Chief Public Defender
Posted in the Blairsville Forum
#1 Mar 6, 2013
The chief public defender allows an assistant public defender represent a non-indigent person in a case. Calls it a lunch break.. Well lunch started at 9:00 am sharp in the main court room.. Case move to mediation. Mediation (lunch break) was over around 11:15.
Law states one must make application and pay 50.00 at the time of application.. The sign on their wall in the office tells all others that its a FELONY to lie on the application and recieve a public defender as counsel.
Same assistant, same person this time a plaintiff.. on another lunch break in superior Court..I guess.
Would you consider this theft of services..The law is very plain stating you must apply.. there is no application for either case anywhere to be found.. no funds to be accounted for in either case.
The plaintiff and defendent one in the same person and is not of the indigent status..
Now the Chief Public Defender has other complaints filed against him and a couple of the assistants in the office.
Sounds like if you need an attorney you should be provided on even if you are not indigent. You should be allowed one even if you are a plaintiff as well.. Law says thats discrimination. What tax funds provide for one must provide for the others under the same circumstances...
Consider Perjury, Theft of services, Discrimination anyone...
Add your comments below
|Re-Elect Lamar Paris 2016||4 hr||Yep||303|
|Pros and Cons of coming out as a gay person (Jan '14)||4 hr||Sam||104|
|Our towns food is terrible||6 hr||wilbeherd||76|
|Cheaters (Jul '15)||12 hr||Hmmm||36|
|This can't be true.||Thu||psychic||6|
|Its okay to be Gay in Blairsville (Jun '09)||Thu||Skeet Cummings||211|
|President Reagan's Stance on Assault Weapons||Thu||TimmysDaddy||3|
Find what you want!
Search Blairsville Forum Now
Copyright © 2016 Topix LLC