Corrupt Judge! Holderfield won't help...
creemos

Canton, OH

#41 Jul 28, 2010
the aunt wrote:
Creemos,
I am aware of all you are doing to help Christian. You are an answered prayer, truly a Godsend! I have checked out all the wonderful things you do and I want you to know you have my sincere gratitude. If I can help in any way with what you are doing please do not hesitate to contact me. Kimberly knows how to get in touch with me.
I am so thankful that I can help in some way or another! I have not stopped and will continue to help in any way I can and to be standing with all of you until Christian is safe! thank you Aunt!!!
newbie

Canton, OH

#42 Jul 28, 2010
crazy
Just Wondering

Louisville, KY

#43 Jul 28, 2010
After reading all of the posts and the blog does no one wonder why the judge would order Christian to have no contact with the girlfriend who created this blog. I am just challenging everyone to think before taking this account of the story that appears it could be single sided.
the aunt

Lexington, KY

#44 Jul 29, 2010
Just Wondering,
The girlfriend is a beautiful, intelligent young lady. She is an honor roll student and has received many awards, one of which was a humanitarian award! Steve has severe control issues, which is why he wanted to keep Christian from seeing the girlfriend. The Judge and Steve’s attorney are life-long family friends … sounds like a conflict of interest for the two to be in the same court room to me. This has never been about the girlfriend except for Steve’s need for control. You tell me how a judge can order no contact from one minor to another in a case that is not even about the girlfriend?? The whole thing is a corrupt, who knows who situation - and Christian is the one suffering from it!

When it is all said and done “stories” are not what will matter. Everything said in the courtroom is documented in black and white. The judge contradicting herself and the lies being told will be evident in court documents, not stories.

That is a good question you posed. Here is another good question. How is it that judge Holderfield can issue a DVO stating that there has been abuse and there is likelihood of more abuse, and 30 days later send Christian back to his dad?? I am challenging everyone to think about that …

If you know anything about DVO’s they are issued when the judge believes there is domestic violence. They remain in place for 1-3 years. 1-3 YEARS!!!! Not 30 days. If you don’t know about DVO’s, google it.
nralife

Louisville, KY

#45 Jul 29, 2010
Could it be?, the attitude of the washington slugs is trickling down? Don't forget, we have the "slug-in
chief" stinking up the white house!!
Bob

Bowling Green, KY

#46 Jul 29, 2010
Let's turn this into a Abama thing now.
Laws were in place before he took office.
Stupid ass learn before you speak.
Bob

Bowling Green, KY

#47 Jul 29, 2010
Let's turn this into a Obama thing now.
Laws were in place before he took office.
Stupid ass learn before you speak.
creemos

Canton, OH

#48 Jul 29, 2010
the aunt wrote:
Just Wondering,
The girlfriend is a beautiful, intelligent young lady. She is an honor roll student and has received many awards, one of which was a humanitarian award! Steve has severe control issues, which is why he wanted to keep Christian from seeing the girlfriend. The Judge and Steve’s attorney are life-long family friends … sounds like a conflict of interest for the two to be in the same court room to me. This has never been about the girlfriend except for Steve’s need for control. You tell me how a judge can order no contact from one minor to another in a case that is not even about the girlfriend?? The whole thing is a corrupt, who knows who situation - and Christian is the one suffering from it!
When it is all said and done “stories” are not what will matter. Everything said in the courtroom is documented in black and white. The judge contradicting herself and the lies being told will be evident in court documents, not stories.
That is a good question you posed. Here is another good question. How is it that judge Holderfield can issue a DVO stating that there has been abuse and there is likelihood of more abuse, and 30 days later send Christian back to his dad?? I am challenging everyone to think about that …
If you know anything about DVO’s they are issued when the judge believes there is domestic violence. They remain in place for 1-3 years. 1-3 YEARS!!!! Not 30 days. If you don’t know about DVO’s, google it.
I am amazed of what I witnessed today and totally outraged in the Godliest way possible. What happened in our courtroom reminded me of maybe being in a communist country like I came out of a long time ago. Heartbreaking but in His Word it says that the truth will persevere and right now we know Christian is in God's Hands and that is the only peace we have right now! Aunt please email me! Praying!!
Concerned

