Our New Sheriffs Dept

[UC Voter]

Yep wrote:

<quoted text>
You need to keep up, if you are interested in what’s going on.
Yep, that’s just the way it is. All this about the judge’s office has been covered already, to the point of revulsion.
To occasionally obtain a factual bit of usable information from this site you must be willing to wade through ridiculous and sometimes rather disgusting trash for weeks and months on end.
That’s just the way it is, in a town without any reliable news sources.(i.e. unbiased investigative newspaper, radio, or TV media reporting)
Personally,(with regard to other postings) informational meetings offered having a Q & A following, in an environment such as we have here, should be a welcomed forum for anyone sincerely interested in the betterment of a community.
It doesn’t matter who sponsors the forum. Go listen, learn, complain, ask questions, get answers, and then you may have something upon which to base a legitimate grievance.
Otherwise, you are just another jerk trying to stir up trouble.
Regarding the New Sheriff, in just over a month, He has obviously made many changes. Some following through with campaign promises, others in personnel, and not to be unexpected modifications to the administration and operations of the department.
Other than irrational adversaries naturally politically attached to the former Sheriff, a reasonable person would realize, it will take a realistic time frame to assess the satisfaction or lack thereof with the performance of the New Sheriff.
One thing is for certain, this is the second month of his administration, and he is offering and making himself available to the public for meeting, not once but twice within the same month, to speak and take questions and give answers.
I could be mistaken, but during the twelve (12) year term of the former Sheriff, I don’t recall him making himself so available, even when beseeched to do so in the most controversial of circumstances.

BS. Mason could have a Q&A without being a guest of the Tea Party. It is logical he would choose that group because they are his cheerleaders. Mason is a Republican and was supported by Republicans. I still think his choice of venue is wrong and he'll lack support as a result. Actually, he has lost support already by many because of what he has done in the past two months and the disregard for several of USCO's employees.

[Truthis Blairsville]

UC Voter wrote:

<quoted text>
BS. Mason could have a Q&A without being a guest of the Tea Party. It is logical he would choose that group because they are his cheerleaders. Mason is a Republican and was supported by Republicans. I still think his choice of venue is wrong and he'll lack support as a result. Actually, he has lost support already by many because of what he has done in the past two months and the disregard for several of USCO's employees.

He could speak to the Rotary, the Lion's club. Church groups or even....The Democratic Party! GASP! But he won't get Amens and Hallelujahs there so it'll never happen. He is a coward.

[Truthis Blairsville]

union co res wrote:

<quoted text>maybe he should have stop gamble so much, he would still have his store. he has a problem.you do not know as much as you think dip sh!t.

Hope karma comes along and bite you big time. Past is past and he did his job. Unlike his LT. who always stood around in the kitchen and the sally port and dispensed his job to others. The LT. is still there I might add.
You are the on who knows nothing.

[Truthis Blairsville]

pigs at the trough wrote:

<quoted text>
So why did the guy get fired then? Maybe he wasn't doing his job? Maybe he picked the wrong side of the fight and went public trying to help influence the election. Maybe that backfired. Lots of people need to work and need the insurance. So to this "guy" and to you and to all the other pigs slopping at the public feed trough - get used to it. You are not OWED anything that any other citizen is. Only difference is too many public servants are spending more time serving themselves. I am sure Mack has a good reason for every person fired. If I recall - some not only asked for it - they said they'd quit. Maybe Mack is just helping them stay true to their words.

Maybe you need to get more information before you spout off.

[Lmao]

The demented dems postings almost make me happy that we have Mason but I thought both choices were very poor.

[Margaret and Arthur]

Truthis Blairsville wrote:

<quoted text>He could speak to the Rotary, the Lion's club. Church groups or even....The Democratic Party! GASP! But he won't get Amens and Hallelujahs there so it'll never happen. He is a coward.

We talk loud and brave.... when we don't have to do it to your face.

[Margaret and Arthur]

PS... my husband can't control me and I am a disgraceful loud mouth. It is even possible that I drink in the afternoon and go online and rant. I'm even thinking of posting my full name and address online here so that my family can be even more publicly humilated.

That way when I call people cowards everyone will know it is me.

[Old timer]

Margaret and Arthur wrote:

PS... my husband can't control me and I am a disgraceful loud mouth. It is even possible that I drink in the afternoon and go online and rant. I'm even thinking of posting my full name and address online here so that my family can be even more publicly humilated.
That way when I call people cowards everyone will know it is me.

. Easy now Margaret

[lmao]

Is our new Sheriff actually drawing a disability pension from the state of Ga? The Chief Deputy who retired from fl has allegations that may or may not be factual but it seems like their was some excellent competent local talent. Fl state law and Ga law are different. Davie Fl is way different than Blairsville.

[UC Voter]

Lmao wrote:

The demented dems postings almost make me happy that we have Mason but I thought both choices were very poor.

This comment is an example why Mason will speak at a Tea Party meeting rather than an open venue. I am a Republican and not a "demented dems" but I can see that Mason lacks the balls to meet with the public unless he is in his elemment -- with supporters.

I did not support Mr. Mason. I know and like Scott a lot. I didn't agree with everything he did, but I would much prefer Scott over Mason. Scott has something Mason doesn't -- compassion for others.

Margaret. Are you sure you haven't already started cocktail hour. YOu post didn't make much sense. What was your point?

[Truthis Blairsville]

Margaret and Arthur wrote:

<quoted text>
We talk loud and brave.... when we don't have to do it to your face.

I would talk directly to your face if I knew who you were, count on it.

