California Proposition 19: the Mariju...

California Proposition 19: the Marijuana Legalization Initiative

Created by CitizenTopix on Oct 7, 2010

19,879 votes

Click on an option to vote

Yes

No

Other (explain below)

Big D

Modesto, CA

#13801 Dec 13, 2012
Mike DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
Ho boy that game again "I already told you and I'm not going to repeat it. nana nana nana"
I suppose my alleged lie is that I said that you said Clinton's impeachment failed. You did say it. No lie. Then you also say he was impeached. No lie.
It's a silly game. End it. Tell us once and for all, impeached? or did it fail?
Waiting.
You suppose? You have to guess now?

Seriously there are courses and cheap books on how to use a computer Liar Mike

Do you need me to find one for you if you dont know how to use a search engine to find one?

Mike DiRucci

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#13802 Dec 13, 2012
Butch wrote:
<quoted text>
Hmm, that's interesting. I thought it gave rise to a gangster class called The Kennedy's. Meh, I can't always be perfect.
As for pot and likening it to alcohol legalization, I think the real point is about social maturity. For example, kids in Germany can go into pubs at the age of 16. Surprisingly, or not, it does not lead to bars being destroyed in drunken fits of teen angst; they do not bolt on their tabs; and when the barkeep rings his little bell to let them know it's 11pm and they have to go, they get up, pay their tab, and they go. IOW, they behave in a mature fashion. We still have grown men,( let's say 40+ for the sake of argument ), in this country who think drinking themselves stupid is permission to do anything they please and behave like total morons. It's a mentality and maturity difference. That said, I'd STILL rather share the road with a car full of stoners than I would with a car full of drunks. The upside for someone like yourself, is you can always just sit back and watch the idiots ram each other to death which result in a more peaceful existence for the sober minded. It's a win-win.
I grew up in NY in the 50's and 60's. Near the border with Connecticut. The drinking age in NY was 18. In Connecticut 21. The Connecticut 18-20 year olds would come to the bars on the NY side and get stupid sick drunk and often get killed driving home. The NY 18-20 year olds were mostly calm experienced drinkers, much less trouble.

Just goes to show, laws don't always work as intended. And prohibition never works.

Mike DiRucci

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#13803 Dec 13, 2012
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
You suppose? You have to guess now?
Seriously there are courses and cheap books on how to use a computer Liar Mike
Do you need me to find one for you if you dont know how to use a search engine to find one?
Impeached or failed tough guy?
Big D

Modesto, CA

#13804 Dec 13, 2012
Mike DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
Impeached or failed tough guy?
You lie when you cant stand up to what is being said tough guy?
Mr Anderson

Washington, UT

#13805 Dec 13, 2012
Mike DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
I grew up in NY in the 50's and 60's. Near the border with Connecticut. The drinking age in NY was 18. In Connecticut 21. The Connecticut 18-20 year olds would come to the bars on the NY side and get stupid sick drunk and often get killed driving home. The NY 18-20 year olds were mostly calm experienced drinkers, much less trouble.
Just goes to show, laws don't always work as intended. And prohibition never works.
that is right mikey boy....finally you got something right...

now if you could just deal with the fact the Bill clinton helped Barack win a second term??

after being "impeached"

then wed all be appreciative...

18-20 years olds were calm drinkers?? mabey in your antiquated days...

id hardly refer to them as "the most experienced"

they tend to puke the fastest.

but then again, you seem to suffer from the delusion that president clintons impeachment was "successful".

;)
Mr Anderson

Washington, UT

#13806 Dec 13, 2012
the most dangerous group of drivers are the 18-20 year olds who drink and drive.
Mr Anderson

Washington, UT

#13807 Dec 13, 2012
Mike DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
Impeached or failed tough guy?
both fool!!

impeached, unsuccessfully

because our measuring stick is a little more realistic than yours is.

Mike DiRucci

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#13808 Dec 13, 2012
Mr Anderson wrote:
<quoted text>
that is right mikey boy....finally you got something right...
now if you could just deal with the fact the Bill clinton helped Barack win a second term??
after being "impeached"
then wed all be appreciative...
18-20 years olds were calm drinkers?? mabey in your antiquated days...
id hardly refer to them as "the most experienced"
they tend to puke the fastest.
but then again, you seem to suffer from the delusion that president clintons impeachment was "successful".
;)
Clinton's impeachment was successful you big dummy!

Don't so blindly follow your hero Mr. D's delusion that it failed. He is a dope and he is wrong.

Clinton was successfully impeached. You're both wrong.

He was acquitted and not removed from office but he was impeached. Still is. It didn't "fail in the Senate or anywhere else.
Big D

Modesto, CA

#13809 Dec 13, 2012
Mike DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
Clinton's impeachment was successful you big dummy!
Don't so blindly follow your hero Mr. D's delusion that it failed. He is a dope and he is wrong.
Clinton was successfully impeached. You're both wrong.
He was acquitted and not removed from office but he was impeached. Still is. It didn't "fail in the Senate or anywhere else.
Your lying about what others have said is already an admission of defeat on that topic over and done with already.

