Who do you support for U.S. Senate in...
LogicalChickn

Douglasville, GA

#6851 Apr 12, 2013
Bored wrote:
<quoted text>
heck you would believe him if he said it was bush's fault 100%.
It doesn't matter what I BELIEVE or what President of the United States of America Barack Obama SAYS in this particular instance.

Believes and Says have nothing to do with it. We're talking facts. They can be looked up and they are what they are.

Why don't you look them up and we can save all this BS talk that you're doing? You don't KNOW like you say you do. And you know it.
Bored

Jefferson, GA

#6852 Apr 12, 2013
LogicalChickn wrote:
<quoted text>
No. You're missing the point.
YOU do it. You're complaining about the deficit. Show us that you understand the official numbers and how they got there.
Personally, I think you're afraid to look at the data before the Republican spin-meisters get a hold of it. I think you're afraid to analyze that data on your own without Fox telling you what to think. But you can easily prove me wrong. I hope you do.
2013 is the only year where Obama has projected a deficit below a Trillion dollars where as Bush had only one year with a deficit of over 1 trillion.

President Barack Obama: First Term =$5.073 trillion deficit.

FY 2013 -$901 billion.
FY 2012 -$1.327 trillion.
FY 2011 -$1.299 trillion.
FY 2010 -$1.546 ($1.293 trillion plus $253 billion from the Obama Stimulus Act that was attached to the FY 2009 budget).


President George W. Bush: First Term =$1.267 trillion. Second Term =$2.027 trillion. Total =$3.294.

FY 2009 -$1.16 trillion.($1.416 trillion minus $253 billion from Obama's Stimulus Act)
FY 2008 -$458 billion.
FY 2007 -$161 billion.
FY 2006 -$248 billion.
FY 2005 -$318 billion.
FY 2004 -$413 billion.
FY 2003 -$378 billion.
FY 2002 -$158 billion.
LogicalChickn

Douglasville, GA

#6853 Apr 12, 2013
Why are Republicans so damn afraid of actually acknowledging a real fact?
Bored

Jefferson, GA

#6854 Apr 12, 2013
LogicalChickn wrote:
<quoted text>
Still not showing that you know anything at all. You're really starting to look like a bunch of hot air.
Show us you can do something besides spew out hot air and repeat what the right-wing media have told you.
And now you show the real azzhole you are.
Just another clucking chicken.
OMTE

London, KY

#6855 Apr 12, 2013
Synergy wrote:
<quoted text>
Folks...here you have Darrell and his other brother, Darrell. rotfl
That wasn't nice. Do you really want to provoke me?
domino

United States

#6856 Apr 12, 2013
LogicalChickn wrote:
<quoted text>
It doesn't matter what I BELIEVE or what President of the United States of America Barack Obama SAYS in this particular instance.
Believes and Says have nothing to do with it. We're talking facts. They can be looked up and they are what they are.
Why don't you look them up and we can save all this BS talk that you're doing? You don't KNOW like you say you do. And you know it.
No one here has seen any proof positive from you either. Just a lot of left wing propaganda. All you have is what your master(Nobama) tells you. You have no facts to back up anything. Just because msn, cnn or all your other left wing media says it, that doesn't make it true.
OMTE

London, KY

#6857 Apr 12, 2013
OMTE wrote:
<quoted text>
Heavy drug use will do that ya.
Please do not use my handle. I don't like it and I will find you.
FactChickn

Douglasville, GA

#6858 Apr 12, 2013
Bored wrote:
<quoted text>
2013 is the only year where Obama has projected a deficit below a Trillion dollars where as Bush had only one year with a deficit of over 1 trillion.
President Barack Obama: First Term =$5.073 trillion deficit.
FY 2013 -$901 billion.
FY 2012 -$1.327 trillion.
FY 2011 -$1.299 trillion.
FY 2010 -$1.546 ($1.293 trillion plus $253 billion from the Obama Stimulus Act that was attached to the FY 2009 budget).
President George W. Bush: First Term =$1.267 trillion. Second Term =$2.027 trillion. Total =$3.294.
FY 2009 -$1.16 trillion.($1.416 trillion minus $253 billion from Obama's Stimulus Act)
FY 2008 -$458 billion.
FY 2007 -$161 billion.
FY 2006 -$248 billion.
FY 2005 -$318 billion.
FY 2004 -$413 billion.
FY 2003 -$378 billion.
FY 2002 -$158 billion.
You're showing how much the deficit grew during each quarter.

