I can't afford Obamacare! What is my fate?

Posted in the Brattleboro Forum

Comments (Page 3)

Showing posts 41 - 60 of88
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Come back

Brattleboro, VT

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#50
Nov 23, 2013
 
Come back fair citizens, YOU can be a part! Not just MM!
ObamaWrench

Dover, NH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#51
Nov 23, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Do you agree that one's 'Healthcare' is their own damn responsibility, or do ewe beLIEve the socialist cry that 'Healthcare Is A Human Right'?

If ewe think ewe'r entitled to 'Healthcare' from the govt. then the same must be true for Car Care right?
And why not manicures too?
Ain't those opposed to ObamaWrench and ObamaNails just racists?

google 'Bill of No Rights'
I Know More Than You

New Boston, NH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#52
Nov 24, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

FoxNewsIdiot wrote:
Good since you are going to be paying for someone else's health care you might as well not object to it.
I already am, you are just too stupid to understand how broke the current system is.

Maybe we can have an actual discussion without you relying solely on Faux News once you grow up.
Mike Mulligan

Brattleboro, VT

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#53
Nov 24, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

I Know More Than You wrote:
<quoted text>
I already am, you are just too stupid to understand how broke the current system is.
Maybe we can have an actual discussion without you relying solely on Faux News once you grow up.
Yes the broken current system where 90% of us are insured and like our insurance. That is some definition of failure. Let's hear it. What is a failure in our current system?

And since you are already paying higher premiums to pay for our current flawed system how come you are going to have to pay higher premiums still for the fix? If they are fixing it shouldn't the premiums be going down? Wasn't that the lie they told us when they designated this the "Affordable Care Act"? Honest liberals are admitting that was a giant mistake.

You are too stupid to see that you are getting screwed by Obamacare. But wait maybe you are one of the freeloaders who will be getting coverage for free since you don't work. Obamacare benefits the few and steals from the many.
I Know More Than You

New Boston, NH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#54
Nov 24, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

FoxNewsIdiot wrote:
Yes the broken current system where 90% of us are insured and like our insurance.
It seems impossible for you to post without lying.
FoxNewsIdiot wrote:
And since you are already paying higher premiums to pay for our current flawed system how come you are going to have to pay higher premiums still for the fix? If they are fixing it shouldn't the premiums be going down? Wasn't that the lie they told us when they designated this the "Affordable Care Act"?
Single payer would most likely end up costing less, I just stated that I would be willing to pay more. Why can't you comprehend what you read?
FoxNewsIdiot wrote:
But wait maybe you are one of the freeloaders who will be getting coverage for free since you don't work. Obamacare benefits the few and steals from the many.
When in doubt, just put up another talking point. <yawn>
Mike Mulligan

Brattleboro, VT

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#56
Nov 24, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

I Know More Than You wrote:
<quoted text>
It seems impossible for you to post without lying.
<quoted text>
Single payer would most likely end up costing less, I just stated that I would be willing to pay more. Why can't you comprehend what you read?
<quoted text>
When in doubt, just put up another talking point. <yawn>
Haha, so how many of us as a percentage were insured? You question my number but you provide none of your own. I will stick with mine.

Single payer would never cost less. You are the fool for thinking so. Paying more is your prerogative but making young healthy Americans pay more for something they don't need is anti-freedom and consequently anti-American.

Go ahead stick with defending this mess. You and your fellow liberals own it lock stock and barrel and young Americans and the working middle class families that are getting screwed will remember who laid it on them.

So far everything the republicans said would happen has happened. We can start calling them the smart party.
I Know More Than You

New Boston, NH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#57
Nov 24, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

FoxNewsIdiot wrote:
Haha, so how many of us as a percentage were insured? You question my number but you provide none of your own. I will stick with mine.
Maybe you just don't understand percentages?

Why don't you have to provide any documentation of claims? Perhaps it's because you are a lying fraud?
FoxNewsIdiot wrote:
Paying more is your prerogative but making young healthy Americans pay more for something they don't need is anti-freedom and consequently anti-American.
When in doubt, sticking to the talking points!
Mike Mulligan

Brattleboro, VT

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#59
Nov 24, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

I Know More Than You wrote:
<quoted text>
Maybe you just don't understand percentages?
Why don't you have to provide any documentation of claims? Perhaps it's because you are a lying fraud?
<quoted text>
When in doubt, sticking to the talking points!
I understand percentages better than you. Again, if you want to challenge my number then your criticism means nothing unless you can give us what you think the real number is. Could it be that it is insignificantly different so you don't want to post it since it really confirms what I said. Your liberals have decided to destroy a private free market system that was working just fine so you could put in place a 100 year old fantasy about government run health care.

