I Know More Than You

Topsham, ME

#21 Sep 22, 2013
FoxNewsIdiot wrote:
Apparently Cramer isn't the only person who thinks this:
"Natural-gas drilling sites arenít leaking as much methane into the atmosphere as previous estimates suggested. The first major, onsite study of emissions might be a major boost for the gas industry. The study was led by researchers at the University of Texas and partially funded by the advocacy group Environmental Defense Fund. Itís likely to ease concerns about the effects of natural gas drilling on the climate."
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/business/2013/09/...
Gotcha again.
Why do you always have to use others to review the work in question and then tell you what to think? Can't you understand the source documents?

Or you could just read (and more importantly, comprehend) my posts.
Atrueliberal

Brattleboro, VT

#22 Sep 23, 2013
I Know More Than You wrote:
<quoted text>
Why do you always have to use others to review the work in question and then tell you what to think? Can't you understand the source documents?
Or you could just read (and more importantly, comprehend) my posts.
The source document says exactly what the review said and exactly what Cramer said. You just aren't smart enough to understand the report. Gotcha.
I Know More Than You

Topsham, ME

#23 Sep 23, 2013
FoxNewsIdiot wrote:
The source document says exactly what the review said and exactly what Cramer said. You just aren't smart enough to understand the report. Gotcha.
Oh wait, you're serious? Let me laugh at you even harder!
Atrueliberal

Brattleboro, VT

#24 Sep 23, 2013
I Know More Than You wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh wait, you're serious? Let me laugh at you even harder!
Rules about liberals no 10 applies to your post. Acutally it applies to most of your posts. Here it is: 10) You must be absolutely close minded: One of the key reasons liberals spend so much time vilifying people they donít like and questioning their motivations is to protect themselves from having to consider their arguments. This helps create a completely closed system for liberals. Conservative arguments are considered wrong by default since theyíre conservative and not worth hearing. On the other hand, liberals arenít going to make conservative arguments. So, a liberal goes to a liberal school, watches liberal news, listens to liberal politicians, has liberal friends, and then convinces himself that conservatives are all hateful, evil, racist Nazis so that any stray conservatism he hears should be ignored. It makes liberal minds into perfectly closed loops that are impervious to anything other than liberal doctrine.

Now go an look at the link you provided and note the graph that shows the levels of methane reported by the EPA in2011 and 2012 for the years 2009 and 2010 and then the levels of methane reported in 2013. Notice any difference? That difference is what Cramer was talking about. If you do acknowledge the difference then look at the quote you provided and compare the difference and the quote to what Cramer said and the additional analysis that I provided by a third party. Any questions? If you do then we better send you back to do sophomore year over again. Keep beating this one. It is making you look stupider and stupider.
I Know More Than You

Topsham, ME

#25 Sep 23, 2013
FoxNewsIdiot wrote:
Rules about liberals no 10 applies to your post. Acutally it applies to most of your posts. Here it is: 10) You must be absolutely close minded: One of the key reasons liberals spend so much time vilifying people they donít like and questioning their motivations is to protect themselves from having to consider their arguments. This helps create a completely closed system for liberals. Conservative arguments are considered wrong by default since theyíre conservative and not worth hearing. On the other hand, liberals arenít going to make conservative arguments. So, a liberal goes to a liberal school, watches liberal news, listens to liberal politicians, has liberal friends, and then convinces himself that conservatives are all hateful, evil, racist Nazis so that any stray conservatism he hears should be ignored. It makes liberal minds into perfectly closed loops that are impervious to anything other than liberal doctrine.
Now go an look at the link you provided and note the graph that shows the levels of methane reported by the EPA in2011 and 2012 for the years 2009 and 2010 and then the levels of methane reported in 2013. Notice any difference? That difference is what Cramer was talking about. If you do acknowledge the difference then look at the quote you provided and compare the difference and the quote to what Cramer said and the additional analysis that I provided by a third party. Any questions? If you do then we better send you back to do sophomore year over again. Keep beating this one. It is making you look stupider and stupider.
Acutally,(sic) I'm not one digging a deeper hole :)

