Suspected child molestor shot in fron...

Suspected child molestor shot in front of elementary school

There are 44 comments on the Daily Breeze story from May 21, 2010, titled Suspected child molestor shot in front of elementary school. In it, Daily Breeze reports that:

A suspected child molester shot by police in front of a Laguna Niguel elementary school was hospitalized today.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Daily Breeze.

First Prev
of 3
Next Last
Concerned Parent

Los Angeles, CA

#2 May 21, 2010
Obviously, there should be a complete investigation into this officer-involved shooting; and possibly some form of punishment for the officer.

The officer's inability to "shoot to kill" is inexcusable.

In the future, I hope police officers will be able to fulfill their duties and "shoot to kill" all child molesters.
whatever

Norwalk, CA

#3 May 21, 2010
God bless America wrote:
I totally understand why it is difficult to always shoot to kill when it comes to Officer Involved Shootings of suspects. However, can we at least make it part of the training where the person being shot DIES when this kind of scum is involved?(Sarcasim intended). Double-tap to the head, kill the perv. and be done with it. I'd do it for free, not lose sleep and I'd be doing everyone a favor. Hurt a child, and you die...there is NEVER an excuse to hurt/molest/harm a child. And, to put a point on it...I am sick to my stomach whenever I read/hear of some liberal/socialist/psycho worker making excuses for those who hurt our most precious and innocent. Enough with the P/C crap and just fricken KILL THEM!!!!
I'd really like to see where you read or hear some "liberal/socialist(the right wing buzz word of the year)/psycho worker" making excuses for those who hurt kids.

I really would.
whatever

Norwalk, CA

#4 May 21, 2010
Concerned Parent wrote:
Obviously, there should be a complete investigation into this officer-involved shooting; and possibly some form of punishment for the officer.
The officer's inability to "shoot to kill" is inexcusable.
In the future, I hope police officers will be able to fulfill their duties and "shoot to kill" all child molesters.
Does nobody understand the word "suspected" and the concept of being innocent until proven guilty?

Or does it not matter in the case of suspected child molesters?

Just wondering.

BTW, I was a victim as a child but STILL believe in the rule of law.
Just me -

Los Angeles, CA

#5 May 21, 2010
What about the word "suspect" did you not understand?
God bless America wrote:
I totally understand why it is difficult to always shoot to kill when it comes to Officer Involved Shootings of suspects. However, can we at least make it part of the training where the person being shot DIES when this kind of scum is involved?(Sarcasim intended). Double-tap to the head, kill the perv. and be done with it. I'd do it for free, not lose sleep and I'd be doing everyone a favor. Hurt a child, and you die...there is NEVER an excuse to hurt/molest/harm a child. And, to put a point on it...I am sick to my stomach whenever I read/hear of some liberal/socialist/psycho worker making excuses for those who hurt our most precious and innocent. Enough with the P/C crap and just fricken KILL THEM!!!!
whatever

Norwalk, CA

#8 May 21, 2010
God bless America wrote:
@ Whatever...I will rise to your challenge!!! How many times have you read about some **** with a degree in mental health make excuses that the molester had a bad childhood, was abused themselves, didn't have enough hugs, didn't have enough after school programs et. al, as the reason for molesting/raping???!!
Zero.

That's why I asked you.

The rest of your rant, I will disregard.
whatever

Norwalk, CA

#9 May 21, 2010
kma wrote:
<quoted text>
No, it does not matter when it comes to child molesters. "Suspected" is "obviously guilty". Kids are to young to lie about something like that. High school girls don't have the experience to make a rational decision about sex. And so on.
Oh, it's a modern-day witch-hunt, eh? Civil rights and due process be damned.

How quickly people forget:

"Never did anyone do anything to me, and I never saw them doing anything. I said a lot of things that didn't happen. I lied.... Anytime I would give them an answer that they didn't like, they would ask again and encourage me to give them the answer they were looking for.... I felt uncomfortable and a little ashamed that I was being dishonest. But at the same time, being the type of person I was, whatever my parents wanted me to do, I would do."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McMartin_prescho...
Concerned Parent

Los Angeles, CA

#10 May 21, 2010
"police were searching an apartment building for the suspect, who ran from the building to a jogging path where he was shot"

it is amazing how many "innocent until proven guilty" suspects run away from the police.