Now you have to eat the results of your arrogance. Good luck for the next few election cycles.
I Know More Than You

New Boston, NH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#60
Nov 24, 2013
 
FoxNewsIdiot wrote:
I understand percentages better than you. Again, if you want to challenge my number then your criticism means nothing unless you can give us what you think the real number is. Could it be that it is insignificantly different so you don't want to post it since it really confirms what I said.
And the backtracking begins. You said 10% but in reality it's >50% greater and you didn't even count the ~30% who utilize medicare/medicaid (you know those socialized forms of medicine that all those old republicans want us to keep our hands off of). How typical of your stupidity.

As usual, you fail to post anything to actually support your bullshit and cry like a bitch about everyone else instead.
FoxNewsIdiot wrote:
Your liberals have decided to destroy a private free market system that was working just fine so you could put in place a 100 year old fantasy about government run health care.
Oh wait, you are serious? Let me laugh harder!
FoxNewsIdiot wrote:
Now you have to eat the results of your arrogance. Good luck for the next few election cycles.
Just like your prediction how the Republitards had a 99% chance of regaining the senate? I'm sure the Democrats look forward to more "beatings" like that.
O-Baa-aaa-aaa-ma a-care

Dover, NH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#63
Nov 24, 2013
 
"at the stupid masses"
-AKA the 'sheeple'

broken promises are one thing, but some of these listed are impeachable and treason!-

http://infowars.com/why-obama-thought-he-coul...

==
Ben Stein: A bank would be "charged with criminal fraud for lies like Obama's"
http://www.infowars.com/ben-stein-a-bank-woul...
BZZZZZZZZZZTTT-A LL Better

Dover, NH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#65
Nov 24, 2013
 
I'm sure ewe would find ECT treatments quite exciting!
Help is just a flick of a switch away
Ask for it at the Brattleboro Retreat
Mike Mulligan

Brattleboro, VT

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#66
Nov 24, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Wasn't Homeland great tonight. Best program ever on YV.
Mike Mulligan

Brattleboro, VT

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#67
Nov 24, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Best program ever on TV.
Mike Mulligan

Brattleboro, VT

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#68
Nov 25, 2013
 
I Know More Than You wrote:
<quoted text>
And the backtracking begins. You said 10% but in reality it's >50% greater and you didn't even count the ~30% who utilize medicare/medicaid (you know those socialized forms of medicine that all those old republicans want us to keep our hands off of). How typical of your stupidity.
As usual, you fail to post anything to actually support your bullshit and cry like a bitch about everyone else instead.
<quoted text>
Oh wait, you are serious? Let me laugh harder!
<quoted text>
Just like your prediction how the Republitards had a 99% chance of regaining the senate? I'm sure the Democrats look forward to more "beatings" like that.
haha again and again and again. Talk about a weak dodge. I think you researched the number and were surprised how right I was and you are stuck. So you are now arguing that it was not 90% of us insured it was only 85%+/-(I can predict another dodge coming form you). BFD. You made my point. Of course no one had real numbers of people who were uninsured. Some people called it 20 million and others 40 million so how you can actually contest my original number makes you a big fat liar. What was the number of people who actually needed to be insured? What percentage of the uninsured (let's use your claim of over 40 million+/-) actually needed insurance? Half? Would that then not increase the actual percentage of people with insurance who needed insurance to over 90%(Hahaha). Maybe it is just that you don't really understand how percentages represent things.

Before Obamacare 85% of us were insured (your number+/-) and you democrats decided to slice and dice and raise premiums on healthy young people and the working middle class to solve some minor problems with the system. Don't you think that we could have tackled the uninsured problem (keeping in mind that a large percentage of uninsured were simply uninsured because they were young and healthy and didn't really need the risk protection that insurance provides) without trashing a system where 85%+/-(HaHaHa) of us were already insured successfully?

