The WilliesTHE Commies are Coming
"Are Artists Special?" was the title of an amusing and insightful talk that the painter Wolf Kahn gave at the Brattleboro Museum and Art Center on Saturday.
Join the discussion below, or Read more at American Reporter.
#1 Nov 25, 2013
I knew it! Senator McCarthy and J. Edgar Hoover and others have long been warning us of the commie takeover and now it's happening!
Their plant Barry Soetoro even Admitted in page 100 of his book that he used to hang out with Marxists. Marx is credited with creating Communism/Socialism (essecntially the same) but we know that him and Engels were members of the Illuminati group 'The League of Just Men'
And everyone knows that the Democratic party is the Communist party in America
So this is what our benevolent & protective govt. Dept. of Homeland Security has been buying up those 2 Billion rounds of ammo for!
#2 Nov 25, 2013
#3 Nov 26, 2013
Do you actually know the difference between communism and socialism? For example, some of the Northern European nations have a great deal of socialized programs, but they are not even slightly communist.(And they live longer, healthier, happier lives in those nations, look it up).
Heck, one socialist program WE have though is the military. Think: Its tax payer funded. Simple as that. Taking tax revenue, pooling it, and then providing a service for the benefit of all is the definition of a socialist program. When a government provides healthcare (universal healthcare) it is referred to as "socialized medicine", how is national defense any different? Is it not just "universal defense", or are they only defending a select few instead of the entire nation?
#5 Nov 26, 2013
Socialism is collectivism, it's total control of ALL goods and services
Having govt-run public services like police fire and military etc. is Not evidence of socialism in a society. Those are public infrustrucure
The ideological difference between Socialism and Communism is about the same as between Bud and Bud Lite, that's why Marx is the most famous socialist AND credited with communism
The real world difference is that a commie has a gun to strictly enforce socialism no matter what. What matters is the fact that the goal of both S & C and F (Fascism) etc. is the same- totalitarian control with No individual rights
They will lie to ewe saying 'healthcare' and welfare and abortion services etc. are rights, when true rights are Not things that the govt. or the Constitution provide for individuals- the individual Already Has rights and govt.s job is simply to protect everone's God-given rights, Jefferson said that and the other founders agreed in the Dec. of Ind. 1776
The rich pay more for the govt. services of police fire and military etc. and at least they can access them when needed, they can't access individual welfare like the poor can in America even though it's unconstitutional. The Constitution says the govt. should provide for the GENERAL welfare, which is why we have the Eisenhower interstate highway system for instance, which was made not so much to help people travel but for the military to be able to get around the country.
#7 Nov 27, 2013
Since: Jan 12
#8 Jan 8, 2014
Time to track down the old Bagwan Sri Rajneesh --spelling?--who used to have the lovely ashram in the northwest U.S. Bring him to Putney and put him in charge of setting up his second neo-utopia based on fundamental communal principles=true community ownership and sharing--and, to boot--instead of all those pretentious Rolls Royces that got him in so much trouble his groupies will drive iconic VT Volvos--gold plated with frilly tassels lining the inside window frames. Aum....Aum...echoes rolling across the forbidding kush of VT.
...and the fragrant aroma of curried mutton and moose pie with a slight hint of maple syrup shall waft the sheeple off to the green hills of Ennui.
#9 Jan 8, 2014
Just shut up and turn your children over to the government for indoctrination.
#10 Jan 8, 2014
No, you can have socialized *parts* of a government, but still not be a "socialist government". That's why we can have tax funded projects, resources, agency's and such which are controlled by the government but other parts of our nations funding are purely capitalist. Your definition of "infrastructure" vs "socialism" is cherry picking.
The idea that its black and white, either a government is completely socialist, or completely sophomoric Ayn Randian, is simplistic thinking. Reality has lots of shades of grey.
A good example of socialist programs without your drivel: "total control of ALL goods and services" - is much of Europe. They have "collective" investments in lots of parts of the government, from support for the poor, excellent health and dental, mass transit, and LOTS more. They are capitalist countries with some socialist programs. Heck, China is Communist (different from socialist you twit)- but also is kicking our ass on the free market now.
Alright, take your Prozac and turn Faux 'News' and Alex back on and breath deep. Ignore all of this - you know that YOU are right!:-)
#11 Jan 8, 2014
Your comparing that excess to Putney and VT just makes you look like a drama queen. Oh ... sorry if that's not respectful of your sexuality.:-)
#12 Jan 8, 2014
Lots Of Looneyness excreted:
"China is Communist (different from socialist you twit)"
-both are socialist, the difference is the commie govt enforces the extremist socialism by extreme force, as Mao said "Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun."
"but [China] also is kicking our ass on the free market now."
-ewe suppose having a couple billion people who accept being basically slaves working for a bare existence has anything to do with that?
The U.S. South did well economically when they had slavery too
No socialist govt. ever extended any real freedom/rights to their people, only privileges which are contingent on toeing the line and not complaining, and they eventually get taken away completely
If ewe like socialism so much go live in that country that's 'kicking our ass', or Cuba which is closer
US State Dept put Mao in power!
and David Rockefeller admitted to the NY Times that he was glad he and his fellow NWO globalists put mao in AND that Mao murdered well over 50 Million people in China
#13 Jan 8, 2014
I mean, how many real nuclear aircraft carriers does China own. Real ones!
China’s weak link is their lack of a Constitution like us…our democratic ideals…their lack of our dwindling institutions. They are fragile as hell.
Add your comments below
|Just another religious criminal (Oct '14)||4 hr||Urinoff||146|
|Global Financial Meltdown (Oct '11)||7 hr||TheDailySheeple d...||17|
|Audit of decommissioning fund should be public (Aug '10)||7 hr||Alex||39|
|Vermonts new economy (Jun '14)||Thu||Make Vermont Diverse||143|
|The third world of science in Vermont/Brattleboro (Nov '11)||May 24||Urinoff||36|
|Why is topix deleting half of my posts? (Aug '11)||May 21||Urinoff||41|
|Why Are You Atheists So Angry?||May 19||Urinoff||15|
Find what you want!
Search Brattleboro Forum Now
Copyright © 2015 Topix LLC