Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

[Big D]

Largelanguage wrote:

<quoted text>
He has yes, that idiot Hudson.

Although I disagree with both of them on several issues neither are as completely clueless as you are, not even close to the same category.

Mike and I may have rather intense disagreements, but you take first prize on not having a clue what you are talking about.

[Bunho is Boozo]

It's not BunHo's fault his mother kept him around.

[Largelanguage]

Big D wrote:

<quoted text>
Although I disagree with both of them on several issues neither are as completely clueless as you are, not even close to the same category.
Mike and I may have rather intense disagreements, but you take first prize on not having a clue what you are talking about.

How dare you! You have proven yourself to be equally foolish as mikey!

[Largelanguage]

Frankie Rizzo wrote:

<quoted text>
Danth's Law.

That is because it has been abused so many times be people who confess to be winsome, but are only poor lonely bastards!

[Largelanguage]

Frankie Rizzo wrote:

<quoted text>
I don't give a sh!t about your accounts Squeaky.
I'm not replying, just telling you to shove it.

Can't stand your ground?

[Largelanguage]

Bunho is Boozo wrote:

It's not BunHo's fault his mother kept him around.

Posting under another username because you can't face me outright anymore? Did you also post as heart and mind, but both egos got crushed?

[Largelanguage]

Frankie Rizzo wrote:

<quoted text>
My alleged "lie" I assume is saying that you said Clinton wasn't impeached. You did. You said his impeachment failed. Many times.
You are wrong. It did not fail. He was impeached on Dec 19, 1998. It's history. Anyone can easily look it up.

Bringing up arguements left in the past? I don't see you dropping it!

[Largelanguage]

Frankie Rizzo wrote:

<quoted text>
My alleged "lie" I assume is saying that you said Clinton wasn't impeached. You did. You said his impeachment failed. Many times.
You are wrong. It did not fail. He was impeached on Dec 19, 1998. It's history. Anyone can easily look it up.

Are you also being a hypocrite just to get Hudson excited and make him think you like him so you are able to use him better?

[Horsert]

LL could also stand for LugieLongers.

[Brian_G]

Rose_NoHo wrote:

...At least I can have some respect for the "Die! f@G! Die!" type of homophobe, at least they are honest, and have some kind of balls. But you are a sniveling little pussy who tries to make his bigotry seem noble....

I have no respect for ad hominem argument; insults are an irrational fallacy. I've never used the terrible language Rose advocates and I never will. I've always written, there is nothing wrong with homosexuals or homosexuality.

I like to quote the gay marriage protectors like this:

Xavier Bongibault, a member of a group called Plus Gay Sans Mariage -- More Gay Without Marriage -- said the demonstration is not for the homophobic.

He said many people who are gay or support gay rights believe marriage should be reserved for heterosexuals.

"In France marriage is not a contract about love: it is a contract that creates the framework for the protection of children. I believe a child must have a mother and father," he said. "Everyone has the right to get married. I am homosexual but if I wanted to get married I could find a woman. Marriage has certain conditions, the main one of which is that it has to be between a man and woman."

http://www.upi.com/Top_News/World-News/2013/0...

[Brian_G]

Here's another gay organization that defends marriage as one man and one woman:
http://www.homovox.com/

[Horsert]

FrankO yo lost your decoder ring again.

[Largelanguage]

Brian_G wrote:

<quoted text>I have no respect for ad hominem argument; insults are an irrational fallacy. I've never used the terrible language Rose advocates and I never will. I've always written, there is nothing wrong with homosexuals or homosexuality.
I like to quote the gay marriage protectors like this:
Xavier Bongibault, a member of a group called Plus Gay Sans Mariage -- More Gay Without Marriage -- said the demonstration is not for the homophobic.
He said many people who are gay or support gay rights believe marriage should be reserved for heterosexuals.
"In France marriage is not a contract about love: it is a contract that creates the framework for the protection of children. I believe a child must have a mother and father," he said. "Everyone has the right to get married. I am homosexual but if I wanted to get married I could find a woman. Marriage has certain conditions, the main one of which is that it has to be between a man and woman."
http://www.upi.com/Top_News/World-News/2013/0...

Why do you think homosexuality is ok, but not marriage? Twisting the bibles words because you are too weak and winsome to stick to the gospel and support what you believe in? Also, mikey tries to hide it, but he also supports gay marriage.