As for Medicare, Obamacare just hit all those seniors with reduced benefits as well. Remember all the money Obama was going to redistribute from Medicare to subsidies for Obamacare by not paying doctors and hospitals? How is that going to improve the healthcare of seniors? You of course don't care about that since you are stupid young. And Medicare is in trouble because of the cost and the inability of the government to run a system like that without substantial fraud and abuse. And the fraud and abuse will be worse with Obamacare as evidenced by how bad the Obama administration already f'd things up. But then he has f'd everything up so it is no surprise he f'd up his own "signature" "legacy" healthcare law.
I Know More Than You

New Boston, NH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#69
Nov 25, 2013
 
FoxNewsIdiot wrote:
haha again and again and again. Talk about a weak dodge. I think you researched the number and were surprised how right I was and you are stuck. So you are now arguing that it was not 90% of us insured it was only 85%+/-(I can predict another dodge coming form you). BFD.
I guess being off by 50% isn't a big deal in your line of "work". For you, it's just a few fries in the happy meal. In this case, it's millions of people.

Thanks for admitting you were wrong. Now maybe we can move on to your assumption that everyone who has insurance is happy with it.

One day you will learn to look things up before running your mouth off.

As for the rest of your rant, I can always tell when I've gotten under your skin because the derp factor of your posts goes through the roof.
Mike Mulligan

Bennington, VT

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#70
Nov 25, 2013
 
I Know More Than You wrote:
<quoted text>
I guess being off by 50% isn't a big deal in your line of "work". For you, it's just a few fries in the happy meal. In this case, it's millions of people.
Thanks for admitting you were wrong. Now maybe we can move on to your assumption that everyone who has insurance is happy with it.
One day you will learn to look things up before running your mouth off.
As for the rest of your rant, I can always tell when I've gotten under your skin because the derp factor of your posts goes through the roof.
Very weak again. I said I knew a weak response was coming. When we are talking an issue whether it is 285+/- million insured vs. 297+/- million insured the answer is that it doesn't matter in the context of the point. So maybe it is 13 million less people getting screwed by Obamacare. Of course you have no intention of debating the point because you are leaning down to pick up your head that I handed you and you dropped.

You don't get under my skin because I relish lopping off your head. And hopefully people are reading the posts getting educated about Obamacare. I provide the education and you provide the comic relief and give me an opportunity to spread a little more education around.

Obamacare is a mess and any idiot defending it now is a fool. You should stick to things you know like researching nuclear power and pointing out minor flaws in people's posts who don't have a daddy to help them out.
Mike Mulligan

Bennington, VT

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#71
Nov 25, 2013
 
I Know More Than You wrote:
<quoted text>
I guess being off by 50% isn't a big deal in your line of "work". For you, it's just a few fries in the happy meal. In this case, it's millions of people.
Thanks for admitting you were wrong. Now maybe we can move on to your assumption that everyone who has insurance is happy with it.
One day you will learn to look things up before running your mouth off.
As for the rest of your rant, I can always tell when I've gotten under your skin because the derp factor of your posts goes through the roof.
You didn't challenge my statement that Obama f'd thins up. You must be in agreement with that. Of course you can't flip the numbers and try to dodge that fact can you?
I Know More Than You

Meredith, NH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#72
Nov 25, 2013
 

Judged:

1

FoxNewsIdiot wrote:
When we are talking an issue whether it is 285+/- million insured vs. 297+/- million insured the answer is that it doesn't matter in the context of the point. So maybe it is 13 million less people
You care enough to post but not enough to get the basic facts right? Just another typical teabagger who doesn't let the pesky facts get in the way of a good derp-fest.

It's only 13 million people, BFD!(I'm I doing it right?)

I'm like an itch you can't scratch because you will never best me. Sucks for you.
Mike Mulligan

Brattleboro, VT

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#73
Nov 25, 2013
 

Judged:

1

I guess I am not needed here?
Mountain Guy

Brattleboro, VT

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#74
Nov 25, 2013
 
Mike Mulligan wrote:
I guess I am not needed here?
You never are.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 41 - 60 of88
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Other Recent Brattleboro Discussions

Search the Brattleboro Forum:
Topic Updated Last By Comments
Guilford stands by recycling bin removal 15 hr Flat Lander 3
When ‘Religious Liberty’ Was Used To Deny All H... 15 hr Gott mit uns 83
A Christian Plot for Domination (Aug '11) 16 hr Gott mit uns 1,177
Russia and the Ukraine 18 hr GodHates Zionist IsraHELL 36
Tectonic Shift (Dec '12) 22 hr truth 368
Truth reason knowledge (Dec '12) 22 hr truth 463
New Hampshire Buying Russian Coal for Generation Jul 16 Importing Mega-Death 2
•••
•••

Brattleboro News Video

•••
•••

Brattleboro Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Brattleboro People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Brattleboro News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Brattleboro
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••