Fleet, Priscilla White denied official Ramsey exoneration statement by DA

Jan 24, 2014 Full story: Daily Camera 198

Boulder District Attorney Stan Garnett released a letter Friday showing he, too, had been pressed recently by acquaintances of John and Patsy Ramsey to issue a public statement exonerating them in JonBenet Ramsey's death, but that he declined to do so.

Full Story
real Topaz

AOL

#133 Jun 11, 2014
whodunnit wrote:
<quoted text>
You shouldn't assume I am satisfied with ~anything~ Smit, Ramsey, or LE did during the investigation.[In fact I found Smit to be wholly unqualified for the title 'detective']You've only to read my posts in this thread to know I do not 'support' the Ramsey's innocence. I think it's pretty clear the indictment probably had it right: John and Patsy covered up the murder of their daughter.[ransome note only the beginning of the evidence for a staged crime scene]
WHY would they do that? I believe NK provided the best, most plausible answer to that question. In any other scenario,[Patsy killed her over toilet issues etc] a faked kidnapping for ransom simply wasn't necessary. A faked kidnapping for ransom, hiding the body, staging the body etc., only became necessary in the presence of evidence of sexual assault. This too could have been explained away by the parents feigning ignorance SHOCK ZOMG what stranger has done this to my child?? No, the staging was necessary because the time and place of the murder,~~the circumstances surrounding the death~~~, had to be obscured.
I think it's safe to assume you don't read what's in front of you. I never said YOU were satified with anyone, I said the LE in Boulder was satisfied with Smit's performance.
It's all very interesting and entertaining to think there's some dark conspiracy or a sex ring behind this, but the only one dead is JonBenet. You'd think more kids, and adults, would mysteriously drop dead or out, knowing what they know..nope, just the Ramseys leaving town and not another word from NK or her fellow abused, ever. FW's kids are fine and upstanding, so clearly he didn't drag them into the sex ring..so, why JonBenet? It couldn't just be her father's to blame, or her mama, or her jealous brother? Has to be something more sinister than that?
whodunnit

Mobile, AL

#134 Jun 12, 2014
real Topaz wrote:
<quoted text>
I think it's safe to assume you don't read what's in front of you. I never said YOU were satified with anyone, I said the LE in Boulder was satisfied with Smit's performance.
It's all very interesting and entertaining to think there's some dark conspiracy or a sex ring behind this, but the only one dead is JonBenet. You'd think more kids, and adults, would mysteriously drop dead or out, knowing what they know..nope, just the Ramseys leaving town and not another word from NK or her fellow abused, ever. FW's kids are fine and upstanding, so clearly he didn't drag them into the sex ring..so, why JonBenet? It couldn't just be her father's to blame, or her mama, or her jealous brother? Has to be something more sinister than that?
From my perspective it is not at all 'entertaining' to 'think' there is some child sex ring behind the murder of JBR.

From my perspective, when people disbelieve victim accounts like NK's the horror continues apace. If there WAS a sex ring involved in this case it continues on unmolested so to speak because nobody believed NK's testimony.

You and other skeptics here must agree that the multi-billiion dollar child pron industry is real, correct? And you must agree that therefore the victims of this industry are also real? These victims have to come from somewhere. Sure, some of the children are stranger-abducted but this is risky business Dutroux found out in Belgium. Logically speaking, many child victims must be the product of a 'cabal' or ring, or 'network' of like minded individuals. These perpetrators aren't placing ads in the paper for 'actors''directors' and 'camera men' for their filthy films, they must be developing and maintaining their 'networks' of people who are 'in the know', and, as pedophiles, they must therefore have no problems with 'grooming' their own children, all children, within this 'protected' network, to produce their highly lucrative filth.
Automatically disbelieving victim accounts and calling them fruit loops isn't a recipe to encourage victims to come forward.[not to mention the violence and threats of violence. remember the dead, sexually molested child in this case?] As long as people like you make victims afraid to come forward this horrible industry will continue to their horrific exploitation of children.
real Topaz

