Who do you support for Governor in Oh...
xxxrayted

Cleveland, OH

#18836 May 27, 2013
Old Guy wrote:
Xxxrayted, you seem to be in a difficult spot. You want to justify the deductions for children on federal income taxes, but the only way you can do it is by trying to shift the argument to local property taxes (which don't have tax deductions for children.)
But, if you rather talk about property taxes, how do you feel about churches being exempt from them? Many churches own large tracts of land, but pay no property taxes (even though they use the services those taxes support.)
Just as you complain about paying property taxes for schools that you don't use, why should people that do not attend church be forced to subsidize those that do through tax exemptions for church property?
I'm not crazy about churches paying no taxes. But on the other hand, what could happen if they were not exempt from taxes?

That would allow the church to preach about anything they desire. Religion is still influential with a lot of people. They could be telling their parishioners that the Democrats party is the party of demons since they promote the murder of babies and strive to take God out of society outside of church and home. They may target Republicans who don't believe in government helping out the poor, or that Republicans are evil because they support wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Who knows?

Whatever political agenda the church decides on could mean serious problems for politicians and/or parties. Of course anybody taking away such tax exemptions would be looked at as attacking religion, so you can't put the toothpaste back in the tube.
Old Guy

New Carlisle, OH

#18837 May 27, 2013
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm not crazy about churches paying no taxes. But on the other hand, what could happen if they were not exempt from taxes?
That would allow the church to preach about anything they desire.
Oh, you mean that the churches would then actively promote political candidates, and instruct their faithful to vote for them?

"The meeting offered no public discussion of an April sermon by Illinois Bishop Daniel Jenky...

After asserting that Obama, "with his radical, pro-abortion and extreme secularist agenda" seemed to be on an anti-Catholic path similar to Hitler and Stalin, Jenky exhorted all Catholics to "vote their Catholic consciences" this fall."

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/06/21/us-...
xxxrayted

Cleveland, OH

#18838 May 27, 2013
Old Guy wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, you mean that the churches would then actively promote political candidates, and instruct their faithful to vote for them?
"The meeting offered no public discussion of an April sermon by Illinois Bishop Daniel Jenky...
After asserting that Obama, "with his radical, pro-abortion and extreme secularist agenda" seemed to be on an anti-Catholic path similar to Hitler and Stalin, Jenky exhorted all Catholics to "vote their Catholic consciences" this fall."
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/06/21/us-...
That's exactly what I mean, except picture that tenfold.

In my opinion, once you start with the politics stuff, you get your tax exemption pulled no questions asked.
Old Guy

New Carlisle, OH

#18839 May 27, 2013
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
In my opinion, once you start with the politics stuff, you get your tax exemption pulled no questions asked.
It's nice to know that we can agree about some things!
Tazzie

UK

#18840 May 27, 2013
They need someone from a place like Greenfield to run
Because none of the idiots that are putting up have nothing in coman with small town rural Ohio and who ever makes it wont make any difference to my life
They spat us out and sold us out years ago
I cant even make ends meet despite having two jobs
And i live in the richest country in the world something wrong ?
LorenEberly

Mount Vernon, OH

#18841 May 27, 2013
Fathers With White Skin Disqualified For Affirmative Action:

The majority of Us the Government of this Representative Republic that vote and the nonvoters that sit on their dead hands and whine; insist on electing Obnoxious President, Vice President, Governor, Representatives of US the Government, County Commissioners, Township Trustees, Mayors, City Council, School Administrators and Board Members with socialist, racist principles and values.

That supports defying USA Labor Law, The Constitution, and demands of Natural Law: what Mother Nature, God, or Whatever Power decreed to be the reality of the real world, democracy, capitalism, the US Constitution, and free, fair, and affordable commerce and common sense demands.

Demanding every Business Owner and their Stockholders, corporation, farmer, business, outsourcer sweatshop, and nonprofit, tax-exempt, organization and Church; markets the cost in the wholesale and retail price of his or her product and service; of every worker, consumer, and taxpayer's wages (union contract), healthcare, pension, investment and independent business profit.

This enables every worker, consumer, and taxpayer to pay healthcare insurance premium or pay healthcare provider. Pay ALL taxes and pay for every product and service they use for life. With money derived from wages, investment profit, and independent business profit.

And holds Fathers disqualified for affirmative action with white skin, Union workers, consumers, taxpayers, and America’s grandchildren’s children, Government employees, Parents, Teachers, Veterans, Police, Firemen; Representatives deny Collective Bargaining Rights accountable.

To fund Illegal drug users and Illegal Immigrants, lottery, casino, and keno losers, unemployed Union workers replaced with nonunion workers, Human Traffickers, waitresses that pander for life for $2.00 per hour, slaves in tax abated enterprise zones, low-income child labor, consumers, and taxpayers, volunteers without wages, and nonunion workers willing to work for fewer wages than they can afford life. That pays with welfare checks, food stamps, housing vouchers, and Medicaid.

Pay income, social security and road tax Amish evade paying 10% of their income derived from wages, Ponzi credit certificates, and independent business profit to nonprofit, tax exempt, Amish Church.

