Count 1: Mulligan's arrest
Posted in the Brattleboro Forum
#1 Aug 3, 2013
aka 'halo guy'
Count One: RSA 634.2
…“Having no right to do so nor any reasonable basis to believe that he has such a right, he purposely damaged the walkway part of the bridge locate on route 119 linking Hinsdale NH to Brattleboro Vermont by purposely removing the walkway boards with a crow bar causing substantial interruption or impairment of public transportation…”
Now you are going see how the police and the prosecutor get to create a knowingly inaccurate and falsified court complaint. They are sending me to court on a lie...a spiked punch bowl full of lies and exaggerations.
1)Based on true severe degradation of the wood planks and their attachments, this created a substantial trip and fall hazard…potentially leading to a walkway fall or falling into the Connecticut River or to the embankment rocks many feet below creating serious injury and death. The NHDOT and Hinsdale police forced my actions because of their inactivity with maintaining adequate public safety because of the NHDOT severe maintenance and inspection negligence, and these conditions being known in a widespread manner with the public using this walkway with maintaining this public walkway.
#2 Aug 3, 2013
2)I had on the walkway a crow bar and hammer. I conceived I’d pick the loose and detached planks off the bridge deck with these tools…I found it easier to just lift the planks off by hand. I only used the small crow bar maybe once or twice to lift the completely detached board off the deck to get my fingers under the board. One I felt the end still was attached by nails, whereby I then left it alone. So the hammer I never used and the crow bar just helped to remove completely detached board. There is insufficient eyewitness testimony based on the actual condition of the board attachment (rusted nails and screws) that I identified to the police. The result of this is the police are using a known exaggeration and inaccurate terms (falsification of state document) to enflame these charge and besmirch my reputation.
3)There was no absolutely “substantial interruption or impairment of public transportation” and the police knows this. Again, this inaccurate information is an attempt by the police to besmirch my reputation to the judge and the courts. So where is the evidence that I made “substantial interruption or impairment of public transportation. It was near 9 pm when I completed shutting down this walkway. I’d seen no person towards Brattleboro and heading toward Hinsdale. There has been substantial homeless encampments on this abandoned Island over the years . There has been know living here out of state drunks, drug addicts and pediphiles living on this island…people with enormous rap sheet. The Hinsdale police over the years have failed to police this area and there is substantial garbage and litter throughout the island cause by this. Habitual lawbreakers in this area has been known to enter Brattleboro and cause substantial public disruptionand very costly crime. So the greater public has great fear of this area and are unlikely cross this area when dark. I took substantial photographs this bridge area around 9:30 am next da and I notice no person in sight. I observed about eight employees and about 5 NHDOT vehicles on site at about 9:30 am. My safety barriers where taken down and passage could be made. The board had all been replace. I have no idea when the NHDOT allowd passage.I rode by the around 6:45 am and again about 7:15. I notice one NHDOT job scoper with a measuring tape on the Bridge at this time. I notice no people along this walkway.
I can only image 1, 2 or 3 people using this side throughout the night and into when my barriers were cleared. There is a high probability as planned no people use this sidewalk and crossed this bridge between when I put up the safety barriers and when the NHDOT took them down.Traffic would be extremely light throughout the night …the pedestrians could use the sides of the road bed like the bicyclist.
If a pedestrian was to approach this bridge with my safety barriers up…there was no impairment of passage. Bicyclist is expected to use the road bed with no safety breakdown lanes and all of them do use it. Most of bicyclists are afraid to use the walkway because the wooden planks are so unsafe and they all can hear how loose these planks are. These biker would rather dodge cars and semi-trucks on this extremely narrow roadbed crossing these bridges. The bikers are afraid a lose plank could get flipped up in their wheels and cause serious injury on the bridge.
So I estimate the bridge walkway was out for twelve hours…during the slowest traffic and pedestrian period.
Again, the Hinsdale police and prosecutor spiked the punch bowl and the truth telling on court and state document for a hidden agenda. They wanted me to get off the bridge and prohibit my protest no matter how much exaggeration it took!
It is the NHDOT bridge inspection falsification of the Hinsdale police department and court documents… they just took for granted my Constitution rights for a secret agenda!
#3 Aug 3, 2013
You just admitted what they alleged???
#4 Aug 3, 2013
They have evidence...the completely corroded nails and screws on the boards...why would I use a crow bar.
They could see there was nails protuding and would make the crow bar thing a exaggeration...
That fits with i forcefully removed them boards...
It doesn't say how long the crow bar is...mine was 18 inches long. Not much leverage there.
Do the got a theory how I would use the crow bar...it was generially useless because the board cracks were so narrow.
You couldn't even get a loose and not attached board out because there was no leverage with the cracks between the board being so small.
#5 Aug 3, 2013
When you are in a hole, stop digging.
#6 Aug 3, 2013
I come from the clan "who never gives up"...
#7 Aug 3, 2013
Maybe they will sentence you to the Retreat, and then to a Group Home. It sounds like you need some looking after.
#8 Aug 3, 2013
Hey, I could run the retreat...
#9 Aug 3, 2013
Maybe they will give you a job while you are there. Then you could forget all about that silly bridge!
#10 Aug 3, 2013
$50 bucks an hour and benefits...big time dental...
And a jazzed up Cadillac CTS-V coup company car…“white diamond tri coat”.
#11 Aug 3, 2013
when ewe are in a hole, it musta been the one ewe fell in caused by mikey removing the boards
So sue him!
But then if such a thing happened the question would be, wtf were ewe doing walking to Hinsdale?
No true Vermonter has any need going over there, and Vermonters don't care for damn outsider/invaders from Any other State!