AOL

#135 Jun 12, 2014
whodunnit wrote:
<quoted text>
From my perspective it is not at all 'entertaining' to 'think' there is some child sex ring behind the murder of JBR.
From my perspective, when people disbelieve victim accounts like NK's the horror continues apace. If there WAS a sex ring involved in this case it continues on unmolested so to speak because nobody believed NK's testimony.
You and other skeptics here must agree that the multi-billiion dollar child pron industry is real, correct? And you must agree that therefore the victims of this industry are also real? These victims have to come from somewhere. Sure, some of the children are stranger-abducted but this is risky business Dutroux found out in Belgium. Logically speaking, many child victims must be the product of a 'cabal' or ring, or 'network' of like minded individuals. These perpetrators aren't placing ads in the paper for 'actors''directors' and 'camera men' for their filthy films, they must be developing and maintaining their 'networks' of people who are 'in the know', and, as pedophiles, they must therefore have no problems with 'grooming' their own children, all children, within this 'protected' network, to produce their highly lucrative filth.
Automatically disbelieving victim accounts and calling them fruit loops isn't a recipe to encourage victims to come forward.[not to mention the violence and threats of violence. remember the dead, sexually molested child in this case?] As long as people like you make victims afraid to come forward this horrible industry will continue to their horrific exploitation of children.
Not a single other abused child that NK claims was there came forward. Not a single piece of evidence was produced by NK. NK had a history of interjecting herself in cases. NK is not the only rape victim in this so called sex ring, so how is anyone to believe her without someone else backing her story? Surely it made national news, and they're all around 40 yrs old and watching the news..where were they to say she's not crazy? She told people she had only months to live after that, said she had cancer and up and left her home..only to be found and exposed as a liar without cancer. For whatever reasons she's a 51/50, I don't know. Maybe she was abused, raped, had a chitty life..they couldn't get anything but her 'script' when it came to sex rings and the Whites and JonBenet's murder.
I don't deny sex rings exist, but really, NKs story didn't add up since the people she claimed were there, just weren't!
M_B_M

Mobile, AL

#136 Jun 12, 2014
whodunnit wrote:
<quoted text>
From my perspective it is not at all 'entertaining' to 'think' there is some child sex ring behind the murder of JBR.
From my perspective, when people disbelieve victim accounts like NK's the horror continues apace. If there WAS a sex ring involved in this case it continues on unmolested so to speak because nobody believed NK's testimony.
You and other skeptics here must agree that the multi-billiion dollar child pron industry is real, correct? And you must agree that therefore the victims of this industry are also real? These victims have to come from somewhere. Sure, some of the children are stranger-abducted but this is risky business Dutroux found out in Belgium. Logically speaking, many child victims must be the product of a 'cabal' or ring, or 'network' of like minded individuals. These perpetrators aren't placing ads in the paper for 'actors''directors' and 'camera men' for their filthy films, they must be developing and maintaining their 'networks' of people who are 'in the know', and, as pedophiles, they must therefore have no problems with 'grooming' their own children, all children, within this 'protected' network, to produce their highly lucrative filth.
Automatically disbelieving victim accounts and calling them fruit loops isn't a recipe to encourage victims to come forward.[not to mention the violence and threats of violence. remember the dead, sexually molested child in this case?] As long as people like you make victims afraid to come forward this horrible industry will continue to their horrific exploitation of children.
Whodunnit, what an eloquent illustration of what people who discredit victims like Nancy Krebs are doing when they disbelieve their accounts of the attrocities committed upon them. Just to think of the courage it must have taken for her to come public with her story and then to be villified for doing so Is IMO akin to pouring gasoline on the fire or more appropriately, like pouring salt in and open wound.
From MY perspective, sometimes it appears that some people prefer to allow such goings on to contiue rather accept what a victim says and try to find out if law enforcement and other high officials are not only covering up such activities but are actively involved in them.
I, for one, hope you continue your campaign to set people straight in their thinking and complacency -- yes, complacency in turning a blind eye to such activities but quickly on the attack when a victim comes forward.
I, however, believe that those who "automatically disbelieve" victims' accounts of what has happened to them are as bad as those here who agree by their skepticism that the multi-billiion dollar child porn industry is unreal, If that were true, then we should all just ignore any news accounts of hundreds being arrested for belonging to and participating in such activities. Calling victims like NK names like "fruit loops" only gives support to the sex ring operators by making victims afraid or reluctant to come forward with their stories. JMO
whodunnit

