How do we protect kids in school?

How do we protect kids in school?

There are 6103 comments on the Ruidoso News story from Jan 8, 2013, titled How do we protect kids in school?. In it, Ruidoso News reports that:

During a newsroom discussion about guns about a decade ago, a woman piped up: "I don't understand what the big deal is.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Ruidoso News.

xando

Wickenburg, AZ

#4738 Jun 25, 2013
Anti-Fascism wrote:
<quoted text>

Again, you trying to hard just makes you look so desperate. You'll not win against me, kid.
The fact that thought even entered your mind means you feel threatened.

I don't expect you to understand that.
Anti-Fascism

United States

#4739 Jun 25, 2013
xando wrote:
<quoted text>
The fact that thought even entered your mind means you feel threatened.
I don't expect you to understand that.
Threatened? Don't you wish? Ha!

I just easily smashed all that you came at me with. I don't feel "threatened" by what you say one tiny bit. If I felt "threatened" then I'd have left this forum a long time ago and not bothered responding.

You're just wasting time and space, so don't bother... unless you're just that bored? Pathetic. You lost, and keep losing. If you really do like embarrassing yourself then, keep going; it's only hurting your reputation though. ;-)
xando

Wickenburg, AZ

#4740 Jun 25, 2013
HAHAHAHA

Thou doth protest too much.
Anti-Fascism wrote:
<quoted text>
Threatened? Don't you wish? Ha!
I just easily smashed all that you came at me with. I don't feel "threatened" by what you say one tiny bit. If I felt "threatened" then I'd have left this forum a long time ago and not bothered responding.
You're just wasting time and space, so don't bother... unless you're just that bored? Pathetic. You lost, and keep losing. If you really do like embarrassing yourself then, keep going; it's only hurting your reputation though. ;-)

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#4741 Jun 25, 2013
Anti-Fascism wrote:
<quoted text>
You might not be surprised by this, if you've read a few of my posts in this thread so far: I don't personally believe moderators should take other peoples' posts out, even if those posts have extremely hard sexual content.
What I hope Topix *could* do (and I've said this on another forum a while ago) is put in some sort of "ignore" option - so one can "ignore" (block out posts made by) any poster from any IP address they so choose. This will not infringe upon *freedom of information* and yet, for those not wanting to see such information, they've the easy access [and right] to ignoring said information.:-)
Win / win!
I agree

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#4742 Jun 25, 2013
Anti-Fascism wrote:
<quoted text>
Not keeping direct count but, by my guesstimate, just from being on this forum the last couple of weeks or so, in many of your posts you seem to bring up oral sex on males
I'm not the one who gets it up thinking about men's sausages, NAZI, that would be you and your assortment of aliases.

Wipe your chin, shug, you're leaking.
Anti-Fascism

United States

#4743 Jun 25, 2013
xando wrote:
HAHAHAHA
Thou doth protest too much.
<quoted text>
Thou doth trolleth too much. ;-)

I 'noticed' that you *conveniently* ignore all of my other posts (which I smashed you in) yet nitpick on some, then try to falsely imply something here or there, which has no evidence backing it. You really are such an embarrassment to yourself, troll.

Come back when you actually have something of worth to debate.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#4744 Jun 25, 2013
Anti-Fascism wrote:
<quoted text>
You might not be surprised by this, if you've read a few of my posts in this thread so far:
Oh BOY! Sock puppet theater!

PS: You are okay with putting cameras in person's homes without their consent,'nuff said.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#4745 Jun 25, 2013
Anti-Fascism wrote:
<quoted text>
You might not be surprised by this, if you've read a few of my posts in this thread so far:
That you have several aliases and that sometimes you lose track of which one is "replying" to the other?

No one is surprised, dear.

It's like El Dumbo was posting in the morning as El Dumbo and then switching to AuCuntraire in the afternoon but making the same exact spelling mistakes for six months and no one was supposed to notice.

HAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAH!

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#4746 Jun 25, 2013
Marauder wrote:
<quoted text>
That was your lapse...not mine.
I'm not the one who didn't know 2008 was in the 21st century, or the one who brought up the Heller decision and then forgot he brought it up five minutes later.

Put the crack pipe down, Shug, you've had enough.
xando

Wickenburg, AZ

#4747 Jun 25, 2013
Anti-Fascism wrote:
<quoted text>

I 'noticed' that you *conveniently* ignore all of my other posts
Actually, I ignore MOST your posts. You're rather stupid, and your drivel is pitiful.
Anti-Fascism

United States

#4748 Jun 25, 2013
Funny; I'm seeing a similarity in your posts and xando' posts.

Looks like you're projecting yet again! This time on "different aliases" accusation.

I just might have to ignore you from now on; save my opinions for those who're genuinely worth debating with.

About the cameras: one private home owner has the right to put cameras in their homes, especially for the sake of catching another home owner in the act of a crime which infringes upon the other home owners rights, liberties and physical well-being, thus to show in court in order to prove their case.

Stop being a partial-truth telling deceiver, kid, we know it's just your desperation in seeking to win even some bit of an argument... to no avail.

