Sorry "Oath"... not gonna play "cut and paste" games (of course, "Amos" WOULD think it was a "great" post!). For every "spun" article you "Google", I could match it with one "spun" the other way. I'm not interested in debating an "article writer" that can't reply... why not "digest" what you COPIED and explain it briefly, YOURSELF. Or did you not know about "one-sided" articles? Incidentally, are you actually DEFENDING the stupidity of what "Luca" posted? Why are you answering for her?Better Off? Let's Count the Ways We're Not
Posted 09/04/2012 06:50 PM ET
I see this in "Amos" all the time... Googles for an article that "agrees" with his one-sided point of view, then claims "righteousness". If you are up for serious discussion, then defend your own position with what you KNOW... don't give "links" to have others do it for you- ANYBODY that Googles can do that, it's a cop out.