Mobile, AL

#137 Jun 12, 2014
real Topaz wrote:
<quoted text>
Not a single other abused child that NK claims was there came forward. Not a single piece of evidence was produced by NK. NK had a history of interjecting herself in cases. NK is not the only rape victim in this so called sex ring, so how is anyone to believe her without someone else backing her story? Surely it made national news, and they're all around 40 yrs old and watching the news..where were they to say she's not crazy? She told people she had only months to live after that, said she had cancer and up and left her home..only to be found and exposed as a liar without cancer. For whatever reasons she's a 51/50, I don't know. Maybe she was abused, raped, had a chitty life..they couldn't get anything but her 'script' when it came to sex rings and the Whites and JonBenet's murder.
I don't deny sex rings exist, but really, NKs story didn't add up since the people she claimed were there, just weren't!
REally? How do you know for sure that the people NK claimed were present at the party weren't there? As far as I can tell the public has yet to be allowed to see the evidence for this so-called investigation into NK's claims. How can you take the word of 'officials' who not only egregiously bungled this case but have also lied and obscured many aspects of it?

Let's not forget, the DA pretended the Ramsey's had not been indicted when they had in been indicted. Let's not forget that the Ramsey's were 'cleared' by officials even knowing they had been indicted. They used 'DNA evidence' to clear them when said evidence might not mean chit to the case.

Why would other victims come forward after seeing the way NK was treated? THE BPD DISCLOSED HER LOCATION TO HER FAMILY AFTER NK BEGGED THEM NOT TO. WHAT PD DOES THAT? NK was an adult. If she didn't want her family to know where she was what business did BPD have telling them where she was, particularly as she told them she was afraid of them, and had on her body at that very moment evidence of a brutal sexual assault recently perpetrated against her.

NK's family members are on tape threatening NK's therapist. You can claim they weren't threats, ok, but what business did her family have in repeatedly calling NK's therapist to demand she leave NK alone? WHO DOES THAT? Is it any wonder she was afraid?

Again, NK did not 'insert' herself into a case that had nothing to do with her. She has/had verifiable ties to players in the case, namely the Whites. SHE FELT CERTAIN HER NIECE HAD WITNESSED THE MURDER. I'd say this gave her a perfectly legitimate justification for getting herself involved. Other victims of the 'network' might not have had the same urgent incentive. In any case the niece was whisked away to Germany.
whodunnit

Mobile, AL

#138 Jun 12, 2014
By the way, I don't know anything about NK having cancer or not. Do you have a reputable, unbiased source [in other words, not Websleuths or Tricia Griffiths or anybody having anything to do with either entity] for these claims?
real Topaz

AOL

#139 Jun 12, 2014
whodunnit wrote:
By the way, I don't know anything about NK having cancer or not. Do you have a reputable, unbiased source [in other words, not Websleuths or Tricia Griffiths or anybody having anything to do with either entity] for these claims?
yes. Mame. You remember mame, don't you? NK's hostess?
As to the rest, you can think whatever you choose, your's is speculation as far as the NK bs not being investigated. As I said before, AH WANTED NK's story to be true..so why would he hide pertinent info backing her crazy accusations? As a matter of fact, I think the entire world would have been thrilled to have her story be true, it would get to the bottom of this case and get justice for JonBenet, once and for all! Nobody in their right mind cares who did it, just that who did it be caught, tried and punished.
I don't know Tricia Griffith nor do I read/belong to Websleuths..I don't know how many times I have to tell you that. I belonged to a private forum where Mame was also a member. The hostess of that forum spoke to mame all the time back then and shared their conversations with the forum. I nolonger have proof as the forum is dead and mame will probably deny it, but as God is my witness, the cancer story came from mame.
whodunnit

