Here's what happened.
Lisa King, a secretary, decided to play vigilante. She orchestrated my arrest through Oscar Ferralez. Told a lot of people that Susana Martinez had authorized everything and then after I had posted bail (they were under the impression that I couldn't) she then sends me a false criminal summons with the wrong date hoping I missed the correct arraignment which would've forfeited my bail and placed me in jail. However I'm not stupid I did go to my correct arraignment, taking note of everyone's surprise because they were under the impression that I was going along with their scheme.(I had informed people I was going to the other date)
Lisa King and Amy Orlando then somehow convince Susana Martinez, the District Attorney, to actually take a case, a case without publicity, no fame, just a meaningless case which she does because Lisa King had fed her a lot of false information.(You could see it at the first hearing when she found out some of the stuff she had been told was wrong) She then makes a joke with Nancy Dominski about the case (seems she forgot the court mic was on) nearly admitting how false the case was.
Then as the threads began to unravel she stepped away from the case. However her and her department chose to cover up the fact that Lisa King, A SECRETARY, had committed the crime of impersonating a public official. A FELONY. Abuse of office, fAlse arrest, etc.
So earlier on this thread when I said she had committed crimes that was the real issue and granted as a supporter I nkow you don't care, but damn, how is it Lisa King gets away with it?
Matter of fact think this through, not only did Susana Martinez cover it up, but Lisa King was then asked to resign and took up as working under Lisa Schultz in the District Court.
Most of these are facts. I'm not an investigator there's only so much I can uncover, but you people at some point have got to consider the fact that Susana Martinez allowed someone in her office to commit a felony and she chose to cover it up. Those are crimes and she should answer in court.
By the way I have very strong evidence and have shared it with others. One of them being that at trial the prosecution admitted no crime occurred. So that's on record. Public record so you can check it for yourself. Now ask yourself, if no crime occurred then why go to trial.
So you keep on supporting this person. Seems you may have something in common with her.
She's a crook and liar just like all politicians!