Who do you support for U.S. Senate in...
Informed Opinion

Fort Myers, FL

#20334 Jul 30, 2013
Bigdave1 wrote:
<quoted text>My reply actually had nothing to do with you, as it was IO's post to me that really set me off. I usually try to be polite and understanding but sometimes I just lose it. IO thinks that wealth is greed. Read all his post for the last two months and you will see.
Now, now.

"IO thinks that wealth is greed. Read all his post for the last two months and you will see."

That's just a silly thing to say, but if it makes you feel better to build "straw men" so you can attack them - enjoy yourself.

Those who have any reading comprehension skills understand two things :

A) your "straw man" is inaccurate, and nonsensical;
and
B) use of such an obvious "straw man" argument is proof that there is no legitimate argument to my posts.

Thanks.
danger zone

Gray, GA

#20335 Jul 30, 2013
Synergy wrote:
<quoted text>
Have you not realized what a complete hypocrite IO is????? He has bragged about all he has due to ALL the money he made by holding people hostage for more money and benefits. THEN, he critizes the "haves". In reality, he critizes those who have MORE than he. He is the perfect combination of wealth envy and braggart. He is a waste of my, yours and anyone else's time. He is an anti-American, communistic socialist who on rare occasions makes a little sense, but most of the time let's his senility prevail.
I thought the one post saying it's more than a love of money thing is absolutely correct. Not for all, of course, but I've learned people do "worship money." It's their God & many will gain & retain wealth, at ALL costs. It's true for sooo many. Greed is a HUGE problem for so many.
Where

Commerce, GA

#20336 Jul 30, 2013
And this is what the APA Oh my highly regards says.


"In 1998, the APA issued a report claiming “that the ‘negative potential’ of adult sex with children was ‘overstated’ and that ‘the vast majority of both men and women reported no negative sexual effects from their child sexual abuse experiences.”
Where

Commerce, GA

#20337 Jul 30, 2013
Informed Opinion wrote:
<quoted text>

B) use of such an obvious "straw man" argument is proof that there is no legitimate argument to my posts.
Thanks.

This part is true, the rest is the usual BS.
Informed Opinion

Fort Myers, FL

#20338 Jul 30, 2013
Synergy wrote:
<quoted text>Have you not realized what a complete hypocrite IO is????? He has bragged about all he has due to ALL the money he made by holding people hostage for more money and benefits. THEN, he critizes the "haves". In reality, he critizes those who have MORE than he. He is the perfect combination of wealth envy and braggart. He is a waste of my, yours and anyone else's time. He is an anti-American, communistic socialist who on rare occasions makes a little sense, but most of the time let's his senility prevail.
Now, now, more silliness.

Do you Right Wingers ever actually read the gibberish you post.

Someone who:
- announces that his union efforts have resulted in a reasonably nice lifestyle;
- who encourages those less fortunate to engage in union building to also obtain decent lifestyles for them and their children; and
- criticizes scabs who want to enjoy the wages and benefits resulting from the efforts of others;

is not a hypocrite.

We all understand it might be different on Right Wing Wacko Planet, but on Planet Earth:

A hypocrite is the scab who enjoys a sect wage and benefits thanks to the efforts of others,
who criticizes the very efforts that create those wages and benefits;

and

A hypocrite is someone who enjoys all the socialist benefits, like Socialist Security, Medicare, Public Schools, Public Utilities, Electrical Co-Ops; State Universities; Insured Bank Accounts and Pensions; Public Roads, Public Hospitals; etc;
then criticizes other who defend those very policies from which they benefit.

Glad I could help.

Maybe you could explain this to the other inhabitants of Right Wing Planet.
Informed Opinion

Fort Myers, FL

#20339 Jul 30, 2013
Oh my wrote:
<quoted text>Nope, never claimed you were hiding anything, simply provided a link to the orgs FAQ page where the org answers many of the mischaracterizations that you are continuing to portray.

You ask "Why have this discussion, Do you really want to have this discussion" which is to say why are you defending "THESE people", but you conflate a defense of "THESE people" with simply pointing to what the org says about itself. Your anti-homosexual stance is well known, the sites you reference and articles you cite are clear in their goal of portraying some vast homosexual agenda, and the whole flow of the World Nut Daily article is part and parcel of this mind-set.
..........
"if the information given in "Where"'s original post hadn't been secondarily documented as accurate in my post #20147"

So you think you've proven something by supporting a flagrantly biased World Nut Daily article with an flagrantly biased article from the The Daily Caller.
..........
Yes, I looked at this link, so what...
https://docs.google.com/viewer...
..........
Riddle me this,
why is it a source of pride for a young male to learn the ropes from an older woman, when that older woman is nothing more than a child molester.

Remember, Right Wing Whackos don't do nuance.
Saying Right Wing Wackos don't do nuance is the understatement of the century.

Right Wing Wackos don't do thought, let alone nuance.