Mobile, AL

#140 Jun 12, 2014
M_B_M wrote:
<quoted text>
Whodunnit, what an eloquent illustration of what people who discredit victims like Nancy Krebs are doing when they disbelieve their accounts of the attrocities committed upon them. Just to think of the courage it must have taken for her to come public with her story and then to be villified for doing so Is IMO akin to pouring gasoline on the fire or more appropriately, like pouring salt in and open wound.
From MY perspective, sometimes it appears that some people prefer to allow such goings on to contiue rather accept what a victim says and try to find out if law enforcement and other high officials are not only covering up such activities but are actively involved in them.
I, for one, hope you continue your campaign to set people straight in their thinking and complacency -- yes, complacency in turning a blind eye to such activities but quickly on the attack when a victim comes forward.
I, however, believe that those who "automatically disbelieve" victims' accounts of what has happened to them are as bad as those here who agree by their skepticism that the multi-billiion dollar child porn industry is unreal, If that were true, then we should all just ignore any news accounts of hundreds being arrested for belonging to and participating in such activities. Calling victims like NK names like "fruit loops" only gives support to the sex ring operators by making victims afraid or reluctant to come forward with their stories. JMO
Thanks M_B_B, i def will continue on. In cases like this my motto is 'comfort the afflicted and afflict the comfortable'. I feel no guild for afflicting those who are comfortable with automatically disbelieving victim accounts. Do/would they treat adult rape victims the same way? Are they ALL bringing forth false accusations? They can't ALL be lying, can they? For what reasons would they lie? They have NOTHING TO GAIN AND EVERYTHING TO LOSE.

For the record, there ARE survivor networks/resources for those who need them, and for those who need convincing that nobody but NK has ever come forward with these types of accusation before:

https://survivorship.org/

https://ritualabuse.us/

For those who wonder why many don't come forward:[And yes M_B_B, it takes epic courage to do so. These people should be applauded, not vilified]
http://laurelhouse.org.au/...

Ritualistic Abuse

What is ritualistic abuse?

Ritual abuse refers to sexual, physical and psychological abuse that occurs repeatedly over a prolonged period of time. Ritual abuse is often carried out systematically and in a group setting, and may be conducted in the confines of a cult, religious group, family setting, or other group, such as a paedophile ring or child pornography network. Ritually abusive groups may be local or far-reaching, with some organisations and cults spanning over multiple cities, states, and even continents. One definition of a cult is:



“…a group or movement that, to a significant degree,(a) exhibits great or excessive devotion or dedication to some person, idea, or thing,(b) uses a thought-reform program to persuade, control, and socialize members (i.e., to integrate them into the group’s unique pattern of relationships, beliefs, values and practices),(c) systematically induces states of psychological dependency in members,(d) exploits members to advance the leadership’s goals, and (e) causes psychological harm to members, their families, and the community.“(Langone, 1993, p. 5)

