Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 Full story: www.cnn.com 201,317

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Full Story
Gustavo

San Pedro, CA

#204035 Jul 21, 2013
I see that you are all getting tired of the therad
Gustavo

San Pedro, CA

#204036 Jul 21, 2013
Ghost of Trayvon Martin wrote:
I hate when queers try to take headlines from me. You are queer opressors anyways.
Traynon's ways live on ... Our president and skinny Al Sharpton will see to that!!!!

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#204041 Jul 21, 2013
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
1.) No idea what you're talking about... Was "we've" meant to be "we're"?
2.) Over the years of my conversations with you, I have never felt like I'm getting my ass kicked. You flatter yourself to believe this to be the case.
3.) Core key elements of marriage... Two people love one another to an extent that they wish to join their lives together in holy and/or legal marriage. You think these people must be opposite gender. I believe that they can be opposite or same-gender.
The reality is that in over 16 countries around the globe and 13 states in the US, my notion about who can enter into marriage is correct and yours is incorrect.
4.) Since marriage is a manmade construct, there are no absolute truths. Go back to your article and read it. The authors were not describing marriage; they were describing how sexual mates are selected between heterosexual couples.
People have been pairing up for eons prior to widespread legal marriage.
5.) Your last comment seems to indicate a level of anger. And since you have already determined that anyone who argues angrily is an indication that they do not believe what they are saying, can I assume that you do not believe what you are saying?
I don't think you believe what you're saying.
Go answer your door.
So you concede that there are absolute truths, but because marriage is a man-made construct, it is not absolute.

If that is true, no law could be applied to an undefinable relationship.

Moreover, what you are really asserting is that the you want to change the historic definition of marriage by dumbing it down to two people in love joined in unholy or manipulated law, and call it marriage.

This leaves the distinct relationship of a heterosexual couple united as one in a life-long union with the likely possibility of procreation, without a distinct description.

As too the rest of your post, it is just such childish foolishness, it merits no response in an adult conversation.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#204046 Jul 21, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
The reality is that same sex couples are married, recognized on the state and federal level, and your opinion of their marriage is meaningless.
I simply point out that the union of a diverse gendered couple creates and births entirely different outcomes than a mutually sterile, duplicate gendered couple.

If homosexuals want to hijack the word that historically describes a heterosexual relationship, it does not change the distinctions, it simply creates a dishonest description of ss couples.

I don't think that is something to celebrate.

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

#204050 Jul 21, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
So you concede that there are absolute truths, but because marriage is a man-made construct, it is not absolute.
If that is true, no law could be applied to an undefinable relationship.
Moreover, what you are really asserting is that the you want to change the historic definition of marriage by dumbing it down to two people in love joined in unholy or manipulated law, and call it marriage.
This leaves the distinct relationship of a heterosexual couple united as one in a life-long union with the likely possibility of procreation, without a distinct description.
As too the rest of your post, it is just such childish foolishness, it merits no response in an adult conversation.
Jesus Christ... Sometimes reading your posts is like herding cats.

Yes, there are absolute truths. If someone chops your head off, you die. That is an absolute truth.

Marriage, being a manmade construct, does not have absolute and universal parameters.

And, yes, I want to change the "historic" definition of marriage because the "historic" definition of marriage does not meet the needs of a segment of tax-paying, law-abiding citizens of this country.

Don't throw "history" at me. If we based every single aspect of our lives on the way our ancestors interacted with their environment, then we'd still be hunter/gatherers; living in caves or some other such nonsense.

"Marriage" is no different than any other aspect of people's lives. It isn't static. It has changed multiple times over the eons and depending on which culture you live(d) in.

And talk about childish... You want your marriage to have a "distinct description".

Girl, if you walk into a room of people with your wife and they can't tell that you're married, to one another then you have more problems than just getting to own the "rights" to the word "marriage".

Having same-sex couples legally married in this country has done nothing to your marriage. You know it; I know it...
Gustavo

San Pedro, CA

#204051 Jul 21, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
That reminds me of the time I hired a Mexican to paint my back porch. I left him there and went and ran some errands. When I came back he was loading up his stuff in his truck in the front of the house and I asked him "Did you paint my porch already?" He said "It wasn't a porch, it was a Mercedes." Lo and behold he had painted my vintage Mercedes I keep in the backyard with house paint and a brush!
Maybe is your fault for slurring your words. You need to put the bottle and drugs down you clown. Also your dago accent doesn't help you nut-sack
Gustavo

San Pedro, CA

#204054 Jul 21, 2013
Ghost of Trayvon Martin wrote:
I hate when queers try to take headlines from me. You are queer opressors anyways.
Tell it to fat Frizzo ...