[UC Voter]

lmao wrote:

Is our new Sheriff actually drawing a disability pension from the state of Ga? The Chief Deputy who retired from fl has allegations that may or may not be factual but it seems like their was some excellent competent local talent. Fl state law and Ga law are different. Davie Fl is way different than Blairsville.

Yes. Disability pension from GA. The sirens use to be placed on top of the patrol vehicles. Many troopers claim that they lost hearing because of those sirens. No joke. If you notice, the sirens are no longer on the top of the trooper's vehicles. A lot of troopers went out on disability because of hearing loss they found a doctor who would back up their claims. No. I'm not making this up or guessing.

Some of the FL retired officers are drawing pensions while, yes, many qualified people in GA were passed up.

The public who supports Mason should have asked some of these questions before voting for him.

Furthermore, Lamar does NOT determine the salaries as statee above. Mr. Mason budgets for those salaries.

[Truthis Blairsville]

Margaret and Arthur wrote:

PS... my husband can't control me and I am a disgraceful loud mouth. It is even possible that I drink in the afternoon and go online and rant. I'm even thinking of posting my full name and address online here so that my family can be even more publicly humilated.
That way when I call people cowards everyone will know it is me.

You apparently don't feel that I live up to your expectations of a well behaved woman. Too bad.
I am not a coward. I am not a liar I do not drink and I try to treat others fairly. You really don't like me and you know nothing but my name. Do what you have to do. I am not afraid. PS Leave my husband out of this as it must be personal between you and me. Too bad I don't have the knowledge of your identity.

[UC Voter]

Truthis Blairsville wrote:

<quoted text>Maybe you need to get more information before you spout off.

TOPIX posters are clueless -- you know that and so do I.
3/4ths of comments don't have facts about anything they write.
You and I are in the mix enough to know what the hell is going on becuase we know many of the people who are being trashed. F'em.

[Truthis Blairsville]

UC Voter wrote:

<quoted text>
This comment is an example why Mason will speak at a Tea Party meeting rather than an open venue. I am a Republican and not a "demented dems" but I can see that Mason lacks the balls to meet with the public unless he is in his elemment -- with supporters.
I did not support Mr. Mason. I know and like Scott a lot. I didn't agree with everything he did, but I would much prefer Scott over Mason. Scott has something Mason doesn't -- compassion for others.
Margaret. Are you sure you haven't already started cocktail hour. YOu post didn't make much sense. What was your point?

You know how it is ...when presented with facts some people stoop to threats and personal attacks.

[TRUDAT]

another mother wrote:

ROLLING METH LAB AT TACO BELL?
LMBO The vehicle stopped was a small white SUV. Yes, I saw it and there were five or six officers at the scene for one vehicle. Wow! How times have changed.

YOU SAW IT HUH? Well i was pumping gas when STATE TROOPER made the stop. The SUV wasn't. White. Johnny and Bear were both there from BPD along with SO. And a rolling meth lab isnt a joke.

[Margaret and Arthur]

Truthis Blairsville wrote:

<quoted text>You know how it is ...when presented with facts some people stoop to threats and personal attacks.

Does that include you coming on here and calling Mack Mason a Coward for having a meeting hosted by The Tea Party? You are talking big here online. But will you go directly to Mason and call him a coward to his face?

In the world of men, if you spoke such someone takes a poke at you. But you are a woman just talking big online. So you will get outed, and your husband dragged into it with you.

Does Arthur know you come online here calling people names?

[Tom Porter]

Fred wrote:

<quoted text>. Tom porter your full of shit and you dont know your facts

Really? Tell me what the facts are if you know so much on the post I made.

[Tom Porter]

union co res wrote:

<quoted text>maybe he should have stop gamble so much, he would still have his store. he has a problem.you do not know as much as you think dip sh!t.

So what does that have to do with his job at the SO dip sh!t?

[Tom Porter]

Yep wrote:

<quoted text>
You need to keep up, if you are interested in what’s going on.
Yep, that’s just the way it is. All this about the judge’s office has been covered already, to the point of revulsion.
To occasionally obtain a factual bit of usable information from this site you must be willing to wade through ridiculous and sometimes rather disgusting trash for weeks and months on end.
That’s just the way it is, in a town without any reliable news sources.(i.e. unbiased investigative newspaper, radio, or TV media reporting)
Personally,(with regard to other postings) informational meetings offered having a Q & A following, in an environment such as we have here, should be a welcomed forum for anyone sincerely interested in the betterment of a community.
It doesn’t matter who sponsors the forum. Go listen, learn, complain, ask questions, get answers, and then you may have something upon which to base a legitimate grievance.
Otherwise, you are just another jerk trying to stir up trouble.
Regarding the New Sheriff, in just over a month, He has obviously made many changes. Some following through with campaign promises, others in personnel, and not to be unexpected modifications to the administration and operations of the department.
Other than irrational adversaries naturally politically attached to the former Sheriff, a reasonable person would realize, it will take a realistic time frame to assess the satisfaction or lack thereof with the performance of the New Sheriff.
One thing is for certain, this is the second month of his administration, and he is offering and making himself available to the public for meeting, not once but twice within the same month, to speak and take questions and give answers.
I could be mistaken, but during the twelve (12) year term of the former Sheriff, I don’t recall him making himself so available, even when beseeched to do so in the most controversial of circumstances.

Many changes? Taking off window tint, getting new chairs, hiring Florida retirees and rejects that the last administration had gotten rid of, and picking on Danny Everett.. Wow, good job!