Try another hypothesis, you are bound to get one right by chance sooner or later.
Trueliberal

Bennington, VT

#26 Sep 25, 2013
I Know More Than You wrote:
<quoted text>
Acutally,(sic) I'm not one digging a deeper hole :)
Try another hypothesis, you are bound to get one right by chance sooner or later.
I thought you didn't chase typos? Of course when you have nothing intelligent to say that is the only thing a 16 year old can come up with.
Rule no. 10 is your rule now.
I Know More Than You

Topsham, ME

#27 Sep 26, 2013
FoxNewsIdiot wrote:
I thought you didn't chase typos?
I reserve the right to mock all aspects of your ignorance and believe me, it's a rich vein to mine.
Trueliberal

Bennington, VT

#28 Sep 26, 2013
I Know More Than You wrote:
<quoted text>
I reserve the right to mock all aspects of your ignorance and believe me, it's a rich vein to mine.
You mock and sneer incessantly so it has no affect whatsoever. You liberals are all alike. Mock and sneer so you don't actually have to defend your positions or don't have to actually give rational responses to what other people say. Rule no. 10 fits you perfectly.

When you decide to become a gentleman and offer legitimate input into any debate in a gentlemanly and rational manner then maybe people will stop judging you "nuts". You have taken over the number one "nuts" poster from Mulligan.
How do you know so much about Nuclear Power? Why is it that you care so much about the Nuclear Power debate and are so defensive about criticism of VY and Entergy?
I Know More Than You

Topsham, ME

#29 Sep 26, 2013
FoxNewsIdiot wrote:
You mock and sneer incessantly so it has no affect whatsoever. You liberals are all alike. Mock and sneer so you don't actually have to defend your positions or don't have to actually give rational responses to what other people say. Rule no. 10 fits you perfectly.
When you decide to become a gentleman and offer legitimate input into any debate in a gentlemanly and rational manner then maybe people will stop judging you "nuts". You have taken over the number one "nuts" poster from Mulligan.
FoxNewsIdiot wrote:
How do you know so much about Nuclear Power? Why is it that you care so much about the Nuclear Power debate and are so defensive about criticism of VY and Entergy?
You probably don't get the irony of this post but everyone smarter than you does which means people are laughing at you, not with you.

Let me know when you want to actually engage in debate and not post meaningless quote from entertainers and pretend that counts.

As for your other question, I think my screen name answers that. Of course you think my imaginary daddy tells me what to post.
liberalthinker

Bennington, VT

#30 Sep 27, 2013
I Know More Than You wrote:
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
You probably don't get the irony of this post but everyone smarter than you does which means people are laughing at you, not with you.
Let me know when you want to actually engage in debate and not post meaningless quote from entertainers and pretend that counts.
As for your other question, I think my screen name answers that. Of course you think my imaginary daddy tells me what to post.
The real irony is that you are both the biggest liar on here and the poster who most often accuses other people of lying.
I Know More Than You

Topsham, ME

#31 Sep 27, 2013
FoxNewsIdiot wrote:
The real irony is that you are both the biggest liar on here and the poster who most often accuses other people of lying.
Of course you can't actually produce any of said lies but keep digging dummy.
liberalmind

Bennington, VT

#32 Sep 27, 2013
I Know More Than You wrote:
<quoted text>
Why do you always have to use others to review the work in question and then tell you what to think? Can't you understand the source documents?
Or you could just read (and more importantly, comprehend) my posts.
You lie about who you are. You lie about where your information comes from and you lie about your motivation for support of VY.
I Know More Than You

Topsham, ME

#33 Sep 27, 2013
FoxNewsIdiot wrote:
You lie about who you are. You lie about where your information comes from and you lie about your motivation for support of VY.
Who did I say I was? I must have missed that post.

