they co-own property with. A School Board Superintendant!!!!
I hope law enforcement is looking into both Kent County and Queen Ann County with this prev and Mrs. perv own property.
Mary should be ashamed of herself, knowing that he is a convicted pedophile, jailed TWICE and SHE Bailed him out TWICE!

OMG!! Shaffer??? In 2003??? Wasn't Hutton's first conviction in 1995? WTF is this all about?

How can any local School Board Superintendent not be aware of the history of a convicted pedophile and not be aware of the implications of a School Board member partnering with a convicted pedophile? Am I in the twilight zone of what?

I haven't seen this printed in the Whig so either they are covering or simply not interested.

And it sure makes me wonder too about our law enforcement. Do the 'good old boys' still rule? Or are they actually making an effort to investigate whether there are more victims of this creep?

Unbelievable.

[Peaches]

I just let them know about this thread at the Cecil Whig Blog. I hope he gets Life without Parole!

[Nancy Drew]

Peaches wrote:

I just let them know about this thread at the Cecil Whig Blog. I hope he gets Life without Parole!

Oh no. I hope that blogger that goes by the name 'Reason' doesn't join us. Did you see some of the crazy stuff she says? Let me offer the following:

Reason wrote on Apr 21, 2009 3:14 PM:
" To all of you who feel the need to leave nasty comments about Randy, I'd suggest you keep those to yourself. In no way are those actions excusable if they are true. But, Randy was a good husband, father, neighbor, friend, etc and that should count for something....."

http://www.cecilwhig.com/articles/2009/04/15/...

So, according to this nimrod, we shouldn't say anything nasty about the pedophile. A good husband, father, neighbor and friend does NOT abuse multiple children and then, when arrested, has any right or expectation for the rest of us to mince words. I am sorry for his children. I highly doubt he has any friends left, and as for his wife - Pffft! If she found his actions horrible, she would not have bailed him out, so she deserves what she gets.

[Peaches]

I agree Nancy..I feel sorry for all the Family members Aunts..Uncles..Nephews and Nieces, grandkids that carry this Last name. But not the wife..you can't tell me that after how many of years of marriage..she didn't have a mothers intuition..???? Please....How could you sleep next to someone like that???

[Already Known]

Henry Shaffer is probably trying to divest himself of that property ownership quickly. Too late though. Makes me wonder what sort of thing is going on here...is there a ring of some sort operating? Why Shaffer, a man with access to children, is getting into dealings with the likes of Hutton is beyond me. If I was Shaffer, I'd come out with a statement about the property ownership...if to do nothing more than to clear the air and try to distance himself from Hutton.

[Nancy Drew]

Peaches wrote:

I agree Nancy..I feel sorry for all the Family members Aunts..Uncles..Nephews and Nieces, grandkids that carry this Last name. But not the wife..you can't tell me that after how many of years of marriage..she didn't have a mothers intuition..???? Please....How could you sleep next to someone like that???

Ewwwww. He gives me the creeps. I'm just not seeing it either. How could she possible justify being with him after his first conviction? That alone would have been a major red flag. And this now? And she bails him out twice? WTH is she thinking? She had to have known or suspected something, yet she did nothing. No excuse for it.

[Nancy Drew]

Already Known wrote:

Henry Shaffer is probably trying to divest himself of that property ownership quickly. Too late though. Makes me wonder what sort of thing is going on here...is there a ring of some sort operating? Why Shaffer, a man with access to children, is getting into dealings with the likes of Hutton is beyond me. If I was Shaffer, I'd come out with a statement about the property ownership...if to do nothing more than to clear the air and try to distance himself from Hutton.

You are right. It's too late now. He is stuck and yes, he should make a statement. The longer he waits, the worse it is for him. Surely the people in his circle are wondering about this, unless they too are turning a blind eye. It's awful to think that this man deliberately set himself in a clear situation with a convicted sexual offender.

I think the Board of Education should be asking lots of questions.

[Nancy Drew]

I just found the Public Access to Maryland Court Records website.

http://www.courts.state.md.us/courtrecords.ht...

If you go to Case Search and type his name, you can view the charges against him. Of course, they don't mention the victims, so their privacy is respected. It appears that Hutton doesn't have a lawyer yet.

[Peaches]

Why hasn't this been on the Baltimore News stations or the News Journal?? or even in the other counties news paper..looked on line at their back issues and nothing...hmmmmmmm

[Peaches]

OMG! Nancy...He was STILL doing things after arrested 3 weeks ago?? Says March 31...

And he's out on bail..free to roam the streets?? So whats keeping him from not doing anything at this moment??????? He's above the law it seems So he thinks!!!!!

[Nancy Drew]

I just find the definitions of Sexual Offenses. All can be searched here:

http://michie.lexisnexis.com/maryland/lpext.d...

§ 3-305. Sexual offense in the first degree.





(a) Prohibited.- A person may not:




(1) engage in a sexual act with another by force, or the threat of force, without the consent of the other; and




(2)(i) employ or display a dangerous weapon, or a physical object that the victim reasonably believes is a dangerous weapon;




(ii) suffocate, strangle, disfigure, or inflict serious physical injury on the victim or another in the course of committing the crime;




(iii) threaten, or place the victim in fear, that the victim, or an individual known to the victim, imminently will be subject to death, suffocation, strangulation, disfigurement, serious physical injury, or kidnapping;




(iv) commit the crime while aided and abetted by another; or




(v) commit the crime in connection with a burglary in the first, second, or third degree.