Bell Buckle, TN

#49 Jul 29, 2010
OUTRAGED wrote:
<quoted text>
Thats what we are doing. Its going to take a few months though probably. thanks though! we are just hoping Christian doesn't get hurt any more until then. we are all very stressed and worried.
I will tell you he will not get hurt in the home that he will be staying in.
believe

Bowling Green, KY

#50 Jul 29, 2010
What Happened in court? Let us know please.
creemos

Canton, OH

#51 Jul 29, 2010
believe wrote:
What Happened in court? Let us know please.
He will be in Foster Care with supervised visitation.
Law Student

Chesapeake, VA

#52 Jul 29, 2010
As a law student I am taught to scrutinize both sides of an issue, and the fact that this young lady was ordered to stay away from the plaintiff also concerns me. And as for the aunt and mother who claim it is because the attorney and father are best friends - that would have nothing to do with it. For a judge to issue such an order there must be proof and reason behind this decision. Screaming corruption will not win your case. A prominent judge would certainly not risk his or her career over a child abuse case that could potentially make headlines, corrupt or not. Child abuse is a VERY serious issue, as is any form of abuse. However, we are told not to believe everything we hear, I would advise that in this situation as well. Or at least until we are able to hear both sides. And to me, something seems fishy here...I'd like to see the transcripts from the court case to see both sides of the story before jumping to conclusions.
FYI

Canton, OH

#53 Jul 29, 2010
Law Student wrote:
As a law student I am taught to scrutinize both sides of an issue, and the fact that this young lady was ordered to stay away from the plaintiff also concerns me. And as for the aunt and mother who claim it is because the attorney and father are best friends - that would have nothing to do with it. For a judge to issue such an order there must be proof and reason behind this decision. Screaming corruption will not win your case. A prominent judge would certainly not risk his or her career over a child abuse case that could potentially make headlines, corrupt or not. Child abuse is a VERY serious issue, as is any form of abuse. However, we are told not to believe everything we hear, I would advise that in this situation as well. Or at least until we are able to hear both sides. And to me, something seems fishy here...I'd like to see the transcripts from the court case to see both sides of the story before jumping to conclusions.
Look at Ky Court Dockets online..father has child abuse case in dockets.
No Faith

Evansville, IN

#54 Jul 30, 2010
I feel your pain! Not to go into detail but our family was burned a few years ago by Holderfield; she leans towards the MONEY...whoever has it WINS! It's not for the best interest of the child; just the pocket of the government! Good luck and God bless!