I see you can't figure out how to use ADAMS, I'm not surprised. Maybe Mulligan will help you, I think he still needs a job.

What is my motivation for support of nuclear power, including VY and what did I say it was?

Here's your chance to have a rational discussion, let's see how it goes.
Scotty

Brattleboro, VT

#34 Sep 27, 2013
I Know More Than You wrote:
<quoted text>
Who did I say I was? I must have missed that post.
I see you can't figure out how to use ADAMS, I'm not surprised. Maybe Mulligan will help you, I think he still needs a job.
What is my motivation for support of nuclear power, including VY and what did I say it was?
Here's your chance to have a rational discussion, let's see how it goes.
You denied you are Evan.
Scotty

Brattleboro, VT

#35 Sep 27, 2013
I Know More Than You wrote:
<quoted text>
Who did I say I was? I must have missed that post.
I see you can't figure out how to use ADAMS, I'm not surprised. Maybe Mulligan will help you, I think he still needs a job.
What is my motivation for support of nuclear power, including VY and what did I say it was?
Here's your chance to have a rational discussion, let's see how it goes.
Using Adams is not the motivation for using it.
Build more nukes

West Rutland, VT

#36 Sep 27, 2013
U.N. panel says it's "extremely likely" global warming is predominantly man-made
cbsnews.com
I Know More Than You

Topsham, ME

#37 Sep 27, 2013
Let's see, you said:
FoxNewsIdiot wrote:
You lie about where your information comes from
And I responded that I use ADAMS and apparently you can't figure it out.

Then you said:
FoxNewsIdiot wrote:
Using Adams is not the motivation for using it.
Try again. Perhaps you could post a link where I stated my motivation and we could start from there since you can't figure out something the Mulligan uses regularly.

Of course I'm not Evan and you could clear it up easily by calling the Twarog house. They're are in the book or web as the case may be.)

Why don't you call them and report back here?
I Know More Than You

Topsham, ME

#38 Sep 27, 2013
Build more nukes wrote:
U.N. panel says it's "extremely likely" global warming is predominantly man-made
cbsnews.com
Of course it is by I doubt the ignorant ideologues here can comprehend that fact. They get their climate science from Jim Cramer.
Atrueliberal

Brattleboro, VT

#39 Sep 28, 2013
I Know More Than You wrote:
Let's see, you said:
<quoted text>
And I responded that I use ADAMS and apparently you can't figure it out.
Then you said:
<quoted text>
Try again. Perhaps you could post a link where I stated my motivation and we could start from there since you can't figure out something the Mulligan uses regularly.
Of course I'm not Evan and you could clear it up easily by calling the Twarog house. They're are in the book or web as the case may be.)
Why don't you call them and report back here?
Give me your parents number and I will call them.
Atrueliberal

Brattleboro, VT

#40 Sep 28, 2013
I Know More Than You wrote:
<quoted text>
Who did I say I was? I must have missed that post.
I see you can't figure out how to use ADAMS, I'm not surprised. Maybe Mulligan will help you, I think he still needs a job.
What is my motivation for support of nuclear power, including VY and what did I say it was?
Here's your chance to have a rational discussion, let's see how it goes.
Why do you access ADAMS and where?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Brattleboro Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Vermonts new economy (Jun '14) 5 hr Community Disorga... 67
New Hampshire Buying Russian Coal for Generation 20 hr March Winds 3
Balint: Raising a glass to millenials Thu March Winds 3
Vermont Yankee prepares to power down Thu Arnie 10
God is coming SOON! (Apr '07) Thu Maranatha 131
Vermont Yankee: Regional organizations release ... Wed March Winds 1
Everyone's Books celebrates 30 years Dec 23 March Winds 1

Brattleboro News Video

Brattleboro Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Brattleboro People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Brattleboro News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Brattleboro

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 6:27 pm PST