[Big D]

Largelanguage wrote:

<quoted text>
How dare you! You have proven yourself to be equally foolish as mikey!

Nothing for me to dare, most here have more education than you do I suspect.

You talk about the Saxons sacking Rome ( it was the Visigoths and later the Vandals ) you talk about Roman Catholic church being founded in Brittan, no it was centuries later and not in Britton, that was the Anglican church founded in Brittan during the time of Elizabeth 1 a thousand years after the fall of the Roman empire ( west anyway ).

You talk as if you didn’t understand that Rome was Christian empire a hundred years before it fell ( much longer for the eastern empire )

You talk as if early Christians were less violent…. All history is against you there, that religion was spread at the point of a sword.

[sheesh void of hate]

Largelanguage wrote:

<quoted text>
How you followed through British politics? Why do you assume you have more than you? And you tried to make yourself sound like an experienced gamer, by saying you played pacman then and went on it, and followed it through, your ignorance of modern gaming proves you as a liar. Why do you want to sound like you have more than you do? Do you feel you aren't good enough?

My friggin god you're touched.

"How you followed through British politics?" How he followed WHAT through Brit politics? That question wasn't a complete one. You're making little sense these days.

"Why do you assume you have more than you?" Why does he assume he has more than he has? WTF? Try calming down a bit and get your thoughts together, then post them so they make sense. Take a few deep breaths.


Pacman? From what I read of that he mentioned it in reference to his age. In that respect he's like me. Pacman was out when I was in college. My girlfriend and I would play it with her daughter. As time passed I moved on and lost any urge to play video games apart from the occasional time waster moment. Some of us don't obsess over them and don't waste our every waking moment playing them or banging away on the computer. I

[sheesh void of hate]

Largelanguage wrote:

<quoted text>
Proverbs says even a fool is wise in his own eyes! Jesus said that even a fool is wise if he keeps is mouth shut!

Now that is foresight. They knew of you 2000 years prior to your birth!

[sheesh void of hate]

Frankie Rizzo wrote:

<quoted text>
WOW! Extra nutty!

I think ol' largelanguage would make an excellent member of the Westboro Baptist Church.

[Largelanguage]

Big D wrote:

<quoted text>
Nothing for me to dare, most here have more education than you do I suspect.
You talk about the Saxons sacking Rome ( it was the Visigoths and later the Vandals ) you talk about Roman Catholic church being founded in Brittan, no it was centuries later and not in Britton, that was the Anglican church founded in Brittan during the time of Elizabeth 1 a thousand years after the fall of the Roman empire ( west anyway ).
You talk as if you didn’t understand that Rome was Christian empire a hundred years before it fell ( much longer for the eastern empire )
You talk as if early Christians were less violent…. All history is against you there, that religion was spread at the point of a sword.

It was not the early church, they were the catholics, idiot!

[Largelanguage]

sheesh void of hate wrote:

<quoted text>
My friggin god you're touched.
"How you followed through British politics?" How he followed WHAT through Brit politics? That question wasn't a complete one. You're making little sense these days.
"Why do you assume you have more than you?" Why does he assume he has more than he has? WTF? Try calming down a bit and get your thoughts together, then post them so they make sense. Take a few deep breaths.
Pacman? From what I read of that he mentioned it in reference to his age. In that respect he's like me. Pacman was out when I was in college. My girlfriend and I would play it with her daughter. As time passed I moved on and lost any urge to play video games apart from the occasional time waster moment. Some of us don't obsess over them and don't waste our every waking moment playing them or banging away on the computer. I

Pacman was such a trivial statement he made. How does seeing pacman when it came out make him old? He is obviously trying to big himself up.

[Big D]

Frankie Rizzo wrote:

<quoted text>
My alleged "lie" I assume is saying that you said Clinton wasn't impeached. You did. You said his impeachment failed. Many times.
You are wrong. It did not fail. He was impeached on Dec 19, 1998. It's history. Anyone can easily look it up.

Not once did I ever say he was not impeached

you remain a liar until you can find a post where I said that

I didn’t

he was impeached

that it later failed is also a fact that you don’t have the capacity to comprehend

OJ was charged with Murder, those charges later failed at the criminal trial, but it didn’t change the fact he was charged, same thing.