Judge overturns California's ban on s...

Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201891 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#204332 Jul 23, 2013
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
The state has no business telling unrelated, consenting adults who they can and cannot marry.
Why unrelated? What is the state's interest in prohibiting a marriage of two brothers?

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#204333 Jul 23, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm simply pointing out that the reunion of a man and woman in marriage connects humanity with the very roots of their existence and, at the same time, reaches into the future with the next generation.
And God knows, we have to keep on breeding, and breeding, and breeding. Every sperm is sacred.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#204334 Jul 23, 2013
Dusty Mangina wrote:
<quoted text>
And God knows, we have to keep on breeding, and breeding, and breeding. Every sperm is sacred.
Why do you keep needing to desecrate kids when I'm simply pointing out the vast differences between marriage and ss couples???

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

#204335 Jul 23, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
VV, marriage has always defined a distinct relationship among all cultures.
Laws limited involvement has historically been directly related to procreation within marriage. That potential has never needed a 'demand'. That is why marriage needs protection to prevent procreation where ss couples need protection to HAVE sex.
Courts are denying the essence of marriage in the face of a massive denial and herd mentality.
We simply and honestly point out the distinctions between the relationships and the consequences of that denial.
You are terrified people will wake up.
You've made your opinion perfectly clear. Millions of people do not agree. Count me among them.

Unfortunately for you, you happen to be living during a period of enlightenment. The tide has turned against people like you. And this is our era.

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#204336 Jul 23, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Why do you keep needing to desecrate kids when I'm simply pointing out the vast differences between marriage and ss couples???
Oh how fun, let's steal a play from Kimare's play-book....

"Where did I ever say that?"

While we're at it, why do you still assume that marriage is a function of reproduction?

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

#204337 Jul 23, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
I know there are many ad homoan troll attacks to address, but honestly VV, you know exactly which one.
Either you're confused, you forgot, or you're under the influence.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#204338 Jul 23, 2013
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
You've made your opinion perfectly clear. Millions of people do not agree. Count me among them.
Unfortunately for you, you happen to be living during a period of enlightenment. The tide has turned against people like you. And this is our era.
They were facts, not opinions.
Far more agree with me than you.
It is clearly a period of denial.
History screams enjoy your moment, because it will quickly pass.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#204340 Jul 23, 2013
Dusty Mangina wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh how fun, let's steal a play from Kimare's play-book....
"Where did I ever say that?"
While we're at it, why do you still assume that marriage is a function of reproduction?
"And God knows, we have to keep on breeding, and breeding, and breeding. Every sperm is sacred."

What did you think you were talking about?

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#204341 Jul 23, 2013
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
Either you're confused, you forgot, or you're under the influence.
I'd ask you to face your lie like a man, but that's a lost cause in every sense.

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#204342 Jul 23, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
"And God knows, we have to keep on breeding, and breeding, and breeding. Every sperm is sacred."
What did you think you were talking about?
Kindly show me where I "desecrated" kids, or shut the hell up.

I anxiously await your dodge.
Pietro Armando

Canton, MA

#204343 Jul 23, 2013
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
Pietro, marriage is a personal decision.
One that involves the state.
The state doesn't issue marriage licenses based on their procreative intentions.
It issues marriage licenses based on the male female relationship, and the understanding that sex between men and women makes babies.
. The state has no business telling unrelated, consenting adults who they can and cannot marry.
It does, if it issues the license, which it does. If you want to marry whoever, don't seek state approval.
That's what the courts seem to be finding throughout the nation. And that's why people seem to be supporting same-gender marriage equality.
Not all the courts, states, or people.

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

#204344 Jul 23, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
I'd ask you to face your lie like a man, but that's a lost cause in every sense.
I'll meet you face to face. Remember, I offered to sit down with you once before but you refused. You tell me when and where...

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

#204345 Jul 23, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
One that involves the state.
<quoted text>
It issues marriage licenses based on the male female relationship, and the understanding that sex between men and women makes babies.
<quoted text>
It does, if it issues the license, which it does. If you want to marry whoever, don't seek state approval.
<quoted text>
Not all the courts, states, or people.
Marriage licenses are not based on the reproductive plans of a couple. No license in any jurisdiction asks or even makes reference to children. No state has ever denied or revoked a license based on a couples desire or ability to have children.
Pietro Armando

Schenectady, NY

#204346 Jul 23, 2013
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
Marriage licenses are not based on the reproductive plans of a couple.
Nor is there a need to. Husband and wife, suffices.
No license in any jurisdiction asks or even makes reference to children.
Nor is there a need to. Husband and wife, suffices.
No state has ever denied or revoked a license based on a couples desire or ability to have children.
Nor would there a need to be. Husband and wife, suffices.

Husband and wife, the desired societal vehicle to create new life.

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#204347 Jul 23, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
I feel sorry for his wife, I would have married mine whether she could have children or not. I cannot even imagine a marriage where the man only thinks of his wife as a baby producing appliance.
He may not think that because he's too busy not thinking of the end result of "marital relations".
TPAF

Covina, CA

#204348 Jul 23, 2013
The PizzO Ant Factory
guest

Long Beach, CA

#204349 Jul 23, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm simply asking why you defended a gay troll attack when I exposed it.
It's not a difficult question.
Why are you here? Please answer that question. I realize it may be difficult to answer HONESTLY, but please do so.
guest

Long Beach, CA

#204350 Jul 23, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
You are using a partial quote if at all.
That is why you don't even reference it.
But more than that, you are trying desperately to distract from the profound distinction of the marriage reunion uniting humanity with their roots and their future at the same time.
Ss couples? A mutation mistake with no future and a past birthed within heterosexuality.
It appears you are desperately trying to distract from the fact that you have serious issues in your own life. People sometimes do that when they are struggling with who or what they are.
guest

Long Beach, CA

#204351 Jul 23, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Aw shuddup Jizzy you silly jackass. You never discuss anything. You're a moron.
"...interesting and fresh"... Too funny!
Pot, meet kettle. You never discuss anything. You only launch silly insults because you are bored with your life and have nothing to offer.
guest

Long Beach, CA

#204352 Jul 23, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
They were facts, not opinions.
Far more agree with me than you.
It is clearly a period of denial.
History screams enjoy your moment, because it will quickly pass.
People agreeing with your opinions does not make them facts.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Brea Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Mayor a deeply disturbeda over incident between... 58 min disturbed 1
Dirty Politics in La Mirada 9 hr REAL NEWS SON 1
News Hundreds March In Anaheim, Demand Arrest Of LAP... 11 hr Well Well 11
ssk gangsters (Jan '13) 12 hr Gorilla 180
LMSA Soccer (Feb '10) 12 hr LM Tailgater 7,485
News Bikes, cars struggle to share Coast Highway 12 hr Why waste the Money 1
News Video shows off-duty California cop fire weapon... 14 hr Tony 6

Brea Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Brea Mortgages