Pay for all stimulus packages, tax abatements, tax incentives, tax refunds, tax credit, and tax exemptions.

Pay sales tax on the more stock dividends (money) OPEC Nations, Enron Stockholders, Wal-Mart Stockholders, Hillarys, Chinese, Foreign and Domestic Investors and Stockholders (money marketers) market quarterly. In the wholesale and retail price of every product and service Human Beings use for life. And School Boards and Government needs to build, maintain and operate schools, infrastructure, and provide local and national security, and Government services. That gets only product or service.

Needed to measure and maintain the strength and growth of this UNAFFORDABLE economy and distribute money Human Beings cannot digest, burn in internal combustion engines, or burn to heat and cool their American Dream. Into OPEC Nations, Enron Stockholders, Wal-Mart Stockholders, Hillarys, Chinese, Foreign and Domestic Investors and Stockholders portfolios.

This Makes free, fair, and affordable commerce IMPOSSIBLE; Makes funding schools IMPOSSIBLE; Makes balancing every budget IMPOSSIBLE; Makes Fathers disqualified for affirmative action with white skin, Union workers, consumers, taxpayers, and Americas grandchildren's children life UNAFFORDABLE; and created Ohio’s $1.35 trillion budget deficit, the $40 trillion social security and the $16 trillion national debt. America’s grandchildren’s children are responsible to pay Chinese, Foreign and Domestic Investors and Stockholders interest with this debt until they are 18 years old.

America’s grandchildren’s children cannot pay this debt in a hundred million years.
xxxrayted

Cleveland, OH

#18842 May 27, 2013
Tazzie wrote:
They need someone from a place like Greenfield to run
Because none of the idiots that are putting up have nothing in coman with small town rural Ohio and who ever makes it wont make any difference to my life
They spat us out and sold us out years ago
I cant even make ends meet despite having two jobs
And i live in the richest country in the world something wrong ?
Something did go wrong. You made a lot of bad decisions in your life.
meme

United States

#18843 May 27, 2013
Noone
Pops

Newport, KY

#18844 May 27, 2013
xxxrayted wrote:
As I pointed out, I don't think schooling is the responsibility of anybody else but the parents. But since it is, that's why I could see a write-off. In my sisters case, she was paying heavily to have other people's children educated through property tax, and she was paying out the nose to have her kids educated. She and her husband took on the responsibility to educate their own children. Why shouldn't she get a tax break?
The same holds true for home school parents. They take on the responsibility of educating their own children while paying good money to educate the children of others. The only way to accomplish that is to sacrifice a full time income.

Sure people like that should get a tax break. At the national average cost of $12,000 per year per pupil in public school, think of the money they save the city, county and state every year.
Generally I agree. Here's my 'but'... It is in the interest of ALL of us to see that ALL kids get educated. Otherwise WE would have more criminals since a lack of education would likely create more thieves, burglars, muggers, dope dealers, etc. That is sad to say but seems to make a sensible theory.
I didn't like paying school taxes for 15 yrs B4 I had children & I will always be paying school taxes forever as will my now adult kids.
That is why I strongly believe in school vouchers. The taxes are to pay for an education. IF your kids are NOT in public schools, they should NOT get the tax dollars. At very least not ALL of the tax revenue.
Oak Hills H.S. is losing students because certain special needs students were to be sent out of his district & he publically whined about 'his' school losing tax dollars. What a putz!! The funds are for the students. IF the school loses X students, the tax funds should follow the students. DUH!
So accordingly, non-public students should be followed by a proportion amount of tax dollars. That's my thinking.
Michael Jackson

Pittsburgh, PA

#18845 May 27, 2013
I support michael jackson all the way 100%
TopicsWebSite

Pittsburgh, PA

#18846 May 27, 2013
1st off you people are stupid. The post says.*** WHO DO YOU SUPPORT FOR GOVERNOR IN OHIO IN 2010. """2010 has passed you stupid people"""
xxxrayted

Cleveland, OH

#18847 May 27, 2013
TopicsWebSite wrote:
1st off you people are stupid. The post says.*** WHO DO YOU SUPPORT FOR GOVERNOR IN OHIO IN 2010. """2010 has passed you stupid people"""
The only stupid people on Topix are those who go to sites to tell others their delight and discussion upset them somehow. Retarded people are those who don't possess the intelligence to ignore subjects that bother them.
xxxrayted

Cleveland, OH

#18848 May 27, 2013
Pops wrote:
<quoted text>Generally I agree. Here's my 'but'... It is in the interest of ALL of us to see that ALL kids get educated. Otherwise WE would have more criminals since a lack of education would likely create more thieves, burglars, muggers, dope dealers, etc. That is sad to say but seems to make a sensible theory.
I didn't like paying school taxes for 15 yrs B4 I had children & I will always be paying school taxes forever as will my now adult kids.
That is why I strongly believe in school vouchers. The taxes are to pay for an education. IF your kids are NOT in public schools, they should NOT get the tax dollars. At very least not ALL of the tax revenue.
Oak Hills H.S. is losing students because certain special needs students were to be sent out of his district & he publically whined about 'his' school losing tax dollars. What a putz!! The funds are for the students. IF the school loses X students, the tax funds should follow the students. DUH!
So accordingly, non-public students should be followed by a proportion amount of tax dollars. That's my thinking.
My thinking is that not all citizens should be taxed equally to support public schools. People who are using those schools should be taxed at a minimum of 50% more than those who do not use the schools. That might make them think twice before passing any new school levies instead of the way it is now.