Report of the Ritual Abuse Task Force Los Angeles County Commission for Women

https://ritualabuse.us/ritualabuse/articles/r...
whodunnit

Mobile, AL

#141 Jun 12, 2014
M_B_M wrote:
<quoted text>
Whodunnit, what an eloquent illustration of what people who discredit victims like Nancy Krebs are doing when they disbelieve their accounts of the attrocities committed upon them. Just to think of the courage it must have taken for her to come public with her story and then to be villified for doing so Is IMO akin to pouring gasoline on the fire or more appropriately, like pouring salt in and open wound.
From MY perspective, sometimes it appears that some people prefer to allow such goings on to contiue rather accept what a victim says and try to find out if law enforcement and other high officials are not only covering up such activities but are actively involved in them.
I, for one, hope you continue your campaign to set people straight in their thinking and complacency -- yes, complacency in turning a blind eye to such activities but quickly on the attack when a victim comes forward.
I, however, believe that those who "automatically disbelieve" victims' accounts of what has happened to them are as bad as those here who agree by their skepticism that the multi-billiion dollar child porn industry is unreal, If that were true, then we should all just ignore any news accounts of hundreds being arrested for belonging to and participating in such activities. Calling victims like NK names like "fruit loops" only gives support to the sex ring operators by making victims afraid or reluctant to come forward with their stories. JMO
[I hope this doesn't double post. It didn't show up the first time I tried}

Thanks M_B_B, i def will continue on. In cases like this my motto is 'comfort the afflicted and afflict the comfortable'. I feel no guild for afflicting those who are comfortable with automatically disbelieving victim accounts. Do/would they treat adult rape victims the same way? Are they ALL bringing forth false accusations? They can't ALL be lying, can they? For what reasons would they lie? They have NOTHING TO GAIN AND EVERYTHING TO LOSE.

For the record, there ARE survivor networks/resources for those who need them, and for those who need convincing that nobody but NK has ever come forward with these types of accusation before:

https://survivorship.org/

https://ritualabuse.us/

For those who wonder why many don't come forward:[And yes M_B_B, it takes epic courage to do so. These people should be applauded, not vilified]
http://laurelhouse.org.au/...

Ritualistic Abuse

What is ritualistic abuse?

Ritual abuse refers to sexual, physical and psychological abuse that occurs repeatedly over a prolonged period of time. Ritual abuse is often carried out systematically and in a group setting, and may be conducted in the confines of a cult, religious group, family setting, or other group, such as a paedophile ring or child pornography network. Ritually abusive groups may be local or far-reaching, with some organisations and cults spanning over multiple cities, states, and even continents. One definition of a cult is:



“…a group or movement that, to a significant degree,(a) exhibits great or excessive devotion or dedication to some person, idea, or thing,(b) uses a thought-reform program to persuade, control, and socialize members (i.e., to integrate them into the group’s unique pattern of relationships, beliefs, values and practices),(c) systematically induces states of psychological dependency in members,(d) exploits members to advance the leadership’s goals, and (e) causes psychological harm to members, their families, and the community.“(Langone, 1993, p. 5)

