Who do you support for Governor in Oh...
Canton

Canton, OH

#28223 May 6, 2014
Pops wrote:
To Canton: YOU are the prince...no King of obsfucation So I bow to your ability to side step, not answer, twist, fold, bend & mutilate ANY post that you wish.
YOU are the TOPS of spilling & speaking B.S. & being Biased.
Better than Jay Carney. You should apply for his lying B.S. job in ANY administration.
YOU would be worth more than you would be paid. Great liars & fact twisters are in demand in Washington D.C. & many if not all state capitals.
Sure now back up your flapping jowls by posting something on here that I lied about. Post, with links to disprove it, one thing on here that you consider bullsh1t. Yah, that's what I thought. You have confused me whooping your @ss on here with the facts with bullsh1t.
woo-boy

Van Wert, OH

#28224 May 6, 2014
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
Well lets' hear your theory.
The guns were sold with no tracking devices. They tried to say it was a continuation of the Bush program, but that program ended because the cartel found the tracking devices on the guns the bush administration sold them. After the failed experiment, Bush said he would never try anything like that again.
So DumBama not only tries to do what Bush did unsuccessfully, but had no tracking devices. So what was his plan if it was proven already that such a program couldn't work?
One of two things: either I am correct saying that DumBama had an ulterior motive, or DumBama is as stupid as they could possibly come. Do you have a third theory? If so, let's hear it.
It's fun watching you Foxbots keep beating up dead and over false conspiracies:

thehill.com/blogs-briefing-room/news/241191-s...
Canton

Canton, OH

#28225 May 6, 2014
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
What I posted was pretty bipartisan, don't you think? The UK, the UN, NASA that you've often cited yourself?
To your chagrin, there are plenty of scientists that disagree with this Global Warming scam. And for every scientist that you find that is funded by any oil company, I'll find several that get their paycheck from some government agency either here or abroad since that's how most science gets their money.
The fact of the matter is that GW is nothing more than a theory. No empirical evidence, no consistency, just a theory. Scientists have opposing theories which is nothing that unusual. But you try to convince others that there is only one side--yours. And there is absolutely no truth to it.
But let me fill you in on the real truth: oil companies don't need to sell anybody oil. If we don't want oil, China or India will gladly take our share. Oil sells itself, but global warming doesn't. And as the articles I've posted here in the past shows, more and more people are jumping off this Global Warming scam, especially those of us that live up north.
Now if only you would name one of these "scientists". You claim you have names many. Name just one that isn't working for the climate change denial oil lobby. Until then, you are a joke with a mouth. No, articles posted by the Heritage Foundation are FAR from bipartisan.
Canton

Canton, OH

#28226 May 6, 2014
Reality Speaks wrote:
<quoted text>
Benghazi was a cover up for Obama re-election purposes only.
Hillary self inflicted her own damage.
These crimes of deliberately lying with deceit as intent, will not go unpunished. People died because of the lies.
Now in regard to oil, then I have to agree you are on to something.
Over seas they daily drive cars not available in the USA. I wonder why, and your oil lobbyist answers seems best fitting.
Diesel fuel is what most cars run on, and with mileage much greater than here in the USA. Natural gas and propane also utilized.
Toyota already has vehicles, and so does Ford and GM that deliver much greater fuel mileage than any deliver here in the USA.
Scale of economy would drive down fuel cost simply due to volume if the USA converted to diesel and natural gases, and create many new jobs with the trickle down that followed.
Yah, we already heard what Fox News told you about Benghazi. That "cover up" must be why the Republicans are pointing fingers at each other and calling bullsh1t. Nothing like too radical for the extreme right to sum up your opinions.
begonia

Chillicothe, OH

#28229 May 6, 2014
Why is this still on TOPIX?
Canton

Canton, OH

#28230 May 6, 2014
Since you guys care way more about Benghazi than the majority of America, and far more than the numerous embassy attacks that happened on GW Bush's watch that involved Americans being killed, we can only imagine your absolute outrage at the Republican party for cutting the budget for U.S. Department of State security. and allowing this to happen.

One has to wonder though why you put those 4 American lives that were lost so much higher than the value of American lives that were lost in embassy attacks while GW Bush was president. Care to explain why those 4 at Benghazi are so much more important than the American lives lost earlier that you COMPLETELY IGNORED.

Check and mate...now what's the next bogus scandal you guys need spanked like a dog that sh1t on the rug?
Canton

Canton, OH

#28231 May 6, 2014
woo-boy wrote:
<quoted text>It's fun watching you Foxbots keep beating up dead and over false conspiracies:
thehill.com/blogs-briefing-room/news/241191-s...
It would be much funner if the GOP lead Congress with the 6% approval rating and most ineffective Congress in history would quit wasting tax payers time and money on bogus fake scandals.