Judge Dismisses Suit Against Online Gun Marketplace
Arkansas school district buys guns for 20 teachers and staff (and libtards are aghast) http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/07/30/arkansa...
#12 Aug 3, 2013
Back when Walmart was right right up the hill, I used to walk to Hinsdale all the time. I don't like cheap junk from China, but Brattleboro is simply too expensive to shop in. There aren't any more true Vermonters left in Brattleboro, anyway. The true Vermonters moved away. Brattleboro and all of Windham County is now peopled by invaders from New York and similar places where hippies come from.
It's hard to believe that Mike actually had the nerve to pull those boards. But then, we have always known that he was crazy.
#13 Aug 4, 2013
There is a difference…that say I used a crow bar to yank planks attached with good screws and nails. I pulled out planks with the nails and screws completely rotted away…the nails and screws weren’t attaching the boards to the bridge.
Right, the charges have to be accurate.
They can’t say I bludgeoned somebody on the walkway and then I pulled off the boards to cover my tracts. They can’t say I murdered somebody to get me convicted of removing the boards.
If the charges are knowingly inaccurate then there is an agenda behind it.
They police and prosecutors have a responsibility and professionalism to submit accurate documents to the counts…
#14 Aug 4, 2013
So we had a conversation, the police called me….then I wrote them a follow up memo. Then I was arrested a few hours later. This is a quote:
“Just to be clear, those boards weren’t attached to the bridge. No extra force like a hammer or anything else was used to lift the boards off the walkway. You can inspect those discarded boards…these is no shiny metal screws or nail metal indicating those board was forced away from the bridge. Matter of fact, there is but a stub left of the nail or screw. They didn’t use the proper rust proof nails or screws?”
So the police contrary to the facts, can’t say I use a crow bar when they have evidence that I just used my hands. Just because the crow bar was on scene didn’t mean I used it to lift an attached board.
My whole case rest on the walkways was not safe because numerous boards weren’t attached to the bridge…
The NHDOT, police and the prosecutes can’t play “lets pretend” to get mike those boards were attached.
I mean, the NHDOT, the police and prosecutors can’t set up a citadel of knowingly or should have been known inaccurate documents courts.
#15 Aug 4, 2013
Right, the police have to be neutral guys here …the police have to weight the allegation against me versus what I say, and the evidence..then make a charge to the courts.
#16 Aug 4, 2013
So what evidence do I have that makes the police not neutral players here. You got to know it involve a high police official!
So the police station has a cameras in their intake area...
#17 Aug 4, 2013
So I staged two events in 24 hours.
1) I removed loose boards, took pictures…replace those boards. Went to the police station, shown pictures the lieutenant…made an official complaint to chief by the lieutenant the walk way was unsafe.
2) Next day I remove those loose boards and hucked them over the side.
On arrival the second day, there was no police tapes up making the walkway safe…there was no indication the police passed on the information to the NHDOT that the walkway grossly unsafe.
There was no friendly call back by the lieutenant with a talk though of these events. Like, I called the NHDOT, indeed those boards are loose, and why did you do this. A friendly talk with the police over public safety at the walkway?
So I am not sure why the crow bar was necessary in the second go round if I had already pulled up the planks?
#18 Aug 4, 2013
We know police and legal actions were pending before #1?
#19 Aug 4, 2013
Yer honor, Ize inner-sent. The koppers say I robbed da bank wit a gun. It twaz a f------ knife.
Hizzoner has taken the madda unda ad-visement......meanwhile, the public awaits whether Mike gets off on a technicality!
#20 Aug 4, 2013
I contend the Hinsdale lieutenant and police chief were negligent in their public safety duties associated with the events surrounding my complaint about the safety of Hinsdale route 119 bridge walkway.
I contend when I went to the station, when I asked if could speak to the chief…the lieutenant said,” the chief is not in and I am busy in a meeting”... what was really happening, is you knew there was pending charges being make against me, so you were pretending to make the Hinsdale police department unavailable to speak to me. But, I still got the lieutenant to come out and see the picture.
As I contended the investigating officer, I think it is vital to my case that there is a documented trail with the actions of the lieutenant and Hinsdale police department. The lieutenant logged down my complaint, the police offices wrote up a report about their investigation of my complaint, and there is a paper trail through the lieutenant and into the NHDOT and back.
The Hinsdale police department should have thoroughly inspected that bridge walkway immediately for safety...they should have conservatively shut that walkway down pending an inspection of the NHDOT.
From that point on, based on a potential of a conspiracy to protect the lieutenant, the chief and the Hinsdale police department to cover-up their failure to “protect the public”, the Hinsdale police department should have used independent investigative police resources to investigate me and make charges.
I contend the majority of these charges are inflammatory, grossly professionally inaccurate and grounds for court document falsification...the inaccuracies are aimed to cover up the failure to” protect the public” with the lieutenant, the police chief and the Hinsdale police department.
I am requesting the charges be dropped and independent outside resources be used to reinvestigate these events, to recharge me if necessary with a independent investigation, accurate charges and investigation.
Add your comments below
|Former employee suing Mack Molding over alleged...||Jan '18||Comrade Sanders||2|
|Diversity dialogue to continue in Brattleboro (Aug '17)||Dec '17||Comrade Sanders||6|
|Grout Pond National Forest Area to Become Paid ...||Nov '17||Defiant1||3|
|Gentlewolf released on bail (Jun '07)||Oct '17||amen||3|
|Tellman Knudson (Jun '12)||Jul '17||Angela Hernandez||51|
|What Does It Take To Get the Brattleboro Reform... (Jun '17)||Jun '17||Kay||1|
|Review: Biologic Integrative Health - Samantha ... (Feb '10)||Jun '17||Amy||65|
Find what you want!
Search Brattleboro Forum Now
Copyright © 2018 Topix LLC