Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-S...

Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil Unions

There are 52051 comments on the CBS2 story from Nov 30, 2010, titled Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil Unions. In it, CBS2 reports that:

The Illinois House has approved a measure to legalize civil unions for same-sex couples.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at CBS2.

Since: Mar 07

Location hidden

#37534 Feb 8, 2013
G-Wiz wrote:
<quoted text>...... Its my belief gays are free to raise their own institutions just as straight people throughout history have done. what a beautiful thing that would be.
We have "raised out own institution". It's called marriage. You know, the basic civil right?

See. Isn't that easy?

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#37535 Feb 8, 2013
Quest wrote:
<quoted text>
If many Americans don't want to marry a gay person, they certainly aren't going to required to. So, who is bullying whom?
What a stupid comment. Who said that? Why is a dismissive, diversionary, deceitful statement like that necessary for a legitimate position?
Quest wrote:
<quoted text>
Why would any sane person worry about the gender of the person that some stranger is marrying?
Because marriage represents a sacred, unique relationship to them. Because it is designed to protect and encourage a natural family, not a fake duplicate union pretending to be one.
Quest wrote:
<quoted text>
That just isn't logical.
Pointing out the lack of reason or logic isn't bullying.
It most certainly is logical, and the only thing you pointed out is the lack of a logical answer. In fact, you can't even equate gay couples at the most basic essence of marriage; a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.

Sorry.

Smile.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#37536 Feb 8, 2013
Quest wrote:
<quoted text>
We have "raised out own institution". It's called marriage. You know, the basic civil right?
See. Isn't that easy?
BS.

You are trying to impose an imposter relationship on the sole birthplace of your existence. By your dumbed down definition of marriage, any relationship qualifies.

The fact that you are not proud enough of your own to distinguish it only exposes the innate sense of a defect.

All this at the expense of your character and the health of mothers and children.

Man up boy!
G-Wiz

United States

#37537 Feb 8, 2013
Quest wrote:
<quoted text>
We have "raised out own institution". It's called marriage. You know, the basic civil right?
See. Isn't that easy?
we can assume this discussion is mute.enjoy..

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#37538 Feb 8, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
BS.
You are trying to impose an imposter relationship on the sole birthplace of your existence. By your dumbed down definition of marriage, any relationship qualifies.
The fact that you are not proud enough of your own to distinguish it only exposes the innate sense of a defect.
All this at the expense of your character and the health of mothers and children.
Man up boy!
Nonsense, oh great generic freak.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#37539 Feb 9, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
BS.
You are trying to impose an imposter relationship on the sole birthplace of your existence. By your dumbed down definition of marriage, any relationship qualifies.
The fact that you are not proud enough of your own to distinguish it only exposes the innate sense of a defect.
All this at the expense of your character and the health of mothers and children.
Man up boy!
Dusty Mangina wrote:
<quoted text>
Nonsense, oh great generic freak.
Says the non-functioning vagina who just had her ass handed to her on a platter.

Smirk.

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#37540 Feb 9, 2013
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
BS.
You are trying to impose an imposter relationship on the sole birthplace of your existence. By your dumbed down definition of marriage, any relationship qualifies.
The fact that you are not proud enough of your own to distinguish it only exposes the innate sense of a defect.
All this at the expense of your character and the health of mothers and children.
Man up boy!
<quoted text>
Says the non-functioning vagina who just had her ass handed to her on a platter.
Smirk.
hi

The only ass I have is you.
grounded in Reality

Nashua, NH

#37541 Feb 9, 2013
no one gives a rats ass what negro gay drug dealers do.

how about addressing real world issues like jobs, getting the negro welfare whores off welfare into jobs. arrest and deport all those illegal immigrants stealing goods and services from America

get the negro drug dealers shooters & DRUG Buyers off da streets and in jail,
stop the senseless killing of black kids. Find out who killed the last thousand kids killed and put them in prison,

get the garbage and panhandlers off the streets.
clean up da city, it looks like a large junk yard with fred Sampson in charge.
Uncle Uganda Mofo

Alpharetta, GA

#37542 Feb 9, 2013
grounded in Reality wrote:
no one gives a rats ass what negro gay drug dealers do.
how about addressing real world issues like jobs, getting the negro welfare whores off welfare into jobs. arrest and deport all those illegal immigrants stealing goods and services from America
get the negro drug dealers shooters & DRUG Buyers off da streets and in jail,
stop the senseless killing of black kids. Find out who killed the last thousand kids killed and put them in prison,
get the garbage and panhandlers off the streets.
clean up da city, it looks like a large junk yard with fred Sampson in charge.
Sounds like a plan
.
When do you start hiring?
CDC