Since: Nov 09

Location hidden

#55 Jul 30, 2010
OUTRAGED MOTHER wrote:
OK, I have heard enought of this MESS.... and a MESS it is. I am a concerned and outraged Mother that is really tired of hearing this MESS. I really don't like to get involved with things like this but enought is enought. For those out there that wants and would like to hear the other side....which we All know that their are two sides to every story. Well, here's mine.....This little 14 yr. old girl forgot to mention that she was sending Christian NUDE pictures of her self and Steve, Christian's father, was not going to allow this to happen. Christian got somewhat spiteful with his Dad and that is when the belt was bought out. Long story short....Soical Services got involved and back Steve up and said that Steve was within the guide lines and did nothing that was out of the guides lines.....Now Holderfield is the one that said that a belt cannot be used any more....to use something else for discipline. So I hope that that clears up the story for the ABuse that you are calling it. So, little 14 yr. old I sooo hope that you are sooo PROUD of yourself for doing all this... for corrupting Christian's life and his family. Oh, I forgot to mention that I saw the pictures that you sent to Christian....come on , did you really thing that no one would see them....it's the internet....again I hope you are sooo PROUD of youself. Christian is a good boy and he is that because of the one that raised him...his Father...as you must know his Mother left him at 8 yrs. old to go to California and didn't even tell Christian...again I sure you know all this stuff. You have really messed up Christian's mind and I hope that this make you fell really good when you lay your head down at night....that sex is sooo much more important to you then having a healthy relationship at 14 yrs. old....a relationship that a respectable girl and boy should have. NO, you don't have to respond to my post...but I want everyboby out there that is getting involved to know the other side of the story. And yes, I know that Soical Services and Judge Holderfield WOULD NOT ALLOW this if they thought that there was any truth to your story.
You said it, the belt came out. But I am pretty sure the belt didn't leave that handprint across his face that turned into a bruise and the other parts if his body that were bruised as well and not from a belt And they are documented, Or did you conviently forget to mention those. A child does bad and yes needs to be punished and a TEENAGER will get spiteful that's what they do, BUT to punch or smack a kid hard enough that they can damn near pull a fingerprint off the bruise well that's going a little to far. You and I both know what I am talking about and NO I am not part of other people who have commented or part of this thing to help Christian.. BTW, How long has he been hitting you now? And how many times has he said he was sorry it wont happen again, How often do you walk on egg shells around him so you don't make him mad by the smalllest little thing that can set him offf?????
creemos

Canton, OH

#56 Jul 30, 2010
FYI wrote:
<quoted text>Look at Ky Court Dockets online..father has child abuse case in dockets.
Can you give me a link, please! It would be a good thing to have that.
to creemos

Louisville, KY

#57 Jul 30, 2010
u can go to warrencountyjail.com and look under past inmates by name- type in his name, it shows the mugshots and charges.
lynn

Scottsville, KY

#58 Jul 30, 2010
people talk

Bowling Green, KY

#59 Jul 30, 2010
Look I went to the site and there is not a charge for abuse.
He looks like all the other people that make a mistake. Arrested for drinking and forgetting a court date. You people are making this worse than it is. If you don't like the guy just say that. Don't try to build a case about abuse when it's shows something else.Don't know this guy but I feel like he is getting a bad rap because of a couple people. Watch who you talk about. It will come home to you.

Since: Nov 09

Location hidden

#60 Jul 30, 2010
people talk wrote:
Look I went to the site and there is not a charge for abuse.
He looks like all the other people that make a mistake. Arrested for drinking and forgetting a court date. You people are making this worse than it is. If you don't like the guy just say that. Don't try to build a case about abuse when it's shows something else.Don't know this guy but I feel like he is getting a bad rap because of a couple people. Watch who you talk about. It will come home to you.
Name: COFFEY , STEVEN HARDIN
Age: 42
Race / Sex: W/M
Intake Date: 2/19/95

Tca description bond court date
ASSAULT 4TH - SPOUSE $500 2/19/95

THIS IS CALLED ABUSE, 4TH DEGREE ASSAULT IS SPOUSE ABUSE, OR IS THAT NOT CONSIDERED ABUSE TO YOU??????

Name: COFFEY , STEVEN HARDIN
Age: 42
Race / Sex: W/M
Intake Date: 12/16/00


Tca description bond court date
VIOLATION OF KY EPO/DVO $1000 Not Set

YOU GET THIS WHEN THERE IS PROOF OF SOME KIND OF ABUSE, ENOUGH FOR YOU?????

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Bowling Green Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Christy willoughby and Carrie Sullivan and Ran... 5 min truth 3
NF You're Special 18 min Durrr 7
Jenny Ramsey & Robert Thomason (Oct '15) 49 min GPS 49
Ray and Winter 1 hr Halves 5
Man in red pick up truck watch out he follow women 1 hr Really 7
God is a Woman 1 hr Thumbsdownsyndrome 1
Who shot Richard aka Young bama a local rap rec... 4 hr Bumper the Dead Beat 15

Bowling Green Jobs

Personal Finance

Bowling Green Mortgages