That's NOT what I asked. Not even anything close to it.

I asked WHAT made the deficit grow, and by how much for each cause.

You know that's what I asked. You're avoiding the truth.

I'm not trying to be an a-hole. I'm trying to establish and get some acknowledgement of some real facts that are very useful if we're going to discuss anything at all.

Otherwise all this "Libtards Suck" "Obama Sucks" "Giving all my money away" comments I keep hearing here are the intellectual equivalent of saying: "Nanny-nanny-Boo-Boo you doo-doo-head". It's an exercise in immaturity and pointlessness.

So how about we go to the official government accounting agencies and seeing why the deficit has gotten to it's current state.?

Care to do that? Or do you just like calling people "Doo-Doo Head"?
FactChickn

Douglasville, GA

#6859 Apr 12, 2013
Bored wrote:
<quoted text>
And now you show the real azzhole you are.
Just another clucking chicken.
Sorry. I see you already answered my question.

You DO prefer calling people names over actually knowing anything.

What a waste of time. Why do you bother?
FactChickn

Douglasville, GA

#6860 Apr 12, 2013
domino wrote:
<quoted text>
No one here has seen any proof positive from you either. Just a lot of left wing propaganda. All you have is what your master(Nobama) tells you. You have no facts to back up anything. Just because msn, cnn or all your other left wing media says it, that doesn't make it true.
Ah turn it around - avoid the questions - put some accusations my way rather than actually answer the question.

How utterly pointless.

Would you care to answer ANY of the questions I asked? What's the point of talking here if NO FACT AT ALL will ever be agreed on? Do you get what I'm saying?

Let's establish what is true, just some very basic things, rather than continuing with our regularly scheduled programming of name calling and deflection.

Wouldn't a change of pace be nice? Maybe you would care to help establish the most simple and basic truths. Want to take a stab at it? Here you go:

1. Did spending go up doing the Bush Years? Yes or No?

2. Did unemployment rise during the Bush Years? Yes or No?

3. Did the economy collapse during the Bush Years? Yes or No?

4. How did Romney intend to reduce the deficit while cutting the wealthiest peoples taxes while at the same time adding 2 Trillion to Defense Spending? How does this math work?

5. How ...., specifically,......does the CURRENT Republican plan intend to reduce the deficit and improve the economy?

Those questions are NOT trick questions, or complex. They're about as basic as we can get if we're going to talk national politics at a level above 1st-graders.
Bored

Jefferson, GA

#6861 Apr 12, 2013
FactChickn wrote:
<quoted text>
You're showing how much the deficit grew during each quarter.
That's NOT what I asked. Not even anything close to it.
I asked WHAT made the deficit grow, and by how much for each cause.
You know that's what I asked. You're avoiding the truth.
I'm not trying to be an a-hole. I'm trying to establish and get some acknowledgement of some real facts that are very useful if we're going to discuss anything at all.
Otherwise all this "Libtards Suck" "Obama Sucks" "Giving all my money away" comments I keep hearing here are the intellectual equivalent of saying: "Nanny-nanny-Boo-Boo you doo-doo-head". It's an exercise in immaturity and pointlessness.
So how about we go to the official government accounting agencies and seeing why the deficit has gotten to it's current state.?
Care to do that? Or do you just like calling people "Doo-Doo Head"?
Well frankly Chickens**t, you are one dumb poster that can't tell a quarter from a year. Nor a quarter from a dollar.
You want answers to "why" there is a deficit, look it up yourself. Google is a friend of everyone except you it seems.

Your posts are an exercise in futility and uselessness for one who can spell correctly but yet remain clueless with deficits, what makes a deficit, and who makes that deficit.

Obama has many supporters like you, clueless and too lazy to do their own education.

Say, you might want to check out that chicken feed you are eating, sound like Obama nuts to me.
Bored

Jefferson, GA

#6862 Apr 12, 2013
FactChickn wrote:
<quoted text>
Why do you bother?
you are right, why do I bother with you.
Thanks, I will let you go on in your own little world.
Bored

Jefferson, GA

#6863 Apr 12, 2013
Obama sucks and so do Chickens.