Saint Louis, MO

#37545 Feb 11, 2013
Lilly, do you have a real job yet?
Lililth_Satans_Bore wrote:
<quoted text>oh look everyone its a troll
Hulk

United States

#37546 Feb 11, 2013
Interesting

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#37547 Feb 11, 2013
The differences between marriage with/without kids and gay couples;
An apple tree bearing fruit.
An apple tree not bearing fruit for some reason.
An walnut tree who never bears any fruit wanting to be a apple tree.
An walnut tree hanging apples on it's branches pretending to be a apple tree.

Even funnier?

The claim that if the government doesn't 'require' apple trees to bear fruit, then it is discrimination not to call walnut trees apple trees too!

Still, no logical response.

Anyone???

“Free your mind”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#37548 Feb 11, 2013
KiMare wrote:
The differences between marriage with/without kids and gay couples;
An apple tree bearing fruit.
An apple tree not bearing fruit for some reason.
An walnut tree who never bears any fruit wanting to be a apple tree.
An walnut tree hanging apples on it's branches pretending to be a apple tree.
Even funnier?
The claim that if the government doesn't 'require' apple trees to bear fruit, then it is discrimination not to call walnut trees apple trees too!
Still, no logical response.
Anyone???
So sad that you don't have anything better to do than to troll gay forums... SMH
Andrew Catherine Singer

Morgan Hill, CA

#37550 Feb 11, 2013
the fact king wrote:
<quoted text>LMAO..... It is funny as hell that someone SO against gay marriage spends his entire day on this site talking to gay people.......I think he might just be a little curious about taking a hard cock in his mouth.......Just remember preacher just because you suck a dick you are not gay..... You just enjoy felling another man getting hard in your mouth.....Don't be ashamed God will understand & not damn you to hell.......Well not for sucking a dick.....God might be so understanding about you screwing that guys wife or when you stole from the church you preached at.......
It makes sense that YOU would support gay marriage, factless. However, no matter how many laws they pass allowing that, I seriously doubt whether Americans are ready to allow you to marry your WIENER DOGS.

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#37551 Feb 11, 2013
TXgurl wrote:
<quoted text>
So sad that you don't have anything better to do than to troll gay forums... SMH
It makes his micro-penis a little stiff. I should know, we live in the same neighborhood.

I'm Kimare's inner lesbian, and I approved this message.

Schizophrenia is a bitch.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#37553 Feb 12, 2013
The differences between marriage with/without kids and gay couples;
An apple tree bearing fruit.
An apple tree not bearing fruit for some reason.
An walnut tree who never bears any fruit wanting to be a apple tree.
An walnut tree hanging apples on it's branches pretending to be a apple tree.

Even funnier?

The claim that if the government doesn't 'require' apple trees to bear fruit, then it is discrimination not to call walnut trees apple trees too!

And STILL, no logical response.

Just look at the gay twirl ad homoan attacks above.

A desperate attempt to stop light that is kicking the sh/t out of darkness!

Oh, and proving that the biggest blondes live in Texas!

Smile.

“Free your mind”

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#37554 Feb 12, 2013
KiMare wrote:
The differences between marriage with/without kids and gay couples;
An apple tree bearing fruit.
An apple tree not bearing fruit for some reason.
An walnut tree who never bears any fruit wanting to be a apple tree.
An walnut tree hanging apples on it's branches pretending to be a apple tree.
Even funnier?
The claim that if the government doesn't 'require' apple trees to bear fruit, then it is discrimination not to call walnut trees apple trees too!
And STILL, no logical response.
Just look at the gay twirl ad homoan attacks above.
A desperate attempt to stop light that is kicking the sh/t out of darkness!
Oh, and proving that the biggest blondes live in Texas!
Smile.
Blah, blah, blah... babble on, parrot. You aren't capable of logical thinking so you have to repeat the same thing over and over... Polly want a cracker?

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#37555 Feb 12, 2013
KiMare wrote:
The differences between marriage with/without kids and gay couples; NOTHING!
A desperate attempt to stop light that is kicking the sh/t out of darkness!