Liar Mike you must realize that having to resort to lying speaks volumes.

Mike DiRucci

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#13810 Dec 13, 2012
Mr Anderson wrote:
<quoted text>
both fool!!
impeached, unsuccessfully
because our measuring stick is a little more realistic than yours is.
Succeeded? or Failed? How can it be both fool?

You and Big D don't understand impeachment. The House has that sole power. The Senate cannot "fail" an impeachment, only try it.

Clinton was impeached on Dec 19 1998. It did not fail.

Mike DiRucci

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#13811 Dec 13, 2012
Mr Anderson wrote:
the most dangerous group of drivers are the 18-20 year olds who drink and drive.
The most dangerous after you that is. If you drive like you think, you're a hazard for sure!

Mike DiRucci

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#13812 Dec 13, 2012
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
Your lying about what others have said is already an admission of defeat on that topic over and done with already.
Liar Mike you must realize that having to resort to lying speaks volumes.
Yes, your resorting to lies speaks volumes.

I didn't lie. You said Clinton's impeachment failed.
Big D

Modesto, CA

#13813 Dec 13, 2012
Mike DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
Succeeded? or Failed? How can it be both fool?
You and Big D don't understand impeachment. The House has that sole power. The Senate cannot "fail" an impeachment, only try it.
Clinton was impeached on Dec 19 1998. It did not fail.
Why dont you just lie about what Anderson has said, that way you can attack that, instead of what he is actually saying

that is your way isnt it?
Mr Anderson

Washington, UT

#13814 Dec 13, 2012
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
Why dont you just lie about what Anderson has said, that way you can attack that, instead of what he is actually saying
that is your way isnt it?
at this point im not sure he can actually comprehend what im saying..

he seems to think in such black and white, two diemnsional terms...
Mr Anderson

Washington, UT

#13815 Dec 13, 2012
Mike DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
Succeeded? or Failed? How can it be both fool?
You and Big D don't understand impeachment. The House has that sole power. The Senate cannot "fail" an impeachment, only try it.
Clinton was impeached on Dec 19 1998. It did not fail.
sorry your brain needs an upgrade before you can comprehend complex things like politics...

by any lay mans standards the measure for "success" would have to be removal.... weve both already admitted that technically he was impeached in congress....

but it didnt mean anything, it may have even helped slick willy politically...

al gore was STOOOOOOOPID to put him in the lock box before the election....

floridians love sluts....

al woulda won!!

just look at what happened to obama?? two term Obama!!

he embraced the willy...
Big D

Modesto, CA

#13816 Dec 13, 2012
Mr Anderson wrote:
<quoted text>
at this point im not sure he can actually comprehend what im saying..
he seems to think in such black and white, two diemnsional terms...
I am not sure he ever could

Mike DiRucci

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#13817 Dec 13, 2012
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
Why dont you just lie about what Anderson has said, that way you can attack that, instead of what he is actually saying
that is your way isnt it?
Because I don't lie.

Mike DiRucci

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#13818 Dec 13, 2012
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
I am not sure he ever could
You're not sure of anything. Especially what impeachment means.

Mike DiRucci

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#13819 Dec 13, 2012
Mr Anderson wrote:
<quoted text>
sorry your brain needs an upgrade before you can comprehend complex things like politics...
by any lay mans standards the measure for "success" would have to be removal.... weve both already admitted that technically he was impeached in congress....
but it didnt mean anything, it may have even helped slick willy politically...
al gore was STOOOOOOOPID to put him in the lock box before the election....
floridians love sluts....
al woulda won!!
just look at what happened to obama?? two term Obama!!
he embraced the willy...
I repeat, you don't know what impeachment means. Clinton's impeachment was a success, it wouldn't have gone to the Senate if it failed.

Don't try to keep up with the big boys! I know you don't mind looking like a fool as much as Big D does, but what the hell, have some dignity.

Pair of jackasses. Dumb and Dumber!
Big D

Modesto, CA

#13820 Dec 13, 2012
Mike DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
You're not sure of anything. Especially what impeachment means.
I am absolutely sure that you lied about what I have been saying, and have not retracted it yet Liar Mike

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Brea Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News UCLA FOOTBALL NOTEBOOK: Neuheisel says Prince w... (Sep '10) 7 hr BFL 32,329
LMSA Soccer (Feb '10) 12 hr leon 6,746
La mirada Splash. Cash cow for La Mirada, where... 14 hr LaMiradaREZ 1
News Yet another South El Monte problem as Departmen... Thu concerned res 2
Whittier Varrio Locos Gang (Jun '07) Wed CRIPS RUN WHITTIER 1,367
News Man wounded in Hacienda Heights shooting (Jun '12) Aug 24 CRIPS RUN SGV 30
News Honk: Are those 'Children at Play' signs legal? (Feb '11) Aug 17 Smilee426 110

Brea Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Brea Mortgages