Who is going to run AGAINST Langley a...

Who is going to run AGAINST Langley and Gunter??

Posted in the Blairsville Forum

First Prev
of 2
Next Last
APB

Hoschton, GA

#1 Jan 7, 2014
Got find someone.. or thing...
mtn man

United States

#2 Jan 9, 2014
Wish we could bring j.b. back!!!!
Drug Court

Jefferson, GA

#3 Jan 9, 2014
I WILL
Shoop

Dawsonville, GA

#4 Jan 10, 2014
Should welfare recipients be required to provide some type of service in exchange for their welfare money?
Langley Do The Right Thin

Byron, GA

#5 Jan 10, 2014
APB wrote:
Got find someone.. or thing...
I sure wish someone would run against both! Gunter and Langley are both an embarrassment to our communities!

I would like to ask Langley why do you not prosecute certain individuals? Two individuals that are in the system and still running loose, that being Kyle Young and Garrick Parks.

I certainly am no fan of this mv person and acog, but if they want to do something worth while, why don't thay jump on Langley about these two individuals.

Here is Young, allegedly selling dope out of Notla Water truck and arrested and still not prosecuted, years later?

Here is Parks, a sworn peace officer who allegedly stole and he is walking around?
this guy

Cornelia, GA

#6 Jan 10, 2014
kyle young spent close to 2 years in a rehab and his sentence was suspended upon completion of the program, he has changed his life and got the hell out of this god forsaken town. lucky him!
Someone

Cleveland, GA

#7 Jan 18, 2014
We need someone to run. Langley only wants to get the convictions to try to get the votes in the upcoming election. Gunter is no judge, he lets the D.A. tell him what is going on.
Concerned

Dawsonville, GA

#8 Jan 20, 2014
Here's qualifications if anyone knows anyone who might throw their hat in the ring. Gotta be someone out there ... there's still time!!

Link is from another county but it's to the general state qualifications document.

http://www.benhillcounty.com/fyi/elections/qu...
good one

Jefferson, GA

#9 Jan 20, 2014
Concerned wrote:
Here's qualifications if anyone knows anyone who might throw their hat in the ring. Gotta be someone out there ... there's still time!!
Link is from another county but it's to the general state qualifications document.
http://www.benhillcounty.com/fyi/elections/qu...
6. Any citizen and taxpayer of a community or the state may challenge qualifications
of public officials to hold office in that community or the state. Such a person has
standing to bring a quo warranto action claiming that a public official is ineligible
to hold the office. Highsmith v. Clark 245 Ga. 158, 264 S.E.2d 1 (1980).

Every public officer must take the oath of office and any oath prescribed by the Constitution
of Georgia and must swear that he or she
a) is not the holder of any unaccounted for public money due this state;
b) is not the holder of any office of trust under the government of the United States, any
other state, or any foreign state which he or she is by the laws of the State of Georgia
prohibited from holding;
c) is otherwise qualified to hold said office according to the constitution and laws of
Georgia; and
d) will support the constitutions of the United States and of this state.
O.C.G.A.§ 45-3-1

Note:b) Persons who are the holders of public funds who have refused or failed to account
for and pay over such funds to the proper officer.
good one

Jefferson, GA

#10 Jan 20, 2014
http://law.justia.com/cases/georgia/supreme-c...

what is there to lose, least the truth will come out. any thoughts
good one

Jefferson, GA

#11 Jan 20, 2014
good one

Jefferson, GA

#12 Jan 20, 2014
read this:http://teamlaw.net/QuoWar ranto.html
hello mv and acog
good one

Jefferson, GA

#13 Jan 20, 2014
Quo Warranto

Though the Latin phrase:“Quo Warranto” means:“By what authority”, it is also the title of one of the most ancient and important original styles of remedial court actions inherent to any sovereign; including (but not limited to) each of the people in the United States. It is the ultimate means the people have to limit officials to acting within the confines of the authority lawfully provided them through their office. Quo Warranto is generally executed through a writ or related court order.

Because all authority in government collectively comes from the individual sovereign people, any of the people, can always use a properly executed quo warranto action to remove any official from office; if said official violates the privileges of their official capacity by acting outside of the lawful bounds of their authority and/or fails to perform the required responsibilities of that office. Respectively, the government cannot lawfully interfere with the right to quo warranto; accordingly, the inherent right is irrevocable, ongoing and cannot be lawfully obviated by any legislative act.

Thus, where all authority in government comes from the people, Quo Warranto remains a right retained by the people to ask,“By what authority”; and, the respective Writ of Quo Warranto is the remedial instrument used by the courts to remove any official from office when that official is, through quo warranto, found to have violated the privilege of that office by acting absent of or in contradiction to the authority of that office.

In the United States, the right, with its respective Writ, are reserved to the people through the 9th and 10th amendments.

Quo Warranto can be used to ask any of the following three questions regarding anyone holding any office:
1.Did the officer acquire the office unlawfully?
2.Did the officer fail to do anything the office required them to do?
3.Did the officer do anything forbidden from them while in the office?

http://teamlaw.net/QuoWarranto.html
Retired Rich Golfer

Murphy, NC

#16 Jan 21, 2014
You just don't get it. Langley was NOT the DA during the Spiva incident. The decision was made by others and it would be unprofessional for Langley to step in at this late date.

It's been handled. It is over. It is out of Langley's hands.
O.V.E.R.

Any other dead bodies you want to dig up?
Retired Rich Golfer

Murphy, NC

#19 Jan 22, 2014
1ACOG wrote:
<quoted text>
Gunter did not prosecute Joy Griggs, only because of tax payer pressure did Langley finally go back and prosecuted her.
Both cases were about the same time. Langley had time to prosecute Judy Spiva and still can, but he won't because of what will come out.
It was a cover-up by not only the prosecutors but also the county commissioner.
What are the dates of both incidents?

