Judge overturns California's ban on s...

Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201884 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

Since: Apr 11

Panorama City, CA

#171437 Dec 15, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Then i suppose you had better call the dictionary people, "Websters", and tell them that they are in error, because they define it thusly: "violating moral principles; not conforming to the patterns of conduct usually accepted or established as consistent with principles of personal and social ethics." Hmm, no mention of parties, consenting or otherwise....
Well, they are wrong.

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#171438 Dec 15, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Your claim that I am dancing is becoming repetitious, and tedious. Change the record.
Stop dancing around.

LOL!!!

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#171439 Dec 15, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
"Yawn"
Jack Daniels making you sleepy?

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#171440 Dec 15, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
As empirical evidence is obvious, I have no need to provide anything more, than to say that you are a buffoon, to not realize that men are not supposed to marry men, and women are not supposed to marry women, as it is pointless. Gay marriage is nothing short of legitimizing deviant sexual behavior, and an attempt to provide aberrant lifestyles a "stamp of approval". Period.
Right.

So there is no emperical evidence. Just a claim of it.

The rest is your opinion.

Next.

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#171441 Dec 15, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you done making noise, now ? You typed gibberish, I was not the only one to notice. The fact that you won't snort wasabi, and all the other stuff I suggested is a disappointment to me. Hope you are enjoying all the rubbish that you are posting, fact of the matter is, that you are incredibly boring. Oh, ask rose-no-ho why she keeps calling me ugly, since you think I haven't shown my face...LOL I think that, perhaps, you DID drink the Drano...
WOW!

A post that blows up in 4 different directions...LOL!!!

You can't find harm in gay marriage outside of your disdain for it Chief.

That much is known.

Lililth_Satans_B ore

Since: May 12

Bellevue, WA

#171442 Dec 15, 2012
wow lok ducrouchi and hudson spent there hole day onhere.... wow... what incredible losers

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#171443 Dec 15, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
Hallelujah!!! Who needs religion, at all, when we have Super-Chongo!!
Who in the HELL is this "Chongo"???

ROFL!!!

Sounds like a Guatemalan drug lord that derived his gang name from watching too many B movies....LOL!!!!

Mike DiRucci

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#171444 Dec 15, 2012
Wakanatabi wrote:
<quoted text>
Right.
So there is no emperical evidence. Just a claim of it.
The rest is your opinion.
Next.
"Next."

Funny stuff!

Mike DiRucci

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#171445 Dec 15, 2012
Wakanatabi wrote:
<quoted text>
WOW!
A post that blows up in 4 different directions...LOL!!!
You can't find harm in gay marriage outside of your disdain for it Chief.
That much is known.
Chief? He's not your friend anymore?

Mike DiRucci

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#171446 Dec 15, 2012
Wakanatabi wrote:
<quoted text>
Who in the HELL is this "Chongo"???
ROFL!!!
Sounds like a Guatemalan drug lord that derived his gang name from watching too many B movies....LOL!!!!
No, that's you, silly.

Mike DiRucci

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#171447 Dec 15, 2012
Wakanatabi wrote:
<quoted text>
Jack Daniels making you sleepy?
No. Just your dumb posts. The Jack is waking me up from them!

HAR!HAR!HAR!

Lililth_Satans_B ore

Since: May 12

Bellevue, WA

#171448 Dec 15, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
Hallelujah!!! Who needs religion, at all, when we have Super-Chongo!!
got stupid!!!!!! hudson sure does

Lililth_Satans_B ore

Since: May 12

Bellevue, WA

#171449 Dec 15, 2012
Mike DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
Chief? He's not your friend anymore?
hey just curious ducrouchi ... did you at least pause from topix long enough to jack--off or something
TheWayItWillBe

Covina, CA

#171451 Dec 15, 2012
And the chicken dance begins.

Lililth_Satans_B ore

Since: May 12

Bellevue, WA

#171452 Dec 15, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Of COURSE they are.....Only YOU know better. The truth will not set us free, only YOU can do that, with the Jedi mind tricks, again....
wow... speaking of mr hand
zef

Los Angeles, CA

#171455 Dec 15, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
So, drug addiction isn't immoral ? Prostitutes giving their tricks Herpes or AIDS isn't immoral ? All it takes to constitute an immoral act is a non-consenting party ?
Doesn't torturing me to death with colon restriction devices make me a non-consenting party? As in rape. I wouldn't say the sadistic tyrants that are torturing me are immoral, I would say the sadistic tyrants that are torturing me are evil.