Report of the Ritual Abuse Task Force Los Angeles County Commission for Women

https://ritualabuse.us/ritualabuse/articles/r...
real Topaz

AOL

#142 Jun 12, 2014
whodunnit wrote:
<quoted text>
Thanks M_B_B, i def will continue on. In cases like this my motto is 'comfort the afflicted and afflict the comfortable'. I feel no guild for afflicting those who are comfortable with automatically disbelieving victim accounts. Do/would they treat adult rape victims the same way? Are they ALL bringing forth false accusations? They can't ALL be lying, can they? For what reasons would they lie? They have NOTHING TO GAIN AND EVERYTHING TO LOSE.
For the record, there ARE survivor networks/resources for those who need them, and for those who need convincing that nobody but NK has ever come forward with these types of accusation before:
https://survivorship.org/
https://ritualabuse.us/
For those who wonder why many don't come forward:[And yes M_B_B, it takes epic courage to do so. These people should be applauded, not vilified]
http://laurelhouse.org.au/...
Ritualistic Abuse
What is ritualistic abuse?
Ritual abuse refers to sexual, physical and psychological abuse that occurs repeatedly over a prolonged period of time. Ritual abuse is often carried out systematically and in a group setting, and may be conducted in the confines of a cult, religious group, family setting, or other group, such as a paedophile ring or child pornography network. Ritually abusive groups may be local or far-reaching, with some organisations and cults spanning over multiple cities, states, and even continents. One definition of a cult is:
“…a group or movement that, to a significant degree,(a) exhibits great or excessive devotion or dedication to some person, idea, or thing,(b) uses a thought-reform program to persuade, control, and socialize members (i.e., to integrate them into the group’s unique pattern of relationships, beliefs, values and practices),(c) systematically induces states of psychological dependency in members,(d) exploits members to advance the leadership’s goals, and (e) causes psychological harm to members, their families, and the community.“(Langone, 1993, p. 5)
Report of the Ritual Abuse Task Force Los Angeles County Commission for Women
https://ritualabuse.us/ritualabuse/articles/r...
why you're a little Al Sharpton, aren't cha? NK is the equivalent of Tawana Brawley and you're still waving her pathetic flag. NK was in a 'cult' of ONE. One lonely, attention seeking nut telling her she's a victim of the same cult JonBenet's from..HER's. I think you and those like you do REAL victims more harm by insisting a flash in the pan's telling the truth without any, ANY, evidence to back it. You want her story to be true? Then why don't you find NK and encourage her to come back out and produce something..ANYTHING thta substanciates her claim? You seem to think because she said stuff about a case player that it has to be true or it's somehow directly related to JBR when in reality it's nothing more than the rantings of a sick sister. JMK said he was there that night, but you're not questioning that investigation..just the one you want to be true, huh?
whodunnit

Mobile, AL

#143 Jun 12, 2014
real Topaz wrote:
<quoted text>
why you're a little Al Sharpton, aren't cha? NK is the equivalent of Tawana Brawley and you're still waving her pathetic flag. NK was in a 'cult' of ONE. One lonely, attention seeking nut telling her she's a victim of the same cult JonBenet's from..HER's. I think you and those like you do REAL victims more harm by insisting a flash in the pan's telling the truth without any, ANY, evidence to back it. You want her story to be true? Then why don't you find NK and encourage her to come back out and produce something..ANYTHING thta substanciates her claim? You seem to think because she said stuff about a case player that it has to be true or it's somehow directly related to JBR when in reality it's nothing more than the rantings of a sick sister. JMK said he was there that night, but you're not questioning that investigation..just the one you want to be true, huh?
Are you an actual racist or are you just playing one on Topix? If the latter, congratulations, you are very convincing. If the former, eff off.
real Topaz

AOL

#144 Jun 12, 2014
whodunnit wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you an actual racist or are you just playing one on Topix? If the latter, congratulations, you are very convincing. If the former, eff off.
LOL! Racist? Really? Because I compared you to Al Sharpton? Is Twana Brawley's fake rape somehow not worthy of NK's fake sex ring? What's so funny is your interpretation that the comparison I drew was racist because they're black..which makes YOU look like the racist:D
You really need to learn how to read before you spew your crap.
whodunnit

Mobile, AL

#145 Jun 12, 2014
Here's an idea: If discussion of NK's allegations so offends, enrages, and aggravates you then STAY OUT OF THE DISCUSSION. Or better yet, go to places where the majority is comfortable with censorship, like Websleuths where rational debate about NK is strictly verboten by FW's good friend Tricia.

http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.p...

Nobody is coming to your house and forcing you to read this or any other thread concerning NK. WHY IS IT SO IMPORTANT TO DERAIL ANY AND ALL DISCUSSIONS ABOUT NK?

