Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#1 Jan 15, 2013
Only in the coal region of Pennsylvania would a town sign a contract with the local police union that only allows union members of the police force to arrest someone. The Chief of Police isn't allowed to arrest anyone, he carries a gun, a badge, handcuffs, etc but he must call a union officer to make an arrest. Seems the Chief ignored this and arrested someone now the union is suing the city.
Yes, I was born and raised in the coal region of PA.
NH Union

Cleveland, GA

#2 Jan 16, 2013
Paladinhgwt wrote:
Only in the coal region of Pennsylvania would a town sign a contract with the local police union that only allows union members of the police force to arrest someone. The Chief of Police isn't allowed to arrest anyone, he carries a gun, a badge, handcuffs, etc but he must call a union officer to make an arrest. Seems the Chief ignored this and arrested someone now the union is suing the city.
Yes, I was born and raised in the coal region of PA.
It would seem that this contract would be voided in State Court as it violates the States' right to authorize powers of law enforcement.
Informed Opinion

Hollywood, FL

#3 Jan 16, 2013
Paladinhgwt wrote:
Only in the coal region of Pennsylvania would a town sign a contract with the local police union that only allows union members of the police force to arrest someone. The Chief of Police isn't allowed to arrest anyone, he carries a gun, a badge, handcuffs, etc but he must call a union officer to make an arrest. Seems the Chief ignored this and arrested someone now the union is suing the city.
Yes, I was born and raised in the coal region of PA.
That sounds interesting.

Can you provide enough to google the situation ?
Oh my

Dahlonega, GA

#4 Jan 16, 2013
Informed Opinion

Hollywood, FL

#5 Jan 16, 2013
Wow, as a former police union president I Iove that result.

I understand now.

We used to have to negotiate against the chief and their labor lawyers every contract.

The chief is paid to fight the cops to deny the cops any pay raise or benefits, and to try to take away what we previously negotiated.

When the chief prevails he gets a big bonus for screwing the working cop.

If the cops prevail after spending tens of thousands of our money, the chief smiles and says thanks - because he too just got the pay raise and benefits he tried to keep the cops from getting.

I remember our chief showing me the new shoes he got for free, when we negotiated the city had to pay for tactical boots for SWAT members.

Win/Win for him.
Lose/Lose for the cops.

You shouldn't be allowed to be a parasitic scab, especially one who actually fights against the cops, but wants to enjoy what others earned at their expense while you fought against them. Choose your side and live with the result.
Freak Boy

Dahlonega, GA

#6 Jan 16, 2013
Informed Opinion wrote:
Wow, as a former police union president I Iove that result.
I understand now.
We used to have to negotiate against the chief and their labor lawyers every contract.
The chief is paid to fight the cops to deny the cops any pay raise or benefits, and to try to take away what we previously negotiated.
When the chief prevails he gets a big bonus for screwing the working cop.
If the cops prevail after spending tens of thousands of our money, the chief smiles and says thanks - because he too just got the pay raise and benefits he tried to keep the cops from getting.
I remember our chief showing me the new shoes he got for free, when we negotiated the city had to pay for tactical boots for SWAT members.
Win/Win for him.
Lose/Lose for the cops.
You shouldn't be allowed to be a parasitic scab, especially one who actually fights against the cops, but wants to enjoy what others earned at their expense while you fought against them. Choose your side and live with the result.
But unions are the real scabs. Want a job? Then work.
Informed Opinion

Hollywood, FL

#7 Jan 16, 2013
Freak Boy wrote:
<quoted text>But unions are the real scabs. Want a job? Then work.
Fine with me.

Just don't demand a 40 hour work week, overtime pay, safe working conditions, workman's compensation coverage, holidays, vacations, retirement, pensions, minimum wage, seniority rights, or any of the thousands of other benefits obtained through the sweat and blood of union workers.
Bored

Berlin, MD

#8 Jan 16, 2013
Informed Opinion wrote:
<quoted text>
Fine with me.
Just don't demand a 40 hour work week, overtime pay, safe working conditions, workman's compensation coverage, holidays, vacations, retirement, pensions, minimum wage, seniority rights, or any of the thousands of other benefits obtained through the sweat and blood of union workers.
Boring.
Informed Opinion

Lehigh Acres, FL

#9 Jan 16, 2013
Bored wrote:
<quoted text>Boring.
No you're not, we are happy you're here.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Blairsville Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Steve's Steakhouse 3 min Who cares 8
tony stewart loses lawsuit aginst walmart!! 4 min I KNOW 92
BRMEMC Board and Akins 19 min lovely 29
GA Who do you support for U.S. Senate in Georgia i... (Oct '10) 44 min rename 55,296
BRMEMC board election results 9 13 2014 1 hr Blairsville Member 102
Remove EMC BOARD and Akins 1 hr Carol Demme 6
Mafia BRMEMC (Sep '13) 1 hr Some Info 72
Lances and BRMEMC 18 hr old timer 12
brmemc Sun Stacey72 391
•••

Blairsville News Video

•••
Blairsville Dating

more search filters

less search filters

•••

Blairsville Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••
•••

Blairsville People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Blairsville News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Blairsville
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••