Smile.
Fruits and nuts, twigs and berries.

A desperate attempt to stop a train that is rolling on down the track and gaining speed.

Let me know if your senile brain needs me explain that metaphor. I'll send a message up via the spinal cord. Of course, I'm not sure it will get past your ass; not much does.
Right

Forest Park, IL

#37558 Feb 12, 2013
It is not logical to counter an illogical argument with logic. Perhaps that is why he didn't counter. The funny thing with referencing statistical information is that the numbers can be easily skewed to whatever outcome the analyzer chooses. For every thing referenced, one could easily find another study that disproves all those previously documented. Take for example the information posted above regarding the woman raised by gay parents. I could easily find many instances where a young woman could not bring home a boyfriend because her straight mother would hit on them, or even female friends, because her father acted inappropriately with them.
KiMare wrote:
STILL no logical counter to this fact;
At it's most basic essence, marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.
Gay couples are the picture of defective failure. Mating behavior gone abusive with NOTHING to show for it.
STILL no logical counter to this fact;
A fruit tree bearing fruit.
A fruit tree not bearing fruit for some reason.
A nut tree who never bears fruit wanting to be a fruit tree.
A nut tree hanging fruit on it's branches pretending to be a fruit tree.
Even funnier?
The claim that if the government doesn't 'require' fruit trees to bear fruit, then it is discrimination not to call nut trees fruit trees too!
Hilarious!!!
Right

Forest Park, IL

#37559 Feb 12, 2013
Love it when people say something has been this way forever, why change it. Why don't we recant women voting? Why don't we go back to slavery? Why don't we stone adulterers? Why don't we re-institute prohibition? What are you afraid will happen if two people that love each other enter into a marriage? How you are making the stretch that defining a marriage as a union between two people as discriminatory is incredible. Who is being discriminated against? To say that it opens the door to polygamy is ludicrousness. I was expecting your next claim to be it encourages beastiality. However, it does raise an interesting point. If you are going to say that marriage is and always has been a union between a man and a women, don't you have to accept the fact that 2000 years ago, or the 6,000 year figure you have already used, polygamy was the norm? To state that this movement challenges the building block of human civilization is insane. Family is not defined by being a man and a woman. Again, what are you afraid of?
Samatha wrote:
how do they get away with making a patently false charge against a 6,000-year-old religious institution and the civil laws that it inspired?

If it is true that limiting the definition of marriage to a union between one man and one woman is inherently a violation of civil rights, wouldn’t it also be true that defining marriage as a union between just two people is equally discriminatory?
The advocates of same-sex marriage hate this challenge, because they have no intelligent response to it. By default, a capitulation to the same-sex marriage advocates represents future capitulation to the logic they use. That means support of same-sex marriage, to be consistent, must translate into support of polygamy and group marriages of any combination.
Recently, a columnist for the Huffington Post tried to make the case that, unlike same-sex marriage, which has never existed in the history of the world anywhere at any time, polygamy represents a clear and present danger to society. That’s the distinction, he claimed. He cites one infamous polygamist leader charged with sexual assaults and incest-related felony counts as examples of how this works. Of course, he ignores a virtual epidemic of violence and molestation in the homosexual community in favor of one isolated case in the polygamy community.
Eliyahu Federman also states:“There isn’t a shred of modern sociological evidence to support the claim that gay marriage is harmful to society, whereas there is a plethora of historical and contemporary evidence to illustrate the dangers associated with polygamy.”
Ten years ago, the notion of same-sex marriage was scarcely even discussed, let alone performed. So the absence of a body of evidence is a red herring. In the case of polygamy, however, we have thousands of years of history to examine.
It is amazing how quickly the same-sex marriage advocates have been able to rally support from the media, the cultural establishment, the government elite and the judiciary for a radical social experiment that challenges the fundamental building block of human civilization – the family.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Brookfield Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Danny's Deli Closed (Apr '17) 22 min Ex-Melrose Parker 6
lyons, il politics (Mar '07) 37 min Fact Check 10,347
stamps 21 hr concerned 2
bowling alley fire 1990 (Jan '07) Thu kasey 18
She Gone Wed Be Gone 12
MP Police selling raffle tickets on duty for th... Wed what’s the secr... 16
assault rifle ban in melrose (Jun '13) Wed destruction 9

Brookfield Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Brookfield Mortgages