What a waste of time you are.
xando

Wickenburg, AZ

#4749 Jun 25, 2013
I just might have to ignore you from now on;
Oh no......no.......anything but that!

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#4750 Jun 25, 2013
xando wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually, I ignore MOST your posts. You're rather stupid, and your drivel is pitiful.
Hard to avoid them all, with the rotating aliases.

Ya' know, most people who have pride in what they say... only need the one...

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#4751 Jun 25, 2013
Anti-Fascism wrote:
Funny; I'm seeing a similarity in your posts and xando' posts.
Sure... we both use "the" and "is" both find you quite boring and your comments insipid; you don't know you have been insulted until after you've switched your aliases, it must be inconvenient to have to switch back.
Marauder

Anchorage, AK

#4752 Jun 25, 2013
xando wrote:
Viewing child porn is a crime. Seems there are several potential criminals in this forum, but then, not surprised by that.
<quoted text>
"Seems there are several potential criminals in this forum, but then, not surprised by that."

I'm not either. Your male alter ego, "Factologist" is a prime example. A sicko, sex pervert just waiting to happen. He has an unnatural obsession with child porn…wants to assault a law abiding person…then place them in bondage by their testicals. No telling what else he would do. That’s a sure sign of a sick and twisted mind. Of course he is a shining example of the very type of person that should be denied the right to keep and bear arms. I hope his doctor makes the appropriate report to get him in the NCIS system.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#4753 Jun 25, 2013
Anti-Fascism wrote:
About the cameras: one private home owner has the right to put cameras in their homes,
We've established you as saying it is okay with you for someone to video tape the owner of the house without his knowledge or (of course) permission.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#4754 Jun 25, 2013
Anti-Fascism wrote:
especially
"especially" means "I have an excuse to video tape someone who doesn't know he or she is being video taped even though he or she is the owner of the house and has the expectation of privacy but I will try to pretend I am catching someone in the act of a horrible crime".

Video taping is almost always done in the house without consent of the owner to get a leg up in the divorce proceeding.

That's it.

Anyone who thinks that that is okay is a NAZI fascist.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#4755 Jun 25, 2013
xando wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh no......no.......anything but that!
HAHAHAAHAHAH!

Look for a few dozen more posts explaining why he's (this alias) is ignoring you.

There's the Richard Pryer routine where he has one of his wife leaving with her laying out why and him saying GO for crying out loud!

If you are lucky, Anti-pasta here will put on a puppet show with another alias, always fun.
Marauder

Anchorage, AK

#4756 Jun 25, 2013
Anti-Fascism wrote:
<quoted text>
The crime itself being committed is not what I'm talking about. Go back and read my posts again. If one commits a crime against some else, like murdering them, stealing from them, etc., then that person is a criminal and should go to prison.
However, if someone shows videos of those crimes and others view them, then that's their right to view them, even if they "get off" on viewing them in one way or another. If *they* now turn that mental fetish in *physical* crime then *they* too should go to prison.
There's a difference between mental immorality and the physical crime itself.
Are you catching on yet?
Simply because I stick up for others' rights of freedom of information, freedom of speech, free to think however they like, doesn't mean I morally agree what the specific things they spread or view as information, or what they say all the time, or what they think, etc.
Many say listening to thug-gangsta rap "fuels the crimes" rapped about in that type of music. Many say lyrics in certain 'heavy metal' songs drives people to commit suicide, satantic ritual crimes (slaughtering people, animals for fun, etc.). Just because I stick up for people to've the right to listen to such things *DOESN'T* mean I agree with what they say.
You people are like 5 year old children, not understanding information spoken/written to you, so one has to repeat it over and over 'til it sinks in.
I hope you guys have an excuse as to why you're "not the sharpest knives in the draw." ?
"Are you catching on yet?"

No...they ("Xando and her male alter ego "factologist) are "frustrated control freaks". THEY want to control people...their thoughts...their actions...what they say...what they read...etc.

"Simply because I stick up for others' rights of freedom of information, freedom of speech, free to think however they like, doesn't mean I morally agree what the specific things they spread or view as information, or what they say all the time, or what they think, etc."

These are the very things they want to control. As long as those that understand the concept of freedom and rights keep getting in their face and refuse to allow them to take control...the more and more frustrated they become.

If you have noticed, "Factologist" has been pushed to the point of repeating himself over and over and over again...sad...but so refreashing...lol
Marauder

Anchorage, AK

#4757 Jun 25, 2013
xando wrote:
<quoted text>
It's funny when you answer for one of your aliases.
I'm sure it is to fools like you.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Blanco Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Man stabbed in Wal-Mart parking lot (May '10) Oct 8 Hazel96 79
News DMV experience a painful one (Oct '10) Sep 29 Riley 87
News Teen faces murder charge (May '10) Sep '17 Daughter of Ben 95
News Ousted Navajo Head Start leader alleges harassment Sep '17 User 2
SJC Fair Aug '17 Biker 5
A New Motorcycle Club running aroung?? (Jan '10) Aug '17 Riley 25
Sunny Aug '17 Kidd Rockk 1

Blanco Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Blanco Mortgages