Lililth_Satans_B ore

Since: May 12

Bellevue, WA

#171458 Dec 15, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
I think that I stepped on you, while you were on the sidewalk, where the dog shyte you out, but I scraped you off the bottom of my shoe.
wow... did ya come up with that one all on your own.... lol... your such a big boy now... lol

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#171459 Dec 15, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Next ?...OK.... there is no empErical evidence, you sure are right about that ....But there is empIrical evidence, mounds out it,....like the facts of life, scientific study, historical precedence, silly stuff like that. The facts are insurmountable. You are in error, and crowing about non-existent victories, delusional, to be sure. Have you ever been taught about the way that people reproduce ? Have you ? Pshaaaw. Buzz off, until you have learned. Empirical evidence means the senses are the primary source of empirical evidence. If you don't like the use of empirical reasoning, there is another school of thought, that of rationalism, which is a theory in which the criterion of the truth is not sensory but intellectual and deductive, in other word, SCIENTIFIC. Which is what you have used to dispute the very presence of a deity, of any kind. No matter which doctrine you wish to subscribe to, you cannot reason away the facts that men and women are designed for opposite-sex mating, and no other type of coupling is moral, or rational. You can use whatever arguments you wish, to justify SSM, but it is morally wrong, and you are not here to redefine our language, or society.
Opinion ? Hah ! No evidence ? Hah ! Just my claim ? Hah ! Open your eyes and wake up, you are an idiot. You are arguing against common sense, something that your douche ass wasn't born with !
You've got nothing.

You've got your baseless claims and still have not been able to present viable harm that gay marriage causes.

You dumbfuck...I was in your camp a few yearfs ago. I thought a lot of things about gay marriage that weren't exactly positive towardsa their pursuit of being able to marry.

That was until I did actual research...not the bullshit selective sampling of any off the wall aspect & unrelated nonsense you bring in here but I actively looked for harm gay marriage caused.

I found the opposite. And I LOOKED friend given I was like you and didn't want to wrong.

Fact is I was. I find it much easier to defend same sex marriage at this point given it's righteous.

I too don't "like" gay marriages. I won't go to one nor will I send noe flowers but it boils down to a basic right our fellow American citizens should have.

Period.

Gotta go to a Christmas party.

If you even had an IQ you might want to chew on what I advised....C-Ya!

Lililth_Satans_B ore

Since: May 12

Bellevue, WA

#171460 Dec 15, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Mr. Money, you mean... You are addressing your superior, and you should act like it.
well while you spent all day playing with yourself and commenting on gay topix i spent the day shopping at bellevue square with money Jerry gave me.... aaawh to bad for you.... oh i bought two really sexy chemises i'm sure he will love

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#171461 Dec 15, 2012
Wakanatabi wrote:
<quoted text>
You've got nothing.
You've got your baseless claims and still have not been able to present viable harm that gay marriage causes.
You dumbfuck...I was in your camp a few yearfs ago. I thought a lot of things about gay marriage that weren't exactly positive towardsa their pursuit of being able to marry.
That was until I did actual research...not the bullshit selective sampling of any off the wall aspect & unrelated nonsense you bring in here but I actively looked for harm gay marriage caused.
I found the opposite. And I LOOKED friend given I was like you and didn't want to wrong.
Fact is I was. I find it much easier to defend same sex marriage at this point given it's righteous.
I too don't "like" gay marriages. I won't go to one nor will I send noe flowers but it boils down to a basic right our fellow American citizens should have.
Period.
Gotta go to a Christmas party.
If you even had an IQ you might want to chew on what I advised....C-Ya!
Aside from validating my comments about evolutionary mating behavior, this new study is an explanation of how and why homosexuality a genetic defect.

"Different genes are involved in the development of genitals, reproductive organs, body shape, sexual orientation and every other trait where genes shape sexual differentiation. And so epi-marks to these different genes will have different influences on those traits.

Mostly, these kinds of epi-marks should not be passed from parent to offspring. But occasionally some are. And when the epi-marks on genes that effect sexual orientation get passed from father to daughter then some traits that would normally develop in female-specific ways end up more masculinized. Likewise mother-son transmission of epi-marks can result in the feminization of some traits that would normally develop in a more masculinized fashion."

http://theconversation.edu.au/new-ideas-about ...

Big Smile.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Brentwood Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Last Post Wins (Dec '11) Jan 11 Princess Hey 4,947
Low-frequency rumbling or humming sound day and... (Mar '11) Jan 8 Scott 223
News Man found shot dead near field in Antioch Jan 8 He got kilt 4
News Council to discuss Zephyr Grill & Bar opening a... Nov '17 Pole Climber 1
Is Antioch Ghetto hell yah!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!... (Jun '06) Oct '17 Ex antiochites 1,145
News Woman Accused of ID Theft, Registering Fraudule... (May '08) Jul '17 Shawn S 41
Arlene Goodrich (Jul '17) Jul '17 escrow 1

Brentwood Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Brentwood Mortgages