They are so amusing with their 2nd grade intellectual skills -

If you suggest it's smart to divert 40 Billion Dollars a year in insurer's profits to actual medical care - you must be a com'nist.

If you suggest it's smart to stop spending $1.5 Trillion Dollars a year providing a War Department for all the countries with which we compete, so our competitors can use their funds to take American jobs - you must be a com'nist.

If you suggest that it's smarter to throw employers of illegal aliens in jail, than spend another 30 Billion Dollars on fences and moats - you must be a com'nist.

If you point out that Right Wing Wackos who repeatedly explode deficits and double our debt have proven they're unable to manage our money - you must be a com'nist.

If you point out that the last administration to balance the budget was democratic, and the current administration has cut the annual budget deficit in half - you must be a com'nist.

If you prefer chocolate chip cookie dough ice cream to vanilla - you must be a com'nist.

Informed Opinion

Fort Myers, FL

#20340 Jul 30, 2013
Where wrote:
"Massive online pedophile ring busted by cops."

"An Internet pedophile ring with up to 70,000 members — thought to be the world's largest —has been uncovered by police, a security official said Wednesday. They include teachers, police officers and scout leaders, AP reported. One Spaniard who worked at summer youth camps is suspected of abusing some 100 children over five years."


http://www.nbcnews.com/id/42108748/ns/us_news...
According to World Nut Daily, all 70,000 members had subscriptions to World Nut Daily and were delegates to the 2004 and 2008 Republican Conventions.

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#20341 Jul 30, 2013
Aggie23 wrote:
<quoted text>
Nubbinhead - I like it.
lol I do, too!

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#20342 Jul 30, 2013
Informed Opinion wrote:
<quoted text>
Now, now, more silliness.
Do you Right Wingers ever actually read the gibberish you post.
Someone who:
- announces that his union efforts have resulted in a reasonably nice lifestyle;
- who encourages those less fortunate to engage in union building to also obtain decent lifestyles for them and their children; and
- criticizes scabs who want to enjoy the wages and benefits resulting from the efforts of others;
is not a hypocrite.
We all understand it might be different on Right Wing Wacko Planet, but on Planet Earth:
A hypocrite is the scab who enjoys a sect wage and benefits thanks to the efforts of others,
who criticizes the very efforts that create those wages and benefits;
and
A hypocrite is someone who enjoys all the socialist benefits, like Socialist Security, Medicare, Public Schools, Public Utilities, Electrical Co-Ops; State Universities; Insured Bank Accounts and Pensions; Public Roads, Public Hospitals; etc;
then criticizes other who defend those very policies from which they benefit.
Glad I could help.
Maybe you could explain this to the other inhabitants of Right Wing Planet.
More gobblygook from the Master of the Lunatics from planet Libroid.
Xxx

Lakeland, FL

#20343 Jul 30, 2013
Yo

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#20344 Jul 30, 2013
danger zone wrote:
<quoted text>
I thought the one post saying it's more than a love of money thing is absolutely correct. Not for all, of course, but I've learned people do "worship money." It's their God & many will gain & retain wealth, at ALL costs. It's true for sooo many. Greed is a HUGE problem for so many.
However, not all wealthy people are greedy. The libs seem to think if people are wealthy, they are evil. I don't agree with that. Actually, I think it's small minded.

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#20345 Jul 30, 2013
Informed Opinion wrote:
<quoted text>

Someone who:
- announces that his union efforts have resulted in a reasonably nice lifestyle;
- who encourages those less fortunate to engage in union building to also obtain decent lifestyles for them and their children; and
- criticizes scabs who want to enjoy the wages and benefits resulting from the efforts of others;
is not a hypocrite.
Oh, my. Where to begin....
1. According to your bragging, you live MUCH MORE than a reasonably nice lifestyle. You've bored us with all of your trappings several times.( Sort of shows a lack of class, imo.)
2. One doesn't need to belong to a bullying union to EARN a "reasonably nice" lifestyle. It's a more admirable lifestyle that is obtained by a LACK of bullying and violence.
3. Scabs. How nice. Those who work HARDER than a spoiled union thug get called names. Non-union workers don't ride on a union thug's coattails at all. They work for less. For you to even THINK their wages and benefits result from your bullying is laughable. They think for themselves. They earn less, yes, but they don't have someone else telling them how to think, who they can associate with and whom they can vote for.
Yes. YOU and those like you are hypocrites.

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#20346 Jul 30, 2013
Informed Opinion wrote:
<quoted text>

A hypocrite is someone who enjoys all the socialist benefits, like Socialist Security, Medicare, Public Schools, Public Utilities, Electrical Co-Ops; State Universities; Insured Bank Accounts and Pensions; Public Roads, Public Hospitals; etc;
then criticizes other who defend those very policies from which they benefit.
Glad I could help.
Maybe you could explain this to the other inhabitants of Right Wing Planet.
And there you go.....slipping right back in to your mental illness abyss.