My characterization of the anit-NK's is not an exaggeration. Go to any thread on Topix in which NK's name comes up and watch how obnoxious, oppressive, virulent, and hateful they are. They swarm over anyone trying to discuss the topic like a ravenous pack of wolves.They are so childishly obvious it would be amusing if the subject wasn't so horribly serious. Here's a good example:

http://www.topix.com/forum/news/jonbenet-rams...
real Topaz

AOL

#146 Jun 12, 2014
whodunnit wrote:
Here's an idea: If discussion of NK's allegations so offends, enrages, and aggravates you then STAY OUT OF THE DISCUSSION. Or better yet, go to places where the majority is comfortable with censorship, like Websleuths where rational debate about NK is strictly verboten by FW's good friend Tricia.
http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.p...
Nobody is coming to your house and forcing you to read this or any other thread concerning NK. WHY IS IT SO IMPORTANT TO DERAIL ANY AND ALL DISCUSSIONS ABOUT NK?
My characterization of the anit-NK's is not an exaggeration. Go to any thread on Topix in which NK's name comes up and watch how obnoxious, oppressive, virulent, and hateful they are. They swarm over anyone trying to discuss the topic like a ravenous pack of wolves.They are so childishly obvious it would be amusing if the subject wasn't so horribly serious. Here's a good example:
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/jonbenet-rams...
obnoxious, oppressive, virulent and hateful? You mean like YOU were when you called me racist for disagreeing with your stance? Look in the mirror before you go pointing at forums that won't have you as a member, they can't all be wrong.
I won't discuss NK or anything else with you again,.. at least not under the hat you're using today, lol.
whodunnit

Mobile, AL

#147 Jun 12, 2014
real Topaz wrote:
<quoted text>
obnoxious, oppressive, virulent and hateful? You mean like YOU were when you called me racist for disagreeing with your stance? Look in the mirror before you go pointing at forums that won't have you as a member, they can't all be wrong.
I won't discuss NK or anything else with you again,.. at least not under the hat you're using today, lol.
Oh dear. YOU are the one who tried to illustrate your dubious point by pulling an 'example' from almost 30 years ago. Couldn't you think of anything more recent? Or better yet, couldn't you find something more relevant to your 'point'? Since you couldn't or wouldn't find a whiter, more recent, more relevant example of your 'point', then I must conclude that you're post is pandering to the lowest common racist denominator.
real Topaz

AOL

#148 Jun 12, 2014
whodunnit wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh dear. YOU are the one who tried to illustrate your dubious point by pulling an 'example' from almost 30 years ago. Couldn't you think of anything more recent? Or better yet, couldn't you find something more relevant to your 'point'? Since you couldn't or wouldn't find a whiter, more recent, more relevant example of your 'point', then I must conclude that you're post is pandering to the lowest common racist denominator.
Your WHAT hurts? LOL you talk in circles fool, a "whiter" case to compare? lolololol you're the f***ing racist, not I. The Brawley case may have happened over 20 years ago, but there's not been a case since that compares like that of NK's. If that's racist, so be it. Now, YOU GFY. And quit cluttering our forum with your bullchit. Got that? Good.
whodunnit

Mobile, AL

#149 Jun 12, 2014
To give some folks the benefit of the doubt perhaps long time internet posters in the JBR case just really have no idea how little impact 'Mystery Woman' had on the opinions of the average American who followed the case.

For instance, I was keenly interested in the case from the very beginning. I read every press account I could get my hands on, watched every news broadcast, and wouldn't miss a tv 'special' dealing with the case. Beyond that, I pored over the Vanity Fair 'expose', PMPT etc. After the GJ 'failed' to hand down an indictment I sort of moved on. My feelings on the case was always that two rich a$$holes had gotten away with murdering their child.[I still feel that way but now I think more than 2 rich a$$holes are getting away with it]

I never read anything about the case on the internet until JMK burst on the scene. In the intervening years, the internet just wasn't a big part of my life. I was married, worked full time, and was raising two kids. I just didn't have a lot of time to devote to 'case studies'.

So I wasn't aware of Nancy Krebs or her allegations until JMK came along and I started scouring the 'net for any and everything on the case that I could find and that is the truth. I had honestly never heard of the 'Mystery Woman' until then.