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#204060 Jul 21, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
So you concede that there are absolute truths, but because marriage is a man-made construct, it is not absolute.
If that is true, no law could be applied to an undefinable relationship.
Moreover, what you are really asserting is that the you want to change the historic definition of marriage by dumbing it down to two people in love joined in unholy or manipulated law, and call it marriage.
This leaves the distinct relationship of a heterosexual couple united as one in a life-long union with the likely possibility of procreation, without a distinct description.
As too the rest of your post, it is just such childish foolishness, it merits no response in an adult conversation.
You still got nothing. Repetition = the argument of fools.

Guess what? You're still a c*nt, and I'm still legally married.

Smile.

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#204061 Jul 21, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
I simply point out that the union of a diverse gendered couple creates and births entirely different outcomes than a mutually sterile, duplicate gendered couple.[/QUJOTE]

"diverse gendered"
"mutual sterile"
"duplicated gendered"

LOL!! You're so f*cking stupid!!

[QUOTE who="KiMare"]<quo ted text>
If homosexuals want to hijack the word that historically describes a heterosexual relationship, it does not change the distinctions, it simply creates a dishonest description of ss couples.
I don't think that is something to celebrate.
"hijacking" !!! LOL!!!

Dear, straight people are still able to marry. No hijacking has occurred. But don't let reality get in the way of your run on sentences!!!

Smile.
Stupid mumbas

Monrovia, CA

#204063 Jul 21, 2013
Previous cases in the UAE have raised similar questions, with alleged sexual assault victims facing charges for sex-related offenses.

Other legal codes also have been criticized for being at odds with the Western-style openness promoted by Dubai.
Tuipd

Monrovia, CA

#204066 Jul 21, 2013
tuipid frank - keeps leaking all over.
Big D

Modesto, CA

#204068 Jul 21, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
I simply point out that the union of a diverse gendered couple creates and births entirely different outcomes than a mutually sterile, duplicate gendered couple.
If homosexuals want to hijack the word that historically describes a heterosexual relationship, it does not change the distinctions, it simply creates a dishonest description of ss couples.
I don't think that is something to celebrate.
You simply point pout that you cannot accept reality

no one has hijacked anything, I was married before same sex couples, I am still married, no change, no harm.

The reality is that same sex couples are married, and recognized at the state and federal level.

Now if your marriage was hijacked, I am not surprised, I cannot imagine you being in a very strong mirage in the first place. No harm came to my marriage
guest

Long Beach, CA

#204069 Jul 21, 2013
Rocky Hudsony wrote:
<quoted text>
You'll have to explain that...
No, I won't.
guest

Long Beach, CA

#204070 Jul 21, 2013
Rocky Hudsony wrote:
<quoted text>
Didn't like that one, eh?
You have not posted anything likeable.
guest

Long Beach, CA

#204071 Jul 21, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
That reminds me of the time I hired a Mexican to paint my back porch. I left him there and went and ran some errands. When I came back he was loading up his stuff in his truck in the front of the house and I asked him "Did you paint my porch already?" He said "It wasn't a porch, it was a Mercedes." Lo and behold he had painted my vintage Mercedes I keep in the backyard with house paint and a brush!
You already posted that lame joke.
guest

Long Beach, CA

#204072 Jul 21, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
As too the rest of your post, it is just such childish foolishness, it merits no response in an adult conversation.
The same applies to all of your posts.
guest

Long Beach, CA

#204073 Jul 21, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Reported! Angry homoerotic death threat!
Relax Jizzy. He implied his opinions were more valid than anyone else. I simply corrected him. Take a chill pill you moron.
"Do have a great day" You're such a fibber! You don't really want me to have a great day do you Jizzy you big dopey galoot?
YUK!YUK!YUK! Ah good times!
You need to calm down.
longoos

Monrovia, CA

#204078 Jul 21, 2013
The M's know squat.
Hank

Los Angeles, CA

#204079 Jul 21, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
For those who might have missed it. You'd say it was funny if I was gay.
What are you talking about? You are flaming gay. That ring of white dried crust around your mouth leaves no doubt!
guest

Long Beach, CA

#204082 Jul 21, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
OK don't. Fine. But if you want us to know what it means you will have to explain it. Not because we're dumb, but because you're dumb.
No.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Brea Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
UCLA FOOTBALL NOTEBOOK: Neuheisel says Prince w... (Sep '10) 10 hr Bruin For Life 28,713
part time work for a 16 year old (Jan '09) 11 hr carlos ramirez 9
Vagos motorcycle club president faces murder ch... (Dec '09) 11 hr Green Eye MexXxican 110
'Try' singer Colbie Caillat is OK with Photosho... 15 hr Peter Tantillo 1
La Mirada Boosters In trouble under Moschetti 20 hr Janet Reno 48
Honk: Are those 'Children at Play' signs legal? (Feb '11) Jan 22 R12 Freon 84
Door to Door magazine sales scam Jan 8 Bobbie 1

Brea News Video

Brea Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Brea People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 7:43 am PST