(b) Violation of § 3-503(a)(2) of this title.- A person may not violate subsection (a) of this section while also violating § 3-503(a)(2) of this title involving a victim who is a child under the age of 16 years.




(c) Age considerations.- A person 18 years of age or older may not violate subsection (a) of this section involving a victim who is a child under the age of 13 years.




(d) Penalty.-




(1) Except as provided in paragraphs (2),(3), and (4) of this subsection, a person who violates subsection (a) of this section is guilty of the felony of sexual offense in the first degree and on conviction is subject to imprisonment not exceeding life.




(2) A person who violates subsection (b) of this section is guilty of the felony of sexual offense in the first degree and on conviction is subject to imprisonment not exceeding life without the possibility of parole.




(3) A person who violates subsection (a) or (b) of this section is guilty of the felony of sexual offense in the first degree and on conviction is subject to imprisonment not exceeding life without the possibility of parole if the defendant was previously convicted of violating this section or § 3-303 of this subtitle.





(4)(i) Subject to subparagraph (iv) of this paragraph, a person 18 years of age or older who violates subsection (c) of this section is guilty of the felony of sexual offense in the first degree and on conviction is subject to imprisonment for not less than 25 years and not exceeding life without the possibility of parole.




(ii) A court may not suspend any part of the mandatory minimum sentence of 25 years.




(iii) The person is not eligible for parole during the mandatory minimum sentence.




(iv) If the State fails to comply with subsection (e) of this section, the mandatory minimum sentence shall not apply.




(e) Required notice.- If the State intends to seek a sentence of imprisonment for life without the possibility of parole under subsection (d)(2),(3), or (4) of this section, or imprisonment for not less than 25 years under subsection (d)(4) of this section, the State shall notify the person in writing of the State's intention at least 30 days before trial.

[Nancy Drew]

§ 3-306. Sexual offense in the second degree.


(a) Prohibited.- A person may not engage in a sexual act with another:



(1) by force, or the threat of force, without the consent of the other;




(2) if the victim is a mentally defective individual, a mentally incapacitated individual, or a physically helpless individual, and the person performing the sexual act knows or reasonably should know that the victim is a mentally defective individual, a mentally incapacitated individual, or a physically helpless individual; or




(3) if the victim is under the age of 14 years, and the person performing the sexual act is at least 4 years older than the victim.




(b) Age considerations.- A person 18 years of age or older may not violate subsection (a)(1) or (2) of this section involving a child under the age of 13 years.




(c) Penalty.-




(1) Except as provided in paragraph (2) of this subsection, a person who violates this section is guilty of the felony of sexual offense in the second degree and on conviction is subject to imprisonment not exceeding 20 years.




(2)(i) Subject to subparagraph (iv) of this paragraph, a person 18 years of age or older who violates subsection (b) of this section is guilty of the felony of sexual offense in the second degree and on conviction is subject to imprisonment for not less than 5 years and not exceeding 20 years.




(ii) A court may not suspend any part of the mandatory minimum sentence of 5 years.




(iii) The person is not eligible for parole during the mandatory minimum sentence.




(iv) If the State fails to comply with subsection (d) of this section, the mandatory minimum shall not apply.




(d) Required notice.- If the State intends to seek a sentence of imprisonment for not less than 5 years under subsection (c)(2) of this section, the State shall notify the person in writing of the State's intention at least 30 days before trial.

[Nancy Drew]

§ 3-307. Sexual offense in the third degree.



(a) Prohibited.- A person may not:


(1)(i) engage in sexual contact with another without the consent of the other; and




(ii) 1. employ or display a dangerous weapon, or a physical object that the victim reasonably believes is a dangerous weapon;


2. suffocate, strangle, disfigure, or inflict serious physical injury on the victim or another in the course of committing the crime;


3. threaten, or place the victim in fear, that the victim, or an individual known to the victim, imminently will be subject to death, suffocation, strangulation, disfigurement, serious physical injury, or kidnapping; or


4. commit the crime while aided and abetted by another;


(2) engage in sexual contact with another if the victim is a mentally defective individual, a mentally incapacitated individual, or a physically helpless individual, and the person performing the act knows or reasonably should know the victim is a mentally defective individual, a mentally incapacitated individual, or a physically helpless individual;


(3) engage in sexual contact with another if the victim is under the age of 14 years, and the person performing the sexual contact is at least 4 years older than the victim;


(4) engage in a sexual act with another if the victim is 14 or 15 years old, and the person performing the sexual act is at least 21 years old; or


(5) engage in vaginal intercourse with another if the victim is 14 or 15 years old, and the person performing the act is at least 21 years old.


(b) Penalty.- A person who violates this section is guilty of the felony of sexual offense in the third degree and on conviction is subject to imprisonment not exceeding 10 years.

[Nancy Drew]

Peaches wrote:

OMG! Nancy...He was STILL doing things after arrested 3 weeks ago?? Says March 31...
And he's out on bail..free to roam the streets?? So whats keeping him from not doing anything at this moment??????? He's above the law it seems So he thinks!!!!!

Three indictments 4/10/09
One more indictment 4/13/09

Total of four?? OMG!!