Since: Jan 10

Location hidden

#20347 Jul 30, 2013
Informed Opinion wrote:
<quoted text>
Now, now.
"IO thinks that wealth is greed. Read all his post for the last two months and you will see."
That's just a silly thing to say, but if it makes you feel better to build "straw men" so you can attack them - enjoy yourself.
Those who have any reading comprehension skills understand two things :
A) your "straw man" is inaccurate, and nonsensical;
and
B) use of such an obvious "straw man" argument is proof that there is no legitimate argument to my posts.
Thanks.
Oh, the irony of this post about Straw Man arguments, from the King of Irony (of is it the Queen?)...
jeb stuart

Cordele, GA

#20348 Jul 30, 2013
Where wrote:
<quoted text>
Poor jeb has no ladder, he has a one step stepstool, get on the public dole.
Would you like to tell us about all the wealth that you have accumulated, or maybe all the property that you own, rich bitch?
When

Commerce, GA

#20350 Jul 31, 2013
jeb stuart wrote:
<quoted text>Would you like to tell us about all the wealth that you have accumulated, or maybe all the property that you own, rich bitch?

Being fixated on money is not a good trait to live by jeb.

The word “poor” can refer to poor decisions made, a poor spirit, poor living conditions,
and etc., including a poor monetary condition.

My use of the “poor” word was not directed at your monetary status.
It was directed at your apparent lack of setting goals to succeed in life.
Poor being the descriptive. The subject being the steps of a ladder to succeed.
Most people will set a goal to succeed, and list out the steps of achieving that goal, if indeed their hope is to better their lot in life. By better I refer to a “more secure station in life for self and family.”

I merely pointed out you seem to have only set one step as your goal in life.


The post was directed at your hope status, based on what you have posted so far as a user on topix.
Such things as “a desire for the rich to be taxed more to alleviate you and others of your burdens.”

A desire to support the liberal socialist cause of equal distribution of assets.

And your inability to post exactly where you stand on different issues.

When

Commerce, GA

#20351 Jul 31, 2013
When wrote:
<quoted text>
Being fixated on money is not a good trait to live by jeb.
The word “poor” can refer to poor decisions made, a poor spirit, poor living conditions,
and etc., including a poor monetary condition.
My use of the “poor” word was not directed at your monetary status.
It was directed at your apparent lack of setting goals to succeed in life.
Poor being the descriptive. The subject being the steps of a ladder to succeed.
Most people will set a goal to succeed, and list out the steps of achieving that goal, if indeed their hope is to better their lot in life. By better I refer to a “more secure station in life for self and family.”
I merely pointed out you seem to have only set one step as your goal in life.
The post was directed at your hope status, based on what you have posted so far as a user on topix.
Such things as “a desire for the rich to be taxed more to alleviate you and others of your burdens.”
A desire to support the liberal socialist cause of equal distribution of assets.
And your inability to post exactly where you stand on different issues.

I'm not your enemy jeb, you are your worst enemy. What Dave has been trying to tell you is people either succeed in life by putting forth an effort to succeed or they can lay blame on others for their failures.

A carpenter who cannot square cut a board will have no customers, neither will a baker who produces a bitter tasting cake.

Those who succeed are the ones who put forth an effort to better themselves in order to create a demand for their product or their services.
danger zone

Gray, GA

#20352 Jul 31, 2013
Synergy wrote:
<quoted text>
However, not all wealthy people are greedy. The libs seem to think if people are wealthy, they are evil. I don't agree with that. Actually, I think it's small minded.


I made that VERY clear in my post by saying, "not all".
When

Commerce, GA

#20353 Jul 31, 2013
"WASHINGTON (AP)-- A report Wednesday is expected to show the U.S. economy barely grew from April through June. But economists are hopeful that the weak second quarter is a temporary lull that gives way to stronger growth in the second half of the year."

So economists are now down to the level of "hopeful."
Sounds to me like they may be Obama's Economists using the word "hopeful."

Most Economists use other methods for their predictions, but not Obamas.

Living and depending on hope from Obama has caused the middle class income to drop from Appox $56k in 2011 to appox $38k today.
That's known as the Obama "hope and change" method of how to run a country.
When

Commerce, GA

#20354 Jul 31, 2013

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Blairsville Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
wow blairsville finally has a real pet store!!! 1 hr F You 77
Local car wash 2 hr filthy Chevy 3
If you cant pay your bills stop spending foolishly 15 hr Waffle boy 134
boycott mike's seafood till he takes orders at ... (Mar '11) 15 hr New Restaurant! 278
Still proud of your President? 21 hr Work does a body ... 77
Local Blairsville eatery (Aug '12) May 21 Chainsaw Five 15
Long Shot...Need help identifying unknown signe... May 21 Chainsaw Five 5

Blairsville Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Blairsville Mortgages