Point being that, unlike Tawana Brawley, whatever coverage Nancy got in the national media outside of Colorado it came and went in a puff of smoke so quickly that even interested parties such as myself missed the whole thing.
real Topaz

AOL

#150 Jun 12, 2014
whodunnit wrote:
To give some folks the benefit of the doubt perhaps long time internet posters in the JBR case just really have no idea how little impact 'Mystery Woman' had on the opinions of the average American who followed the case.
For instance, I was keenly interested in the case from the very beginning. I read every press account I could get my hands on, watched every news broadcast, and wouldn't miss a tv 'special' dealing with the case. Beyond that, I pored over the Vanity Fair 'expose', PMPT etc. After the GJ 'failed' to hand down an indictment I sort of moved on. My feelings on the case was always that two rich a$$holes had gotten away with murdering their child.[I still feel that way but now I think more than 2 rich a$$holes are getting away with it]
I never read anything about the case on the internet until JMK burst on the scene. In the intervening years, the internet just wasn't a big part of my life. I was married, worked full time, and was raising two kids. I just didn't have a lot of time to devote to 'case studies'.
So I wasn't aware of Nancy Krebs or her allegations until JMK came along and I started scouring the 'net for any and everything on the case that I could find and that is the truth. I had honestly never heard of the 'Mystery Woman' until then.
Point being that, unlike Tawana Brawley, whatever coverage Nancy got in the national media outside of Colorado it came and went in a puff of smoke so quickly that even interested parties such as myself missed the whole thing.
who cares how you got interested or whether NKs case made waves? Nobody gives a damn why you're here or what you think, you called me a racist for bringing up a case where the players were black, then went on to challenge me for not using a "whiter" case as an example. Now you think an explanation for your being here will sweep that nasty accusation under the carpet and hopefully change the subject back to YOU. scat! be gone little troll, you're not fooling anyone but yourself.

“If life gives you melons”

Since: Nov 06

You might be dyslexic

#151 Jun 12, 2014
whodunnit
No one is forcing you to be rude and call other people racist or bash other forum owners either, why don't you take your own advice?
whodunnit

Mobile, AL

#152 Jun 12, 2014
real Topaz wrote:
<quoted text>
Your WHAT hurts? LOL you talk in circles fool, a "whiter" case to compare? lolololol you're the f***ing racist, not I. The Brawley case may have happened over 20 years ago, but there's not been a case since that compares like that of NK's. If that's racist, so be it. Now, YOU GFY. And quit cluttering our forum with your bullchit. Got that? Good.
'OUR' forum? Now you and your friends OWN the place? LOL what kind of power trip is this?

*commences to ignore the nut who thinks s/he owns the place*

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Boulder Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
JonBenet Investigation (Nov '11) 4 hr Justice1313 1,629
Marijuana fest meant to educate, enlighten (May '10) Sat bud 4
Students hack into school system, change grades (Apr '07) Sat Hacker 618
Space probe wakes up for close-up with Pluto Dec 19 Sparky Rabbit 3
JonBenet Ramsey (Mar '14) Dec 19 True Blue Local 4
Horizons K-8 seventh and eighth grade immigrati... Dec 16 Holla Isabella 3
Boulder: Is affordable housing working? Dec 15 Deep Upinya 1

Avalanche Warning for Boulder County was issued at December 22 at 6:30AM MST

Boulder Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Boulder People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Boulder News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Boulder

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 8:45 pm PST

Bleacher Report 8:45PM
Roethlisberger Proves His Toughness vs. Chiefs
NBC Sports12:17 AM
Broncos visit Bengals as favorites in key playoff tilt - NBC Sports
Bleacher Report 4:00 AM
Monday Night Football Week 16: TV Schedule, Live Stream for Broncos vs. Bengals
Bleacher Report 6:00 AM
Preview, Prediction for Bengals vs. Broncos
Bleacher Report 8:00 AM
NFL Power Rankings Week 17: Predicting Post-Monday Night Football Standings