Strange how many Americans actually despised GW Bush without any of the corporate sponsored provided "outrage" we see with Obama. No daily emails on what to hate next. No oil billionaires spending millions to make Bush look bad. Just real Americans hating the slack jawed "God's President" as he plunged our country into needless war and economic despair. Guess that's the difference between reality and Tea Bagger garbage.
Canton

Canton, OH

#28232 May 6, 2014
Pops wrote:
To Canton: YOU are the prince...no King of obsfucation So I bow to your ability to side step, not answer, twist, fold, bend & mutilate ANY post that you wish.
YOU are the TOPS of spilling & speaking B.S. & being Biased.
Better than Jay Carney. You should apply for his lying B.S. job in ANY administration.
YOU would be worth more than you would be paid. Great liars & fact twisters are in demand in Washington D.C. & many if not all state capitals.
Pray to your imaginary god that I don't run for office. First step, since water boarding "isn't torture", a round for every Tea Bagger in the country.
xxxrayted

Berea, OH

#28233 May 6, 2014
Canton wrote:
<quoted text>
It would be much funner if the GOP lead Congress with the 6% approval rating and most ineffective Congress in history would quit wasting tax payers time and money on bogus fake scandals.
This Just Might Be The Worst Poll Yet For Democrats
BRETT LOGIURATO
MAY 5, 2014, 8:45 AM

The Republican Party is at its strongest point in two decades heading into midterm elections, according to a new Pew Research-USA Today poll, the latest daunting sign for Democrats ahead of campaign season.

The GOP is at an even stronger point than in previous "wave" elections in 1994 and 2010 and looks poised to make major gains — and possibly take control of the U.S. Senate.

According to the poll, out Monday, Republicans have a 47-43 lead on the generic congressional ballot. That's a 10-point swing from October, when Democrats, boosted by GOP blame for the federal government shutdown, held a 6-point lead in the Pew poll.

Overall, Democrats are plagued by the still-sluggish economy, the unpopularity of the Affordable Care Act, and the undesirable views of President Obama. More voters (26%) say their vote will be "against" the president. Only 16% say their vote will be "for" Obama. And by more than a 2-to-1 margin, voters say they want the next president to pursue policies different from the Obama administration's priorities.

As has been seen in other polls showing trouble for Democrats this year, the party is hampered by a lack of enthusiasm. For example, only 31% of Democratic voters say their vote is "for" Obama. In 2010, that number was 47%.

Some of the other troubling signs for Democrats:

•Obama's approval rating sits at 44%, compared with 50% who disapprove.

Although last Friday's jobs report showed the unemployment rate dropping to its lowest level since 2008, most people (65%) say jobs are still difficult to find.

•And while 25% of voters think the economy will get better next year, about an equal number think it'll get worse.

•The percentage of voters who disapprove of the Affordable Care Act (55%) is still tied for the highest in the law's history.

Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/poll-elections...
xxxrayted

Berea, OH

#28234 May 6, 2014
Canton wrote:
Since you guys care way more about Benghazi than the majority of America, and far more than the numerous embassy attacks that happened on GW Bush's watch that involved Americans being killed, we can only imagine your absolute outrage at the Republican party for cutting the budget for U.S. Department of State security. and allowing this to happen.
One has to wonder though why you put those 4 American lives that were lost so much higher than the value of American lives that were lost in embassy attacks while GW Bush was president. Care to explain why those 4 at Benghazi are so much more important than the American lives lost earlier that you COMPLETELY IGNORED.
Check and mate...now what's the next bogus scandal you guys need spanked like a dog that sh1t on the rug?
One has to learn chess to know what check mate means. Obviously you never played chess.

Wonder no more though, Republicans cutting funds for security is nothing more than typical Democrat BS. There was no security fund to begin with. The funds allocated to Benghazi which was approved by the Democrat Senate in negotiations was for building, maintenance and security. The Congress had no say-so as to how the money was divided or spent. Given the fact that there couldn't have been much more than 50 grand in security there, one has to wonder what happened to the remaining 1.5 billion of that money.

Hey! I know. Maybe the State Department can tell us what happened to that money! Nah, then their lie about Republicans cutting security funds would be exposed:

http://www.factcheck.org/2012/10/veep-debate-...
xxxrayted

Berea, OH

#28235 May 6, 2014
begonia wrote:
Why is this still on TOPIX?
Uhhhh, because it's still an active topic????
xxxrayted

Berea, OH

#28236 May 6, 2014
Pope Che Reagan Christ I wrote:
<quoted text>
You voted for Dole. You are afraid to say it. You have no principles. I've got it figured out pretty good.
Yes you do. And I say Good For You.

