Skimpy Tiny Shorts in public

Skimpy Tiny Shorts in public

Posted in the Bowling Green Forum

First Prev
of 9
Next Last
Curtis

United States

#1 Jun 30, 2012
After the woman was assualted in lowes the other day for wearing the tiny shorts, it made me think that she brought it on herself with her skanky outfit. If girls and women dressed more conservatively and wore shorts that did not look like underpants with there butt hanging out, maybe perverts would not be tempted to assualt you.
A Different View

Frankfort, KY

#2 Jun 30, 2012
No she didn't,maybe she was giving a show,but no one still had the right to put their hands on her without her permission.
Wow

United States

#3 Jul 1, 2012
Regardless of what she had on, he has no right to attempt rape! He had no right to even touch her. I am a woman and do dress conservatively, but if and when I want to feel "sexy", I dress according to what my husband likes. I do it to impress him and for him only. I know others may look, but that's all the sicko f*cker should do.
torn

La Grange, KY

#4 Jul 1, 2012
I agree with both opinions. However, there's an old saying "Don't advertise for something your not selling." Even though I agree that she has a right not to be molested, I do get a little irritated at how people continuously tempt fate and then stand around bitching when something bad happens. Young women's clothing has long since passed into the inappropriate category. I read an article the other day about a push up bakini top made for 7 year old girls. It's ridiculous.
Relevant

Bowling Green, KY

#5 Jul 1, 2012
Dressing immodestly is like rolling in manure. Yes, you'll get attention, but mostly from pigs.
dont think so

Canton, OH

#6 Jul 1, 2012
Curtis wrote:
After the woman was assualted in lowes the other day for wearing the tiny shorts, it made me think that she brought it on herself with her skanky outfit. If girls and women dressed more conservatively and wore shorts that did not look like underpants with there butt hanging out, maybe perverts would not be tempted to assualt you.
Absolutely no one was assaulted in lowes. Someone has done a very good job at starting a completely unfounded rumor.
vickous

United States

#7 Jul 1, 2012
Whether or not someone was assualted or not, the point is if you go around with shorts so short u can see your private area, then you shouldn't complain if you become a victim of sexual assualt.
short shorts

Bowling Green, KY

#8 Jul 1, 2012
A Different View wrote:
No she didn't,maybe she was giving a show,but no one still had the right to put their hands on her without her permission.
That's why it is called RAPE . Put some decent clothes on when you leave the house !!
Camel Toe Fan

Franklin, TN

#9 Jul 1, 2012
I love it when shorts are so tight on women that their labia split on the seam and their muffin looks like a taco.

At Russell Sims pools you see more moose-knuckles than cute little camel toes.

I am a huge fan of puffy p^ssy lips in short shorts.
Prudes

Canton, OH

#10 Jul 1, 2012
Oh please, if you had the figures, you would where it too.
Dawn

Brownsville, KY

#12 Jul 1, 2012
I wish more men would wear shorter shorts from the 70's. Give us gals a peek from time to time. All you Bible thumping women, get off this site and go sew a quilt or something.
Laughable

Lexington, KY

#13 Jul 1, 2012
Wow. Just wow. Regardless of whether someone was actually attacked or not, I'm a bit astounded by how many people agree with the opinion that a woman can "deserve" to be raped based on ANYTHING, clothing, demeanor, anything! Rape is a crime of power perpetrated by those who get off on controlling others because they have serious psychological issues. It has nothing to do with actual sex, which is why it happens to elderly women, conservatively dressed women and even men. Sexual intercourse should ALWAYS be a consensual choice between two people and the violation of that principle is NEVER justified. What a horrible, horrible outlook to have.
lady licker

United States

#14 Jul 1, 2012
Laughable wrote:
Wow. Just wow. Regardless of whether someone was actually attacked or not, I'm a bit astounded by how many people agree with the opinion that a woman can "deserve" to be raped based on ANYTHING, clothing, demeanor, anything! Rape is a crime of power perpetrated by those who get off on controlling others because they have serious psychological issues. It has nothing to do with actual sex, which is why it happens to elderly women, conservatively dressed women and even men. Sexual intercourse should ALWAYS be a consensual choice between two people and the violation of that principle is NEVER justified. What a horrible, horrible outlook to have.
AMEN it is so unbelievable that anyone would have the attitude that because a woman wears reviling clothing that she is asking to be raped or assaulted. that is the most stupid idiotic attitude i have ever heard. if the world worked like that no woman in the world would be able to wear a swimsuit, let alone a bikini. my god people wake up.
flash