million dollar warrant?
whatever

Norwalk, CA

#11 May 21, 2010
kma wrote:
<quoted text>
No, it does not matter when it comes to child molesters. "Suspected" is "obviously guilty". Kids are to young to lie about something like that. High school girls don't have the experience to make a rational decision about sex. And so on.
And of course once a person is "convicted" they can no longer live as a human being. They msut have every movement of every second of the day tracked. They can't live in any city with a school but must visit their parole office every day of the rest of their life. Of course they cannot possibly have a job but cannot live near their PO, who won't go to them.
Castrate them, cut off their d!ks, tear their tongues out, stick a poker in their eyes, brand them,... do whatever it takes to get them dead! And for God's sake do not ever, ever, ever forgive them even when their accuser finally confesses it was all a lie.
Oh, that was sarcasm, sorry I didn't catch it right away.
The Shadow

Bellflower, CA

#12 May 21, 2010
I agree with most statements folks have posted about not giving the guilty pervs another chance or any sympathy whatever their story is. But lumping in Democrats with socialists and making them all sound as if they support molesters is quite ignorant,(Hello GBA). Also statements such as this:(""Suspected " is "obviously guilty". "Kids are to young to lie about something like that. High school girls don't have the experience to make a rational decision about sex. And so on.")

Apparently you missed the Mc Martin case that ran in the south bay for years. Go do some research, I can't educate everyone. Tawana Bradley, another liar claiming rape, just ask Al Sharpton. Kids can and do make this stuff up, that's where it becomes very important to make sure the perp really did something wrong. Did Kobe really rape that girl who came to his room? Guess not as he's not in jail.
Repeal AB32

El Segundo, CA

#13 May 21, 2010
A molester living near a school?

Seems to me that shouldn't be happening.
Dr Demetrious Imo

Irvine, CA

#14 May 21, 2010
Surgically remove his huevos, I say. And then shoot him again.
pedro sanchez

Los Angeles, CA

#15 May 21, 2010
Guess what race? 100 to 1 it was a US Anglo citizen.
Johnnycake

Los Angeles, CA

#16 May 21, 2010
Good! let the sicko get shot, I feel that child molestaion deserves to be irraticated ever since i felt compassion for my sister being sexually molested by someone who i dont want to mention at the moment. But ever since that day child molestaton sickens me, but i can't help to feel pity for people that are like that, their just pathetic since they can't get none and have to refer to nailing some little innocent nine year old girl, who ends up being mentally scarred for the rest of their lives. SCREW YOU CHILD MOLESTERS GO F@$% YOURSELVES!!!
Attorney

United States

#17 May 21, 2010
A gay man, Raul Pando, is charged with raping a little 6 year old boy in OKC.

Raul Pando admitted raping the boy to police. He also told police that he knows he's infected with HIV-AIDS and he wanted to transfer the disease to the innocent child.

Question: What should be the punishment for that homosexual pedophile, if the jury convicts him of raping and infecting the little boy with AIDS?
Bubbles

Aliso Viejo, CA

#20 May 21, 2010
guilty till proven not wrote:
<quoted text>Guess what race are most illegal aliens in Los Angeles? 95% Mexican Hispanic Citizens.
Uh, when is Mexican considered a "race"? Please explain.
gicelle ramirez

Los Angeles, CA

#21 May 21, 2010
i belive its wrong because no matter how ppl are they should have a chance to life n matter what they are and thats like pathos because no one should b kiiled becaus they are filed under a child molestor,......thanks
gicelle ramirez

Los Angeles, CA

#22 May 21, 2010
please excuse my friend for her bad english ....Thanks she actually writes very well sorry for her brain fart!:)
Seriously

United States

#23 May 21, 2010
illegals messing up our country, we should adapt Arizona's law and make it federal law. Deport all ILLEGALS! Si Se Puede!!!!!
Jose Luis Wilmington

United States

#24 May 21, 2010
That is what should happen.
fred

Redondo Beach, CA

#25 May 21, 2010
I bet it's a cop. Maybe from Torrance.

Why else not release the name?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 3
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Brea Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News UCLA FOOTBALL NOTEBOOK: Neuheisel says Prince w... (Sep '10) 2 hr Chosen Traveler 35,804
LMSA Soccer (Feb '10) 5 hr Davis 11,198
News Sheriff's deputies arrest two after high-speed ... (Sep '10) 21 hr Stand up for kids 24
News State to close Chino youth authority facility (Aug '09) Mon Lontae Sims 39
tragedy el monte high (Apr '06) Mon Brent F 106
News Liking Parnell Park (May '08) Sun Amyk819 42
News Joshua Tree man jailed for fatal shooting of fr... (Apr '10) Apr 19 Ron 23

Brea Jobs

Personal Finance

Brea Mortgages