There are 22 comments on the San Gabriel Valley Tribune story from Sep 30, 2010, titled Glendora's appeal regarding a redevelopment challenge with county e.... In it, San Gabriel Valley Tribune reports that:The California Supreme Court has decided not to hear a case regarding redevelopment in Glendora, officials said Thursday.
Join the discussion below, or Read more at San Gabriel Valley Tribune.
#21 Feb 1, 2012
Critics of California redevelopment say that it was a subsidy for developers at taxpayers' expense.
Building malls, sports stadiums and arenas, kickback campaign funds to politicial insiders instead of funding for schools, roads and other vital needs.
The $6 billion a year which they were siphoning away, especially from the school districts, is no longer sustainable.
The state of California is broke and we can no longer afford this kind of expensive corporate welfare that redevelopment has become.
For public schools, the move means they'll receive $1 billion more a year.
#22 Sep 30, 2012
Lets not forget the powerful Lawyer firms who sucked on RDA monies tees.
And then there are the greased up political machines (republican)..
Jerry Brown just took their money away.
You just know the development and realty lobbies are having a conniption fit today.
Add your comments below
|Is Ken Rupe still an obnoxious a-hole (Dec '07)||Wed||Jerry||31|
|Scrapped bill stalls broadband project||May 1||More Info||3|
|10 Best Restaurants in Santa Monica||Apr '16||Lucy Jane||1|
|Serial ADA lawsuit filer striking Bay Area||Apr '16||Julie Jane||1|
|3 arrested, 82 cars impounded in Moreno Valley (Jul '10)||Apr '16||JimiCash||11|
|Topless Bernie Sanders supporters arrested outs...||Mar '16||Le Jimbo||9|
|East county woman suspected of growing marijuana (Aug '09)||Feb '16||APHALady||12|
Find what you want!
Search Boulevard Forum Now
Copyright © 2016 Topix LLC