Elizabethtown, KY

#15 Jul 1, 2012
Dawn wrote:
I wish more men would wear shorter shorts from the 70's. Give us gals a peek from time to time. All you Bible thumping women, get off this site and go sew a quilt or something.
I will give u a peek without the short shorts.29 y/o white male 160lbs clean. I think u would like. Just a show.
stupid

Lewisburg, KY

#16 Jul 1, 2012
Prudes wrote:
Oh please, if you had the figures, you would where it too.
wear...not where...sun cooked your brain?
stupid

Lewisburg, KY

#17 Jul 1, 2012
lady licker wrote:
<quoted text>AMEN it is so unbelievable that anyone would have the attitude that because a woman wears reviling clothing that she is asking to be raped or assaulted. that is the most stupid idiotic attitude i have ever heard. if the world worked like that no woman in the world would be able to wear a swimsuit, let alone a bikini. my god people wake up.
yeah! the only reason you want them to show it all is so you can decide which one you want to lick....disgusting!!!
Bottom Boy

Floyds Knobs, IN

#18 Jul 1, 2012
Laughable wrote:
Wow. Just wow. Regardless of whether someone was actually attacked or not, I'm a bit astounded by how many people agree with the opinion that a woman can "deserve" to be raped based on ANYTHING, clothing, demeanor, anything! Rape is a crime of power perpetrated by those who get off on controlling others because they have serious psychological issues. It has nothing to do with actual sex, which is why it happens to elderly women, conservatively dressed women and even men. Sexual intercourse should ALWAYS be a consensual choice between two people and the violation of that principle is NEVER justified. What a horrible, horrible outlook to have.
Consensual choice with more that two is not justified to you?? We like lots of consensual friends and acquaintences.
lady licker

United States

#19 Jul 1, 2012
stupid wrote:
<quoted text>
yeah! the only reason you want them to show it all is so you can decide which one you want to lick....disgusting!!!
your name must suit you well, STUPID. of course i like looking at attractive people, male or female. the point being raised here if it is okay for someone to be assaulted or raped simply because they wear revealing clothing. i guess if it is okay in your eyes to rape someone because they wear that type of clothing it is okay if someone gets in your car and steals it simply because it is a nice car and they like it? please go back and be stupid somewhere else .
lady licker

United States

#20 Jul 1, 2012
stupid wrote:
<quoted text>
yeah! the only reason you want them to show it all is so you can decide which one you want to lick....disgusting!!!
And as far as me deciding which one to lick....... i am sorry you are jealous of my sexual freedom, its to bad more people are not more open with their sexual fantasies and desires. it sure makes for alot of unhappy people walking around when they have to live their lives by other peoples standards. i live my life by my standards and i am sure i do not have an affect on your life, so mind your own buisness and i will mind mine.
Laughable

Lexington, KY

#21 Jul 1, 2012
Bottom Boy wrote:
<quoted text>
Consensual choice with more that two is not justified to you?? We like lots of consensual friends and acquaintences.
Okay, this made me chuckle, I'll admit. And fair point, two is not necessarily the rule. "Consensual" was the keyword there, though. Regardless of how many people choose to be involved, the point is the CHOICE to do so. Nevertheless, ya got me on that one.

Still, I reiterate - Rape is never justified, regardless of anything.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 9
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Bowling Green Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Hannah White 23 min IsThisReal 1
Meghan Cardwell 30 min Cody 2
rock creek shooting 30 min heavy hearted 1
poor little blacks ... 48 min rebel999 1
Mariah's, 643 Sports Bar Closed (Mar '15) 1 hr explain 83
Chris Gerald and Jessica Miller 1 hr Haha 15
sun products laying off 150+ express temp emplo... (Feb '14) 1 hr Logger 24

Bowling Green Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Bowling Green Mortgages