You are correct again!! Jesus would starve the poor on a daily basis, preferring not to help them since they were so lazy, just like a certain group wants to do today. He had no compassion for others who did not have the tools to prosper on their own, and was strictly for what was good for him, just like a certain group does today. He had no problem when bankers (moneychangers) overcharged the citizens of the time, they deserved to be taken advantage of and making rules to prevent that is bad, the same as a certain group does today. The group is mainly southern based and consider themselves to be religious. How can that be when our Savior was so liberal on social issues, and he surely had DARK skin like a certain hated leader does today, oh my.<quoted text>
You have written many foolish things on here, but you take the cake when you keep trying to claim that Jesus would be a liberal. To trivialize Jesus in terms of what political bent He would take is insulting. But to look at the positions that a "liberal" would take and to then claim that Jesus would be in agreement is to do nothing but illustrate your ignorance of the Gospel. Make all the arguments you want to support the liberal agenda you are so enamored with, but out of respect for the Christian faith, kindly leave Jesus out of your arguments.
Which reincarnation of the Gospel do you prefer? Which Christian faith do you follow, are you a member of the largest Christian faith in the world, Catholic? Or one of the smaller Christian faiths like Evangelical.
Just curious, whatever you believe is a personal issue and really no one else’s business. I am sure you will at least agree with that.