Red-light camera vendor sues over Ten...

Red-light camera vendor sues over Tennessee restrictions

There are 2 comments on the The Elizabethton Star story from Nov 14, 2011, titled Red-light camera vendor sues over Tennessee restrictions. In it, The Elizabethton Star reports that:

#leftcontainerBox { float:left; position: fixed; top: 60%; left: 70px; } #leftcontainerBox .buttons { float:left; clear:both; margin:4px 4px 4px 4px; padding-bottom:2px; } #bottomcontainerBox { width: 50%; padding-top: 1px; } #bottomcontainerBox .buttons { float: left; margin: 4px 4px 4px 4px; } KNOXVILLE (AP) - The city of Knoxville is being sued by a red light camera vendor in a case that could change the new state law limiting citations for improper right turns on red.

American Traffic Solutions Inc. filed the lawsuit Tuesday in Knox County Chancery Court. The Scottsdale, Ariz.-based company provided the equipment for the city's red-light cameras in Knoxville.

A state law that took effect July 1 bars cities with the cameras from issuing right-turn-on-red citations if the only evidence comes from traffic camera video. Sponsors of the measure, which also sets new restrictions on how local governments set up and use speeding cameras, said a camera couldn't distinguish between truly illegal turns and drivers who nose into the intersection to see if it is safe to turn.

This lawsuit from ATS seeks to overturn the new law or to exempt about 20 cities that had contracts with traffic camera companies when the law took effect.

Under the contract with Knoxville, ATS is paid $40 out of every $50 fine for right-turn-on-red violations, up to $4,500 per camera per month, according to The Knoxville News-Sentinel. For any revenue over $4,500, the company's share is 50 percent.

ATS also has contracts with Huntingdon and Bluff City, whose speeding cameras were often cited by lawmakers as examples of why they supported the measure that eliminates using traffic cameras as speed traps and reduces private vendors' influence over where they are located.

Knoxville has seen citations from its 14 cameras drop 90 percent since the new law took effect, going from more than 30,000 violations in August, September and October of 2010 to just over 3,200 for the same period this year, said Knoxville Police Department Capt. Gordon Catlett, who oversees the red-light camera enforcement program for the city.

"The big winners are the people who don't want to obey the law," Catlett said. "The big loser is the city of Knoxville, which loses its 50 percent margin."

The state attorney general's office issued a nonbinding opinion that the law was constitutional.

In its lawsuit, the vendor notes the city's decision was not made in bad faith, but has harmed the company. The lawsuit said the new law "irrationally disallows" camera evidence for right turns on red but still allows it to prosecute drivers who run a red light.

Other cities also report a decline in red-light camera revenue. Farragut's citations are down about 50 percent, according to Ben Harkins, traffic enforcement manager for the town.

Knoxville Finance Director Jim York said the city has experienced a significant reduction in revenues since the law was passed.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Elizabethton Star.

Anonymous

Kingsport, TN

#1 Dec 14, 2011
This shouldn't be about how much revenue a city can get from writing tickets. This seems to be a way for the city collect more taxes in the name of safety. This shows that it is obvious that if the amount of tickets issued goes down then the cities will pass a new law to make it passible to issue a ticket. Why don't they just pass one that states "no right turns if you have a baby in the car, wearing a pink dress, on Sunday. Issue a ticket/fine on a Tennessee resident by an Arizona company, not law enforcement, give 20% to the state and keep 80% for a private company in another state. Who's to say that they won't check every vehicle that goes down the road. The camera doesn't care if there is probable cause or not. People need to wake up and notice this is the power of the state pushing it's way into everyones personal space. I know there are some people that say "if you don't do anything wrong then you have nothing to worry about" my point would be if something happens to someone else it's not your problem until it's you that's the problem.
ThomasA

Leeds, AL

#2 Dec 16, 2011
Anonymous wrote:
This shouldn't be about how much revenue a city can get from writing tickets. This seems to be a way for the city collect more taxes in the name of safety. This shows that it is obvious that if the amount of tickets issued goes down then the cities will pass a new law to make it passible to issue a ticket. Why don't they just pass one that states "no right turns if you have a baby in the car, wearing a pink dress, on Sunday. Issue a ticket/fine on a Tennessee resident by an Arizona company, not law enforcement, give 20% to the state and keep 80% for a private company in another state. Who's to say that they won't check every vehicle that goes down the road. The camera doesn't care if there is probable cause or not. People need to wake up and notice this is the power of the state pushing it's way into everyones personal space. I know there are some people that say "if you don't do anything wrong then you have nothing to worry about" my point would be if something happens to someone else it's not your problem until it's you that's the problem.
What's to stop the contractor and cities from shortening the yellow cycle to increase revenue? Having a contractor is WRONG!!!!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Bluff City Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Old Gord is running for election!!! 1 hr Bj the bear 54
Elizabethton BAD IDEAS Groupthink: Covered Brid... 2 hr Jenett 14
Who will be Sheriff 2 hr Bobo 125
County leash laws? (Oct '07) 3 hr Yaa 129
TA Dugger Principal Change???? 3 hr Oh yeah 11
Richard Beam 6 hr Porkchop 1
Rocket Diner 6 hr Dreamlover 6

Bluff City Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Bluff City Mortgages