Sure, we are all better off as a society with educated kids, but we would also be better off as a society to have families with cars. After all, if you don't have a vehicle, how would you get to work, to go to grocery stores, to get to an emergency room if needed? So maybe we should tax the citizens so all have automobiles. But in most states, you can't have a car without insurance, can you? I guess we could tax people for that too. What do these people do with no communications in the event of an emergency? Why...... we have to give them cell phones. How would these people find a job??? So now our cell phone bills are increase to pay for 250 anytime minutes per phone so these people could.......... find a job. Because society would be better off if more people were working.

When you promote irresponsibility, don't be surprised when you create more irresponsible people. If you're having children you can't afford to feed, clothe or educate, then you are irresponsible for having children. And as long as we use these children as a Get Out Of Jail Free card, then we can use these children to provide just about anything to the leeches of these children on working people's dime.
Old Guy

New Carlisle, OH

#18849 May 27, 2013
TopicsWebSite wrote:
1st off you people are stupid.
We are known by the company we keep. Welcome aboard!
Pops

Newport, KY

#18850 May 27, 2013
TopicsWebSite wrote:
1st off you people are stupid. The post says.*** WHO DO YOU SUPPORT FOR GOVERNOR IN OHIO IN 2010. """2010 has passed you stupid people"""
IF you don't like the way that this topic has evolved... just shut up or go count the stars in the skies on your fingers, Talk about being STUPID !!
Pops

Newport, KY

#18851 May 27, 2013
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
My thinking is that not all citizens should be taxed equally to support public schools. People who are using those schools should be taxed at a minimum of 50% more than those who do not use the schools. That might make them think twice before passing any new school levies instead of the way it is now.
That is exactly why I believe that VOUCHERS are proper
Old Guy

New Carlisle, OH

#18852 May 27, 2013
Pops wrote:
<quoted text>Generally I agree. Here's my 'but'... It is in the interest of ALL of us to see that ALL kids get educated. Otherwise WE would have more criminals since a lack of education would likely create more thieves, burglars, muggers, dope dealers, etc. That is sad to say but seems to make a sensible theory.
I agree. I'd rather see a younger generation that is smart, educated and able to support themselves in a changing world. It's much cheaper to educate them now, rather than incarcerate them later.
TipixWebSite

Pittsburgh, PA

#18853 May 27, 2013
Pops wrote:
<quoted text>IF you don't like the way that this topic has evolved... just shut up or go count the stars in the skies on your fingers, Talk about being STUPID !!
Sttupid your the one that's srupid.

Tbis is 2013 not 2010 you stupid people.
xxxrayted

Cleveland, OH

#18854 May 28, 2013
Pops wrote:
<quoted text>That is exactly why I believe that VOUCHERS are proper
If you think that, what do you think of my idea about education:

Home schooled children have a descent success rate. But as I mentioned earlier, not all people can afford to sacrifice a full or part-time income to teach their own children. We also know that many public schools are failures. The last average per pupil per year that I read about in the country is around $12,000.

It's clear that it would benefit us all to have more home schooling. But if a mother of two children can successfully teach her own children at home, why can't she teach other neighborhood kids as well?

If a home school mother can possibly teach other children, why can't we pay her to teach others? Again, using the average of $12,000 per pupil, we could voucher him or her with $8,000 per year per child they decide to teach. That saves the taxpayer $4,000 per year per pupil.

The children are likely to get a better education. It eliminates the concern that teachers and unions have expressed about smaller class sizes (even though they are just trying to expand their own unions) and also concerns of other critics who state that home schooled students are robbed of social values because they are not with other children.

I think it's a great idea except for one thing: unions. Unions would have a conniption over the suggestion.
xxxrayted

Cleveland, OH

#18855 May 28, 2013
TipixWebSite wrote:
<quoted text>
Sttupid your the one that's srupid.
Tbis is 2013 not 2010 you stupid people.
You're a real psycho, aren't you?

So if we started another forum but titled it 2013, and had the same members discussing the same subjects,that would make you happy somehow?

I think you need to get a job or something. Get out of the house. You're losing your mind.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Brook Park Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Group circulates petitions aimed at keeping Lak... 4 hr kwarren 1
News Theodore Wilt arrested in July 4 fatal stabbing... (Jul '09) Jul 28 I miss you my son 20
Anyone? Jul 25 Love 1
Four car windows smashed: Brook Park police blo... Jul 20 kimberly 2
the music thread (Mar '12) Jul 12 Musikologist 17
News A man flees from police at high speeds as his g... (Nov '09) Jul '15 mack 252
John Zalic, BOTTOM FEEDER Jun '15 Casimer Nowakowski 2
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Brook Park Mortgages