Whoooo Eeeeee! You sure know how to cut "Not my fault" of Rock Port, MO down to size.<quoted text>
I understand that your last 2 replies to me are way off topic from my original reply to Savannah. You went on a rant about how money is not governing when I was posting to Savannah about the republican's responsibility for lack of security the night our Embassy in Benghazi was attacked and 4 people died.
Savannah wrote:<quoted text>That is part of being a Democrat. Never take responsibility and always try to find someone else to blame your failures on. Trying to blame Benghazi on the house republicans is just another one of their desperate attempts to avoid responsibility for their failures. No one except the ones who subscribe to their line of thinking is going to believe that load of garbage. It was a failure on the part of the Obama administration and the Clinton state department. Nothing else. You need to quit dignifying this stuff with replies. To them that means they are getting their message out. Just ignore their blame nonsense. You know the truth. The real American people know the truth and that is all that matters.
After reading your sos, let's get down to facts, Savannah. Try this truth serum"
My reply to Savannah:
"House Republicans cut the administration’s request for embassy security funding by $128 million in fiscal 2011 and $331 million in fiscal 2012....Last year, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton warned that Republicans’ proposed cuts to her department would be “detrimental to America’s national security”— a charge Republicans rejected.
Ryan, Issa and other House Republicans voted for an amendment in 2009 to cut $1.2 billion from State operations, including funds for 300 more diplomatic security positions. Under Ryan’s budget, non-defense discretionary spending, which includes State Department funding, would be slashed nearly 20 percent in 2014, which would translate to more than $400 million in additional cuts to embassy security." Mother Jones
Yep, your Darrel Issa witch hunt against the Obama Administration over Benghazi is about to blow back into the Tea Party's face. If Hillary runs again, she will most definitely be sworn in January, 2017. Why? Because no republican can beat her in a general election. And your obstructionist, Ted Cruze, can't run for president, because he was born in Canada.
I "Judge" your comment "Brilliant" ... "Agree" ... "Helpful" ... "Cuts Rock Port Down"