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#6864 Apr 12, 2013
LogicalChickn wrote:
Why are Republicans so damn afraid of actually acknowledging a real fact?
When you state an actual fact, maybe one of us might.
FactChickn

Douglasville, GA

#6865 Apr 12, 2013
Bored wrote:
<quoted text>
Well frankly Chickens**t, you are one dumb poster that can't tell a quarter from a year. Nor a quarter from a dollar.
You want answers to "why" there is a deficit, look it up yourself. Google is a friend of everyone except you it seems.
Your posts are an exercise in futility and uselessness for one who can spell correctly but yet remain clueless with deficits, what makes a deficit, and who makes that deficit.
Obama has many supporters like you, clueless and too lazy to do their own education.
Say, you might want to check out that chicken feed you are eating, sound like Obama nuts to me.
Avoiding the truth. You REFUSE to acknowlege any facts at all while doing nothing but complaining and criticizing.

You're comfortable having the propaganda wash over you. It's too bad.

Maybe some other day we can have a real conversation once we can agree on some base facts.

But today:

Not ONE of you will admit that the United States of America's economy collapsed during Former Republican George w. Bush's administration after 8 years of Republican policy. According to Republicans that never happened.

Not ONE of you will admit that the Unemployment Rate was in an out of control spin in the United States of Americaduring Former Republican President George w. Bush's administration after 8 years of Republican policy. According to Republicans that never happened.

Not ONE of you will admit that the United States of America's deficit went up dramatically Former Republican George w. Bush's administration after 8 years of Republican policy. According to Republicans that never happened.

Not ONE of you will even ATTEMPT to look at which policies and events created the deficit.

It's simply pathetic.
Bored

Jefferson, GA

#6866 Apr 12, 2013
President Obama contributed the most to the debt, with cumulative deficits totaling $5.073 trillion in just four years. Obama's budgets included the economic stimulus package, which added $787 billion by cutting taxes, extending unemployment benefits, and funding job-creating public works projects. The Obama tax cuts added $858 billion to the debt over two years. Obama's budget included increased defense spending to around $800 billion a year. Federal income was down, thanks to lower tax receipts from the 2008 financial crisis.

Both Presidents Bush and Obama had to contend with higher mandatory mandatory spending for Social Security and Medicare. Obama also sponsored the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, which was designed to reduce the debt by $143 billion over 10 years. However, these savings don't show up until the later years. But now the cost of the Affordable Act has doubled in cost, wiping out any savings projected in later years.


Yep, Obama and his economists are ruining this country.

As for how Bush created his deficit, I'll let the libtards deal with that. I expect they will come up with some screwball reason. But I will give a couple of hints, 9-11 and Katrina.


Bored

Jefferson, GA

#6867 Apr 12, 2013
"It's simply pathetic."

Yes, you are.

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#6868 Apr 12, 2013
Oh, this is rich. The state of New York - no hot bed of conservatism there - is advertising for businesses to move there by touting their LOWER TAXES. Their advertisements trumpet that they have "lowered business taxes" in order to "ENCOURAGE JOB CREATION" and have created tax free zones and have tax incentive programs in order to encourage business.

Please explain that those of you who refuse to acknowledge how taxes can either encourage growth or stifle it.
Libtard

Jefferson, GA

#6870 Apr 12, 2013
Aggie23 wrote:
Oh, this is rich. The state of New York - no hot bed of conservatism there - is advertising for businesses to move there by touting their LOWER TAXES. Their advertisements trumpet that they have "lowered business taxes" in order to "ENCOURAGE JOB CREATION" and have created tax free zones and have tax incentive programs in order to encourage business.
Please explain that those of you who refuse to acknowledge how taxes can either encourage growth or stifle it.
but-but-but.
domino

Senoia, GA

#6871 Apr 12, 2013
Factchicken, chicken crap or whoever only wants to present questions but never answer any or give facts.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Blackshear Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Deadbeat dads 19 hr Coolalmamom 19
Tina post up here I won a big lottery Apr 23 P Rice 4
Blond 40 to 50 years old Apr 23 Farrell 4
Texas Flip and Move Apr 21 Farrell Ghost Hunter 1
ambulance wreck on wolfpit church road?? (Mar '13) Apr 21 Farrell Ghost Hunter 54
Ghost (Feb '13) Apr 21 Farrell Ghost Hunter 34
Nicole Prescott Henderson Apr 21 Farrell Landon 4

Blackshear Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Blackshear Mortgages