What facts do you have that the county commissioner is involved in a cover-up? Is that what Langley told you?
Jimmy

Dawsonville, GA

#20 Jan 22, 2014
Retired Rich Golfer wrote:
<quoted text>
What are the dates of both incidents?
What facts do you have that the county commissioner is involved in a cover-up? Is that what Langley told you?
The bag is not answering you! ROLMFAO
Retired Rich Golfer

Murphy, NC

#21 Jan 22, 2014
Jimmy wrote:
<quoted text>
The bag is not answering you! ROLMFAO
They seldom do answer questions that put them on the spot.
tmv post

AOL

#22 Jan 22, 2014
I will answer. Langley stated it was covered up. I cannot speak for ACOG's reference to the Commissioner's involvement in a coverup. What I do know is that Langley said that Judy Spiva was not prosecuted, but was allowed to pay the money back, and was fired (instead of prosecution). I personally put in Open Records Requests asking for copies of the Repayment to the county by Judy Spiva. I was told "No Records Exist" of the repayment. Then through some research I came up with some Deposit Records that I thought might be the repayment. The Commissioner illegally refused to supply information regarding the deposit in a subsequent Open Records Request. That could be what ACOG referred to as his part in the coverup.

I have no idea whether the Commissioner was part of a coverup of the theft or not - however the Commissioner usually stays in the middle of most things going on in "his" county. Also - if he had nothing to hide, why did he go out of his way to illegally refuse to supply Open Records Information - even to the point that he relieved Peggy Deyton of her position as Records Custodian when I threatened to sue her to get the info. If there was a theft I have a hard time believing he didn't know about it. If he did, then yes he is also guilty of the matter being illegally covered up - just like I believe Langley is guilty of Criminal Wrongdoing in the coverup of the crime. And if Gunter intentionally did not prosecute an offense involving theft of public funds, but cut a deal that allowed her to simply be fired - then he is guilty of a crime I believe also. Langley is also guilty of ethics violations for intentionally lying to a citizen inquiry.

In regards to the Rich Golfers idiotic earlier comments that it would be "unprofessional" for Langely to prosecute what happened on another (Gunter) DA's watch - that is unquestionably the most lame-brained and idiotic summary of the situation that is possible. If that was the case - then why was it appropriate for Langley to prosecute Griggs? Public Pressure is the only reason. There was no public pressure in the Spiva case because it was illegally covered up. Rumors have supplied several reasons for this, including the possibility that Judy Spiva was being protected - allegedly because of ugly facts that she could present if she was prosecuted.

Let me sum this up neatly and clearly. For all the yip yapping from these Trolls and Golfers - there are people plenty worried, and plenty angry. And the fact is that it's going to get worse for them. THAT is the neat thing about the TRUTH. IT IS regardless of all the yip yap. And it always bears fruit in the end, even though it may take time to ripen.

And here is the real question: DID Spiva payback the money stolen, or was it just covered up. Is it possible that there never really was a deal for her to pay it back? Becasue there are NO RECORDS of it being paid back. Because it appears that the only "Deal" is that they let her get away with it. They caught her, and all that happened is that she got fired. Until there is a clear answer, PROOF that the money was paid back - this is alive as a legitimate issue. If the money was paid back - Prove it.

Peace,
- david
aka The Mountains Voice

* no peace to the wicked
Retired Rich Golfer

Murphy, NC

#24 Jan 23, 2014
1ACOG wrote:
I too put in ORR on the pay back of the money by Judy Spiva.
If the money was paid back why hide it and answer the ORR request?
You can't tell me that Lamar did not know anything about the cover-up. HIS employee got caught stealing the money! Langley said the money was paid back. Why is he covering up the crime now if he did not know?
Awww. Poor little ACOG got snubbed.
You'll never know, will you?
Just gets under your skin that you don't know what really happened.

Guessing is all you have. Squirm some more.

Do you think there are people who really know what happened? I know the answer to that one. You don't! LMAO
tmv post

AOL

#25 Jan 23, 2014
Retired Rich Golfer wrote:
<quoted text>
Awww. Poor little ACOG got snubbed.
You'll never know, will you?
Just gets under your skin that you don't know what really happened.
Guessing is all you have. Squirm some more.
Do you think there are people who really know what happened? I know the answer to that one. You don't! LMAO
I actually do know what happened because I was told by someone on the inside that is disgusted about it. But I am under honor not to say until I get it completely from a separate source, or my source allows me to use the information provided me. My thinking is that around election time for Langley this can be used to attract public attention to lots of issues - basically use the election as a vehicle to promote a few other stories as well. But for now we'll just keep it alive and see what else shakes out. There isn't a statute of limitations on the crime, if all it accomplishes is to draw attention to the overall problems, then it will at least have been useful. Have another tip on an aspect of the Audit that am following up on also - looks interesting.

PS... My guess is that Golfer doesn't have a clue what happened. TBTB don't share information with nobodies. Like Norm, Golfer is just a fringe cheerleader that lives to be noticed by the "in crowd", surviving on the occassional crumbs of praise for a job well done acting as Topix Editor in Chief.

Peace,
- david
aka The Mountains Voice

* no peace to the wicked

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Blairsville Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
wake up america ! 7 hr Ed Anger 1
Gays in the school 9 hr Snooper 7
Sentinel Offender Services 11 hr Bobbie 1
Are there any blacks in Blairsville? (Oct '08) 11 hr America is Doomed 398
Opinions on Farm Fresh Processing. 12 hr Sharon 2
Re-Elect Lamar Paris 2016 22 hr Hillary for priso... 377
Sybil Denise Bellew (Dec '12) Thu ladyjetfan 66

Blairsville Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Blairsville Mortgages