See, you can figure out things all by yourself. You don't need government to do everything for you.
xxxrayted

Berea, OH

#28237 May 6, 2014
Canton wrote:
<quoted text>
Now if only you would name one of these "scientists". You claim you have names many. Name just one that isn't working for the climate change denial oil lobby. Until then, you are a joke with a mouth. No, articles posted by the Heritage Foundation are FAR from bipartisan.
Unlike you, I have a job. I don't have time to research each scientist. But since I gave you hundreds to choose from, be my guest. BTW, when did NASA get on the oil payroll anyway?
xxxrayted

Berea, OH

#28238 May 6, 2014
woo-boy wrote:
<quoted text>It's fun watching you Foxbots keep beating up dead and over false conspiracies:
thehill.com/blogs-briefing-room/news/241191-s...
Page Not Found is always fun. The Hill blog? Is this a joke or something? April 1st was last month.
Old Guy

Mason, OH

#28239 May 6, 2014
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>

Dole, funny? The guy had a puss like Nixon. What do you mean funny?
Bob Dole, speaking about 3 former Presidents:

“History buffs probably noted the reunion at a Washington party a few weeks ago of three ex-presidents: Carter, Ford and Nixon—See No Evil, Hear No Evil and Evil.”
Old Guy

Mason, OH

#28240 May 6, 2014
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
One has to learn chess to know what check mate means.
The word is "checkmate", without a space. It is sometimes abbreviated as "mate." When someone says "check and mate", it means the king is under attack (check) and there is no move to save him (checkmate.)
Canton

Canton, OH

#28241 May 6, 2014
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
One has to learn chess to know what check mate means. Obviously you never played chess.
Wonder no more though, Republicans cutting funds for security is nothing more than typical Democrat BS. There was no security fund to begin with. The funds allocated to Benghazi which was approved by the Democrat Senate in negotiations was for building, maintenance and security. The Congress had no say-so as to how the money was divided or spent. Given the fact that there couldn't have been much more than 50 grand in security there, one has to wonder what happened to the remaining 1.5 billion of that money.
Hey! I know. Maybe the State Department can tell us what happened to that money! Nah, then their lie about Republicans cutting security funds would be exposed:
http://www.factcheck.org/2012/10/veep-debate-...
One has to have a college degree unless he wants to end up driving truck. Obviously you don't have one. I learned chess at about the age of 9. By 13, I was setting my electronic chess game to expert level. As far as your cute little poll goes, that's not what I heard...

http://theweek.com/article/index/261051/speed...

We all remember the last time the GOP was doing a victory dance in the end zone before the final goal was scored...ain't that right, President Romney?
xxxrayted

Berea, OH

#28242 May 6, 2014
Canton wrote:
<quoted text>
One has to have a college degree unless he wants to end up driving truck. Obviously you don't have one. I learned chess at about the age of 9. By 13, I was setting my electronic chess game to expert level. As far as your cute little poll goes, that's not what I heard...
http://theweek.com/article/index/261051/speed...
We all remember the last time the GOP was doing a victory dance in the end zone before the final goal was scored...ain't that right, President Romney?
Well you're going to see it again. Not only will we have a stronger Congress, but a real good shot at the Senate. 45/42? CNN? Hmmm.

I liked the way they worded the question too. IF Republicans maintain control of the Congress. Well HTF is anybody supposed to know if the Republicans keep the Congress until AFTER the election? LOL!

Better get back to that favorite book of yours, Chess 101.
xxxrayted

Berea, OH

#28244 May 6, 2014
Pope Che Reagan Christ I wrote:
<quoted text>
Voting for a guy you think is a bad candidate. Brilliant.
Aw gee. And here I thought you were catching on. How disappointing.

Dole was a bad candidate. He was a terrible candidate. But his opposition was worse. Now do you get it hence the phrase "I didn't vote for Dole, I voted against Clinton????"
Pops

Cincinnati, OH

#28245 May 6, 2014
Canton wrote:
<quoted text>
Sure now back up your flapping jowls by posting something on here that I lied about. Post, with links to disprove it, one thing on here that you consider bullsh1t. Yah, that's what I thought. You have confused me whooping your @ss on here with the facts with bullsh1t.
Here youi go again! Twisting, spindling, mutilating etc. Where did I say that you lied?
Then you think that you whooped my a$$ even when you stray off of the post?
You can be quite entertaining, especially when you prove my point.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Brook Park Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Happier Meal? McDonald's nixing some unpalatabl... Aug 2 Elise Gingerich 1
Chocolate Shop Aug 1 Hkharb 1
News Cleveland Clinic doc who sought Libertarian Par... Jul '16 Poker Paul 1
NEORSD Storm Water Fee Jun '16 GRS 1
alisa hogan jackson Jun '16 jamie 1
Attorney Stephen Wolf. Apr '16 Stephen Wolf Atto... 4
Waiting (Feb '16) Feb '16 Queen215 1

Brook Park Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Brook Park Mortgages